Dergiler / ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

ainstreaming Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition into Policies and Practices: Methodologies and Lessons Learned from Four Countries

Sayfa
25–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Case study examples from Brazil, Kenya, Turkey, and Sri Lanka demonstrate how the approach can be adapted to suit specific country contexts and how a multi-level, cross-sectoral partnership-based approach can create an enabling environment for mainstreaming biodiversity to improve nutrition.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper outlines the methodology for mainstreaming biodiversity developed by the Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition Project (BFN), a multi-country initiative led by Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka and Turkey.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:BFN explored the nutritional properties of traditional and/or neglected native edible species, both wild and cultivated (including varieties and landraces), and used this knowledge to incorporate local agricultural biodiversity into national and global policy instruments that address food and nutrition security through the promotion of healthy, diversified and sustainable diets.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Case study examples from Brazil, Kenya, Turkey, and Sri Lanka demonstrate how the approach can be adapted to suit specific country contexts and how a multi-level, cross-sectoral partnership-based approach can create an enabling environment for mainstreaming biodiversity to improve nutrition.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

This paper outlines the methodology for mainstreaming biodiversity developed by the Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition Project (BFN), a multi-country initiative led by Brazil, Kenya, Sri Lanka and Turkey. BFN explored the nutritional properties of traditional and/or neglected native edible species, both wild and cultivated (including varieties and landraces), and used this knowledge to incorporate local agricultural biodiversity into national and global policy instruments that address food and nutrition security through the promotion of healthy, diversified and sustainable diets. Across the four countries, the project adopted a three-pillar approach for mainstreaming biodiversity for food and nutrition into policies and practices by: 1) Providing Evidence, 2) Influencing Policy, and 3) Raising Awareness. Case study examples from Brazil, Kenya, Turkey, and Sri Lanka demonstrate how the approach can be adapted to suit specific country contexts and how a multi-level, cross-sectoral partnership-based approach can create an enabling environment for mainstreaming biodiversity to improve nutrition.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BELTRAME, D., GEE, E., GUNER, B., LAURIDSEN, N. O., SAMARASINGHE, W. L. G., WASIKE, V. W., HUNTER, D., BORELLI, T. (2019). ainstreaming Biodiversity for Food and Nutrition into Policies and Practices: Methodologies and Lessons Learned from Four Countries. ANADOLU Ege Tarımsal Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 25–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/142411

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Abukutsa-Onyango, M. O. 2007. Seed Production and Support Systems for African Leafy Vegetables in Three Communities in Western Kenya. African Journal of Food Agriculture, Nutrition and Development Volume 7, No: 3. ISSN 1648-5374 (Online). Allen, T., P. Prosperi, B. Cogill, and G. Flichman. 2014. Agricultural biodiversity, social-ecological systems and sustainable diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 73 (4): 498-508. Anonymous. 2006. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). COP 8, Decision VIII/23. Available at: https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=11037. Anonymous. 2009. State of Brazil’s plant genetic resources - Second National Report. Conservation and sustainable utilization for food and agriculture. Brasília, DF, 2009, p. 29. Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation. Anonymous. 2014a. Fifth National Report to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs (MoF&WA), Republic of Turkey. Anonymous. 2014b.
  2. TürKomp, Turkish Food Composition Database, version 1.0. Food Institute, TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Gebze / Kocaeli, 2014. Website:www.turkomp.gov.tr. Anonymous. 2015a. Connecting global priorities, biodiversity and human health. Summary of the state of knowledge review. WHO. World Health Organization. Anonymous. 2015b. The state of food insecurity in the world 2015. Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress (FAO, IFAD and WFP). Rome, FAO. Anonymous. 2015c. Conselho Federal de Nutricionistas. IV jornada de atualização técnica de fiscais do Sistema CFN/CRN. Anonymous. 2016a. Food systemsanddiets: Facingthechallengesofthe21stCentury. Global Panelon Agricultureand Food Systems forNutrition(GPA&FSN). London,UK. Anonymous. 2016b. IPES-Food. From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International panel of experts on sustainable food systems. Anonymous. 2016c. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). Brazil - Country profile - Biodiversity facts. Available at:https://www.cbd.int/countries/profile/default.shtml?country=br. Anonymous. 2016d. Global Nutrition Report 2016: From promise to impact: ending malnutrition by 2030. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Washington, D. C. USA. Anonymous. 2016e. National biodiversity strategic action plan 2016-2022.
  3. Colombo, Sri Lanka: Biodiversity Secretariat, Ministry of Mahaweli Development and Environment (MoMD & E). Anonymous. 2016f. National bi