Dergiler / BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL / 2020 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

Long-Term Results in Transcanalicular Laser and External Dacryocystorhinostomy

Sayfa
22–25
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The long-term success rates of both EX-DCR and TCL-DCR were high.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: This study was an examination of the long-term results of transcanalicular laser (TCL) and external (EX) dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Methods: Patients who had undergone TCL-DCR or EX-DCR between 2009 and 2013 were invited for long-term follow-up in 2019.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The long-term success rates of both EX-DCR and TCL-DCR were high.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2009 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objectives: This study was an examination of the long-term results of transcanalicular laser (TCL) and external (EX) dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Methods: Patients who had undergone TCL-DCR or EX-DCR between 2009 and 2013 were invited for long-term follow-up in 2019. All of the patients who responded had an ophthalmic examination and were assessed using lacrimal irrigation. An intranasal evaluation was performed when the irrigation test had non-patent results. TCL procedures were performed with a diode laser (980 nm). Ostium cleansing with a suction unit and a nasal endoscope was performed in the first week. In EX-DCR procedures, an anterior flap was created and tented to the orbicularis oculi muscle. A silicon tube was implanted in both methods and removed at 4-6 months. Results: A total of 74 EX-DCR patients were assessed. The lacrimal irrigation test was negative in 5 cases. The functional success rate was 93.2% with a follow-up of 8 years. A total of 63 patients who had undergone TCL-DCR were evaluated and the irrigation test was negative in 9 patients. The functional success rate was 85.7% with a follow-up of 7 years. The difference in the success rate was statistically insignificant with a p value of 0.09. Conclusion: The long-term success rates of both EX-DCR and TCL-DCR were high.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YENER, H. İ., ÖZÇİMEN, M. (2020). Long-Term Results in Transcanalicular Laser and External Dacryocystorhinostomy. BEYOGLU EYE JOURNAL, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/142058

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (13)

  1. Dalgic A, Ceylan ME, Çelik Ç, Aliyeva A, Aksoy GY, Edizer DT. Outcomes of endoscopic powered revision dacryocystorhinostomy. J Craniofac Surg 2018;29:1960–2
  2. Alañón Fernández FJ, Alañón Fernández MA, Martínez Fernández A, Cárdenas Lara M. Transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy technique using diode laser. [Article in Spanish] Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol.2004;79:325–30
  3. Eloy P, Trussart C, Jouzdani E, Collet S, Rombaux P, Bertrand B. Transcanalicular diode laser assisted dacryocystorhinostomy. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg 2000;54:157–63
  4. Plaza G, Beteré F, Nogueira A. Transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser: long-term results. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23:179–82
  5. Basmak H, Caklı H, Sahin A, Gursoy H, Ozer A, Altun E, et al. Comparison of endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy with and without endonasal procedures. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:737–43
  6. Henson RD, Henson RG Jr, Cruz HL Jr, Camara JG. Use of the diode laser with intraoperative mitomycin C in endocanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23:134–7
  7. Yeniad B, Uludag G, Kozer-Bilgin L. Assessment of patient satisfaction following external versus transcanalicular dacryocystorhinostomy with a diode laser and evaluation if change in quality of life after simultaneous bilateral surgery in patients with bilateral nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Curr Eye Res 2012;37:286–92
  8. Mourya D, Rijal RK. Transcanalicular laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy with diode laser. Orbit 2017;36:370–4
  9. Derya K, Demirel S, Doganay S, Orman G, Cumurcu T, Gunduz A. Endoscopic transcanalicular diode laser dacryocystorhinostomy: Is it an alternative method to conventional external dacryocystorhinostomy? Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:15–7
  10. Hartikainen J, Grenman R, Puukka P, Seppä H. Prospective randomized comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy and endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1106–13
  11. Moore WM, Bentley CR, Olver JM. Functional and anatomic results after two types of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: surgical and holmium laser. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1575–82
  12. Warren JF, Seiff SR, Kavanagh MC. Long-term results of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36:446–50
  13. Deka A, Saikia SP, Bhuyan SK. Combined posterior flap and anterior suspended flap dacryocystorhinostomy: A modification of external dacryocystorhinostomy. Oman J Ophthalmol