DİN EĞİTİMİNDE ULUSLARARASI EĞİLİM VE YEREL UYGULAMALAR: İNGİLTERE VE HAMBURG’TAKİ GELİŞMELER

Kaynakça (31)

1. Alberts, W., Integrative Religious Education in Europe: A Study-of- Religions Approch (Religion and Reason vol. 47), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin/New York 2007.
2. Bell, D., Change and Continuity: Reflections on The Butler Act, speech to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the 1944 Education Act: House of Commons, 21 April 2004, 2004. Available online: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/publications/index/cfm?fuseaction=pubs.displayfile&id=3615&type =pdf [11.07.2006].
3. Birmingham, The Birmingham Agreed Syllabus for Religious Education, Birmingham City Council, Birmingham 1975.
4. Bråten, O., Suggestions for a template for comparative studies in religious education, Unpublished working paper for members of the REDCo Projekt, 2008.
5. DfES & QCA, Religious Education: The non statutory national framework. London:Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 2004. Available online: http://www.qca.org.uk/libraryAssets/media/9817_re_national_framework_04.pdf [21.03.2008].
6. Habermas, J., “Religion in the public sphere”. Europen Journal of Philosphy, 2006, c. 14, sayı: 1, ss. 1- 25.
7. Ipgrave, J., “Dialogue, citizenship and religious education”, International Perspectives on Citizenship, Education and Religious Diversity, RoutledgeFalmer, London 2003, ss. 147-68.
8. Jackson, R., Religious Education: An Interpretive Approach, Hodder and Stoughton, London 1997.
9. , (edit.) International Perspectives on Citizenship, Education and Religious Diversity, RoutledgeFalmer, London 2003.
10. , Rethinking Religious Education and Plurality: Issues in Diversity and Pedagogy, RoutledgeFalmer, London 2004.
11. Jackson, R., “Understanding religious diversity in a plural world: The interpretive approach”, International Handbook of the Religious, Moral and Spritual Dimensions of Education, The Springer Academic Publishers, Netherlands 2006, ss. 399-414.
12. , “European institutions and the contribution of studies of religious diversity to education for democratic citizenship”, Religion and Education in Europe: Developments, Contexts and Debates, Münster: Waxmann, 2007, ss. 27-55.
13. , “Teaching about Religions in the Public Sphere: European Policy Initiatives and the Interpretive Approach”, Numen: International Review for the History of Religions, 2008, c. 55, sa- yı: 2/3, ss. 151-182.
14. , “The Emergence and Development of the Interpretive Approach”, Lived Religion-Conceptual, Empirical and Practical-Theological Approaches: Essays in Honour of Hans-Günther Heimbrock, Brill, Leiden 2008, ss. 309-322.
15. , Fujiwara, S. (edit.), Peaca Education and Religious Plurality: International Perspectives, Routledge, London 2008.
16. , Nesbitt, E., Hindu Children in Britain, Stoke on Trent, Trentham 1993.
17. , McKenna, U. (edit), Intercultural Education and Religious Plurality, Oslo Coalition Occasional Papers (1), Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion or Belief, Oslo 2005.
18. Keast, J. (edit.), Religious Diversity and Intercultural Education: A Reference Book for Schools, Council of Europe Publishing, Strasbourg 2007.
19. Knauth, T., “Religious Educations in Germany- Contribution to Dialogue or Source of Conflict? A Historical and Contextual Analysis of its development since the 1960s”, Religion and Education in Europe: Developments, Contexts and Debates, Waxmann, Münster 2007, ss. 243-265.
20. Larsen, L. & Plesner, I.T. (edit.) Teaching for Tolerance and Freedom of Religion or Belief, University of Oslo, Oslo Coalition on Freedom of Religion and Belief, Oslo 2002.
21. McKenna, U., Ipgrave, J. & Jackson, R. Interfaith Dialogue by Email in Primary Schools: An Evaluation of the Building E-Bridges Project, Waxmann, Münster 2008.
22. OSCE, The Toledo Guiding Principles on Teaching about Religion or Belief. Warsaw: Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe, Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights, 2007. Available online: http://www.osce.org/item/28314.html [18.03.2008].
23. Phenix, P.H., Realms of Meaning: A Philosophy of the Curriculum for General Education, McGraw-Hill, New York 1964.
24. School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA) Model Syllabuses for religious Educations: Mo- del1: Living faiths Today, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, London 1994.
25. School Curriculum and Assessment Authority (SCAA) Model Syllabuses for Religious Education: Mo- del 2: Questions and Teaching, School Curriculum and Assessment Authority, London 1994.
26. Schweitzer, F., “Let the captives speak for themselves More dialogue between religious education in england and Germany”, British Journal of Religious Education, 2006, c. 28, sayı: 2, ss. 141-151.
27. UK Parliament, Education Reform Act 1988, HMSO., London 1988.
28. UK Parliament, School Standards and Framework Act, Department for Education and Employment, London 1998.
29. UNESCO, Learning: the Treasure Within (the Delors Report), The report to UNESCO of the International Commission on education for the Twenty-first Century, UNESCO, Paris 1996.
30. Weisse, W. (Edit.), Interreligious and Intercultural Education: Methodologies, Conceptions and Pilot Projects in South Africa, Nambia, Great Britain, the Netherlands and Germany, Comenius Institut, Münster 1996.
31. Weisse, W., “Difference without discrimination: Religious education as a field of learning for social understanding”, International Perspectives on Citizenship, Education and Religious Diversity, RoutledgeFalmer, London 2003, ss. 191-208.