Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2007 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4

Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in Distance Education

Sayfa
114–124
Yayın Tarihi
2007-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study draws the preferences and the extant to which distance learners in Pakistan are use to mobile learning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The main aim of this research is to better understand and measure students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the importance of mobile learning in distance education.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results of this survey clearly indicate that facilitating mobile learning can improve the entire distance education by enhancing ways of communication among distance learners, tutors and supporting staff.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study draws the preferences and the extant to which distance learners in Pakistan are use to mobile learning.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Mobile learning · m-Learning · Covering Problems of Distance Learning

Abstract

The main aim of this research is to better understand and measure students’ attitudes and perceptions towards the importance of mobile learning in distance education. Results of this survey clearly indicate that facilitating mobile learning can improve the entire distance education by enhancing ways of communication among distance learners, tutors and supporting staff. The biggest advantage of this technology is that it can be used anywhere, anytime and its usage is easy access to a larger number of distance learners. This study draws the preferences and the extant to which distance learners in Pakistan are use to mobile learning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YOUSUF, M. İ. (2007). Effectiveness of Mobile Learning in Distance Education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 4, 114–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/140766

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Ary, D., L. Jacobs., and A. Razaviech. 1990. Introduction to Research in Education. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College, Fort Worth TX. Ashby, A. (2004). Monitoring Student Retention in the Open University: detritions, measurement, interpretation and action. Open Learning, 19(1), 65-78.
  2. Attewell, J. (2005). Mobile Technologies and Learning: A technology update and m- learning www.LSDA.org.uk Learning and Skills Development Agency. Brown, K. M. (1996). The role of internal and external factors in the discontinuation of off campus students. Distance Education, 17(1), 44-71.
  3. Carr, S. (2000, February 11). As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping http://chronicle.com/infotech students. The Chronicle of Higher Education, Fleischman, J. (2001) Going Mobile: New Technologies in Education, Converge Magazine. Galusha, J. (1997). Barriers to learning in distance education. Interpersonal Computing j/1997/n4/galusha.html Technology, (3-4).http://www.emoderators.com/ipct-
  4. Garland, M. (1993). Ethnography penetrates the “I didn‟t have time” rationale to elucidate higher order reason for distance education withdrawal. Research in Distance Education, 8(2), 181-198.
  5. Gibson, C. C., & Graff, A. O. (1992). Impact of adults‟ preferred learning styles and perception of barriers on completion of external baccalaureate degree programmes. Journal of Distance Education, 7(1), 39-51.
  6. Habitzel, K., Märk, T. D, Stehno, B., & Prock, S. (2006) Microlearning: Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning. Proceedings of Microlearning Learning & Working in New Media. In Conference Series: Innsbruck University Press: http://www.microlearning.org/micropapers/microlearning2005_proceedings_digitalversion.pdf
  7. Harris, P. (2001) “Goin‟ Mobile” – Learning Circuits ASTD Magazine All about eLearning. Heverly, M. A. (1999). Predicting retention from students‟ experiences with college processes. Journal of College Student Retention, 1(1), 3-11.
  8. McGivney, V. (2004). Understanding persistence in adult learning. Open Learning, (1), 33-46.
  9. Moore, M.G. & Thompson, M.M., with Quigley, A.B., Clark, G.C., & Goff, G.G. (1990). The effects of distance learning: A summary of the literature. Research Monograph No. 2. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, American Center for the Study of Distance Education. (ED 330 321). Naismith, L., Lonsdale, P., Vavoula, G., & Sharples, M. (2005). Literature Review in Mobile Technologies and Learning, 11: NESTA Futurelab. Bris