KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1

SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONSHIPS

SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONS

Arzu İlsev(Hacettepe University, Department of Business Administration, Beytepe, Ankara, TURKEY)
Sayfa
209–233
Yayın Tarihi
2009-07-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilerin analiz sonuçları amirin davranışının çalışanın beklentileriyle olan uyumsuzluğu-nun algılanan çekiciliği ile lider-üye değişiminin kalitesinin beklenmeyen davranış için yapılan atıflara etkide bulunduklarını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların amirlerinin beklenmedik davranışlarını hangi faktörlere atfettiklerini incelemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilerin analiz sonuçları amirin davranışının çalışanın beklentileriyle olan uyumsuzluğu-nun algılanan çekiciliği ile lider-üye değişiminin kalitesinin beklenmeyen davranış için yapılan atıflara etkide bulunduklarını göstermektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, lider-üye değişimi ilişkisinin kalitesinin hem bu ilişkiyi hem de uyumsuzluğun çekiciliğiyle içsel atıflar arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenleyici etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur.  
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Lider-üye değişimi · atıf · atfetme

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı çalışanların amirlerinin beklenmedik davranışlarını hangi faktörlere atfettiklerini incelemektir. Anket yöntemiyle toplanan verilerin analiz sonuçları amirin davranışının çalışanın beklentileriyle olan uyumsuzluğu-nun algılanan çekiciliği ile lider-üye değişiminin kalitesinin beklenmeyen davranış için yapılan atıflara etkide bulunduklarını göstermektedir. Uyumsuz-luğun çekiciliğinin amirin olumlu/olumsuz niyetine yapılan atıfları olumlu yönde etkilediği saptanmıştır. Ayrıca, lider-üye değişimi ilişkisinin kalitesinin hem bu ilişkiyi hem de uyumsuzluğun çekiciliğiyle içsel atıflar arasındaki ilişkiyi düzenleyici etkisi olduğu bulunmuştur.  

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine subordinate attributions made for unexpected supervisor behaviors in established supervisor-subordinate relationships. Data for this study were collected from employees through a questionnaire Results of the analysis suggest that favorability of the supervisor behavior inconsistent with subordinate expectations along with the quality of the LMX (Leader-Member Exchange) relationship influence attributions made for unexpected behaviors. Perceived favorability of deviation had a positive and direct effect on attribution to positive intentions. Furthermore, quality of the LMX relationship was found to have a moderating effect on this relationship and the relationship between perceived favorability of deviation and internal attribution.  

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İlsev, A. (2009). SUBORDINATE ATTRIBUTIONS FOR UNEXPECTED BEHAVIORS IN SUPERVISOR-SUBORDINATE RELATIONSHIPS. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 1, 209–233. https://ajindex.com/articles/1406502

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (51)

  1. Aiken, L.S. and S.G. West (1991) Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  2. Baldwin, M.W. (1992) “Relational Schemas and the Processing of Social Information”, Psychological Bulletin, 112, 461-484.
  3. Bauer, T.N. and S.G. Green (1996) “Development of Leader-Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test”, Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
  4. Belmore, S.M. (1987) “Determinants of Attention during Impression Formation”, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 480-489.
  5. Benet-Martinez, V. and O.P. John (1998) “Los Cinco Grandes across Cultures and Ethnic Groups: Multitrait Multimethod Analyses of the Big Five in Spanish and English”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 729-750.
  6. Bhal, K.T. and M.A. (1996) “Measuring Quality of Interaction between Leaders and Members”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 945-972.
  7. Bies, R.J. and T.M. Tripp (1996) “Beyond Distrust: ‘Getting Even’ and the Need for Revenge”, in Kramer, R. and Tyler, T. (eds.), Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 246-260.
  8. Bradbury, T.N. and F.D. Fincham (1990) “Attributions in Marriage: Review and Critique”, Psychological Bulletin, 107, 3-33.
  9. Bradbury, T.N and F.D. Fincham (1992) “Attributions and Behavior in Marital Interaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 613-628.
  10. Burgoon, J.K. (1993) “Interpersonal Expectations, Expectancy Violations, and Emotional Communication”, Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 12, 30-48.
  11. Dansereau, F., G. Graen, and W.J. Haga (1975) “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership within Formal Organizations: A Longitudinal Investigation of the Role Making Process”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  12. Duchon, D., S.G. Green, and T.D. Taber (1986) “Vertical Dyad Linkage: A Longitudinal Assessment of Antecedents, Measures, and Consequences”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60.
  13. Duck, S. and H. Sants (1983) “On the Origin of the Specious: Are Personal Relationships Really Interpersonal States?”, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 1, 27-41.
  14. Fincham, F.D. (1985) “Attributions in Close Relationships”, in Harvey, J.H. and Weary, G. (eds.), Attribution: Basic Issues and Applications, Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 203-234.
  15. Fincham, F.D. and J.M. Jaspars (1980) “Attribution of Responsibility: From Man the Scientist to Man as Lawyer”, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, New York: Academy Press, 13, 81-138.
  16. Fincham, F.D. and T.N. Bradbury (1987) “The Impact of Attributions in Marriage: A Longitudinal Analysis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 510-517.
  17. Fletcher, G.J.O. and F.D. Fincham (1991) “Attribution Processes in Close Relationships”, in Fletcher, G.J.O. and Fincham, G.J.O. (eds.), Cognition in Close Relationships, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, 7-35.
  18. Floyd, K. and M. Voloudakis (1999) “Attributions for Expectancy Violating Changes in Affectionate Behavior in Platonic Friendships”, Journal of Psychology, 133, 32-48.
  19. Gerstner, C.R. and D.V. Day (1997) “Meta-Analytic Review of Leader-Member Exchange Theory: Correlates and Construct Issues”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844.
  20. Graen, G. and J.F. Cashman (1975) “A Role-Making Model of Leadership in Formal Organizations: A Developmental Approach”, in Hunt, J. G. and Larson, L. L. (eds.), Leadership Frontiers, Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 143-165.
  21. Graen, G., M.A. Novak, and P. Sommerkamp (1982) “The Effects of Leader-Member Exchange and Job Design on Productivity and Satisfaction: Testing a Dual Attachment Model”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30, 109-131.
  22. Graen, G.B. and T.A. Scandura (1987) “Toward a Psychology of Dyadic Organizing”, in Cummings, L.L. and Staw, B.M. (eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, Vol. 9, 175-208.
  23. Graen, G. and W. Schiemann (1978) “Leader-Member Agreement: A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, 206-212.
  24. Graen G. and M. Uhl-Bien (1995) “Relationship-Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level Multi-Domain Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247.
  25. Hackman, J.R. and E.E. Lawler (1971) “Employee Reactions to Job Characteristics”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 55, 259-286.
  26. Harvey, O.J. and W.F. Clapp (1965) “Hope, Expectancy, and Reactions to the Unexpected”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 45-52.
  27. Hastie, R. (1984) “Causes and Effects of Causal Attribution”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 44-56.
  28. Heider, F. (1958) The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations, New York: Wiley.
  29. Hemsley, G.D. and H.H.C. Marmurek (1982) “Person Memory: The Processing of Consistent and Inconsistent Person Information”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 433-438.
  30. Hilton, J.L., J.G. Klein, and W. von Hippel (1991) “Attention Allocation and Impression Formation”, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 548-559.
  31. Jones, W.H. and M.P. Burdette (1994) “Betrayal in Relationships”, in Weber, A. and Harvey, S. (eds.), Perspectives on Close Relationships, Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 243-262.
  32. Karney, B. R. and T. N. Bradbury (2000) “Attributions in Marriage: State or Trait? A Growth Curve Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 295-309.
  33. Karney, B.R., T.N. Bradbury, F.D. Fincham, and K.T. Sullivan (1994) “The Role of Negative Affectivity in the Association between Attributions and Marital Satisfaction”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 413-424.
  34. Kelley, H.H. (1973) “The Process of Causal Attribution”, American Psychologist, 28, 107-128.
  35. Kim, K.I. and D.W. Organ (1982) “Determinants of Leader-Subordinate Exchange Relationships”, Group and Organization Studies, 7, 77-89.
  36. Kramer, R.M. (1994) “The Sinister Attribution Error: Paranoid Cognition and Collective Distrust in Organizations”, Motivation and Emotion, 18, 199-230.
  37. Liden, R.C. and G. Graen (1980) “Generalizability of the Vertical Dyad Linkage Model of Leadership”, Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465.
  38. Liden, R.C. and J.M. Maslyn (1998) “Multidimensionality of Leader-Member Exchange: An Empirical Assessment through Scale Development”, Journal of Management, 24, 43-72.
  39. Liden, R. C., R. T. Sparrowe, and S. J. Wayne (1997) “Leader-Member Exchange Theory: The Past and Potential for the Future”, Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 15, 47-119.
  40. Liden, R.C., S.J. Wayne and D. Stilwell (1993) “A Longitudinal Study on the Early Development of Leader-Member Exchanges”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 662-674.
  41. Locke, E.A. (1969) “What is Job Satisfaction?”, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 4, 309-336.
  42. McClelland, D.C., J.W. Atkinson, R.A. Clark, and E.L. Lowell (1953) The Achievement Motive, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  43. Olson, J.M., N.J. Roese and M.P. Zanna (1996) “Expectancies”, in Higgins, E. T. and Kruglanski, A. W. (eds.), Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles, New York: The Guilford Press, 211-238.
  44. Planalp, S. (1987) “Interplay between Relational Knowledge and Events”, in Burnett, R., McGhee, P., and Clarke, D. (eds.), Accounting for Relationships: Explanation, Representation, and Knowledge, London: Methuen, 175-191.
  45. Planalp, S. and M. Rivers (1996) “Changes in Knowledge of Personal Relationships”, in Fletcher, G.O. and Fitness, J. (eds.), Knowledge Structures in Close Relationships: A Social Psychological Approach, 299-324.
  46. Pyszczynski, T.A. and J. Greenberg (1981) “Role of Disconfirmed Expectancies in the Instigation of Attributional Processing”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 31-38.
  47. Ross, L. (1977) “The Intuitive Psychologist and His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process”, in Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 10, 173-220.
  48. Shultz, T.R., M. Schleifer and I. Altman (1981) “Judgments of Causation, Responsibility, and Punishment in Cases of Harm-Doing”, Canadian Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 12, 238-253.
  49. Tepper, B.J. (2000) “Consequences of Abusive Supervision”, Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178-190.
  50. Warr, P.B., J. Cook, and T.D. Wall (1979) “Scales for the Measurement of Some Work Attitudes and Aspects of Psychological Well-being”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, 52, 129-148.
  51. Wong, P.T.P. and B. Weiner (1983) “When People Ask for ‘why’ Questions, and the Heuristics of Attributional Search”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650-663.