KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2

ÇALIŞANLARIN ÇEVRE DOSTU DAVRANIŞ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

ADAPTATION OF EMPLOYEES' ECO-FRIENDLY BEHAVIOR SCALE INTO TURKISH: VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY STUDY

Sermed Doğan(KAYSERİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0001-8782-7227
Sayfa
321–334
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Kurumların çevre dostu davranışlara yönelik eğilimi son zamanlarda artış göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Kurumların çevre dostu davranışlara yönelik eğilimi son zamanlarda artış göstermektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çevre dostu, çevreye duyarlı veya çevre yanlısı davranışlar birçok kurumun var olma amaçları arasında değerlendirdiği gibi sağlık kurumları açısından da kritik öneme sahiptir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ölçeğin orijinal yapısına benzer sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Sağlık Kurumları · Çevre Dostu Davranış · Yeşil Dönüşüm

Özet

Kurumların çevre dostu davranışlara yönelik eğilimi son zamanlarda artış göstermektedir. Çevre dostu, çevreye duyarlı veya çevre yanlısı davranışlar birçok kurumun var olma amaçları arasında değerlendirdiği gibi sağlık kurumları açısından da kritik öneme sahiptir. Kavram farklı disiplinlerde ve örneklem gruplarında inceleme alanı bulmasına karşın sağlık kurumlarında nispeten daha az değerlendirilmiştir. Sağlık kurumları, yoğun kaynak tüketimi ve artan israf ile mücadele etmektedir. Aynı zamanda sağlık harcamalarında sürekli olarak artış meydana gelmektedir. Bu gibi durumlar sağlık kurumlarında sürdürülebilirliği destekleyecek uygulamaları gündeme taşımaktadır. Kurumların sürdürülebilirlik hedeflerine ulaşmada çalışanlar kilit kaynak olarak görülmektedir. Ancak çalışanların çevre yanlısı tutumlarını ölçmeye yönelik araçlar kısıtlılık göstermektedir. Bu bağlamda Kim vd., (2019) tarafından geliştirilen “Çalışanların Çevre Dostu Davranışı” ölçeğinin Türkçe ’ye uyarlanması ve geçerlik-güvenirlik incelemesinin yapılması araştırmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Ölçeğin orijinal dili İngilizce olup tek faktör altında 7 maddeden oluşmaktadır. Türkçe dil uyarlaması yapılan ölçeğin kapsam geçerliliği, yapı geçerliliği, iç tutarlılık ve zamana göre güvenirliği incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre tek faktörlü model ile ölçek iyi uyum göstermektedir. Ölçeğin orijinal yapısına benzer sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır.

Abstract

Organizations' tendency toward eco-friendly behavior has been increasing recently. Eco-friendly, environmentally sensitive or pro-environmental behaviors are of critical importance for health institutions, as they are considered among the purposes of existence of many institutions. Although the concept has been studied in different disciplines and sample groups, it has been relatively less evaluated in healthcare institutions. Healthcare institutions are struggling with intensive resource consumption and increasing waste. At the same time, there has been a continuous increase in healthcare expenditures. Such situations bring to the forefront practices that will support sustainability in healthcare institutions. Employees are seen as a key resource in helping organizations achieve their sustainability goals. However, tools for measuring employees' eco-friendly attitudes are limited. In this context, the purpose of the study is to adapt the “Employees' Eco-Friendly Behavior” scale developed by Kim et al. (2019) into Turkish and to examine its validity and reliability. The original language of the scale is English, and it consists of 7 items under a single factor. The scale, which was adapted into Turkish, was examined for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency and reliability over time. According to the analysis results, the scale shows good fit with the single-factor model. Results similar to the original structure of the scale were obtained.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Doğan, S. (2026). ÇALIŞANLARIN ÇEVRE DOSTU DAVRANIŞ ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE’YE UYARLANMASI: GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 Sayı: 2, 321–334. https://doi.org/10.61859/hacettepesid.1732546

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. Ali, M. A., Khan, A. Z., Azeem, M. U., & Inam, U. H. (2023). How does environmental corporate social responsibility contribute to the development of a green corporate image? The sequential mediating roles of employees' environmental passion and pro‐environmental behavior. Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, 32(3), 896–909.
  2. Alotaibi, M., & Noureldin, A. (2024). The impact of green recruitment on organizational sustainability: Investigating the mediating role of employee eco-friendly behaviors in Saudi Arabia's industrial sectors. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research, 7(S6), 2222.
  3. Bandyopadhyay, A., Chatterjee, R., & Das, N. (2022). E-waste management in digital healthcare system and sustainability paradigm. In Environmental Informatics: Challenges and Solutions, 157–166.
  4. Begum, S., Xia, E., Ali, F., Awan, U., & Ashfaq, M. (2022). Achieving green product and process innovation through green leadership and creative engagement in manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 33(4), 656–674.
  5. Benis, A., & Tamburis, O. (2023). The need for green and responsible medical informatics and digital health: looking forward with one digital health. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 32(01), 007-009.
  6. Berniak-Woźny, J., & Rataj, M. (2023). Towards green and sustainable healthcare: A literature review and research agenda for green leadership in the healthcare sector. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(2), 908.
  7. Boiral, O. (2009). Greening the corporation through organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 221–236.
  8. Bujang, M. A. B. N., & Baharim, N. (2017). Guidelines of the minimum sample size requirements for Cohen’s kappa. Epidemiology Biostatistics and Public Health, 14.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Faktör analizi: Temel kavramlar ve ölçek geliştirmede kullanımı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 32, 470–483.
  10. Chaudhary, R. (2020). Green human resource management and employee green behavior: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 630–641.
  11. Choong, Y. O., Ng, L. P., Tee, C. W., Kuar, L. S., Teoh, S. Y., & Chen, I. C. (2019). Green work climate and pro-environmental behaviour among academics: The mediating role of harmonious environmental passion. International Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 77–97.
  12. Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
  13. Dumont, J., Shen, J., & Deng, X. (2017). Effects of green HRM practices on employee workplace green behavior: The role of psychological green climate and employee green values. Human Resource Management, 56(4), 613–627.
  14. Fekih-Romdhane, F., Alhuwailah, A., Shuwiekh, H. A. M., Stambouli, M., Hakiri, A., Cheour, M.,. & Hallit, S. (2024). Development and initial validation of the cannabis-related psychosis risk literacy scale (CPRL): a multinational psychometric study. BMC psychiatry, 24(1), 298.
  15. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: SAGE.
  16. Fragão-Marques, M., & Ozben, T. (2023). Digital transformation and sustainability in healthcare and clinical laboratories. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 61(4), 627–633.
  17. Gill, A. A., Ahmad, B., & Kazmi, S. (2021). The effect of green human resource management on environmental performance: The mediating role of employee eco-friendly behavior. Management Science Letters, 11(6), 1725–1734.
  18. Gürbüz, S. (2021). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (2. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  19. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri (5. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  20. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
  21. Harrington, D. (2009). Confirmatory factor analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  22. Hayati, N., Nashrullah, W., Mustar, M. Y., & Suryanegara, M. (2024, August). Designing a Management Information System to Support Green Hospital Initiatives. In 2024 4th International Conference on Electronic and Electrical Engineering and Intelligent System (ICE3IS) (pp. 241-246). IEEE.
  23. Johns, G., Whistance, B., Burhouse, A., Khalil, S., Whistance, M., Ahuja, S., … Ahuja, A. (2023). Benefits, challenges and sustainability of digital healthcare for NHS Wales: A qualitative study. BMJ Open, 13(5), e069371.
  24. Kaladharan, S., Dhanya, M., Rejikumar, G., & Puthanpurayil, J. (2023). Sustainability triangle framework for digital health systems: A conceptual model for sustainable health care. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Smart Trends for Information Technology and Computer Communications (pp. 533–541). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  25. Kim, Y. J., Kim, W. G., Choi, H. M., & Phetvaroon, K. (2019). The effect of green human resource management on hotel employees’ eco-friendly behavior and environmental performance. International journal of hospitality management, 76, 83-93.
  26. Latif, W. B., & Yasin, I. M. (2025). From disparities to sustainability: Embedding artificial intelligence and digital health literacy into learning health systems—A critical review article. Pacific Journal of Medical Research, 2(4), 167–173.
  27. Lee, K. H. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 47(7), 1101-1121.
  28. Manika, D., Wells, V. K., Gregory-Smith, D., & Gentry, M. (2015). The impact of individual attitudinal and organisational variables on workplace environmentally friendly behaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 126, 663-684.
  29. Nazir, A., Nazir, A., Zaheer, R., & Haq, H. (2025). The role of tertiary care in the digital and green transformation of health systems. IntechOpen.
  30. Norton, T. A., Zacher, H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2012). On the importance of pro-environmental organizational climate for employee green behavior. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(4), 497-500.
  31. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
  32. Pasharibu, Y., Sugiarto, A., Ariarsanti, T., & Wijayant, P. (2019). Dimensions of green office evidence from regency/city government offices in central java, Indonesia. Business: Theory and Practice, 20(0), 391–402.
  33. Perron, G. M., Côté, R. P., & Duffy, J. F. (2006). Improving environmental awareness training in business. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(6-7), 551-562.
  34. Pett, M.A., Lackey, N.R., & Sullivan, J. (2003). Making sense of factor analysis: The use of factor analysis for instrument development in healthcare research. SAGE.
  35. Pinzone, M., Guerci, M., Lettieri, E., & Huisingh, D. (2019). Effects of ‘green’ training on pro-environmental behaviors and job satisfaction: Evidence from the Italian healthcare sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, 221–232.
  36. Prasad, K. D. V., Singh, S., Srinivas, V., Kothari, H., & Shrimali, D. (2025). The impact of green human resource management on it employees’ environmentally eco-friendly performance and behavior: The mediating role of organizational commitment. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(1), 229-248.
  37. Qalati, S. A., Barbosa, B., & Ibrahim, B. (2023). Factors influencing employees’ eco-friendly innovation capabilities and behavior: the role of green culture and employees’ motivations. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1-22.
  38. Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14.
  39. Ribeiro, N., Gomes, D. R., Ortega, E., Gomes, G. P., & Semedo, A. S. (2022). The impact of green HRM on employees’ eco-friendly behavior: The mediator role of organizational identification. Sustainability, 14(5), 2897.
  40. Sabbir, M. M., & Taufique, K. M. R. (2022). Sustainable employee green behavior in the workplace: Integrating cognitive and non‐cognitive factors in corporate environmental policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1), 110-128.
  41. Saeed, B. B., Afsar, B., Hafeez, S., Khan, I., Tahir, M., & Afridi, M. A. (2019). Promoting employee’s proenvironmental behavior through green human resource management practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 424–438.
  42. Saxena, S., & Joshi, H. (2024). Digital health innovations: Advancing climate–health–sustainability synergies. In The Climate-Health-Sustainability Nexus, 325–349.
  43. Scherbaum, C. A., Popovich, P. M., & Finlinson, S. (2008). Exploring individual‐level factors related to employee energyconservation behaviors at work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(3), 818–835.
  44. Sijm-Eeken, M. E., Arkenaar, W., Jaspers, M. W., & Peute, L. W. (2022). Medical informatics and climate change: a framework for modeling green healthcare solutions. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(12), 2083-2088.
  45. Sugiarto, A., Lee, C. W., & Huruta, A. D. (2022). Promoting eco-friendly behavior on government and private offices in Indonesia: The Mediating role of eco-friendly commitment. Calitatea, 23(190), 278-291.
  46. Sushchenko, O. A., Kozubova, N. V., & Prokopishyna, O. V. (2018). Eco-friendly behavior of local population, tourists and companies as a factor of sustainable tourism development. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.2), 514-518.
  47. Sürücü, L., Şeşen, H., & Maşlakçı, A. (2021). SPSS, AMOS ve PROCESS macro ile ilişkisel, aracı/düzenleyici ve yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
  48. Swathi, A., & Johnpaul, M. (2025). Eco-friendly practices impact on organizational climate: Fostering a sustainable work culture. In Green Management Approaches to Organizational Behavior (pp. 145-174). IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
  49. Uslu, F., Keles, A., Aytekin, A., Yayla, O., Keles, H., Ergun, G. S., & Tarinc, A. (2023). Effect of green human resource management on green psychological climate and environmental green behavior of hotel employees: The moderator roles of environmental sensitivity and altruism. Sustainability, 15(7), 6017.
  50. Yeşiltaş, M., Gürlek, M., & Kenar, G. (2022). Organizational green culture and green employee behavior: Differences between green and non-green hotels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 343, 1-17.
  51. Yucedag, C., Kaya, L. G., & Cetin, M. (2018). Identifying and assessing environmental awareness of hotel and restaurant employees’ attitudes in the Amasra District of Bartin. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 190, 1-8.
  52. Zacher, H., Rudolph, C. W., & Katz, I. M. (2023). Employee green behavior as the core of environmentally sustainable organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 465–494.
  53. Zientara, P., & Zamojska, A. (2018). Green organizational climates and employee pro-environmental behaviour in the hotel industry. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(7), 1142-1159.
  54. Fekih-Romdhane, F., Alhuwailah, A., Shuwiekh, H. A. M., Stambouli, M., Hakiri, A., Cheour, M.,. & Hallit, S. (2024). Development and initial validation of the cannabis-related psychosis risk literacy scale (CPRL): a multinational psychometric study. BMC psychiatry, 24(1), 298.