Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Set Of Criteria For Efficiency Of The Process Forming The Answers To Multiple-Choice Test Items

Sayfa
75–84
Yayın Tarihi
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Is offered the set of criteria for assessing efficiency of the process forming the answers to multiple-choice test items.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To increase accuracy of computer-assisted testing results, it is suggested to assess dynamics of the process of forming the final answer using the following factors: loss of time factor and correct choice factor.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:E-Learning · Distance Learning · Web-Based E-Learning System

Abstract

Is offered the set of criteria for assessing efficiency of the process forming the answers to multiple-choice test items. To increase accuracy of computer-assisted testing results, it is suggested to assess dynamics of the process of forming the final answer using the following factors: loss of time factor and correct choice factor. The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RYBANOV, A. A. (2013). Set Of Criteria For Efficiency Of The Process Forming The Answers To Multiple-Choice Test Items. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 75–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/140204

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Bereby-Meyer, Y., Meyer, J., Flascher, O.M. (2002). Prospect Theory Analysis of Guessing in Multiple Choice Tests. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15 (4), 13-327.
  2. Rybanov, A.A. (2006a). Quantitative assessment of efficiency of the process of forming answers to test items in distance education testing. Quality. Innovations. Education, 5, 44 Rybanov, A.A. (2008). Modelling dynamics of the process of assessing answers to multiple-choice test items in distance education testing. Quality. Innovations. Education, 1, 2 Rybanov, A.A. (2006b). Modelling dynamics of the process of forming answers to multiple-choice test items in distance education testing. Open Education, 6, 43-50.
  3. Van Der Linden, W.J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33 (1), 5-20.