SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Set Of Criteria For Efficiency Of The Process Forming The Answers To Multiple-Choice Test Items

Alexander Aleksandrovich RYBANOV
Pages
75–84
Publication Date
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Is offered the set of criteria for assessing efficiency of the process forming the answers to multiple-choice test items.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To increase accuracy of computer-assisted testing results, it is suggested to assess dynamics of the process of forming the final answer using the following factors: loss of time factor and correct choice factor.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:E-Learning · Distance Learning · Web-Based E-Learning System

Abstract

Is offered the set of criteria for assessing efficiency of the process forming the answers to multiple-choice test items. To increase accuracy of computer-assisted testing results, it is suggested to assess dynamics of the process of forming the final answer using the following factors: loss of time factor and correct choice factor. The model application results show the high efficiency of suggested set of criteria.

🔖

Cite This Article

RYBANOV, A. A. (2013). Set Of Criteria For Efficiency Of The Process Forming The Answers To Multiple-Choice Test Items. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 75–84. https://ajindex.com/articles/140204

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Bereby-Meyer, Y., Meyer, J., Flascher, O.M. (2002). Prospect Theory Analysis of Guessing in Multiple Choice Tests. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 15 (4), 13-327.
  2. Rybanov, A.A. (2006a). Quantitative assessment of efficiency of the process of forming answers to test items in distance education testing. Quality. Innovations. Education, 5, 44 Rybanov, A.A. (2008). Modelling dynamics of the process of assessing answers to multiple-choice test items in distance education testing. Quality. Innovations. Education, 1, 2 Rybanov, A.A. (2006b). Modelling dynamics of the process of forming answers to multiple-choice test items in distance education testing. Open Education, 6, 43-50.
  3. Van Der Linden, W.J. (2008). Using response times for item selection in adaptive testing. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 33 (1), 5-20.