KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Elektrikli Araç Benimsenmesinde TAM–TRA Çerçevesi ve Tüketici Etnosentrizminin Moderatör Rolü

Electric Vehicle Adoption within the TAM–TRA Framework and the Moderating Role of Consumer Ethnocentrism

Behiye Beğendik(BEYKOZ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7615-2049
Dursun Yener(İSTANBUL MEDENİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4294-4056
Sayfa
390–407
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-12
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, elektrikli araç benimseme niyetinin en güçlü belirleyicisinin çevresel öznel normlar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye’de tüketicilerin elektrikli araç (EA) benimseme niyetlerini etkileyen faktörleri Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TAM) ve Gerekçeli Eylem Kuramı (TRA) çerçevesinde incelemek ve tüketici etnosentrizminin bu ilişkiler üzerindeki düzenleyici rolünü değerlendirmektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Çalışmada çevresel tutum, çevresel öznel normlar, fiyat değeri, algılanan fayda ve algılanan kullanım kolaylığı değişkenlerinin EA benimseme niyeti üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, elektrikli araç benimseme niyetinin en güçlü belirleyicisinin çevresel öznel normlar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Elektrikli araç benimseme niyeti · Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TAM) · Gerekçeli Eylem Kuramı (TRA)

Özet

Bu araştırmanın amacı, Türkiye’de tüketicilerin elektrikli araç (EA) benimseme niyetlerini etkileyen faktörleri Teknoloji Kabul Modeli (TAM) ve Gerekçeli Eylem Kuramı (TRA) çerçevesinde incelemek ve tüketici etnosentrizminin bu ilişkiler üzerindeki düzenleyici rolünü değerlendirmektir. Çalışmada çevresel tutum, çevresel öznel normlar, fiyat değeri, algılanan fayda ve algılanan kullanım kolaylığı değişkenlerinin EA benimseme niyeti üzerindeki etkileri analiz edilmiştir. Kolayda örnekleme yöntemiyle elde edilen 437 geçerli anket verisi çoklu regresyon ve moderasyon analizleriyle test edilmiştir. Bulgular, elektrikli araç benimseme niyetinin en güçlü belirleyicisinin çevresel öznel normlar olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Algılanan fayda ve algılanan kullanım kolaylığı da niyeti anlamlı ve pozitif yönde etkilemektedir. Buna karşın çevresel tutum ve fiyat değeri anlamlı bir etki göstermemiştir. Moderasyon analizinde tüketici etnosentrizminin yalnızca algılanan fayda–benimseme niyeti ilişkisinde zayıflatıcı bir rol oynadığı belirlenmiştir. Çalışma, TAM ve TRA’nın bütünleşik yapısını etnosentrizm ile birlikte ele alarak literatüre teorik katkı sunmakta; pazarlama stratejileri ve kamu politikaları açısından sosyal onayın ve kullanım deneyiminin kritik rolüne işaret etmektedir.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the factors influencing consumers' intentions to adopt electric vehicles (EVs) in Türkiye within the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) and to evaluate the moderating role of consumer ethnocentrism on these relationships. The study analyzed the effects of environmental attitude, environmental subjective norms, price value, perceived benefit and perceived ease of use variables on EA adoption intention . The 437 valid survey data obtained through convenience sampling were tested using multiple regression and moderation analyses. The findings reveal that environmental subjective norms are the strongest determinant of electric vehicle adoption intention. Perceived utility and perceived ease of use also significantly and positively influence intention. In contrast, environmental attitude and price value did not show a significant effect. The moderation analysis determined that consumer ethnocentrism only plays a moderating role in the perceived utility–adoption intention relationship. The study contributes to the literature by examining the integrated structure of TAM and TRA alongside ethnocentrism; it highlights the critical role of social approval and usage experience in terms of marketing strategies and public policies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Beğendik, B., Yener, D. (2026). Elektrikli Araç Benimsenmesinde TAM–TRA Çerçevesi ve Tüketici Etnosentrizminin Moderatör Rolü. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 390–407. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.1839067

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (95)

  1. Cecchin, A., Salomone, R., Deutz, P., Raggi, A., Cutaia, L. What is in a name? The rising star of the circular economy as a resource-related concept for sustainable development. Circular Economy and Sustainability, 1(1), (2021), 83-97.
  2. Dutta, B. and Hwang, H.-G. Consumers Purchase Intentions of Green Electric Vehicles: The Influence of Consumers Technological and Environmental Considerations. Sustainability, 13, (2021), 12025. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su132112025
  3. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdfs/news/expert/2019/3/story/20190313STO31218/20190313STO31218_en.pdf / EP Report: CO2 emissions from cars: facts and figures,(infographics), 6-12-2024, 20190313STO31218
  4. Nian, V., Hari, M. P., Yuan, J. A new business model for encouraging the adoption of electric vehicles in the absence of policy support. Applied energy, 235, (2019), 1106-1117.
  5. Yaprak, B. Togg’un pazarlama çevresinin değerlendirilmesi: PESTLE analizi. Akıllı Ulaşım Sistemleri ve Uygulamaları Dergisi, 6(1), (2023), 155-165.
  6. Wang, S., Wang, J., Li, J., Wang, J., Liang, L. Policy implications for promoting the adoption of electric vehicles: do consumer’s knowledge, perceived risk and financial incentive policy matter? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, (2018), 58-69.
  7. Liao, F., Molin, E., Van Wee, B. Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), (2017), 252-275.
  8. Ivanova, G. and Moreira, A. C. Antecedents of electric vehicle purchase intention from the consumer’s perspective: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(4), (2023), 2878.
  9. Carley, S., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., Graham, J. D. Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18, (2013), 39-45.
  10. Uzun, D. Sürdürülebilir pazarlama kapsamında tüketicilerin elektrikli araç satın alma niyeti. Holistic Economics, 3(2), (2024), 43-58.
  11. Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., Bodin, J. Advances in consumer electric vehicle adoption research: A review and research agenda. Transportation Research. Part D, Transport and Environment, 34, (2015), 122– 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.10.010
  12. Jaiswal, D., Deshmukh, A. K., Thaichon, P. Who will adopt electric vehicles? Segmenting and exemplifying potential buyer heterogeneity and forthcoming research. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, (2022), 102969.
  13. Featherman, M., Jia, S. J., Califf, C. B., Hajli, N. The impact of new technologies on consumers beliefs: Reducing the perceived risks of electric vehicle adoption. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169, (2021), 120847.
  14. Juan, A. A., Mendez, C. A., Faulin, J., De Armas, J., Grasman, S. E. Electric vehicles in logistics and transportation: A survey on emerging environmental, strategic, and operational challenges. Energies, 9(2), (2016), 86.
  15. Covic, G. A., Boys, J. T., Budhia, M., Huang, C. Y. Electric Vehicles–Personal transportation for the future. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 4(4), (2010), 693-704.
  16. Zheng, J., Mehndiratta, S., Guo, J. Y., Liu, Z. Strategic policies and demonstration program of electric vehicle in China. Transport Policy, 19(1), (2012), 17-25.
  17. Hayashida, S., La Croix, S., Coffman, M. Understanding changes in electric vehicle policies in the US states, 2010–2018. Transport policy, 103, (2021), 211-223.
  18. Wang, Q. and Mah, J. S. The role of the government in development of the electric vehicle industry of China. China Report, 58(2), (2022), 194-210.
  19. Kumar, R. R., Chakraborty, A., Mandal, P. Promoting electric vehicle adoption: Who should invest in charging infrastructure? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149, (2021), 102295.
  20. Huang, X., Lin, Y., Zhou, F., Lim, M. K., Chen, S. Agent-based modelling for market acceptance of electric vehicles: evidence from China. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 28, (2021), 206-217.
  21. Priessner, A., Sposato, R., Hampl, N. Predictors of electric vehicle adoption: An analysis of potential electric vehicle drivers in Austria. Energy policy, 122, (2018), 701-714.
  22. Hardman, S., Shiu, E., Steinberger-Wilckens, R. Comparing high-end and low-end early adopters of battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 88, (2016), 40-57.
  23. Davis, F.D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology, MIS. Q. 13 (3), (1989), 319–340, https://doi.org/10.2307/249008.
  24. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological bulletin, 82(2), (1975), 261.
  25. Şenyapar, H. N. D. and Tür, M. R. Turkey’s Domestic Car TOGG in the Framework of New Trends in Electric Vehicles and Consumer Ethnocentrism. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 11(2), (2023),15-128.
  26. Wel, C. A. C., Alam, S. S., Khalid, N. R., Mokhtaruddin, S. A. Effect of Ethnocentrism and Patriotism on the buying intention of Malaysian National Car. Jurnal Pengurusan, 52, (2018), 169-179.
  27. Shimp, T. A. and Sharma, S. Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of marketing research, 24(3), (1987), 280-289.
  28. Balabanis, G. and Siamagka, N. T. Inconsistencies in the behavioural effects of consumer ethnocentrism: The role of brand, product category and country of origin. International Marketing Review, 34(2), (2017), 166-182.
  29. Wang, N., Huang, Y., Fu, Y., Chen, L. Does lead userness matter for electric vehicle adoption? An integrated perspective of social capital and domain‐specific innovativeness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(6), (2022), 1405-1419.
  30. Tilki, İ., Bozkurt, B., Aktan, M., Koçak, A. Türkiye'nin ülke imajı ile genel ürün imajının yerli otomobil TOGG'un algılanan ürün imajına ve satın alma niyetine etkisi. Bingol University Journal of Economics & Administrative Science, 6(2), (2022).
  31. Yildirim, M. and Ozdemir, S. Purchase intentions of Turkish electric vehicle in perspectives of consumer ethnocentrism and consumer innovativeness: A pre-assessment. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 10(2), (2021), 110-142.
  32. Panjaitan, R., & Cahya, H. N. A Perspective of Theory of Reasoned Action and Planned Behavior: Purchase Decision. Jurnal Manajemen, 29(1), 2025, 42-65.
  33. Lai, P. C. The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14(1), (2017), 21-38.
  34. Rahma, B., Kramberger, T., Barakat, M., Ali, A. H. Investigating customers’ purchase intentions for electric vehicles with linkage of theory of reasoned action and self-image congruence. Business Process Management Journal, 31(3), (2025), 948-973.
  35. Alzahrani, K., Hall-Phillips, A., Zeng, A. Z. Applying the theory of reasoned action to understanding consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles in Saudi Arabia. Transportation, 46(1), (2019), 199-215.
  36. Paul, J., Modi, A., Patel, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of retailing and consumer services, 29, (2016), 123-134.
  37. Asih, D., Setini, M., Soelton, M., Muna, N., Putra, I., Darma, D., Judiarni, J. Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Management science letters, 10(14), (2020), 3367-3374.
  38. Liu, H. T. and Tsaur, R. C. The theory of reasoned action applied to green smartphones: Moderating effect of government subsidies. Sustainability, 12(15), (2020), 5979
  39. Kumar, S., Gupta, K., Kumar, A., Singh, A., Singh, R. K. Applying the theory of reasoned action to examine consumers' attitude and willingness to purchase organic foods. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(1), (2023), 118-135.
  40. Gill, A. A., Ansari, R. H., Tufail, M. W. Going green: Theory of reasoned action application to examine the consumer intention through mediating role of green technology beliefs. Review of Applied Management and Social Sciences, 4(1), (2021), 63-77.
  41. Gundala, R. R., Nawaz, N., Boobalan, K., Gajenderan, V. K. Does gender moderate the purchase intention of organic foods? Theory of reasoned action. Heliyon, (2022), 8(9).
  42. Ajzen, I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 50(2), (1991), 179-211.
  43. Fouad Mohamed, T. Z. Extending the theory of planned behavior with government support and perceived risk to test the adoption of light electric vehicles in Tainan. Transportation Journal, 63(1), (2024), 24-41.
  44. Haustein, S. and Jensen, A. F. Factors of electric vehicle adoption: A comparison of conventional and electric car users based on an extended theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(7), (2018), 484-496.
  45. Deka, C., Dutta, M. K., Yazdanpanah, M., Komendantova, N. Can gain motivation induce Indians to adopt electric vehicles? Application of an extended theory of Planned Behavior to map EV adoption intention. Energy Policy, 182, (2023), 113724.
  46. Park, H. S. Relationships among attitudes and subjective norms: Testing the theory of reasoned action across cultures. Communication studies, 51(2), (2000), 162-175.
  47. Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., Geng, J. A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, (2017), 318-328.
  48. Higueras-Castillo, E., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., García-Maroto, I. Evaluating consumer attitudes toward electromobility and the moderating effect of perceived consumer effectiveness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 51, (2019), 387-398.
  49. Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., Dütschke, E. Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, (2014), 96-109.
  50. McDonald, S., Oates, C. J. Sustainability: Consumer perceptions and marketing strategies. Business strategy and the environment, 15(3), (2006), 157-170.
  51. Darma, F. S., & Padmantyo, S. The Effect of Attitude, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioral Control and Environmental Concern on Electric Vehicle Adoption Intention. Majapahit Journal of Islamic Finance and Management, 5(2), 2025, 1312-1334.
  52. Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., Nogueira, S. Willingness to pay more for green products: A critical challenge for Gen Z. Journal of Cleaner Production, 390, (2023), 136092.
  53. Chang, C. Y. C. Does price matter? How price influences online consumer decision-making. Japanese Journal of Administrative Science, 22(3), (2009), 245-254.
  54. Safitri, I. The influence of product price on consumers' purchasing decisions. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research, 7, (2018), 328-337.
  55. Hahnel, U. J., Ortmann, C., Korcaj, L., Spada, H. What is green worth to you? Activating environmental values lowers price sensitivity towards electric vehicles. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, (2014), 306-319.
  56. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., Grewal, D. Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), (1991), 307-319.
  57. Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., Xu, X. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, (2012), 157-178.
  58. Mohamad, M. A., Hanafiah, M. H., Radzi, S. M. Understanding tourist mobile hotel booking behaviour: Incorporating perceived enjoyment and perceived price value in the modified Technology Acceptance Model. Tourism & Management Studies, 17(1), (2021), 19-30.
  59. Winer, R. S. Behavioral perspective on pricing: Buyers' subjective perceptions of price revisited. Issues in pricing: Theory and research. (1988).
  60. Thomas, M. and Menon, G. When internal reference prices and price expectations diverge: The role of confidence. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(3), (2007), 401-409.
  61. Gulzari, A., Wang, Y., Prybutok, V. A green experience with eco-friendly cars: A young consumer electric vehicle rental behavioral model. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 65, (2022), 102877.
  62. Pamidimukkala, A., Kermanshachi, S., Rosenberger, J. M., & Hladik, G. (2024). Examining Drivers of Electric Vehicle Adoption. In International Conference on Transportation and Development (2024) (pp. 788-797).
  63. Barth, M., Jugert, P., Fritsche, I. Still underdetected–Social norms and collective efficacy predict the acceptance of electric vehicles in Germany. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 37, (2016), 64-77.
  64. Masson, T., & Fritsche, I. Adherence to climate change‐related ingroup norms: Do dimensions of group identification matter?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 2014, 455-465.
  65. Adnan, N., Nordin, S. M., Rahman, I., Amini, M. H. A market modeling review study on predicting Malaysian consumer behavior towards widespread adoption of PHEV/EV. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 24(22), (2017), 17955-17975.
  66. Tu, J. C., & Yang, C. Key factors influencing consumers’ purchase of electric vehicles. Sustainability, 11(14), 2019, 3863.
  67. Hussain, S. and Qureshi, I. M. Electric vehicle adoption: the nexus of knowledge, perceived usefulness, and ease of use. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), (2024), 154-161.
  68. Ngoc, A. M., Nishiuchi, H., Nhu, N. T. Determinants of carriers' intentions to use electric cargo vehicles in last-mile delivery by extending the technology acceptance model: a case study of Vietnam. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 34(1), (2023), 210-235.
  69. Krishnan, V. V. and Koshy, B. I. Evaluating the factors influencing purchase intention of electric vehicles in households owning conventional vehicles. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(3), (2021), 1122-1129.
  70. Bektaş, B. C. and Alçura, G. A. Understanding Electric Vehicle Adoption in Türkiye: Analyzing User Motivations Through the Technology Acceptance Model. Sustainability, 16, (2024), 9439. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16219439
  71. Wu, J., Liao, H., Wang, J. W., Chen, T. The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 60, (2019), 37-46.
  72. Adu-Gyamfi, G., Song, H., Obuobi, B., Nketiah, E., Wang, H., Cudjoe, D. Who will adopt? Investigating the adoption intention for battery swap technology for electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 156, (2022), 111979.
  73. Astuti, R. D. and Susanto, A. A. Challenges of electric vehicle adoption in Indonesia: Revealing the hidden factors affecting purchase intention. Jurnal Siasat Bisnis, (2024), 149-171.
  74. Balabanis, G. and Siamagka, N. T. A meta-analysis of consumer ethnocentrism across 57 countries. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 39(3), (2022), 745-763.
  75. Tsai, W. S., Yoo, J. J., Lee, W. N. For love of country? Consumer ethnocentrism in China, South Korea, and the United States. Journal of Global Marketing, 26(2), (2013), 98-114.
  76. Chinen, K., Matsumoto, M., Liu, C., Tong, P., Han, Y. S., Endo, H. Expanding electric-vehicle adoption beyond the national border: Insights for developing marketing policies for global electric-vehicle manufacturers. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 17(4), (2023), 393-405.
  77. Hongyi, D., Yingjie, G., Yang, H., Chen, M., Yoo, S. Navigating Green Consumer Behavior: Tesla vs. Xiaomi in Shaping Electric Vehicle Adoption through Brand Personality in China's Sustainable Market. International journal of advanced smart convergence, 13(4), (2024), 280-293.
  78. Şentürk, T. (2025). Ethnocentrism among Turkish Consumers: Is There a ‘Buy Local’Tendency Towards TOGG National Car Brand?. Ethnocentrism and Country of Origin Effects, 73. Ed.: Khalid Al-Sulaiti Ibrahim Al-Sulaiti Jaffar Abbas Hussam Al Halbusi.
  79. Durmuş Senyapar, H. N., Akil, M., Dokur, E. Adoption of electric vehicles: Purchase intentions and consumer behaviors research in Turkey. Sage Open, 13(2), (2023), 21582440231180586.
  80. Nguyen, P. H., Duong, H. T., Hoang, S. D. The impact of cultural values on the electric vehicle purchase intention: Testing the moderating role of subjective norms. Innovative Marketing, 21(3), (2025), 183.
  81. Curtale, R., Liao, F., Van Der Waerden, P. User acceptance of electric car-sharing services: The case of the Netherlands. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 149, (2021), 266-282.
  82. Bloomberg HT. (2025, Temmuz 7). Türkiye’de elektrikli araç satışları artıyor. https://www.bloomberght.com/turkiye-de-elektrikli-arac-satislari-artiyor-3751906/
  83. Higueras-Castillo, E., Singh, V., Singh, V. Liébana-Cabanillas, F. Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: a cross-cultural study. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), (2024), 29293-29329.
  84. Wang, S., Fan, J., Zhao, D., Yang, S., Fu, Y. Predicting consumers’ intention to adopt hybrid electric vehicles: using an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model. Transportation, 43(1), (2016), 123-143.
  85. Kottala, S. Y., Chanagala, S., Balaji, C., Narsi Reddy, V. V., Babu, G. N. P. V. Exploring Electric Vehicle Consumer Behaviour: Impact of Digital Innovation, Environmental Concern, Perceived Value, and Social Influence on Purchase Intentions. Frontiers in Sustainable Cities, 7, (2025), 1655074.
  86. Yang, Y. and Lan, J. SEM-based analysis of factors ınfluencing the purchase ıntention of electric vehicle consumers. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 9(2), (2023),18-26. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i2.8991.
  87. Kocagöz, E., & İğde, Ç. S. Elektrikli araç satın alma niyetini hangi faktörler etkiler? Bir tüketici araştırması. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(21. Uluslararası İşletmecilik Kongresi" Özel Sayısı), (2022), 104-120.
  88. Efendioğlu, İ. H. Elektrikli Araç Satın Alma Niyetini Etkileyen Faktörler. İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), (2024), 106-122.
  89. Lampo, A., Silva, S. C., Duarte, P. The role of environmental concern and technology show-off on electric vehicles adoption: the case of Macau. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 20(2), 2025, 561-583.
  90. Khazaei, H. (2019). The influence of personal innovativeness and price value on intention to use of electric vehicles in Malaysia. European Online Journal of Natural and Social Sciences, 8(3), pp-483.
  91. MINI Türkiye. (2025, 30 Kasım). Fiyat Listesi MINI Türkiye. https://www.mini.com.tr/tr_TR/home/fiyat-listesi.html
  92. Altintaş, M. H. and Tokol, T. Cultural openness and consumer ethnocentrism: An empirical analysis of Turkish consumers. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 25(4), (2007), 308-325.
  93. Mola, H., Kutlu, Ş. Ş., Adin, S. S. Ekolojik Ayak İzi Farkındalığı: Türkiye’de Gençler Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Dynamics in Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), (2025), 1-9.
  94. Şenyapar, H. N. D., & Akıl, M. (2023). Analysis of consumer behavior towards electric vehicles: Intentions, concerns, and policies. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, 11(1), 161-183.
  95. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdfs/news/expert/2019/3/story/20190313STO31218/20190313STO31218_en.pdf / EP Report: CO2 emissions from cars: facts and figures,(infographics), 6-12-2024, 20190313STO31218