KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3

Gerçek Bir Kampüs Şebekesinde Dağıtık Üretimin Eş Zamanlı Yerleşimi, Boyutlandırılması ve Miktar Optimizasyonu: GA ve GWO Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma

Simultaneous Allocation, Sizing, and Quantity Optimization of Distributed Generation in a Real Campus Grid: A Comparative Study of GA and GWO

Bekir Dursun(Trakya University)0000-0002-7741-8873
Sayfa
1796–1810
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Temel durum analizi, aşırı yüklenmiş transformatörler (>%80) nedeniyle ciddi gerilim kısıtları ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Dağıtık Üretim (DÜ) birimlerinin Radyal Dağıtım Şebekelerine (RDŞ) entegrasyonu, teknik kayıpları azaltmak ve gerilim kararlılığını artırmak açısından hayati önem taşımaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Geleneksel çalışmalar, değişken DÜ sayısını dikkate almadan idealize edilmiş test sistemlerini kullanırken; bu çalışma, gerçek bir 17 baralı, 34,5/0,4 kV kampüs dağıtım şebekesinde (Trakya Üniversitesi Balkan Yerleşkesi) DÜ birimlerinin optimum yerini, kapasitesini ve adedini eşzamanlı olarak belirlemek için simülasyon tabanlı çok amaçlı bir optimizasyon yöntemi önermektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Temel durum analizi, aşırı yüklenmiş transformatörler (>%80) nedeniyle ciddi gerilim kısıtları ortaya koymuştur.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dağıtık üretim · Kampüs dağıtım şebekesi · Genetik Algoritma

Özet

Dağıtık Üretim (DÜ) birimlerinin Radyal Dağıtım Şebekelerine (RDŞ) entegrasyonu, teknik kayıpları azaltmak ve gerilim kararlılığını artırmak açısından hayati önem taşımaktadır. Geleneksel çalışmalar, değişken DÜ sayısını dikkate almadan idealize edilmiş test sistemlerini kullanırken; bu çalışma, gerçek bir 17 baralı, 34,5/0,4 kV kampüs dağıtım şebekesinde (Trakya Üniversitesi Balkan Yerleşkesi) DÜ birimlerinin optimum yerini, kapasitesini ve adedini eşzamanlı olarak belirlemek için simülasyon tabanlı çok amaçlı bir optimizasyon yöntemi önermektedir. Aktif güç kaybını (Ploss), reaktif güç kaybını (Qloss) ve Gerilim Sapma İndeksini (VDI) optimize etmek için Genetik Algoritma (GA) ve Gri Kurt Optimizasyonu (GWO) yöntemlerini MATPOWER'ın analitik güç akışı denklemleriyle bütünleştirdik. Özgün bir dinamik kod çözme stratejisi mükerrer bara atamalarını önlerken, statik ceza fonksiyonları işletme kısıtlarını uygulamaktadır. Temel durum analizi, aşırı yüklenmiş transformatörler (>%80) nedeniyle ciddi gerilim kısıtları ortaya koymuştur. Hem GA hem de GWO, 4. ve 6. baralarda iki DÜ biriminin (toplam 4,82–4,84 MW) aynı optimum yerleşimine bağımsız olarak yakınsamıştır. Dengeli çok amaçlı koşullar altında, aktif kayıplar ~%15 oranında azalırken (0,0318 MW'den 0,0270 MW'ye), Qloss ve VDI'da eşzamanlı iyileşmeler elde edilmiştir. Buna karşın, yalnızca gerilim optimizasyonu yapılması >5,3 MW üretim fazlasına ve >%10 aktif kayıp artışına yol açmış; bu durum, dengeli çok amaçlı çalışmaların etkili bir RDŞ planlaması için şart olduğunu göstermiştir

Abstract

The integration of Distributed Generation (DG) into Radial Distribution Networks (RDNs) is crucial for reducing technical losses and enhancing voltage stability. Unlike traditional studies utilizing idealized test systems without variable DG counts, this study proposes a simulationbased multi-objective optimization method to simultaneously determine the optimal location, capacity, and quantity of DG units in an actual 17-bus, 34.5/0.4 kV campus distribution grid (Trakya University Balkan Campus). We couple a Genetic Algorithm (GA) and a Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO) with MATPOWER's analytical load-flow equations to optimize active power loss (Ploss), reactive power loss (Qloss), and the Voltage Deviation Index (VDI). A novel dynamic decoding strategy prevents duplicate bus allocations, while static penalty functions enforce operational constraints. Baseline analysis revealed severe voltage constraints due to overloaded transformers (>80%). Both GA and GWO independently converged to identical optimal placements of two DG units (totaling 4.82–4.84 MW) at Bus 4 and Bus 6. Under balanced multiobjective conditions, active losses decreased by ~15% (from 0.0318 MW to 0.0270 MW) with simultaneous improvements in Qloss and VDI. Conversely, single-objective voltage optimization yielded >5.3 MW over-generation and >10% increased active losses, demonstrating that balanced multi-objective frameworks are essential for effective RDN planning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Dursun, B. (2026). Gerçek Bir Kampüs Şebekesinde Dağıtık Üretimin Eş Zamanlı Yerleşimi, Boyutlandırılması ve Miktar Optimizasyonu: GA ve GWO Üzerine Karşılaştırmalı Bir Çalışma. Gazi Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi Part C: Tasarım ve Teknoloji, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 3, 1796–1810. https://doi.org/10.29109/gujsc.2038174

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (47)

  1. Bouchikhi N, Boussadia F, Bouddou R, Salau AO, Mekhilef S, Gouder C, Adiche S, Belabbes A. Optimal distributed generation placement and sizing using modified grey wolf optimization and ETAP for power system performance enhancement and protection adaptation. Scientific Reports. 2025; 15(1): 13919. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-98012-0
  2. Khoudry E. Optimal placement and sizing of multiple distributed generators in distribution networks using an adapted equilibrium optimizer. IEEE Access. 2026; 14: 11713–11743. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2026.3656090
  3. Shawon SMRH, Liang X, Janbakhsh M. Optimal placement of distributed generation units for microgrid planning in distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications. 2023; 59(3): 2785–2795. https://doi.org/10.1109/tia.2023.3236363
  4. Sundar R, Ashokaraju D, Dharmaraj T, Thangaraj D, Sabarish P, Rajakumar P, Mwanandiye ES. Distributed generation and shunt capacitor allocation in radial distribution power networks using a hybrid optimization approach. Scientific Reports. 2026; 16: 6299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-37713-6
  5. Kumar A, Verma R, Choudhary NK, Singh, N. Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation in power distribution system: a comprehensive review. Energy Sources Part a Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects. 2023; 45(3): 7160–7185. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2023.2216167
  6. Lone RA, Iqbal SJ, Anees AS. Optimal location and sizing of distributed generation for distribution systems: An improved analytical technique. International Journal of Green Energy. 2024; 21(3): 682–700. https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2023.2207638
  7. Al Soudi M, Alsayyed O, Batiha B, Hamadneh T, Malik OP, Dehghani M, Montazeri Z. (2026). Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation units in distribution networks using an enhanced particle swarm optimization framework. Electrical Engineering & Electromechanics. 2026; 1: 15–19. https://doi.org/10.20998/2074-272x.2026.1.02
  8. Ali A, Keerio MU, Laghari JA. Optimal site and size of distributed generation allocation in radial distribution network using multi-objective optimization. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. 2020; 9(2): 404–415. https://doi.org/10.35833/mpce.2019.000055
  9. Kumar M, Soomro A, Uddin W, Kumar L. Optimal Multi-Objective Placement and Sizing of Distributed generation in Distribution System: A Comprehensive Review. Energies. 2022; 15(21): 7850. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15217850
  10. Anuradha K, Jayatunga U, Perera HR. Loss-Voltage sensitivity analysis based battery energy storage systems allocation and distributed generation capacity upgrade. Journal of Energy Storage. 2021; 36: 102357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.102357
  11. Moses IA, Kiprono LL, Talai SM. Optimal placement and sizing of distributed generation (DG) units in electrical power distribution networks. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering Studies. 2023; 9(1): 66–124. https://doi.org/10.37745/ijeees.13/vol9n166124
  12. Vita V. Development of a Decision-Making Algorithm for the optimum size and placement of distributed generation units in distribution networks. Energies. 2017; 10(9): 1433. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091433
  13. Ćetković D, Komen, V. Optimal distributed generation and capacitor bank allocation and sizing at two voltage levels. IEEE Systems Journal. 2023; 17(4): 5831–5841. https://doi.org/10.1109/jsyst.2023.3280673
  14. Diab AAZ, Mahmoud FS, Sultan HM, El-Sayed AM, Ismeil MA, Kamel OM. Various optimization algorithms for efficient placement and sizing of photovoltaic distributed generations in different networks. PLoS ONE. 2025; 20(4): e0319422. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0319422
  15. Pereira BR, Da Costa GRMM, Contreras J, Mantovani JRS. Optimal distributed generation and reactive power allocation in electrical distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 2016; 7(3): 975–984. https://doi.org/10.1109/tste.2015.2512819
  16. Yuvaraj T, Devabalaji KR, Prabaharan N, Alhelou HH, Manju A, Pal P, Siano P. Optimal integration of capacitor and distributed generation in distribution system considering load variation using BAT optimization algorithm. Energies. 2021; 14(12): 3548. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123548
  17. Hari Prasad C, Subbaramaiah K, Sujatha P. Optimal DG unit placement in distribution networks by multi-objective whale optimization algorithm & its techno-economic analysis. Electric Power Systems Research. 2023; 214: 108869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108869
  18. Alzaareer K, Salem Q, El-Bayeh C Z, Harasis S, Aldaoudeyeh A I, Malkawi A M, Al-Shetwi AQ. Development of new admittance matrix for Newton-Raphson power flow in distribution networks. Mathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems. 2022; 9(1): 168–177. https://doi.org/10.18280/mmep.090121
  19. Bazrafshan M, Gatsis N. Comprehensive modeling of Three-Phase distribution systems via the bus admittance matrix. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2018; 33(2): 2015–2029. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2728618
  20. Di Fazio AR, Russo M, Valeri S, De Santis M. Linear method for steady-state analysis of radial distribution systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems. 2018; 99: 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2018.02.001
  21. Grisales-Noreña L, Morales-Duran J, Velez-Garcia S, Montoya OD, Gil-González W. Power flow methods used in AC distribution networks: An analysis of convergence and processing times in radial and meshed grid configurations. Results in Engineering. 2023; 17: 100915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2023.100915
  22. Zhu R. Analysis of steady‐state operation of active distribution network under uncertain conditions. IET Generation Transmission & Distribution. 2024; 18: 3732–3744. https://doi.org/10.1049/gtd2.13315
  23. Ehsan A, Yang Q. Optimal integration and planning of renewable distributed generation in the power distribution networks: A review of analytical techniques. Applied Energy. 2018; 210: 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.106
  24. Li H, Li L. Bilevel Planning of Distribution Networks with Distributed Generation and Energy Storage: A Case Study on the Modified IEEE 33-Bus System. Energy Engineering. 2025; 122(4): 1337–1358. https://doi.org/10.32604/ee.2025.060105
  25. Muñoz-Delgado G, Contreras J, Arroyo JM. Joint expansion planning of distributed generation and distribution networks. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2015; 30(5): 2579–2590. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2014.2364960
  26. Sellami R, Sher F, Neji R. An improved MOPSO algorithm for optimal sizing & placement of distributed generation: A case study of the Tunisian offshore distribution network (ASHTART). Energy Reports. 2022; 8: 6960–6975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.05.049
  27. Zimmerman RD, Murillo-Sanchez CE, Thomas RJ. MATPOWER: Steady-State Operations, planning, and analysis tools for power systems research and education. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2011; 26(1): 12–19. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2010.2051168
  28. Yassim HM, Abdullah MN, Gan CK. A Comparison of Power Flow Based on Bus Admittance Matrix for Networked Microgrid Energy Management Gy Management. ASEAN Engineering Journal. 2024; 14(2): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.11113/aej.v14.20603
  29. Ehsan A, Yang Q. State-of-the-art techniques for modelling of uncertainties in active distribution network planning: A review. Applied Energy. 2019; 239: 1509–1523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.01.211
  30. Lazo J, Watts D. Stochastic model for active distribution networks planning: An analysis of the combination of active network management schemes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2024; 191: 114156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2023.114156
  31. Zhang S, Cheng H, Wang D, Zhang L, Li F, Yao L. Distributed generation planning in active distribution network considering demand side management and network reconfiguration. Applied Energy. 2018; 228: 1921–1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.054
  32. Jooshaki M, Farzin H, Abbaspour A, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M, Lehtonen M. A model for stochastic planning of distribution network and autonomous DG units. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics. 2020; 16(6): 3685–3696. https://doi.org/10.1109/tii.2019.2936280
  33. Akbar MI, Kazmi SaA, Alrumayh O, Khan Z A, Altamimi A, Malik MM. A novel hybrid Optimization-Based algorithm for the single and Multi-Objective achievement with optimal DG allocations in distribution networks. IEEE Access. 2022; 10: 25669–25687. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2022.3155484.
  34. Georgilakis PS, Hatziargyriou ND. Optimal Distributed Generation placement in power distribution networks: models, methods, and future research. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2013; 28(3): 3420–3428. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpwrs.2012.2237043
  35. Montoya OD, Gil-González W, Grisales-Noreña L. An exact MINLP model for optimal location and sizing of DGs in distribution networks: A general algebraic modeling system approach. Ain Shams Engineering Journal. 2020; 11(2): 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2019.08.011
  36. Sanjay R, Jayabarathi T, Raghunathan T, Ramesh V, Mithulananthan N. Optimal allocation of distributed generation using hybrid Grey Wolf Optimizer. IEEE Access. 2017; 5: 14807–14818. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2017.2726586
  37. Sharma A, Chakraborty P, Datta M, Hasan KN. Optimal placement and sizing of PV-Based DG units in a distribution network considering loading capacity. arXiv (Cornell University). 2026. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2602.16565
  38. Ganguly S. Multi-objective distributed generation penetration planning with load model using particle SWARM optimization. Decision Making Applications in Management and Engineering. 2020; 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003065g
  39. Cikan M, Cikan NN, Kekezoglu B. Determination of optimal island regions with simultaneous DG allocation and reconfiguration in power distribution networks. IET Renewable Power Generation. 2025; 19(1): e12942. https://doi.org/10.1049/rpg2.12942
  40. Almabsout EA, El-Sehiemy RA, An ONU, Bayat O. A hybrid Local Search-Genetic algorithm for simultaneous placement of DG units and shunt capacitors in radial distribution systems. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 54465–54481. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2981406
  41. Pesaran HA, M Nazari-Heris M, Mohammadi-Ivatloo B, Seyedi H. A hybrid genetic particle swarm optimization for distributed generation allocation in power distribution networks. Energy. 2020; 209: 118218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118218
  42. Kumar DM, Reddy SS, Sujatha P. Optimal DG and Capacitor Allocation Along with Network Reconfiguration Using Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm. International Journal of Electrical and Electronics Research. 2024; 12(4): 1495–1501. https://doi.org/10.37391/ijeer.120445
  43. Sultana U, Khairuddin AB, Mokhtar A, Zareen N, Sultana B. Grey wolf optimizer based placement and sizing of multiple distributed generation in the distribution system. Energy. 2016; 111: 525–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.128
  44. Prabha DR, Jayabarathi T. Optimal placement and sizing of multiple distributed generating units in distribution networks by invasive weed optimization algorithm. Ain Shams Engineering Journal.2016; 7(2): 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.05.014
  45. Hosseini H, Nezhad AE, Estahbanati MSJ. Optimal siting and sizing of distributed generation units and energy storage systems for reconfigurable distribution networks. Journal of Energy Storage. 2026; 156, 121555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2026.121555
  46. Salam IU, Yousif M, Numan M, Zeb K, Billah M. Optimizing distributed generation placement and sizing in distribution systems: a Multi-Objective analysis of power losses, reliability, and operational constraints. Energies. 2023; 16(16): 5907. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16165907
  47. Nicodemus K, Muriithi C, Mambo S. Maintaining the electrical distribution grid network reliability with distributed photovoltaic generations. Journal of Energy Systems. 2025; 9(1): 116-131. https://doi.org/10.30521/jes.1527231