KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Tavlama benzetim algoritmasıyla portföy optimizasyonu: Borsa İstanbul uygulaması

The portfolio optimization with simulated annealing algorithm: An application of Borsa Istanbul

Seyyide Doğan(KARAMANOGLU MEHMETBEY UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7835-7905
Müge Sağlam Bezgin(KARAMANOĞLU MEHMETBEY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8674-2707
Emine Karaçayır(KARAMANOĞLU MEHMETBEY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0512-9084
Sayfa
1–15
Yayın Tarihi
2024-02-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Markowitz kısıtlı ortalama-varyans modeline dayanarak elde edilen kısıtsız etkin sınıra yaklaşabilmek için, düşük risk düzeyinde varlık sayısının daha fazla, yüksek risk seviyesinde varlık sayısının daha az olması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Finans alanının önemli konularından Markowitz’in kısıtlı ortalama-varyans modelinde, portföye dahil edilecek varlık sayısı sınırlandırılır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Kuadratik ve tamsayılı programlama problem sınıfına ait genelleştirilmiş bu problemin, boyut sayısının artmasıyla çözümünün standart yöntemlerle elde edilmesi zordur.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Markowitz kısıtlı ortalama-varyans modeline dayanarak elde edilen kısıtsız etkin sınıra yaklaşabilmek için, düşük risk düzeyinde varlık sayısının daha fazla, yüksek risk seviyesinde varlık sayısının daha az olması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Portföy optimizasyonu · markowitz ortalama-varyans modeli · tavlama benzetim

Özet

Finans alanının önemli konularından Markowitz’in kısıtlı ortalama-varyans modelinde, portföye dahil edilecek varlık sayısı sınırlandırılır. Kuadratik ve tamsayılı programlama problem sınıfına ait genelleştirilmiş bu problemin, boyut sayısının artmasıyla çözümünün standart yöntemlerle elde edilmesi zordur. Bu çalışmada yerel arama tabanlı meta-sezgisel yöntemlerden olan tavlama benzetim (TB) algoritması tercih edilmiş, geliştirilen TB algoritması Hang-Seng benchmark veri setine uygulanmış, sonuçlar öncü çalışmalarla kıyaslanmıştır. Markowitz kısıtlı ortalama-varyans modeline dayanarak elde edilen kısıtsız etkin sınıra yaklaşabilmek için, düşük risk düzeyinde varlık sayısının daha fazla, yüksek risk seviyesinde varlık sayısının daha az olması gerektiği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Abstract

One of the key concepts in finance is Markowitz’s constrained mean-variance model, the number of assets to be included in the portfolio is restricted. The solution of this generalized problem, which belongs to the quadratic and integer programming problem class, as the number of dimensions increases, is difficult to obtain with standard methods. In this study, the simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, which is one of the local search-based meta-heuristic methods, was preferred. The developed SA algorithm was applied to the Hang-Seng benchmark data set, and the results were compared with pioneering studies. According to the experimental results, upon the performance of the algorithm was found to be sufficient, the SA algorithm was applied for the Borsa Istanbul 30 index. The results of the experiments based on the Markowitz mean-variance model demonstrate that, while more assets must be maintained at lower risk levels to converge an unconstrained efficient frontier and the number of assets needed to do so decreases as risk rises

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Doğan, S., Bezgin, M. S., Karaçayır, E. (2024). Tavlama benzetim algoritmasıyla portföy optimizasyonu: Borsa İstanbul uygulaması. Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30855/gjeb.2024.10.1.001

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Abuelfadl, M. (2017). Quantum particle swarm optimization for short-team portfolios, Journal of Accounting and Finance. 17(8), 121-137.
  2. Ackora-Prah, J., Gyamerah, S. A., Andam, P. S., and Gyamfi, D. (2014), Pattern search for portfolio selection, Applied Mathematical Science, 8(143), 7137-7147. Doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.12988/ams.2014.46425
  3. Adıgüzel Mercangöz, B. (2019). Parçacık sürü optimizasyonu ile portföy optimizasyonu: Borsa İstanbul ulaştırma sektörü hisseleri üzerine bir uygulama. Journal of Yasar University, 14 (Special Issue), 126-136.
  4. Akyer, H., Kalaycı, C. B. and Aygören, H. (2018), Ortalama varyans portföy optimizasyonu için parçacık sürü optimizasyonu algoritması: Bir Borsa İstanbul uygulaması. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 24(1), 124-129. Doi: http://doi.org/ 10.5505/pajes.2017.91145
  5. Baykasoğlu, A., Yunusoglu, M. G. and Özsoydan F. B. (2015). A GRASP based solution approach to solve cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problems. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 90(2015), 339-351. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.10.009.
  6. Bermúdez, J. D., Segura, J. V. and Vercher, E. (2012), A multi-objective genetic algorithm for cardinality constrained fuzzy portfolio selection, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 188(1), 16-26. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2011.05.013
  7. Çelenli, A. Z., Eğrioğlu, E. and Çorba, B. Ş. (2015), İMKB 30 indeksini oluşturan hisse senetleri için parçacık sürü optimizasyonu yöntemlerine dayalı portföy optimizasyonu, Dogus Univesity Journal, 6(1), 25-33.
  8. Cerny, V. (1985). Thermo dynamical approach to the traveling salesman problem: an efficient simulation algorithm, J. Optimisation Theory Appl, 45(1), 41-51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00940812.
  9. Cesarone, F., Scozzari, A. and Tardella, F. (2013), A new method for mean-variance portfolio optimization with cardinality constraints, Annals of Operations Research, 205(1), 213–234. Doi: http://doi:10.1007/s10479-012-1165-7.
  10. Chang, T. J, Yang, S. C. and Chang, K. J. (2009), Portfolio optimization problems in different risk measures using genetic algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications, 36(7), 10529-10537. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.02.062
  11. Chang, T.J, Meade, N., Beasley J. E. and Sharaiha, Y.M. (2000), Heuristics for cardinality constrained portfolio optimisation, Computers and Operations Research, 27, 1271-1302.
  12. Chen, B., Lin, Y., Zeng, W., Xu, H. and Zhang, D. (2017), The mean-variance cardinality constrained portfolio optimization problem using a local search-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. Applied Intelligence, 47(2), 505-525. Doi:10.1007/s10489-017-0898-z
  13. Chen, Y., Mabu, S. and Hirasawa, K. (2011), Genetic relation algorithm with guided mutation for the large-scale portfolio optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3353-3363. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.120
  14. Corazza, M, Fasano, G. and Gusso, R. (2013), Particle swarm optimization with non-smooth penalty reformulation, for a complex portfolio selection problem, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 224, 611-624. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2013.07.091
  15. Coutino-Gomez, C.A., Torres-Jimenez J. and Villarreal-Antelo B.M. (2003), Heuristic methods for portfolio selection at the Mexican stock exchange In J. Liu, Y. Cheung and H. Yin (Eds.), Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  16. Crama, Y. and Schyns, M. (2003), Portfolio selection problems, European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3), 546-571.
  17. Cura, T. (2009), Particle swarm optimization approach to portfolio optimization, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, 10(4), 2396-2406. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nonrwa.2008.04.023
  18. Delahaye D., Chaimatanan, S. and Mongeau, M. (2018). Simulated annealing: From basics to applications. In M. Gendreau and J. Y. Potvin (Eds.), Handbook of Metaheuristics. International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, 272. Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91086-4_1.
  19. Deng, G.F., Lin, W.T. and Lo, C.C. (2012), Markowitz based portfolio selection with cardinality constraints using improved particle swarm optimization. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(4), 4558-4566. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.129
  20. Eshlaghy, T.A., Abdolahi, A., Moghadasi, M. and Maatofi, A. (2011), Using genetic and particle swarm algorithms to select and optimize portfolios of companies admitted to Tehran stock exchange, Research Journal of Internatıonal Studies, 20, 95-105.
  21. Fastrich, B. and Winker, P. (2012), Robust portfolio optimization with a hybrid heuristic algorithm, Computational Management Science, 9(1), 63-88. Doi: https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10287-010-0127-2
  22. Fernandez, A. and Gomez, S. (2007), Portfolio selection using neural networks, Computers and Operations Research, 34(4), 1177–1191.
  23. García, F., Guijarro, F. and Oliver, J. (2018), Index tracking optimization with cardinality constraint: a performance comparison of genetic algorithms and tabu search heuristics, Neural Computing and Applications, 30(8), 2625-2641.
  24. Golmakani, H. R. and Fazel, M. (2011), Constrained portfolio selection using particle swarm optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(7), 8327-8335. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.01.020
  25. Gorgulho, A., Neves, R. and Horta, N. (2011), Applying a GA kernel on optimizing technical analysis rules for stock picking and portfolio composition, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14072-14085. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.216
  26. Hsu, C. M. (2014), An integrated portfolio optimisation procedure based on data envelopment analysis, artificial bee colony algorithm and genetic programming, International Journal of Systems Science, 45(12), 2645-2664. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207721.2013.775388
  27. Jadhav, D. and Ramanathan, T.V. (2018), Portfolio optimization based on modified expected shortfall, Studies in Economics and Finance, 36(3), 440-463. Doi: 10.1108/SEF-05-2018-0160.
  28. Jalota, H. and Thakur, M. (2018), Genetic algorithm designed for solving portfolio optimization problems subjected to cardinality constraint, International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 9(1), 294-305. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0574-z
  29. Kalaycı, C. B., Ertenlice, O. and Akbay, M. A. (2019), A comprehensive review of deterministic models and applications for mean-variance portfolio optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 125, 345-368. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.02.011
  30. Kalaycı, C. B., Ertenlice, O., Akyer and H., Aygören, H. (2017-b), An artificial bee colony algorithm with feasibility enforcement and infeasibility toleration procedures for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 85, 61–75. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.05.018
  31. Kalaycı, C. B., Ertenlice, Ö., Akyer, H. and Aygören, H. (2017-a). A review on the current applications of genetic algorithms in mean-variance portfolio optimization. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences, 23(4), 470-476. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5505/pajes.2017.37132
  32. Kalaycı, C.B., Polat O. and Akbay M.A. (2020), An efficient hybrid metaheuristic algorithm for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 54 (2020) 100662. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.swevo.2020.100662
  33. Kamali, S. (2014), Portfolio optimization using particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithm, Journal of Mathematics and Computer Science, 10(2), 85-90.
  34. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C.D. and Vecchi, M.P. (1983). Optimization by simulated annealing. Science, 220(1), 671–680.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.220.4598.67
  35. Kumar C., Doja M.N. and Baig M.A. (2018), A novel framework for portfolio optimization based on modified simulated annealing algorithm using ANN, RBFN, and ABC algorithms, In S. Chakraverty, A. Goel And S. Misra (Eds.) Towards Extensible and Adaptable Methods İn Computing. Singapore: Springer: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2348-5_13.
  36. Lukovac, V., Pamucar D., Popovic, M. and Dorovic, B. (2017), Portfolio model for analyzing human resources: an approach based on neuro-fuzzy modeling and the simulated annealing algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications 90(1), 318-331. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.034
  37. Maringer, D. and Kellerer, H. (2003), Optimization of cardinality constrained portfolios with a hybrid local search algorithm OR Spectrum, 25(4), 481-495.Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-003-0139-1
  38. Markowitz, H. (1952), Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance, (1), 77-91.
  39. Meghwani, S. S. and Thakur, M. (2018), Multi - objective heuristic algorithms for practical portfolio optimization and rebalancing with transaction, Cost Applied Soft Computing, 67, 865-894 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2017.09.025.
  40. Metaxiotis, K., and Liagkouras, K. (2012). Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms for portfolio management: A comprehensive literature review. Expert Systems With Applications, 39(14), 11685-11698. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.053
  41. Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth A.W., Rosenbluth, M.N., Teller, A.H. and Teller E., (1953), Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines, J. Chem. Phys. 21(6), 1087-1092.
  42. Moradi, N., Kayvanfar, V. and Rafiee, M. (2021), An efficient population-based simulated annealing algorithm for 0–1 knapsack problem, Engineering with Computers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-020-01240-3.
  43. Moral-Escudero, R., Ruiz-Torrubiano, R. and Suarez, A. (2006), Selection of optimal investment portfolios with cardinality constraints, IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation,Doi: http://doi:10.1109/CEC.2006.1688603.
  44. Mozafari, M., Jolai, F. and Tafazzoli, S. (2011), A new IPSO-SA approach for cardinality constrained portfolio optimization, International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 2(2), 249-262. Doi: https://doi.org/10.5267/j.ijiec.2011.01.004
  45. Ni, Q., Yin, X., Tian, K. and Zhai, Y. (2017), Particle swarm optimization with dynamic random population topology strategies for a generalized portfolio selection problem, Natural Computing, 16(1), 31-44. Doi: https://doi.org /10.1007/s11047-016-9541-x
  46. Özdemir, M. (2011), Genetik algoritma kullanarak portföy seçimi, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 26(229), 43-66.
  47. Pandari, A. R., Azar, A. and Shavazi, A. R. (2012), Genetic algorithms for portfolio selection problems with non-linear objectives, African Journal of Business Management, 6(20), 6209-6216. Doi: https://doi.org /10.5897/AJBM11.2876
  48. Qodsi, S., Tehrani, R. and Bashiri, M. (2015), Portfolio optimization with simulated annealing algorithm, Financial Research Journal, 17(1), 141-158. doi: 10.22059/jfr.2015.52036.
  49. Sadigh A.N, Mokhtari, H., Iranpoor, M. and Fatemi-Ghomi, SMT. (2012), Cardinality constrained portfolio optimization using a hybrid approach based on particle swarm optimization and hopfield neural network, Advanced Science Letters, 17(1), 11-20. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2012.3666
  50. Sasaki, M., Laamrani, A., Yamashiro, M., Alehegn, C. and Kamoyedji, A. (2018), Portfolio optimization by fuzzy interactive genetic algorithm, Journal of Advanced Management Science, 6(3).
  51. Schaerf, A. (2002), Local search techniques for constrained portfolio selection problems, Computational Economics, 20(3), 177-190.
  52. Sen, T., Saha, S., Ekbal, A. and Laha, A.K. (2014), Bi - objective portfolio optimization using archive multi-objective simulated annealing, International Conference on High Performance Computing and Applications (ICHPCA). Doi: http://doi:10.1109/ICHPCA.2014.7045343.
  53. Shaw, D.X., Liu, S. and Kopman, L. (2008), Lagrangian relaxation procedure for cardinality-constrained portfolio optimization, Optimization Methods and Software, 23(3), 411-420. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10556780701722542
  54. Shoaf, J. and Foster J. A. (1998), Efficient set GA for stock portfolios, IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence,Doi: http://doi:10.1109/ICEC.1998.699758.
  55. Speranza, M. G. (1996), A heuristic algorithm for a portfolio optimization model applied to the milan stock market, Computers and Operations Research, 23 (5), 433-441. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(95)00030-5
  56. Sun, J., Fang, W., Wu, X., Lai, C.H. and Xu, W. (2011), Solving the multi-stage portfolio optimization problem with a novel particle swarm optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(6), 6727-6735. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.11.061
  57. Vasiani, V. D., Handari, B. D. and Hertono, G. F. (2020), Stock portfolio optimization using priority index and genetic algorithm, In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1442 (1) 12031. Doi: https://doi.org 10.1088/1742-6596/1442/1/012031
  58. Wang, J., Chen, W.N., Zhang, J. and Lin Y. (2015), A dimension-decreasing particle swarm optimization method for portfolio optimization, Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO Companion’15), Doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/2739482.2764652.
  59. Wong, W. K. (2020), Review on behavioral economics and behavioral finance, Studies in Economics and Finance, 37(4), 1086-7376. Doi: 10.1108/SEF-10-2019-0393.
  60. Woodside-Oriakhi, M., Lucas, C. and Beasley, J. E. (2011), Heuristic algorithms for the cardinality constrained efficient frontier, European Journal of Operational Research, 213(3), 538-550. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.03.030
  61. Yakut, E. and Çankal, A. (2016), Çok amaçlı genetik algoritma ve hedef programlama metotlarini kullanarak hisse senedi portföy optimizasyonu: Bist-30’da bir uygulama, Business and Economics Research Journal, 7(2), 43. Doi: https://doi.org 10.20409/berj.2016217495
  62. Yin, X., Ni, Q. and Zhai, Y. (2015), A novel PSO for portfolio optimization based on heterogeneous multiple population strategy, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2015.7257025.
  63. Zeren, F. and Bayğın, M. (2015), Genetik algoritmalar ile optimal portföy seçimi: Bist-30 örneği, Journal of Business Research Turk, 7(1), 309-324.
  64. Zhu, H., Wang, Y., Wang, K. and Chen, Y. (2011), Particle swarm optimization (PSO) for the constrained portfolio optimization problem, Expert Systems with Applications, 38(8), 10161-10169. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.02.075