KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2019 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

The Teacher Professional Development Student Assessment Scale: A Tool for Principals

Kıvanç BOZKUŞ
Sayfa
375–405
Yayın Tarihi
2019-11-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

School principals can use the scale to determine the professional development levels of teachers and can make necessary interventions to achieve better quality in teaching.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research aims to develop a teacher professional development assessment scale based on the dynamic professional development approach.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The resulting Teacher Professional Development Student Assessment Scale is a data collection tool consisting of 27 items under 7 factors and can explain 62.90% of the total variance.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:School principals can use the scale to determine the professional development levels of teachers and can make necessary interventions to achieve better quality in teaching.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dynamic approach · professional development · assessment

Abstract

This research aims to develop a teacher professional development assessment scale based on the dynamic professional development approach. The resulting Teacher Professional Development Student Assessment Scale is a data collection tool consisting of 27 items under 7 factors and can explain 62.90% of the total variance. The items have a five-point Likert scale ranging from never (1) to always (5). The Cronbach alpha reliability coefficients of the factors range from 0.66 to 0.83. The factor loads of the items ranged from 0.47 to 0.82. The construct validity of the scale was confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The criterion validity of the scale was tested using a parallel scale. The scale measures the teaching-related characteristics that can determine the professional development level of the teachers from all branches. It is concluded that the scale developed in this research can be used to assess teacher professional development according to student perceptions. School principals can use the scale to determine the professional development levels of teachers and can make necessary interventions to achieve better quality in teaching.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BOZKUŞ, K. (2019). The Teacher Professional Development Student Assessment Scale: A Tool for Principals. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 375–405. https://ajindex.com/articles/139143

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(3), 291-311.
  2. Baines, L. A., & Stanley, G. K. (2006). The iatrogenic consequences of standards-based education. Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 79(3), 119-123.
  3. Bathmaker, A. (2000). Standardising teaching: The introduction of the national standards for teaching and supporting learning in further education in England and Wales. Journal of In-Service Education, 26(1), 9-23.
  4. Buchanan, J. (2012). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: A teacher-as-learner centred approach. International Journal of Learning, 18(10), 345-356.
  5. Budak, Y., & Demirel, Ö. (2003). Öğretmenlerin hizmetiçi eğitim ihtiyacı. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 33, 62-81.
  6. Bümen, N. T., Ateş, A., Çakar, E., Ural, G., & Acar, V. (2012). Türkiye bağlamında öğretmenlerin mesleki gelişimi: Sorunlar ve öneriler. Milli Eğitim, 194, 31-50.
  7. Ceylan, M., & Özdemir, S. M. (2016). Türkiye ve İngiltere’deki öğretmenlerin sürekli mesleki gelişime ilişkin görüşlerinin ve katılım durumlarının incelenmesi. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 397-417.
  8. Chyung, S. Y., Stepich, D., & Cox, D. (2006). Building a competency-based curriculum architecture to educate 21st-century business practitioner. Journal of Education for Business, 81(6), 307-314.
  9. Clement, M., & Vandenberghe, R. (2001). How school leaders can promote teachers' professional development: An account from the field. School Leadership & Management, 21(1), 43-57. doi: 10.1080/13632430120033036 Cohen, R. J., & Swerdlik, M. (2009). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurement (7th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Cornford, I. R. (2002). Reflective teaching: Empirical research findings and some implications for teacher education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 54, 219-236.
  10. Creemers, B., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. New York: Routledge. Creemers, B., Kyriakides, L., & Antoniou, P. (2013). Teacher professional development for improving quality of teaching. Dordrecht: Springer. Çalık, C., & Şehitoğlu, E. T. (2006). Okul müdürlerinin insan kaynakları yönetimi işlevlerini yerine getirebilme yeterlikleri. Milli Eğitim De