Dergiler / Denetişim / 2019 / Sayı: 19

SİBER HİJYENİN SAĞLANMASINDA İÇ DENETİMİN ROLÜ

THE ROLE OF INTERNAL AUDITING IN PROVIDING CYBER HYGIENE

Alptuğ Güler(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8439-9511
Ali Kasım Arkın(DÜZCE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6826-0998
Sayfa
17–40
Yayın Tarihi
2019-06-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu makalede, siber güvenlik ve siber hijyen bağlamında  iç denetçilerin ve iç denetimin siber rolü değerlendiril mektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Dünya tarihinde en yıkıcı savaşlar olarak 1. ve 2.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Siber dünyadaki siber savaşların siber  saldırganları, kendilerini 7 gün / 24 saat hazırlamakta  ve çok uzun olmayan bir gelecekte bir ameliyathanenin  enerji sistemlerini kesintiye uğratma, metro hattındaki  trenleri çarpıştırma, fabrikaların üretim hatlarını dur durma gibi teknolojik saldırı potansiyeline sahip olma  yolunda ilerlemektedirler.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu makalede, siber güvenlik ve siber hijyen bağlamında  iç denetçilerin ve iç denetimin siber rolü değerlendiril mektedir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Siber Güvenlik · Siber Hijyen · İç Denetim

Özet

Dünya tarihinde en yıkıcı savaşlar olarak 1. ve 2. Dün ya Savaşları kabul edilmektedir. Ancak bu durum artık  değişmektedir. Siber dünyadaki siber savaşların siber  saldırganları, kendilerini 7 gün / 24 saat hazırlamakta  ve çok uzun olmayan bir gelecekte bir ameliyathanenin  enerji sistemlerini kesintiye uğratma, metro hattındaki  trenleri çarpıştırma, fabrikaların üretim hatlarını dur durma gibi teknolojik saldırı potansiyeline sahip olma  yolunda ilerlemektedirler. Ülke, kurum ve kişisel kul lanıcı olarak, teknolojik araçların sahip olduğu siber  riskler göz önünde bulundurulduğunda bu risklerin  kontrolü için siber güvenlik ve siber güvenlik risk yöne timi temelli yaklaşım önem kazanmaktadır. Siber hijyen,  siber bilgi güvenliği ile ilgili temel bir ilkedir ve kişisel  hijyenle benzerlik gösterdiği gibi, siber tehditlerden kay naklanan riskleri en aza indirgemek için basit rutin ön lemler almanın eşdeğeridir. Bu bağlamda, bir olgunluk  modeli olarak siber hijyen, kişisel hijyen ile aynı önemde  görülmeli ve bir kuruma düzgün şekilde entegre edildi ğinde, kurumsal siber bağışıklık sistemleri ve sağlıkları nın en iyi durumda olacağı göz önünde bulundurulma lıdır. Günümüz kurumları için bu denli kritik olan risk  yönetimi ve siber güvenlik sitemleri için gerekli bağım sız güvence, iç denetim tarafından benzersiz bir şekilde  sağlanabilir. İç denetçiler bu süreçte önemli danışmanlar  olabilir. Bu bakımdan, siber güvenliğin oluşturulması  sürecinde siber hijyenden başlayarak üçüncü savunma  hattına kadar iç denetim faaliyetinin siber rolü her geçen  gün artmaktadır. Bu makalede, siber güvenlik ve siber hijyen bağlamında  iç denetçilerin ve iç denetimin siber rolü değerlendiril mektedir.

Abstract

The most destructive wars in the history of the world are  accepted as the first and second world wars. However, this  situation is changing now. The cyber attackers of cyber  wars in the cyber world prepare themselves for 7 days /  24 hours, and in the not too long future, they are on the  way to interrupt the energy systems of an operating room,  collide the trains in the subway line, and have the poten tial of technological attacks such as stopping the produc tion lines of the factories. As a country, organization and  personal user, the cyber security and cyber security risk  management based approach is important for controlling  these risks when the cyber risks of technological tools are  taken into consideration. Cyber hygiene is a fundamental  principle of cyber information security and is equivalent  to personal hygiene and is equivalent to taking simple rou tine measures to minimize the risks associated with cyber  threats. In this context, cyber hygiene as a model of matu rity should be seen as of the same importance as personal  hygiene, and when integrated properly into an organiza tion, it should be considered that organizational cyber im mune systems and health are in the best condition. The  independent assurance for risk management and cyber se curity systems that are so critical for today’s organizations  can be uniquely provided by internal audit. Internal audi tors may be important consultants in this process. In this  respect, starting from cyber hygiene in the process of cyber  security creation the cyber role of internal audit activity is  increasing day by day until the third line of defense. In this article, the cyber role of internal auditors and in ternal audit is evaluated in the context of cyber security  and cyber hygiene

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Güler, A., Arkın, A. K. (2019). SİBER HİJYENİN SAĞLANMASINDA İÇ DENETİMİN ROLÜ. Denetişim, Sayı: 19, 17–40. https://ajindex.com/articles/1380815

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. Ahıa ve Protıvıtı, (2016) Cybersecurity, IT Transformation and Analytics - Addressing Priorities for Internal Auditors in U.S. Healthcare Provider Organizations, Ahia and Protiviti.
  2. Ahıa ve Protıvıtı, (2017) Cybersecurity, Data Analytics and Other Priorities for Internal Auditors in U.S. Healthcare Providers, Ahia and Protiviti.
  3. AICPA, (2017) Reporting on an Entity’s Cybersecurity Risk Management Program and Controls, American Institute ofCertified Public Accountants Inc.
  4. Antonuccı D,, (2017) “Internal Organization Context”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, JohnWiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  5. Antonuccı D. ve Verstıchel D., (2017) “Epilogue”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  6. Bayuk J. L., Healey J., Rohmeyer P., Sachs M. H., Schmıdt J. ve Weıss J., (2012) Cyber Security Policy Guidebook, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  7. BSI, (2008) Information Security Audit (IS audit): - A Guideline for IS Audits Based on IT-Grundschutz, German Federal Office for Information Security.
  8. Caravellı J. ve JONES N., (2019) Cyber Security: Threats and Responses for Government and Business, Praeger Security International.
  9. CBN, (2018) Risk-Based Cybersecurity Framework and Guidelines for Deposit Money Banks and Payment Service Providers, Central Bank of Nigeria.
  10. CMM, (2016) Cybersecurity Capacity Maturity Model for Nations (CMM) Revised Edition, Global Cyber Security Capacity Centre University of Oxford.
  11. DELOITTE, (2015) Cybersecurity: The Role of Internal Audit, Deloitte.
  12. DELOITTE, (2017) Cybersecurity and the Role of Internal Audit: An Urgent Call to Action, Deloitte.
  13. ENISA, (2016) Review of Cyber Hygiene practices, European Union Agency For Network and Information Security.
  14. EY, (2011) The Evolving IT Risk Landscape: The Why and How of IT Risk Management Today, Ernst & Young.
  15. FFIEC, (2015) FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.
  16. FINRA, (2018) Report on Selected Cybersecurity Practices - 2018, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority https://www.finra.org/sites/default/files/Cybersecurity_Report_2018.pdf Erişim Tarihi: 12.02.2019.
  17. Fountaın L., (2019, February) “Internal Audit’s Evolving Cybersecurity Role”, Internal Auditor, 19-21.
  18. Frazıer & Deeter, (2015) Cybersecurity: Considerations for Internal Audit, IIA Atlanta Chapter Meeting, Frazier & Deeter.
  19. GAC 16, (2016) Global Agenda Council on Cybersecurity, White Paper, World Economic Forum: Geneva.
  20. GTAG, (2016) Assessing Cybersecurity Risk: Roles of the Three Lines of Defense, The Institute of Internal Auditors.
  21. Hale r., (2017) “Foreword The State of Cybersecurity”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  22. Hermans J. ve Dıemont T., (2017) “Treating Cyber Risks”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  23. Holmes C. ve Phıllıppe J., (2017) “Cybersecurity for Operations and Communications”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  24. IIAC, (2015) IIAC Cybersecurity Guidebook, Investment Industry Association of Canada.
  25. ISACA, (2016) Information Systems Auditing: Tools and Techniques- Creating Audit Programs, ISACA.
  26. ISACA, (2017) Auditing Cyber Security: Evaluating Risk and Auditing Controls, ISACA.
  27. ISPG-SM01, (2017) Information Security: Practice Guide for Security Risk Assessment & Audit, Office of the Government Chief Information Officer-The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
  28. ITGI, (2003) Board Briefing on IT Governance, 2nd ed., IT Governance Institute.
  29. ITGI, (2006) Information Security Govenance for Board of Directors and Executive Management, 2nd ed., IT Governance Institute.
  30. ITRC, (2017) Data Breach Reports: 2016 End of Year Report, Identity Theft Resource Center.
  31. ITRC, (2019) Data Breach Report: 2018 End of Year Report, Identity Theft Resource Center.
  32. ITU-T X.1208, (2014) Series X: Data Networks, Open System Communıcations and Security: Cyberspace Security – Cybersecurity, International Telecommunication Union.
  33. Jamıson J., Morrıs L. ve Wılkınson C., (2018) The Future of Cybersecurıty in Internal Audit, The Internal Audit Foundation.
  34. KPMG, (2018) Siber Güvenlik Olgunluk Değerlendirmesi, KPMG.
  35. Lı K. C., Chen X. ve SusılO W., (2019a) “Foreword I-II”, Advances in Cyber Security: Principles, Techniques, and Applications, Ed.: Kuan-Ching Li, Xiaofeng Chen, Willy Susilo, Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.: Singapore.
  36. Lıng C., (2017) “Information Asset Management for Cyber”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  37. Lınkov I., Eısenberg D. A., Plourde K., Seager T. P, Allen, J. ve Kott A., (2013) “Resilience Metrics for Cyber Systems”, Environment Systems and Decisions, 33(4), 471-476.
  38. Keys B. ve Shapıro S., (2019) “Frameworks and Best Practices”, Cyber Resilience of Systems and Networks, Ed.: Alexander Kott, Igor Linkov, Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature: Switzerland.
  39. Mccarthy Tétrault, (2017) Cybersecurity Risk Management: A Practical Guide for Businesses, McCarthy Tétrault.
  40. NACD, (2017) Cyber-Risk Oversight, Director’s Handbook, National Association of Corporate Directors.
  41. Nhede N., (2017) “Grid Automation Drives Increase in Utility Cybersecurity Investments: Report”. Smart Energy International. 10 August 2017, https://www.smart-energy.com/industry-sectors/smart-grid/cybersecurity-technologies-navigant-research/, Erişim Tarihi: 19.02.2019.
  42. ONG-C2M2, (2014) Oil and Natural Gas Subsector Cybersecurity Capabılity Maturity Model, U.S.Department of Homeland Security-Department of Energy.
  43. Protıvıtı, (2016) Cybersecurity, IT Transformation and Analytics – Addressing Priorities for Internal Auditors in U.S. Healthcare Provider Organizations, Assoc. of Internal Auditors.
  44. Rodrıguez A,, (2017) “Monitoring and Review Using Key Risk Indicators (KRIs)”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  45. Sadek K. ve CLOSE C., (2015) The Changing IT Risk Landscape: Understanding and Managing Existing and Emerging Risks, Deloitte.
  46. SAMA, (2017) Cyber Security Framework, Saudi Arabian Monetary Authority.
  47. Souppaya M., Stıne K., Sımos M., Sweeney S. ve Scarfone K., (2018) Critical Cybersecurity Hygiene: Patching The Enterprise, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  48. Sunde S. J., (2017) “Assurance and Cyber Risk Management”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  49. Totade A. ve Godbole S., (2017) “Culture and Human Factors”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  50. VAndıjck I. ve Lerberghe P. V., (2017) “Physical Security”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  51. Vıllıers S., (2017) “Access Control”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.
  52. WEF, (2018) Cyber Resilience Playbook for Public-Private Collaboration, World Economic Forum: Geneva.
  53. Whıt G. B., (2011) “The community cyber security maturity model”, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (HST), 173-178.
  54. Wyatt M., (2017) “Cybersecurity Systems: Acquisition, Development, and Maintenance”, The Cyber Risk Handbook: Creating and Measuring Effective Cybersecurity Capabilities, Ed.: Domenic Antonucci, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, New Jersey.