KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Current Research in Social Sciences / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1

Kiloyla İlgili Zorluklar için Kabul ve Eylem Formu Revize Türkçe Uyarlaması ve Psikometrik Özellikleri

Turkish Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised

Buse Keskindağ(BAHÇEŞEHİR KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0827-0561
Hüseyin Güney(BAHÇEŞEHİR KIBRIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7924-1904
Meryem Karaaziz(YAKIN DOĞU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0085-612X
Sayfa
13–33
Yayın Tarihi
2024-05-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Genel olarak, KEFK-R'nin Türkçe versiyonu aşırı kilolu olmayan örneklemde kiloya bağlı deneyimsel kaçınmayı ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmanın amacı, revize edilmiş Kiloyla İlgili Zorluklar için Kabul ve Eylem Formu'nun (KEFK-R) Türkçeye uyarlanması ve aşırı kilolu olmayan bir örneklemde psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu kesitsel çalışmaya ağırlıklı olarak kadın bireyler (%83,2) katılmıştır ve örneklemin ortalama yaşı 21,5'tir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Genel olarak, KEFK-R'nin Türkçe versiyonu aşırı kilolu olmayan örneklemde kiloya bağlı deneyimsel kaçınmayı ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kabul ve Kararlılık Terapisi · Kiloya İlişkin Tutumlar · Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, revize edilmiş Kiloyla İlgili Zorluklar için Kabul ve Eylem Formu'nun (KEFK-R) Türkçeye uyarlanması ve aşırı kilolu olmayan bir örneklemde psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Bu kesitsel çalışmaya ağırlıklı olarak kadın bireyler (%83,2) katılmıştır ve örneklemin ortalama yaşı 21,5'tir. Nihai örneklem büyüklüğü 161 üniversite öğrencisinden oluşmaktadır. KEFK -R öncelikle Türkçeye çevrildi ve tekrardan İngilizce'ye çevrildi. Güvenilirlik için toplam KEFK-R puanı ve alt ölçekleri (yani kontrol amaçlı yemek, yaşama engeli olarak kilo ve damgalanması) için iç tutarlılık seviyeleri elde edildi. Genel deneyimsel kaçınma (KEF-II), Beden kaygısı (SFK), işlevsiz yeme tutumları (İYT-26), kaygı belirtileri (GKB-7) ve öznel mutluluk (SMÖ) ölçümleri yakınsak ve ıraksak geçerlilik açısından incelendi. Ölçeğin faktör yapısını incelemek amacıyla doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yapılmıştır. Üç faktörlü yapı modeli verilere iyi uyum sağlamıştır (χ2 [N = 161] = 81,27, p < 0,001, RMSEA = 0,098, %90 GA [0,072, 0,124]). KEFK -R'nin Türkçe versiyonu ve alt ölçekleri iyi düzeyde bir iç tutarlılığa işaret etmektedir (α değeri .70 ile .87 arasında değişmektedir). KEFK -R'nin genel deneyimsel kaçınma, işlevsiz yeme tutumları ve kaygı belirtileri ile pozitif yönde ilişkili olduğu bulundu ve bu da yakınsak geçerliliği desteklemektedir. KEFK-R ile öznel mutluluk arasında hiçbir ilişki saptanmamıştır. Genel olarak, KEFK-R'nin Türkçe versiyonu aşırı kilolu olmayan örneklemde kiloya bağlı deneyimsel kaçınmayı ölçmek için geçerli ve güvenilir bir araç olduğu söylenebilir.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the revised Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised (AAQW-R) into Turkish language and examine its psychometric properties in a nonoverweight sample. This cross-sectional study included predominantly female individuals (83.2%), and mean age of the sample was 21.5. Final sample size included 161 university students. AAQW-R was translated into Turkish and translated back into English. Internal consistency levels for the total AAQW-R score and its subscales (i.e., food as control, weight as barrier to living, and weight stigma) were obtained for reliability. Measures of general experiential avoidance (AAQ-II), body anxiety (SPAS), dysfunctional eating attitudes (EAT-26), anxiety symptoms (GAD-7) and subjective happiness (SHS) were examined for convergent and divergent validity. Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the scale. The three-factor structure model was a good fit to the data (χ2 [N = 161] = 81.27, p < .001, RMSEA = .098, 90% CI [.072, .124]). The Turkish version of AAQW-R and the subscales indicated a good level of internal consistency (α value ranging between .70 and .87). AAQW-R was found positively correlated with general experiential avoidance, dysfunctional eating attitudes and anxiety symptoms, indicating support for convergent validity. No relationship between AAQW-R and subjective happiness demonstrated evidence for divergent validity. Overall, the Turkish version of AAQW-R is valid and reliable tool to measure weight-related experiential avoidance in nonoverweight sample.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Keskindağ, B., Güney, H., Karaaziz, M. (2024). Kiloyla İlgili Zorluklar için Kabul ve Eylem Formu Revize Türkçe Uyarlaması ve Psikometrik Özellikleri. Current Research in Social Sciences, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 1, 13–33. https://doi.org/10.30613/curesosc.1388938

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Allen, K. L., Byrne, S. M., Blair, E. M., & Davis, E. A. (2006). Why do some overweight children experience psychological problems? The role of weight and shape concern. International Journal of Pediatric Obesity, 1(4), 239-247.
  2. Alimoradi, Z., Golboni, F., Griffiths, M. D., Broström, A., Lin, C. Y., & Pakpour, A. H. (2020). Weight-related stigma and psychological distress: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Nutrition, 39(7), 2001-2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.016
  3. Arbuckle, J. (2008). Amos 17.0 user's guide. SPSS Inc.
  4. Association for Contextual Behavioral Science, (n.d.). AAQ-II. Retrieved December 21, 2022, from https://contextualscience.org/aaq_and_aaqii_in_30_languages
  5. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
  6. Blodorn, A., Major, B., Hunger, J., & Miller, C. (2016). Unpacking the psychological weight of weight stigma: A rejection-expectation pathway. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.12.003
  7. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K.,. & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
  8. Brown, T.A. (2014). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford.
  9. Byrne, S. M., Cooper, Z., & Fairburn, C. G. (2003). Weight maintenance and relapse in obesity: A qualitative study. International Journal of Obesity, 27, 955–962. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0802305
  10. Cardel, M. I., Lee, A. M., Chi, X., Newsome, F., Miller, D. R., Bernier, A.,. & Butryn, M. L. (2021). Feasibility/acceptability of an acceptance‐based therapy intervention for diverse adolescent girls with overweight/obesity. Obesity Science & Practice, 7(3), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.483
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2022, July 23). Body Mass Index (BMI). https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/assessing/bmi/index.html
  12. Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 189–225.
  13. Cohen, J (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
  14. Dochat, C., Afari, N., Wooldridge, J. S., Herbert, M. S., Gasperi, M., & Lillis, J. (2020). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised (AAQW-R) in a United States sample of adults with overweight and obesity. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 189-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.006
  15. Doğan, T., & Totan, T. (2013). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of the Subjective Happiness Scale. The Journal of Happiness & Well-Being, 1(1), 21-28.
  16. Dunn, K. J., & McCray, G. (2020). The place of the bifactor model in confirmatory factor analysis investigations into construct dimensionality in language testing. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1357. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01357
  17. Ergüney-Okumuş, F. E., & Sertel-Berk, H. Ö. (2020). The psychometric properties of the Eating Attitudes Test Short Form (EAT-26) in a college sample. Studies in Psychology, 40(1), 57-78. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2019-0039
  18. Garner, D. M., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1979). The eating attitudes test: An index of the symptoms of anorexia nervosa. Psychological Medicine, 9(2), 273-279.
  19. Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M. P., Bohr, Y., & Garfinkel, P. E. (1982). The eating attitudes test: Psychometric features and clinical correlates. Psychological Medicine, 12(4), 871-878.
  20. Hart, E. A., Leary, M. R., & Rejeski, W. J. (1989). Tie measurement of social physique anxiety. Journal of Sport and exercise Psychology, 11(1), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.11.1.94
  21. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D.,. & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553-578.
  22. Hill, M. L., Masuda, A., Melcher, H., Morgan, J. R., & Twohig, M. P. (2015). Acceptance and commitment therapy for women diagnosed with binge eating disorder: A case-series study. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 22(3), 367-378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.02.005
  23. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3(4), 424.
  24. Johnson, F., & Wardle, J. (2005). Dietary restraint, body dissatisfaction, and psychological distress: a prospective analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.1.119
  25. Karadere, M. E., Yavuz, K. F., Asafov, E. Y., & Küçükler, F. K. (2019). Reliability and validity of a Turkish Version of the Acceptance and Action Diabetes Questionnaire. Psychiatry investigation, 16(6), 418–424. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2019.02.26.2
  26. Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Guilford Publications.
  27. Kluck, A. S. (2010). Family influence on disordered eating: The role of body image dissatisfaction. Body Image, 7(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.09.009
  28. Konkan, R., Şenormancı, Ö., Güçlü, O., Aydin, E., & Sungur, M. Z. (2013). Validity and reliability study for the Turkish adaptation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Scale [Yaygın Anksiyete Bozukluğu-7 (YAB-7) Testi Türkçe uyarlaması, geçerlik ve güvenirliği]. Archives of Neuropsychiatry/Noropsikiatri Arsivi, 50(1), 53-58.
  29. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B., Monahan, P. O., & Löwe, B. (2007). Anxiety disorders in primary care: Prevalence, impairment, comorbidity, and detection. Annals of Internal Medicine, 146(5), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-146-5-200703060-00004
  30. Kuru, T., Karadere, M. E., Burhan, H. S., & Safak, Y. (2021). Reliability and validity study of the Turkish Version of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for University Students. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 11(1), 18-24. https://doi.org/10.5455/PBS.20201202024935
  31. Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2008). Measuring avoidance and inflexibility in weight related problems. International Journal of Behavioral Consultation and Therapy, 4(4), 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0100829
  32. Lillis, J., Hayes, S. C., Bunting, K., & Masuda, A. (2009). Teaching acceptance and mindfulness to improve the lives of the obese: A preliminary test of a theoretical model. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 37(1), 58-69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-009-9083-x
  33. Litwin, R., Goldbacher, E. M., Cardaciotto, L., & Gambrel, L. E. (2017). Negative emotions and emotional eating: The mediating role of experiential avoidance. Eating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia, Bulimia and Obesity, 22(1), 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-016-0301-9
  34. Lyubomirsky, S., & Lepper, H. S. (1999). A measure of subjective happiness: Preliminary reliability and construct validation. Social Indicators Research, 46(2), 137-155. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006824100041
  35. Major, B., Eliezer, D., & Rieck, H. (2012). The psychological weight of weight stigma. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 651-658. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611434400
  36. Manaf, N. A., Saravanan, C., & Zuhrah, B. (2016). The prevalence and inter-relationship of negative body image perception, depression and susceptibility to eating disorders among female medical undergraduate students. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 10(3), VC01-VC04. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2016/16678.7341
  37. Mento, C., Le Donne, M., Crisafulli, S., Rizzo, A., & Settineri, S. (2017). BMI at early puerperium: Body image, eating attitudes and mood states. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 37(4), 428-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2016.1250727
  38. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(4), 599-620. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0904_8
  39. Mülazimoğlu Balli, Ö., & Aşçı, F. H. (2006). Reliablity and validity of “Social Physique Anxiety Scale”. Hacettepe Journal of Sport Sciences, 17(1), 11-19. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sbd/issue/16400/171453
  40. Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., Hannan, P. J., Perry, C. L., & Irving, L. M. (2002). Weight-related concerns and behaviors among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents: Implications for preventing weight-related disorders. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 156(2), 171-178.
  41. Niemeier, H. M., Leahey, T., Reed, K. P., Brown, R. A., & Wing, R. R. (2012). An acceptance-based behavioral intervention for weight loss: a pilot study. Behavior Therapy, 43(2), 427-435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.10.005
  42. Nguyen-Rodriguez, S. T., Unger, J. B., & Spruijt-Metz, D. (2009). Psychological determinants of emotional eating in adolescence. Eating Disorders, 17(3), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10640260902848543
  43. O’Hara, L., Tahboub-Schulte, S., & Thomas, J. (2016). Weight-related teasing and internalized weight stigma predict abnormal eating attitudes and behaviours in Emirati female university students. Appetite, 102, 44-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.01.019
  44. Palmeira, L., Cunha, M., Pinto-Gouveia, J., Carvalho, S., & Lillis, J. (2016). New developments in the assessment of weight-related experiential avoidance (AAQW-Revised). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 5(3), 193-200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2016.06.001
  45. Pearson, A., Heffner, M., & Follette, V. (2010). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for body image dissatisfaction: A practitioner’s guide to using acceptance and mindfulness based behavior change strategies. New Harbinge
  46. Pearson, A. N., Follette, V. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). A pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy as a workshop intervention for body dissatisfaction and disordered eating attitudes. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19(1), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.03.001
  47. Pellegrini, R. A., Finzi, S., Veglia, F., & Di Fini, G. (2021). Narrative and bodily identity in eating disorders: Toward an integrated theoretical-clinical approach. Frontiers in Psychology, 12:785004, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.785004
  48. Pirmoradi, M.R., Asgharzadeh, A., Birashk, B. Gharaee, B., Salehian, R., Ostadrahimi, A. R., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2021) Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the weight-related experiential avoidance (AAQW): Overweight and obese treatment seeker at the clinical setting. BMC Psychiatry, 21, 335. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03352-6
  49. R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
  50. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), http://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
  51. Suhr, D. (2006). Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis. In SAS Users Group International Conference (pp. 1 - 17). SAS Institute, Inc.
  52. Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B., & Löwe, B. (2006). A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166(10), 1092–1097. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
  53. Spoor, S. T., Bekker, M. H., Van Strien, T., & van Heck, G. L. (2007). Relations between negative affect, coping, and emotional eating. Appetite, 48(3), 368-376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2006.10.005
  54. Stefano, E. C., Wagner, A. F., Mond, J. M., Cicero, D. C., & Latner, J. D. (2016). Loss of Control Over Eating Scale (LOCES): Validation in undergraduate men and women with and without eating disorder symptoms. Eating Behaviors, 23, 137-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.09.005
  55. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
  56. Uygur, H., Yavuz, K. F., Eren, İ., Uygur, O. F., Selcuk, M., Varsak, N.,. & Demirel, B. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the acceptance and action questionnaire-substance abuse (AAQ-SA) on a clinical sample. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 30, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.5455/PCP.20200320085704
  57. Weineland, S., Arvidsson, D., Kakoulidis, T. P., & Dahl, J. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy for bariatric surgery patients, a pilot RCT. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice, 6(1), e21-e30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orcp.2011.04.004
  58. Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models: An evaluation of power, bias, and solution propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 76(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
  59. Yavuz, F., Ulusoy, S., Iskin, M., Esen, F. B., Burhan, H. S., Karadere, M. E., & Yavuz, N. (2016). Turkish version of Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II): A reliability and validity analysis in clinical and non-clinical samples. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 26(4), 397-408. https://doi.org/10.5455/bcp.20160223124107
  60. Arbuckle, J. (2008). Amos 17.0 user's guide. SPSS Inc.
  61. Bond, F. W., Hayes, S. C., Baer, R. A., Carpenter, K. M., Guenole, N., Orcutt, H. K.,. & Zettle, R. D. (2011). Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behavior Therapy, 42(4), 676-688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007
  62. Cardel, M. I., Lee, A. M., Chi, X., Newsome, F., Miller, D. R., Bernier, A.,. & Butryn, M. L. (2021). Feasibility/acceptability of an acceptance‐based therapy intervention for diverse adolescent girls with overweight/obesity. Obesity Science & Practice, 7(3), 291-301. https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.483
  63. Hayes, S. C., Strosahl, K., Wilson, K. G., Bissett, R. T., Pistorello, J., Toarmino, D.,. & McCurry, S. M. (2004). Measuring experiential avoidance: A preliminary test of a working model. The Psychological Record, 54(4), 553-578.
  64. Uygur, H., Yavuz, K. F., Eren, İ., Uygur, O. F., Selcuk, M., Varsak, N.,. & Demirel, B. (2020). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the acceptance and action questionnaire-substance abuse (AAQ-SA) on a clinical sample. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 30, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.5455/PCP.20200320085704