Dergiler / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1

Modeling Egg Curves In Partridges

Esra Yavuz(ŞIRNAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ŞIRNAK MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU, MUHASEBE VE VERGİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0002-5589-297X
Mustafa Şahin(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-3622-4543
İsmail Gök(KAHRAMANMARAŞ SÜTÇÜ İMAM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, ZİRAAT FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-0759-1187
Sayfa
21–25
Yayın Tarihi
2023-01-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was concluded that the Schnute (MSE= 11.24, R^2= 0.990, AIC= 136.51, DW= 0.49), Gamma (MSE= 24.67, R^2= 0.991, AIC= 69.89, DW= 2.95) and Quadratic Spline (MSE= 10.43, R^2= 0.946, AIC= 149.34, DW= 2.97) models had the worst results.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In this study, a modeling study was carried out on the weekly average values of henna partridge egg production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, weekly average of henna partridge egg yields of 148 days from the herd consisting of 320 breeders were taken and cubic spline, Gompertz, Logistic, Richard, Schunute, Quadratic Spline, McNally and Gamma equations were used in the modeling.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was concluded that the Schnute (MSE= 11.24, R^2= 0.990, AIC= 136.51, DW= 0.49), Gamma (MSE= 24.67, R^2= 0.991, AIC= 69.89, DW= 2.95) and Quadratic Spline (MSE= 10.43, R^2= 0.946, AIC= 149.34, DW= 2.97) models had the worst results.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Partridge · Egg production · Curve modeling

Abstract

In this study, a modeling study was carried out on the weekly average values of henna partridge egg production. For this purpose, weekly average of henna partridge egg yields of 148 days from the herd consisting of 320 breeders were taken and cubic spline, Gompertz, Logistic, Richard, Schunute, Quadratic Spline, McNally and Gamma equations were used in the modeling. In the comparison of the goodness of fit of the equations, Determination Coefficient〖(R〗^2), Mean Square Error (MSE), Durbin-Watson (DW) and Akaike Information Criteria (AIC) values were taken into account. As a result of the study, Logistic (MSE= 12.4, R^2= 0.994, AIC= 43.56, DW= 2.09), Cubic Spline (MSE= 10.56, R^2= 0.996, AIC= 46.55, DW= 1.95) and McNally (MSE= 11.02, R^2= 0.996, AIC= 48.67, DW= 2.11) models were found to have the best results with similar results. It was concluded that the Schnute (MSE= 11.24, R^2= 0.990, AIC= 136.51, DW= 0.49), Gamma (MSE= 24.67, R^2= 0.991, AIC= 69.89, DW= 2.95) and Quadratic Spline (MSE= 10.43, R^2= 0.946, AIC= 149.34, DW= 2.97) models had the worst results.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tolun, T., Yavuz, E., Şahin, M., Gök, İ. (2023). Modeling Egg Curves In Partridges. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1, 21–25. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1139272

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Alkan S, Karabağ K, Galiç A, Balcıoğlu MS. 2008. Effects of male-female ratio on hatching traits in Henna partridges (Alectoris chukar). Lalahan Hay J Res Inst, 48(1): 45-50.
  2. Kazancı ON. 2019. Comparative analysis of some models used in individual growth curves of Japanese quail. Master Thesis, Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University, Institute of Science, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, pp: 37.
  3. Mazı A. 2021. Modeling of egg yield and weight in Japanese quails. Master Thesis, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Institute of Science, Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye, pp: 47.
  4. Narinç D, Üçkardeş F, Aslan E. 2014. Egg production curve analyzes in poultry science. World's Poultry Sci J, 70(04): 817-828.
  5. SAS Institute, 2011. SAS/STAT User Guide, Version 9.3 edition. SAS Institute Inc.
  6. Şengül T, Çelik Ş, İnci H, Söğüt B, Şengül A. 2016. Investigation of egg production in Henna partridges with some nonlinear models. YYU Tar J, 26(1): 33-39.
  7. Uckardes F, Narinç D. 2014. An application of modified Logistic and Gompertz growth models in Japanese quail. Indian J Anim Sci, 84(8): 903-907.
  8. Yalçınöz E, Şahin M. 2020. Modeling of egg yield curves in layer chickens. KSU J Agri Natur, 23(5): 1373-1378.
  9. Yavuz E, Önem AB, Fahrettin K, Çanga D, Şahin M. 2018. Modeling of individual growth curves in Japanese quails. BSJ Eng Sci, 2(1): 11-15.