KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2025 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 6

Investigating the Use of Probiotics to Improve Nutrient Utilization and Growth Performance in Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Kayode Omowunmi Ahmed(University of Ibadan)0009-0005-0018-3139
Godswill Arinzechukwu Iwuchukwu(ONDOKUZ MAYIS UNIVERSITY)0009-0001-3621-7055
Uğur Şen(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6058-1140
Toheeb Olalekan Olayiwola(University of Ibadan)0009-0009-6288-2217
Oluwagbemiga Tomisin Adegoke(University of Ibadan)0009-0005-1699-4067
Samson Damilare Emiola(University of Ibadan)0009-0008-2831-5457
Hasan Önder(ONDOKUZ MAYIS ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8404-8700
Sayfa
885–898
Yayın Tarihi
2025-11-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It offers evidence-based recommendations for sustainable livestock production and offers a nuanced understanding of the circumstances in which probiotics work best.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Interest in non-antibiotic growth enhancers like probiotics has increased due to the global demand for sustainable livestock production.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In order to synthesize empirical data and guide more sustainable and effective cattle feeding practices, this study systematically examines how well probiotic supplements enhance nutrient utilization and growth performance in cattle.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It offers evidence-based recommendations for sustainable livestock production and offers a nuanced understanding of the circumstances in which probiotics work best.
🔬Tür:Laboratuvar & Saha Deneyi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Probiotics · Cattle · Nutrient utilization

Özet

Interest in non-antibiotic growth enhancers like probiotics has increased due to the global demand for sustainable livestock production. In order to synthesize empirical data and guide more sustainable and effective cattle feeding practices, this study systematically examines how well probiotic supplements enhance nutrient utilization and growth performance in cattle. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. There were 14 peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials with 19 comparisons between different probiotic strains and cattle breeds. Key nutrient digestibility parameters were extracted, including dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), crude protein (CP) digestibility, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility. Growth performance metrics, such as average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency (FE), body weight gain (BWG), and dry matter intake (DMI), were also extracted. Heterogeneity was evaluated and pooled mean differences were computed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software. Probiotic supplementation considerably increased CP digestibility (MD=+2.72%, P=0.004) and ADG (MD = +0.04 kg/day, P<0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity, according to the meta-analysis. Other outcomes, including DMD, OMD, FE, BWG, and DMI, frequently showed significant inter-study variability and non-significant or inconsistent results. Notably, probiotics' effects varied depending on the situation and were impacted by the cattle's age, diet type, dosage, and strain. Particularly for young calves and forage-based systems, probiotics can be a useful nutritional tool to slightly improve protein utilization and growth in cattle. The need for specialized application techniques and more investigation into particular strain-diet-animal interactions is highlighted by their inconsistent effects across studies. This study provides one of the first thorough meta-analyses that focus solely on probiotic supplementation (apart from prebiotics and enzymes) and its dual impact on cattle performance outcomes and nutrient digestibility. It offers evidence-based recommendations for sustainable livestock production and offers a nuanced understanding of the circumstances in which probiotics work best.

Abstract

Interest in non-antibiotic growth enhancers like probiotics has increased due to the global demand for sustainable livestock production. In order to synthesize empirical data and guide more sustainable and effective cattle feeding practices, this study systematically examines how well probiotic supplements enhance nutrient utilization and growth performance in cattle. Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review and meta-analysis were carried out. There were 14 peer-reviewed randomized controlled trials with 19 comparisons between different probiotic strains and cattle breeds. Key nutrient digestibility parameters were extracted, including dry matter digestibility (DMD), organic matter digestibility (OMD), crude protein (CP) digestibility, and neutral detergent fiber (NDF) digestibility. Growth performance metrics, such as average daily gain (ADG), feed efficiency (FE), body weight gain (BWG), and dry matter intake (DMI), were also extracted. Heterogeneity was evaluated and pooled mean differences were computed using Review Manager (RevMan 5.4) software. Probiotic supplementation considerably increased CP digestibility (MD=+2.72%, P=0.004) and ADG (MD = +0.04 kg/day, P<0.00001), with moderate heterogeneity, according to the meta-analysis. Other outcomes, including DMD, OMD, FE, BWG, and DMI, frequently showed significant inter-study variability and non-significant or inconsistent results. Notably, probiotics' effects varied depending on the situation and were impacted by the cattle's age, diet type, dosage, and strain. Particularly for young calves and forage-based systems, probiotics can be a useful nutritional tool to slightly improve protein utilization and growth in cattle. The need for specialized application techniques and more investigation into particular strain-diet-animal interactions is highlighted by their inconsistent effects across studies. This study provides one of the first thorough meta-analyses that focus solely on probiotic supplementation (apart from prebiotics and enzymes) and its dual impact on cattle performance outcomes and nutrient digestibility. It offers evidence-based recommendations for sustainable livestock production and offers a nuanced understanding of the circumstances in which probiotics work best.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ahmed, K. O., Iwuchukwu, G. A., Şen, U., Olayiwola, T. O., Adegoke, O. T., Emiola, S. D., Önder, H. (2025). Investigating the Use of Probiotics to Improve Nutrient Utilization and Growth Performance in Cattle: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 6, 885–898. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1771443

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (44)

  1. Ajuogu PK, Al-Aqbi MA, Hart RA, Wolden M, Smart NA, McFarlane JR. 2020. The effect of dietary protein intake on factors associated with male infertility: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of animal clinical trials in rats. Nutr Health, 26(1): 53-64.
  2. Anderson PT. 2025. 288 US beef cattle industry trends. J Anim Sci, 103(Supplement_1), 62-63.
  3. Arowolo MA, He J. 2018. Use of probiotics and botanical extracts to improve ruminant production in the tropics: A review. Anim Nutr, 4(3): 241-249.
  4. Ayyat MS, El-Nagar HA, Wafa WM, Abd El-Latif KM, Mahgoub S, Al-Sagheer AA. 2023. Comparable evaluation of nutritional benefits of Lactobacillus plantarum and Bacillus toyonensis probiotic supplementation on growth, feed utilization, health, and fecal microbiota in pre-weaning male calves. Animals, 13(21): 3422.
  5. Basarab JA, Price MA, Okine EK. 2002. Commercialization of net feed efficiency. In Proceedings of the 23rd Western Nutritional Conference, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, pp: 183-194.
  6. Bomfim LEDL, Nascimento KDS, Calaça AMDM, Silva LDO, Arnhold E, Couto VRM, Barreto YM, Mari LJ, Santos MC, Marine G, Chevaux E, Fernandes JJDR. 2024. Supplementation with live Saccharomyces cerevisiae boulardii during the initial 42 days of the feedlot phase in Nellore beef cattle. Transl Anim Sci, 8: txae097. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae097
  7. Boyd J, West JW, Bernard JK. 2011. Effects of the addition of direct-fed microbials and glycerol to the diet of lactating dairy cows on milk yield and apparent efficiency of yield. J Dairy Sci, 94(9): 4616-4622. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3984
  8. Branco-Lopes R, Winder C, Canozzi ME, Lopez YSA., Schmitz B, Silva-del-Río N. 2025. Effects of probiotic supplementation on growth performance and feed intake of dairy calves: A meta-analysis. J Dairy Sci, 108(9): 9501-9515.
  9. Casper DP, Hultquist KM, Acharya IP. 2021. Lactobacillus plantarum GB LP-1 as a direct-fed microbial for neonatal calves. J Dairy Sci, 104(5): 5557-5568.
  10. Dar AH, Singh SK, Rahman JU, Ahmad SF. 2022. The effects of probiotic Lactobacillus acidophilus and/or prebiotic mannan oligosaccharides on growth performance, nutrient utilization, blood metabolites, faecal bacteria, and economics of crossbred calves. Iran J Vet Res, 23(4): 322.
  11. Davis TC, White RR. 2020. Breeding animals to feed people: The many roles of animal reproduction in ensuring global food security. Theriogenology, 150: 27-33.
  12. Dias BG, Santos FA, Meschiatti M, Brixner BM, Almeida AA, Queiroz O, Cappellozza BI. 2022. Effects of feeding different probiotic types on metabolic, performance, and carcass responses of Bos indicus feedlot cattle offered a high-concentrate diet. J Anim Sci, 100(10): skac289.
  13. Ellis JL, Bannink A, Hindrichsen IK, Kinley RD, Pellikaan WF, Milora N, Dijkstra J. 2016. The effect of lactic acid bacteria included as a probiotic or silage inoculant on in vitro rumen digestibility, total gas and methane production. Anim Feed Sci Technol, 211: 61-74.
  14. Eyre KE, Pan L, Harper K, e Silva, LFP. 2025. The effect of a Bacillus-based probiotic on feed intake and digestibility of a forage and a feedlot diet in Bos indicus Steers. Vet Anim Sci, 100463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vas.2025.100463
  15. Fernández-Ciganda S, Fraga M, Zunino P. 2022. Probiotic lactobacilli administration induces changes in the fecal microbiota of Preweaned dairy calves. Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins, 14(5): 804-815.
  16. Gao L, Yan X, Liu Y, Xia C. 2022. Effect of enzyme and probiotic supplementation on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, carcass traits, and meat quality of Simmental steers. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 51: e20220034.
  17. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B. & Sanders ME. 2014. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11(8): 506-514.
  18. Karimov IS, Kondrashova K, Duskaev G, Kvan O. 2020. Evaluation of effects of rumen fluid in combination with probiotic preparations and vanillin on the luminescence of a recombinant strain E. coli. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 143). EDP Sciences.
  19. Kawauchi D, Angthong W, Keaokliang O, Ishida T, Takahashi T, Kawashima T. 2021. Effect of feeding B acillus subtilis on rumen fermentation, blood metabolites, nutrient digestibility, and energy and nitrogen balances in non‐lactating crossbred cows. Anim Sci J, 92(1): e13531. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13531
  20. Küçükoflaz M, Özbek V, Güçlü BK, Sarıözkan S, Zaman Cİ, Aydın E. & Akın MA. 2025. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FD777 and Macleaya cordata extract on performance, immunity, gastrointestinal system microbiome, and profitability in Holstein calves. Animals, 15(3): 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030313
  21. Maamouri O, Ben Salem M. 2022. The effect of live yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as probiotic supply on growth performance, feed intake, ruminal pH and fermentation in fattening calves. Vet Med Sci, 8(1): 398-404. https://doi.org/10.1002/vms3.631
  22. Ncho CM, Kim SH, Rang SA, Lee SS. 2024. A Meta-analysis of probiotic interventions to mitigate ruminal methane emissions in cattle: Implications for sustainable livestock farming. Animal, 18(6): 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.animal.2024.101180
  23. Niranjan D, Sridhar NB, Chandra US, Manjunatha SS, Borthakur A, Vinuta MH, Mohan BR. 2023. Recent perspectives of growth promoters in livestock: an overview. J Livest Sci, 14: 53-64
  24. Oenema J, Oenema O. 2022. Unraveling feed and nutrient use efficiencies in grassland-based dairy farms. Front Sustain Food Syst, 6: 846561.
  25. Ogunade IM, McCoun M, Idowu MD, Peters SO. 2020. Comparative effects of two multispecies direct-fed microbial products on energy status, nutrient digestibility, and ruminal fermentation, bacterial community, and metabolome of beef steers. J Anim Sci, 98(9): skaa201. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa201
  26. Ojo AO, Mulim HA, Campos GS, Junqueira VS, Lemenager RP, Schoonmaker JP, Oliveira HR. 2024. Exploring feed efficiency in beef cattle: from data collection to genetic and nutritional modeling. Animals, 14(24): 3633. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14243633
  27. Pan L, Eyre K, Harper K, e Silva LP. 2023. 333 Using specific bacillus strains to improve digestibility and performance of growing steers. J Anim Sci, 101(Suppl 3): 275.
  28. Pinloche E, McEwan N, Marden JP, Bayourthe C, Auclair E, Newbold CJ. 2013. The effects of a probiotic yeast on the bacterial diversity and population structure in the rumen of cattle. PloS One, 8(7): e67824. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067824
  29. Saba AO, Fakoya KA, Elegbede IO, Amoo ZO, Moruf RO, Ibrahim MA. & Azmai Amal MN. 2023. Replacement of fishmeal in the diet of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci, 46(1): 153-176.
  30. Salah N, Legendre H, Nenov V, Briche M, Serieys F, Grossi S, Rossi CAS. 2024. Does micro-granulated yeast probiotic (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation in milk replacer affect health, growth, feed efficiency and economic gain of calves?. Vet Anim Sci, 23: 100329.
  31. Sun P, Wang JQ, Zhang HT. 2010. Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto on performance and immune function of preweaning calves. J Dairy Sci, 93(12): 5851-5855.
  32. Tedeschi LO, Almeida AKD, Atzori AS, Muir JP, Fonseca MA, Cannas A. 2017. A glimpse of the future in animal nutrition science. 1. Past and future challenges. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 46(5): 438-451.
  33. Terry SA. Basarab JA. Guan LL. McAllister TA. 2020. Strategies to improve the efficiency of beef cattle production. Can J Anim Sci, 101(1): 1-19.
  34. Várhidi Z, Máté M, Ózsvári L. 2022. The use of probiotics in nutrition and herd health management in large Hungarian dairy cattle farms. Front Vet Sci, 9: 957935.
  35. Wang H, Yu Z, Gao Z, Li Q, Qiu X, Wu F,. Su H. 2022. Effects of compound probiotics on growth performance, rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and health status of neonatal Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci, 105(3): 2190-2200.
  36. Xu H, Huang W, Hou Q, Kwok LY, Sun Z, Ma H,. Zhang H. 2017. The effects of probiotics administration on the milk production, milk components and fecal bacteria microbiota of dairy cows. Sci Bull, 62(11): 767-774.
  37. Zhang N, Wang L, Wei Y. 2020. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus pumilus on rumen and intestine morphology and microbiota in weanling Jintang black goat. Anims, 10(9): 1604.
  38. Zhang R, Zhou M, Tu Y, Zhang NF, Deng KD, Ma T, Diao QY. 2016. Effect of oral administration of probiotics on growth performance, apparent nutrient digestibility and stress‐related indicators in Holstein calves. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 100(1): 33-38.
  39. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B. & Sanders ME. 2014. Expert consensus document: The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 11(8): 506-514.
  40. Küçükoflaz M, Özbek V, Güçlü BK, Sarıözkan S, Zaman Cİ, Aydın E. & Akın MA. 2025. Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FD777 and Macleaya cordata extract on performance, immunity, gastrointestinal system microbiome, and profitability in Holstein calves. Animals, 15(3): 313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15030313
  41. Saba AO, Fakoya KA, Elegbede IO, Amoo ZO, Moruf RO, Ibrahim MA. & Azmai Amal MN. 2023. Replacement of fishmeal in the diet of African Catfish (Clarias gariepinus): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pertanika J Trop Agric Sci, 46(1): 153-176.
  42. Várhidi Z, Máté M, Ózsvári L. 2022. The use of probiotics in nutrition and herd health management in large Hungarian dairy cattle farms. Front Vet Sci, 9: 957935.
  43. Wang H, Yu Z, Gao Z, Li Q, Qiu X, Wu F,. Su H. 2022. Effects of compound probiotics on growth performance, rumen fermentation, blood parameters, and health status of neonatal Holstein calves. J Dairy Sci, 105(3): 2190-2200.
  44. Xu H, Huang W, Hou Q, Kwok LY, Sun Z, Ma H,. Zhang H. 2017. The effects of probiotics administration on the milk production, milk components and fecal bacteria microbiota of dairy cows. Sci Bull, 62(11): 767-774.