Dergiler / Black Sea Journal of Agriculture / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5

Effects of Salicylic and Ascorbic Acid Applications on Growth, Biomass, and Physiological Responses of Tomato Seedlings under Salt Stress

Haydar Balcı(Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Van, Türkiye)0000-0003-0210-3639
Murat Kara(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GEVAŞ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-1011-918X
Muhsin Yıldız(YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, GEVAŞ MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-0766-5174
Sayfa
842–849
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Overall, these findings demonstrate that the combined foliar application of 2 mM SA and 2 mM AA represents an effective, practical, and promising strategy for improving the performance of tomato seedlings under salt stress conditions.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study investigated the effects of salicylic acid (SA) and ascorbic acid (AA) applications on the growth and physiological performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings in order to evaluate their potential to mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The experiment was conducted under 100 mM NaCl-induced salt stress conditions and consisted of eight treatment groups including single and combined foliar applications of SA and AA at different concentrations (1 mM and 2 mM).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Overall, these findings demonstrate that the combined foliar application of 2 mM SA and 2 mM AA represents an effective, practical, and promising strategy for improving the performance of tomato seedlings under salt stress conditions.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L) · Salicylic acid · Ascorbic acid

Özet

This study investigated the effects of salicylic acid (SA) and ascorbic acid (AA) applications on the growth and physiological performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings in order to evaluate their potential to mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress. The experiment was conducted under 100 mM NaCl-induced salt stress conditions and consisted of eight treatment groups including single and combined foliar applications of SA and AA at different concentrations (1 mM and 2 mM). Plant height, stem diameter, root length, leaf number, leaf area, total fresh and dry weight, and SPAD values (chlorophyll content) were assessed. The results indicated that salt stress significantly suppressed all morphological and biomass-related parameters; however, SA and AA applications alleviated these negative effects to varying extents. The most pronounced positive effect was observed with the combined application of 2 mM salicylic acid (SA) and 2 mM ascorbic acid (AA). Compared with the salt-stressed control, this treatment increased plant height by 100.4%, total fresh weight by 60.8%, and leaf area by 61.2%, resulting in the highest biomass performance among all treatments. In contrast, the sole application of salicylic acid exhibited more limited effects, particularly on dry weight and leaf development. Chlorophyll content showed a dose-dependent response, with the low-dose combination (1 mM SA + AA) being more effective in preserving chlorophyll, whereas higher doses were associated with lower SPAD values. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the combined foliar application of 2 mM SA and 2 mM AA represents an effective, practical, and promising strategy for improving the performance of tomato seedlings under salt stress conditions.

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of salicylic acid (SA) and ascorbic acid (AA) applications on the growth and physiological performance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) seedlings in order to evaluate their potential to mitigate the adverse effects of salt stress. The experiment was conducted under 100 mM NaCl-induced salt stress conditions and consisted of eight treatment groups including single and combined foliar applications of SA and AA at different concentrations (1 mM and 2 mM). Plant height, stem diameter, root length, leaf number, leaf area, total fresh and dry weight, and SPAD values (chlorophyll content) were assessed. The results indicated that salt stress significantly suppressed all morphological and biomass-related parameters; however, SA and AA applications alleviated these negative effects to varying extents. The most pronounced positive effect was observed with the combined application of 2 mM salicylic acid (SA) and 2 mM ascorbic acid (AA). Compared with the salt-stressed control, this treatment increased plant height by 100.4%, total fresh weight by 60.8%, and leaf area by 61.2%, resulting in the highest biomass performance among all treatments. In contrast, the sole application of salicylic acid exhibited more limited effects, particularly on dry weight and leaf development. Chlorophyll content showed a dose-dependent response, with the low-dose combination (1 mM SA + AA) being more effective in preserving chlorophyll, whereas higher doses were associated with lower SPAD values. Overall, these findings demonstrate that the combined foliar application of 2 mM SA and 2 mM AA represents an effective, practical, and promising strategy for improving the performance of tomato seedlings under salt stress conditions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Balcı, H., Kara, M., Yıldız, M. (2026). Effects of Salicylic and Ascorbic Acid Applications on Growth, Biomass, and Physiological Responses of Tomato Seedlings under Salt Stress. Black Sea Journal of Agriculture, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 5, 842–849. https://doi.org/10.47115/bsagriculture.1883695

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (29)

  1. Acosta-Motos, J. R., Ortuño, M. F., Bernal-Vicente, A., Diaz-Vivancos, P., Sanchez-Blanco, M. J., & Hernandez, J. A. (2017). Plant responses to salt stress: Adaptive mechanisms. Agronomy, 7(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy7010018
  2. Athar, H.-u.-R., Khan, A., & Ashraf, M. (2008). Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 63(1-3), 224–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.018
  3. Boorboori, M. R., & Li, J. (2025). The effect of salinity stress on tomato defense mechanisms and exogenous application of salicylic acid, abscisic acid, and melatonin to reduce salinity stress. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 71(1), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2024.2405834
  4. Bücker-Neto, L., Paiva, A. L. S., Machado, R. D., Arenhart, R. A., & Margis-Pinheiro, M. (2017). Interactions between plant hormones and heavy metals responses. Genetics and Molecular Biology, 40(1), 373–386. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0108
  5. Canene-Adams, K., Campbell, J. K., Zaripheh, S., Jeffery, E. H., & Erdman Jr, J. W. (2005). The tomato as a functional food. The Journal of Nutrition, 135(5), 1226–1230. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/135.5.1226
  6. Comas, L. H., Becker, S. R., Cruz, V. M. V., Byrne, P. F., & Dierig, D. A. (2013). Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science, 4, 442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00442
  7. Flowers, T. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2008). Salinity tolerance in halophytes. New Phytologist, 179(4), 945–963. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02531.x
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2025). FAOSTAT: Crops and Livestock Products Database. Retrieved July 1, 2026, from https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL
  9. Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909–930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016
  10. Hasanuzzaman, M., Bhuyan, M. H. M. B., Zulfiqar, F., Raza, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mahmud, J. A., Fujita, M., & Fotopoulos, V. (2020). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants, 9(8), 681. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox9080681
  11. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. A., & Fujita, M. (2011). Plant responses and tolerance to abiotic oxidative stress: Antioxidant defense is a key factor. In V. V. Kozlowski (Ed.), Crop Stress and its Management: Perspectives and Strategies (pp. 261–315). Springer.
  12. Hasanuzzaman, M., Hossain, M. A., & Fujita, M. (2012). Exogenous selenium pretreatment protects rapeseed seedlings from cadmium-induced oxidative stress by up-regulating antioxidant defense and methylglyoxal detoxification systems. Biological Trace Element Research, 149(3), 248–261.
  13. Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., Gill, S. S., & Fujita, M. (2013). Drought stress responses in plants, oxidative stress, and antioxidant defense. In N. Tuteja & S. S. Gill (Eds.), Climate change and plant abiotic stress tolerance (Chap. 9). Wiley-VCH. https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527675265.ch09
  14. Hayat, Q., Hayat, S., Irfan, M., & Ahmad, A. (2010). Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 68(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.08.005
  15. Khan, M. I. R., Fatma, M., Per, T. S., Anjum, N. A., & Khan, N. A. (2015). Salicylic acid-induced abiotic stress tolerance and underlying mechanisms in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science, 6, 462. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00462
  16. Li, A., Sun, X., & Liu, L. (2022). Action of salicylic acid on plant growth. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 878076. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.878076
  17. Lynch, J. (1995). Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiology, 109(1), 7–13.
  18. Mittler, R. (2017). ROS are good. Trends in Plant Science, 22(1), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.002
  19. Munns, R., & Gilliham, M. (2015). Salinity tolerance of crops—What is the cost? New Phytologist, 208(3), 668–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13519
  20. Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59, 651–681. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
  21. Nazar, R., Iqbal, N., Syeed, S., & Khan, N. A. (2011). Salicylic acid alleviates decreases in photosynthesis under salt stress by enhancing nitrogen and sulfur assimilation and antioxidant metabolism differentially in two mungbean cultivars. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168(8), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2010.11.001
  22. Noctor, G., & Foyer, C. H. (1998). Ascorbate and glutathione: Keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 49, 249–279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249
  23. Rao, A. V., & Agarwal, S. (2000). Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. Journal of the American College of Nutrition, 19(5), 563–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/07315724.2000.10718953
  24. Rivas-San Vicente, M., & Plasencia, J. (2011). Salicylic acid beyond defence: Its role in plant growth and development. Journal of Experimental Botany, 62(10), 3321–3338. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err031
  25. Turkish Statistical Institute (TurkStat). (2025). Crop Production Statistics. Retrieved January 6, 2026, from https://data.tuik.gov.tr/
  26. van Butselaar, T., & Van den Ackerveken, G. (2020). Salicylic acid steers the growth–immunity tradeoff. Trends in Plant Science, 25(6), 566–576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2020.02.002
  27. Xiao, F., & Zhou, H. (2023). Plant salt response: Perception, signaling, and tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 1053699. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1053699
  28. Yang, W., Zhou, Z., & Chu, Z. (2023). Emerging roles of salicylic acid in plant saline stress tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(4), 3388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24043388
  29. Zhu, J. K. (2001). Plant salt tolerance. Trends in Plant Science, 6(2), 66–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(00)01838-0