KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Education and Future / 2012 / Sayı: 2

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bağlanma Stilleri ve Mesleklerindeki Önemi

Simona Prosen
Helena Smrtnik Vitulic
Sayfa
1–14
Yayın Tarihi
2012-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Detailed analysis of insecure attachment indicated that about one half of the students in each group reported at least one “risky” attachment style

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of the study was to explore the attachment styles in university students, future primary school teachers, preschool teachers and social pedagogues.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study sample consisted of 619 students from the Faculty of Education in Ljubljana.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Detailed analysis of insecure attachment indicated that about one half of the students in each group reported at least one “risky” attachment style
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Attachment · university students · relationship

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to explore the attachment styles in university students, future primary school teachers, preschool teachers and social pedagogues. The study sample consisted of 619 students from the Faculty of Education in Ljubljana. The Relationship Questionnaire (Bartholomew & Horowitz, 1991) was used to analyze the attachment styles: secure, preoccupied, fearful and dismissing. Results showed a relatively high level of secure attachment style among primary education and social pedagogy students, whereas in preschool education students the level was moderate and significantly lower. Cluster analysis confirmed two configurations of attachment styles: predominantly secure (including 71.7% primary education, 66.1% social pedagogy and 59.3% preschool education students), and a cluster of predominantly fearfulpreoccupied attachments. Detailed analysis of insecure attachment indicated that about one half of the students in each group reported at least one “risky” attachment style

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Prosen, S., Vitulic, H. S. (2012). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Bağlanma Stilleri ve Mesleklerindeki Önemi. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 2, 1–14. https://ajindex.com/articles/137600

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Baldwin, M. W., Keelan, J. P. R., Fehr, B., Enns, V. & Koh-Rangarajoo, E. (1996). Social-cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(1), 94–109.
  2. Bartholomew, K. & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 226–244.
  3. Bowlby, J. (1969/1997). Attachment and Loss. Vol. 1. Great Britain: Pimlico. Bowlby, J. & Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1965). Child Care and the Growth of Love. Great Britain: Penguin books. Broberg, A. G., Hjalmers, I. & Nevonen, L. (2001). Eating disorders, attachment and interpersonal difficulties: a comparison between 18- to 24-year-old patients and normal controls. European Eating Disorders Review, 9(6), 381–396.
  4. Cugmas, Z. (2003). Narisal sem sonce zate - izbrana poglavja o razvoju otrokove navezanosti in samozaznave [I drew a sun for you – selected chapters on child’ s attachment development]. Ljubljana: Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva, d.o.o. Cugmas, Z. (1998). Bodi z menoj, mami - razvoj otrokove navezanosti [Mummy, be with me – development of child’s attachment]. Ljubljana: Center za psihodiagnostična sredstva, d.o.o. Dekleva, B., Kobolt, A. & Klemenčič, M. M. (2006). Analiza doseženih in zaželenih kompetenc študijskega programa Socialna pedagogika na Pedagoški fakulteti v Ljubljani [The analysis of achieved and desired competencies in the Social Pedagogy programme at the Faculty of Education in Ljubljana]. In S. Tancig & T. Devjak (Eds.), Prispevki k posodobitvi pedagoških študijskih programov (p. 150–169). Ljubljana: Pedagoška fakulteta. Fonagy, P. (2001). Attachment Theory and Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac. Griffin, D. & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Models of the self and the other: fundamental dimensions underlying measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(3), 430–445.
  5. Gross, J. J. & Thompson, R.A. (2009). Emotion regulation: conceptual foundations. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of Emotion Regulation (p. 3–24).
  6. New York, London: The Guilford Press.
  7. Grossmann, K. E., Grossmann, K. & Keppler, A. (2005). Universal and culture- specific aspects of human behavior: The case of attachment. In W. Friedlmeier, P. Chakkarath & B. Schwarz (Eds.), Culture and Human Development: The Importance of Cross-cultural Research for the Social Sciences (p. 75–97). New York: Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group. Predstavitveni zbornik študijskega programa