KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 1

Deep Transfer Learning to Classify Mass and Calcification Pathologies from Screen Film Mammograms

Volkan Müjdat Tiryaki(SİİRT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1824-5260
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The number of breast cancer diagnosis is the biggest among all cancers, but it can be treated if diagnosed early.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A total of 3,360 patches were used from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) and CBIS-DDSM mammogram databases for convolutional neural network training and testing.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Breast cancer · image classification · nodule

Abstract

The number of breast cancer diagnosis is the biggest among all cancers, but it can be treated if diagnosed early. Mammography is commonly used for detecting abnormalities and diagnosing the breast cancer. Breast cancer screening and diagnosis are still being performed by radiologists. In the last decade, deep learning was successfully applied on big image classification databases such as ImageNet. Deep learning methods for the automated breast cancer diagnosis is under investigation. In this study, breast cancer mass and calcification pathologies are classified by using deep transfer learning methods. A total of 3,360 patches were used from the Digital Database for Screening Mammography (DDSM) and CBIS-DDSM mammogram databases for convolutional neural network training and testing. Transfer learning was applied using Resnet50, Xception, NASNet, and EfficientNet-B7 network backbones. The best classification performance was achieved by the Xception network. On the original CBIS-DDSM test data, an AUC of 0.9317 was obtained for the five-way classification problem. The results are promising for the implementation of automated diagnosis of breast cancer.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tiryaki, V. M. (2023). Deep Transfer Learning to Classify Mass and Calcification Pathologies from Screen Film Mammograms. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 12 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1190134

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. H. L. Bleich, “The computer as a consultant,” N. Engl. J. Med., vol. 284, no. 3, pp. 141–7, 1971.
  2. M. E. Cohen and D. Le Hudson, “A hybrid system for diagnosis involving biosignals,” Proc. 2005 IEEE Int. Conf. Comput. Intell. Meas. Syst. Appl. CIMSA 2005, vol. 2005, no. July, pp. 312–315, 2005.
  3. I. Gökbay, S. Karaman, S. Yarman, and B. Yarman, “An intelligent decision support tool for early diagnosis of functional pituitary adenomas,” TWMS J. Appl. Eng. Math., vol. 5, no. 2, p. 169, 2015.
  4. P. Xi, C. Shu, and R. Goubran, “Abnormality Detection in Mammography using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” in 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications, Proceedings, 2018, pp. 1–6.
  5. J. Tang, R. M. Rangayyan, J. Xu, I. E. El Naqa, and Y. Yang, “Computer-aided detection and diagnosis of breast cancer with mammography: Recent advances,” IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 236–251, 2009.
  6. V. Ozmen, “Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients),” J. Breast Heal., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 98–105, 2014.
  7. L. Ackerman and E. Gose, “Breast lesion classification by computer and xeroradiograph,” Cancer, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1025–1035, 1972.
  8. Y. Kaya, “A new intelligent classifier for breast cancer diagnosis based on a rough set and extreme learning machine: Rs + elm,” Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 21, no. SUPPL. 1, pp. 2079–2091, 2013.
  9. P. Görgel, A. Sertbas, and O. N. Uçan, “Computer-aided classification of breast masses in mammogram images based on spherical wavelet transform and support vector machines,” Expert Syst., vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2015.
  10. A. Jain and D. Levy, “Breast Mass Classification from Mammograms using Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1612.00542, 2016.
  11. N. Wu et al., “Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists’ Performance in Breast Cancer Screening,” IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 1184–1194, 2020.
  12. L. Shen, L. R. Margoiles, J. H. Rothstein, E. Fluder, R. McBride, and W. Sieh, “Deep Learning to improve Breast cancer Detection on Screening Mammography,” Sci. Rep., vol. 9, no. 12495, pp. 1–12, 2019.
  13. B. Zoph, V. Vasudevan, J. Shlens, and Q. V. Le, “Learning Transferable Architectures for Scalable Image Recognition,” Proc. IEEE Comput. Soc. Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., pp. 8697–8710, 2018.
  14. Jia Deng, Wei Dong, R. Socher, Li-Jia Li, Kai Li, and Li Fei-Fei, “ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009, pp. 248–255.
  15. M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “EfficientNet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” 36th Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. ICML 2019, vol. 2019-June, pp. 10691–10700, 2019.
  16. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016, vol. 2016-Decem, pp. 770–778.
  17. F. Chollet, “Xception: Deep learning with depthwise separable convolutions,” Proc. - 30th IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017, vol. 2017-Janua, pp. 1800–1807, 2017.
  18. R. S. Lee, F. Gimenez, A. Hoogi, and D. Rubin, “Curated Breast Imaging Subset of DDSM [Dataset],” 2016. [Online]. Available: https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/CBIS-DDSM#22516629cf2ec23796854d91bc86c4ae2e499baa.
  19. R. S. Lee, F. Gimenez, A. Hoogi, K. K. Miyake, M. Gorovoy, and D. L. Rubin, “A curated mammography data set for use in computer-aided detection and diagnosis research,” Sci. Data, vol. 4, pp. 1–9, 2017.
  20. K. Clark et al., “The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.,” J. Digit. Imaging, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1045–1057, Dec. 2013.
  21. M. Heath et al., “Current status of the Digital Database for Screening Mammography,” in Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 1998, pp. 457–460.
  22. M. Heath, K. Bowyer, D. Kopans, R. Moore, and W. P. Kegelmeyer, “The Digital Database for Screening Mammography,” in Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Digital Mammography, 2001, pp. 212–218.
  23. O. Russakovsky et al., “ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge,” Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 211–252, 2015.
  24. D. P. Kingma and J. L. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” 3rd Int. Conf. Learn. Represent. ICLR 2015 - Conf. Track Proc., pp. 1–15, 2015.
  25. F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python,” J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.