KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 1

Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic

Selçuk Topal(GEBZE TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7074-2569
Oğuz Ayhan Kireçci(BİTLİS EREN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2205-4758
Behçet Kocaman(BITLIS EREN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-1432-0959
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In general, the framework shows how neutrosophic reasoning gives us a better way to understand the uncertainty that comes with living green energy systems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), bio-photovoltaic arrays, and hybrid electrochemical platforms are all examples of new types of renewable energy systems that use living plants to generate a small but steady amount of electricity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:But their performance is always uncertain because changes in the environment, biological variability, and limits on measurements make things less clear than classical deterministic models can show.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In general, the framework shows how neutrosophic reasoning gives us a better way to understand the uncertainty that comes with living green energy systems.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Neutrosophic logic · Environmental uncertainty · Plant microbial fuel cell

Abstract

Plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs), bio-photovoltaic arrays, and hybrid electrochemical platforms are all examples of new types of renewable energy systems that use living plants to generate a small but steady amount of electricity. These systems depend on the metabolic interactions between roots, soil microorganisms, and materials that can conduct electricity. But their performance is always uncertain because changes in the environment, biological variability, and limits on measurements make things less clear than classical deterministic models can show. Fuzzy logic as it is used now can show different levels of truth, but it combines ignorance and vagueness into one value, making it harder to understand in complicated natural systems. This study presents a conceptual and mathematical model based on neutrosophic logic that aims to define and measure uncertainty in plant-based electricity generation. Neutrosophic triplets (T,I,F) show key environmental and biological factors like solar radiation, soil moisture, temperature suitability, and plant vitality. This lets truth, indeterminacy, and falsity be shown separately. A rule-based inference mechanism puts these triplets together to make an interval-based guess about how much electricity will be produced. The work lays out the theoretical framework for this method and makes it clear how it can be used to model environmental energy. In general, the framework shows how neutrosophic reasoning gives us a better way to understand the uncertainty that comes with living green energy systems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Topal, S., Kireçci, O. A., Kocaman, B. (2026). Modeling Plant-Based Electricity Generation Under Environmental Uncertainty Using Neutrosophic Logic. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1816333

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. D. P. Strik, H. V. Hamelers, and C. J. Buisman, “Solar energy powered microbial fuel cell with a reversible bioelectrode,” Environmental science & technology, 2020, 44(1), pp. 532-537.
  2. A. Timmers, D.P. Strik, H.V. Hamelers and C. J. Buisman, “Long-term performance of a plant microbial fuel cell with Spartina anglica,” Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2010, 86(3), pp. 973-981.
  3. W. Cui, S. Espley, W. Liang, S. Yi and X. Dong, “Microbial fuel cells for power generation by treating mine tailings: recent advances and emerging trends,” Sustainability, 2025, 17(2), 466.
  4. B. E. Logan, B. Hamelers, R. Rozendal, U. Schröder, J. Keller, S. Freguia, P. Aelterman, W. Verstraete, and K. Rabaey, “Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology,” Environmental science & technology, 2006, 40(17), pp. 5181-5192.
  5. S. Son and S.P. Jung, “Trends and prospects of sediment microbial fuel cells as sustainable aquatic ecosystem remediation technology,” Journal of Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, 2022, 44(11), pp. 468-492.
  6. F. T. Kabutey, Q. Zhao, L. Wei, J. Ding, P. Antwi, F. K. Quashie, W. Wang, “An overview of plant microbial fuel cells (PMFCs): Configurations and applications,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019, 110, pp. 402-414.
  7. R. Nitisoravut and R. Regmi, “Plant microbial fuel cells: A promising biosystems engineering approach for energy generation,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2017, 76, pp. 81–89.
  8. R. Shaikh, A. Rizvi, M. Quraishi, S. Pandit, A. S. Mathuriya, P. K. Gupta, J. Singh and R. Prasad, “Bioelectricity production using plant–microbial fuel cell: present state of art,” South African Journal of Botany, 140, 2021, pp. 393–408.
  9. T. Kuleshova, A. Rao, S. Bhadra, V. K. Garlapati, S. Sharma, A. Kaushik, P. Goswami, T. R. Sreekrishnan and S. Sevda, “Plant microbial fuel cells as an innovative, versatile agro-technology for green energy generation combined with wastewater treatment and food production,” Biomass and Bioenergy, 167, 2022, 106629.
  10. J. Greenman, R. Thorn, N. Willey, I. Ieropoulos, “Energy harvesting from plants using hybrid microbial fuel cells: potential applications and future exploitation,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 12, 2024, 1166423.
  11. J. Tschörtner, B. Lai and J. O. Krömer, “Biophotovoltaics: green power generation from sunlight and water,” Frontiers in microbiology, 2019, 10, 866.
  12. F. Smarandache, “A Unifying Field in Logics: Neutrosophic Logic,” American Research Press, 1999.
  13. H. Wang, F. Smarandache, Y. Zhang, R. Sunderraman, “Single-valued neutrosophic sets,” Multispace and Multistructure, 4, 2010, pp. 410–413.
  14. H. Eroğlu, “A spatial decision making framework using neutrosophic VIKOR for wind energy investment in Turkey,” Scientific Reports, 2025, 15(1), 33593.
  15. P. N. Prasad and S. Kalla, “Plant-microbial fuel cells-A bibliometric analysis,” Process Biochemistry, 2021 111, pp. 250-260.
  16. P. L. Chong, J. H. Chuah, C. O. Chow and P. K. Ng, “Plant microbial fuel cells: A comprehensive review of influential factors, innovative configurations, diverse applications, persistent challenges, and promising prospects”, International Journal of Green Energy, 2025, 22(3), pp. 599-648.
  17. I. Brugellis, M. Grassi, P. Malcovati, and S. Assini, “Evaluating a New Prototype of Plant Microbial Fuel Cell: Is the Electrical Performance Affected by Carbon Pellet Layering and Urea Treatment?,” Energies, 2025, 18(19), 5320.
  18. N. G. Attah, D. M. Kongnine, P. Kpelou, and E. Mouzou, “Experimental investigation of inter-electrode distance and design in Cymbopogon citratus plant microbial fuel cells for sustainable energy production,” International Journal of Renewable Energy Development, 2025, 14(6), pp. 1099-1109.
  19. T. C. Dakal, N. Singh, A. Kaur, P. K. Dhillon, J. Bhatankar, R. Meena, R.K. Sherma, B.R. Gadi, B. S. Sahu, A. Patel, B. Singh and K. Kumari, “New horizons in microbial fuel cell technology: applications, challenges, and prospects,” Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, 2025, 18(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-025-02649-y
  20. A. A. Salam, M. A. Mohamed, H. M Amer, M. M. J. H. AlZubi and H. E. Khalid, “Proposed Discoveries Using Neutrosophic Logic towards Electrical Energy Recovery Systems Administration,” Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 2025, 86(1), 35.