KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 3

Spatial Prediction And Safe Route Optimization of Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: Machine Learning And Gis-Based Integrated Approach

Ayşin Ceren Arslan(GAZI UNIVERSITY)0009-0008-3001-221X
Merve Ozkan(Ankara Üniversitesi/Mühendislik Fakültesi/Bilgisayar Mühendisliği)0000-0002-1071-2541
Kürşat Yıldız(Gazi Üniversitesi/Teknoloji Fakültesi/İnşaat Mühendisliği)0000-0003-2205-9997
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The proposed approach offers a data-driven basis for risk-aware route planning and dynamic safety management in intelligent transportation systems.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Autonomous vehicle technologies are reshaping traffic safety and urban mobility; however, software and sensor failures, legal uncertainties, and mixed traffic environments continue to pose significant accident risks.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The results show that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models perform effectively in accident severity prediction, while ANN achieves superior performance in accident occurrence prediction under balanced data conditions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The proposed approach offers a data-driven basis for risk-aware route planning and dynamic safety management in intelligent transportation systems.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Autonomous Vehicle · Deep Learning · Machine Learning

Abstract

Autonomous vehicle technologies are reshaping traffic safety and urban mobility; however, software and sensor failures, legal uncertainties, and mixed traffic environments continue to pose significant accident risks. Recent fatal incidents during real-world testing underline the critical need for effective risk prediction approaches. While existing studies mainly focus on accident causes and probabilities, deep learning research is often limited to in-vehicle sensor data. This study proposes a hybrid framework integrating machine learning and deep learning models with Geographic Information Systems (GIS)-based spatial analysis to predict both the occurrence and severity of autonomous vehicle accidents and to identify high-risk locations and conditions. The results show that Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) models perform effectively in accident severity prediction, while ANN achieves superior performance in accident occurrence prediction under balanced data conditions. The proposed approach offers a data-driven basis for risk-aware route planning and dynamic safety management in intelligent transportation systems.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Arslan, A. C., Ozkan, M., Yıldız, K. (2026). Spatial Prediction And Safe Route Optimization of Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: Machine Learning And Gis-Based Integrated Approach. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.17798/bitlisfen.1848616

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (25)

  1. S. Bayındır, “Autonomous driving systems and their applications,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation, 2021.
  2. L. Chen, “AI-driven perception systems in autonomous driving,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 2020.
  3. SAE International, Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems (SAE J3016), 2021.
  4. J. M. Anderson, N. Kalra, K. D. Stanley, P. Sorensen, C. Samaras, and O. A. Oluwatola, Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Guide for Policymakers. Santa Monica, CA, USA: RAND Corporation, 2016.
  5. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Autonomous Vehicle Crash Reports Summary. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2024.
  6. B. Ren, H. Liu, and X. Zhao, “Failure analysis of autonomous vehicle perception systems,” Journal of Automotive Safety, 2021.
  7. M. Bulut, “Machine learning-based crash prediction models for autonomous vehicles,” Transportation Safety Review, 2024.
  8. S. Pour, M. Ahmed, and J. Lee, “Crash prediction using multi-model machine learning approaches,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, 2022.
  9. T. Endashaw, “Spatial patterns of autonomous vehicle crashes using GIS-based clustering,” International Journal of Urban Mobility, 2025.
  10. A. Ulu, “Geographical distribution of autonomous vehicle crashes: A spatial analysis,” Urban Computing Journal, 2024.
  11. A. Mimi et al., “Hybrid GIS and machine learning frameworks for crash hotspot detection,” Journal of Geospatial Analysis, 2025.
  12. R. Singh, “GIS-based safe routing strategies for autonomous vehicles,” Smart Mobility Letters, 2025.
  13. Q. Jiao, Y. Zhang, and L. Han, “Spatial–machine learning integration for traffic risk prediction,” Sensors and Autonomous Systems, 2025.
  14. D. J. Fagnant and K. Kockelman, “Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations,” Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, vol. 77, pp. 167–181, 2015.
  15. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Automated Vehicles Crash Report. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2024.
  16. H. Zhou, H. Xu, C. Zhang, and Y. Wang, “Traffic accident prediction using machine learning: A survey and analysis,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 42363–42381, 2021.
  17. S. Grigorescu, B. Trasnea, T. Cocias, and G. Macesanu, “A survey of deep learning techniques for autonomous driving,” Journal of Field Robotics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 362–386, 2020.
  18. K. Xie and X. Yan, “Detecting traffic accident clusters with network kernel density estimation and local spatial statistics: An integrated approach,” Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 31, pp. 64–71, 2013.
  19. E. W. Dijkstra, “A note on two problems in connexion with graphs,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 1, pp. 269–271, 1959.
  20. Y. L. Chen and H. H. Yang, “Finding the first K shortest paths in a time window network,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 499–513, 2004.
  21. B. W. Silverman, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Chapman and Hall, 1986.
  22. T. K. Anderson, “Kernel density estimation and K-means clustering to profile road accident hotspots,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 359–364, 2009.
  23. M. Abdel-Aty, C. Lee, C. Siddiqui, and K. Choi, “Real-time crash risk assessment using traffic data,” Transportation Research Record, vol. 2237, pp. 45–54, 2013.
  24. C. Wang, M. Quddus, and S. Ison, “The effect of traffic and road characteristics on road safety: A review and future research direction,” Safety Science, vol. 75, pp. 43–55, 2015.
  25. L. Y. Chang, “Analysis of freeway accident frequencies using artificial neural networks,” Safety Science, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 541–559, 2005.