KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Education and Future / 2020 / Sayı: 18

An Analysis of Young Children’s Preferences on STEM Activities in terms of Gender

Mustafa Çetin(AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4461-5969
H. Özlen Demircan(MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3536-4643
Ezgi Şenyurt(MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7534-7509
Aysun Ata Aktürk(KASTAMONU UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9433-5247
Sayfa
1–15
Yayın Tarihi
2020-07-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study may indicate the basis from which the gender gap emerged in STEM-related fields.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Presenting differences in the participation rates of genders in STEM activities may be a practical way to reveal that a solution to the gender gap should include addressing children at an early age, rather than at later periods in life.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Thus, the purpose of the study was to investigate the STEM-related activity preferences of 3 to 8-year-old children.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study may indicate the basis from which the gender gap emerged in STEM-related fields.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:STEM activities · gender-related preferences · gender gap

Abstract

Presenting differences in the participation rates of genders in STEM activities may be a practical way to reveal that a solution to the gender gap should include addressing children at an early age, rather than at later periods in life. Thus, the purpose of the study was to investigate the STEM-related activity preferences of 3 to 8-year-old children. The sample of the study consisted of 193 children, between 3- and 8-years old attended STEM activities presented at the eight-hours-long science fair annually organized. Data was collected through a checklist. The results of the study revealed that the number of boys that attended the activities was greater than that of girls. More boys participated in the age group 5 than girls. On the other hand, girls’ participation was higher than boys in age group 6. The results of the study also revealed that the activity preference of girls and boys did not differ for five out of six activities, i.e., Catapult Design, Jumping Wooden Sticks, Design Own Ship, Rescue the Horse, and Constructing with Mirror. However, it was found that among the six activities, boys participated in the magnetic wall activity significantly more than girls. This study may indicate the basis from which the gender gap emerged in STEM-related fields.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çetin, M., Demircan, H. Ö., Şenyurt, E., Aktürk, A. A. (2020). An Analysis of Young Children’s Preferences on STEM Activities in terms of Gender. Journal of Education and Future, Sayı: 18, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30786/jef.650246

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (64)

  1. Aina, O. E., & Cameron, P. A. (2011). Why does gender matter? Counteracting stereotypes with young children. Dimensions of Early Childhood, 39(3), 11-19.
  2. Bailey, S. M. (1993). The current status of gender equity research in American schools. Educational psychologist, 28(4), 321-339.
  3. Baker, D., & Leary, R. (1995). Letting girls speak out about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 3-27. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660320104
  4. Bell, P., Lewenstein, B., Shouse, A. W., & Feder, M. A. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  5. Birch, L. L. (1980). Effects of peer models' food choices and eating behaviors on preschoolers' food preferences. Child Development, 51(2), 489-496.
  6. Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Elliot, E. (2011). Young children and educator’s engagement and learning outdoors: A basis for rights-based programming. Early Education and Development, 22(5), 757-777. doi:10.2307/1129283
  7. Bowman, B. T., Donavan, M.S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  8. Caine-Bish, N. L., & Scheule, B. (2009). Gender differences in food preferences of school‐aged children and adolescents. Journal of School Health, 79(11), 532-540. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00445.x
  9. Carlone, H. B. (2004). The cultural production of science in reform-based physics: Girls’ access, participation and resistance. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(4), 392-414. doi:10.1002/tea.20006
  10. Chang, A., Sandhofer, C. M., & Brown, C. S. (2011). Gender biases in early number exposure to preschool-aged children. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 30(4), 440-450. doi:10.1177/0261927X11416207
  11. Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(49), 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049
  12. Chick, K. A., Heilman-Houser, R. A., & Hunter, M. W. (2002). The impact of child care on gender role development and gender stereotypes. Early Childhood Education Journal, 29(3), 149-154.
  13. Christidou, V. (2006). Greek Students’ Science‐related Interests and Experiences: Gender differences and correlations. International Journal of Science Education, 28(10), 1181-1199. doi:10.1080/09500690500439389
  14. Cooke, L. J., & Wardle, J. (2005). Age and gender differences in children's food preferences. British Journal of Nutrition, 93(5), 741-746. doi:10.1079/BJN20051389
  15. Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258-261. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00347
  16. del Río, M. F., & Strasser, K. (2013). Preschool children’s beliefs about gender differences in academic skills. Sex Roles, 68(3-4), 231-238. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0195-6
  17. Desouza, J. M. S., & Czerniak, C. M. (2002). Social behaviors and gender differences among preschoolers: implications for science activities. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 16(2), 175-188. doi:10.1080/02568540209594983
  18. Early, D. M., Iruka, I. U., Ritchie, S., Barbarin, O. A., Winn, D. M. C., Crawford, G. M.,. & Bryant, D. M. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 177-193. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.003
  19. Farenga, S. J., & Joyce, B. A. (1999). Intentions of young students to enroll in science courses in the future: An examination of gender differences. Science Education, 83(1), 55-75. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199901)83:1 3.0.CO;2-O
  20. Finn, K., Johannsen, N., & Specker, B. (2002). Factors associated with physical activity in preschool children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 140(1), 81-85. doi:10.1067/mpd.2002.120693
  21. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  22. Freeman, N. K. (2007). Preschoolers’ perceptions of gender appropriate toys and their parents’ beliefs about genderized behaviors: Miscommunication, mixed messages, or hidden truths?. Early Childhood Education Journal, 34(5), 357-366. doi:10.1007/s10643-006-0123-x
  23. Gelman, S. A., & Kalish, C. W. (2006). Conceptual development. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), William Damon, and Richard M. Lerner, Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 687-733). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  24. Goble, P., Martin, C. L., Hanish, L. D., & Fabes, R. A. (2012). Children’s gender-typed activity choices across preschool social contexts. Sex Roles, 67(7-8), 435-451. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0176-9
  25. Gold, Z. S., Elicker, J., Choi, J. Y., Anderson, T., & Brophy, S. P. (2015). Preschoolers' engineering play behaviors: Differences in gender and play context. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 1-21. doi:10.7721/chilyoutenvi.25.3.0001
  26. Gullo, D. F. (2005). Understanding Assessment and Evaluation in Early Childhood Education (2nd ed.). New York, N.Y.: Teachers College Press.
  27. Halford, G., & Andrews G., C. W. (2006 Reasoning and problem solving. In D. Kuhn & R. Siegler (Eds.), William Damon, and Richard M. Lerner, Handbook of child psychology: Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 557-608). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  28. Hill. C., Corbett. C., & St. Rose, A. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: American Association of University Women.
  29. Hughes, F. (2003). Sensivity to the social and cultural contexts of the play of young children. In J. P. Isenberg & M. R. Jalongo (Eds.), Major trends and issues in early childhood education (2nd ed.) (pp. 126-135). New York: Teacher College Press.
  30. The Institution of Engineering and Technology [IET], (2016, December 6). Parents, retailers and search engines urged to ‘re-think the pink’ next Christmas. Retrieved from http://www.theiet.org/policy/media/press-releases/20161206.cfm
  31. Kelly, L. A., Reilly, J. J., Fisher, A., Montgomery, C., Williamson, A., McColl, J. H.,. & Grant, S. (2006). Effect of socioeconomic status on objectively measured physical activity. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(1), 35-38. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.080275
  32. Kinzie, J. (2007). Women’s paths in science: A critical feminist analysis. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2007(133), 81–93. doi:10.1002/ir.206
  33. Leibham, M. B., Alexander, J. M., & Johnson, K. E. (2013). Science interests in preschool boys and girls: Relations to later self‐concept and science achievement. Science Education, 97(4), 574-593. doi:10.1002/sce.21066
  34. Lee, L. (2008). Understanding gender through Disney’s marriages: A study of young Korean immigrant girls. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(1), 11-18. doi:10.1007/s10643-008-0260-5
  35. Leslie S. J., Cimpian A., Meyer M., & Freeland E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science 347(6219), 262-265. doi:10.1126/science.1261375
  36. Liss, M. B. (1981). Patterns of toy play: An analysis of sex differences. Sex Roles, 7(11), 1143-1150. doi:10.1007/BF00287590
  37. LoBue, V., & DeLoache, J. S. (2011). Pretty in pink: The early development of gender‐stereotyped colour preferences. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 656-667. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02027.x
  38. Lynn, R., & Mikk, J. (2008). Science: sex differences in attainment. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies, 33(1), 101-124. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.003
  39. MacPhee, D., Farro, S., & Canetto, S. S. (2013). Academic self-efficacy and performance of underrepresented STEM majors: Gender, ethnic, and social class patterns. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13(1), 347-369. doi:10.1111/asap.12033
  40. Mantzicopoulos, P., Patrick, H., & Samarapungavan, A. (2008). Young children's motivational beliefs about learning science. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23(3), 378-394.
  41. Mantzicopoulos, P., & Patrick, H. (2010). “The seesaw is a machine that goes up and down”: Young children's narrative responses to science-related informational text. Early Education and Development, 21(3), 412-444. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00171
  42. Miller, C., Lurye, L., Zosuls, K., & Ruble, D. (2009). Accessibility of gender stereotype domains: Developmental and gender differences in children. Sex Roles, 60(11/12), 870-881.
  43. Miller, P. H., Blessing, J. S., & Schwartz, S. (2006). Gender differences in high‐school students’ views about science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 363-381. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9584-x
  44. Moomaw, S. (2013). Teaching STEM in the early years. St. Paul, MN: The Readleaf Press.
  45. Murphy, P., & Elwood, J. (1998). Gendered experiences, choices and achievement-exploring the links. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2(2), 95-118. doi:10.1080/1360311980020202
  46. NAECY, (2009). Developmentally appropriate practices in early childhood education programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
  47. National Academies (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
  48. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for k-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
  49. Nielsen, G., Pfister, G., & Andersen, L. B. (2011). Gender differences in the daily physical activities of Danish school children. European Physical Education Review, 17(1), 69-90. doi:10.1177/1356336X11402267
  50. OECD (2018). Education at Glance 2018: OECD Indicators. OECD Publishing: Paris. doi: http://dx.doi.org./10.1787/eag-2018-en
  51. Parke, R. D., & Buriel, R. (2008) Socialization in the family: Ethnic and ecological perspectives. In W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotionaland personality development (pp. 429-505). New Jearsey, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
  52. Ruble, D. N., Martin, C., & Berenbaum, S. (2006). Gender development. In N. Eisenberg (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social emotionaland personality development (pp. 858- 932). New York: Wiley.
  53. Saçkes, M. (2014). Parents who want their PreK children to have science learning experiences are outliers. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29(2), 132-143. doi: 10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.11.005
  54. Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Klein, S. (1991). Chapter 7: The issue of gender in elementary and secondary education. Review of research in education, 17(1), 269-334.Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing atfairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone.
  55. Segal, M., Montie, J., & Iverson, T. J. (2000). Observing for individual differences in the social interaction styles of preschool children. In K. Gitlin-Weiner, A. Sandgrund, & C. Shaefer (Eds.), Play diagnosis and assessment, (2nd edition) (pp. 544-562). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
  56. Serbin, L. A., Poulin-Dubois, D., Colburne, K. A., Sen, M. G., & Eichstedt, J. A. (2001). Gender stereotyping in infancy: Visual preferences for and knowledge of gender-stereotyped toys in the second year. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(1), 7-15. doi:10.1080/01650250042000078
  57. Shapiro, C. A., & Sax, L. J. (2011). Major selection and persistence for women in STEM. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2011(152), 5-18. doi:10.1002/ir.404Sullivan, A. A. (2016). Breaking the STEM Stereotype: Investigating the Use of Robotics to Change Young Children's Gender Stereotypes About Technology and Engineering (Doctoral dissertation). Retrievded from Proquest. (10118647).
  58. Timmons, B. W., Naylor, P. J., & Pfeiffer, K. A. (2007). Physical activity for preschool children—how much and how? Applied Physiology, Nutrition, and Metabolism, 32, 122-134. doi:10.1139/H07-112
  59. Turkish Ministry of National Education (2013). Early childhood education curriculum. Ankara: Turkish Ministry of National Education.
  60. Van Ausdale, D., & Feagin, J. R. (2007). Using racial and ethnic concepts: The critical case of very young children. American Sociological Review, 61(5), 779-793. doi: 0.2307/2096453
  61. Weisgram, E. S., Fulcher, M., & Dinella, L. M. (2014). Pink gives girls permission: Exploring the roles of explicit gender labels and gender-typed colors on preschool children's toy preferences. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 401-409. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2014.06.004
  62. Wertheim, M. (2006, October 3). Numbers are male, said Pythagoras, and the idea persists. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
  63. Early, D. M., Iruka, I. U., Ritchie, S., Barbarin, O. A., Winn, D. M. C., Crawford, G. M.,. & Bryant, D. M. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 177-193. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.003
  64. Kelly, L. A., Reilly, J. J., Fisher, A., Montgomery, C., Williamson, A., McColl, J. H.,. & Grant, S. (2006). Effect of socioeconomic status on objectively measured physical activity. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(1), 35-38. doi:10.1136/adc.2005.080275