Dergiler / Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering / 2026 / Cilt: 14

ULUSLARARASI ÇEVRE ANLAŞMALARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE G-7 ÜLKELERİNDE KARBON EMİSYONLARININ DÖNÜŞÜMÜ

Transformation of Carbon Emissions in G-7 Countries within the Framework of International Environmental Agreements

Muhammed İnal(BATMAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0165-6565
Sayfa
26–32
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, Kyoto müzakereleri ve uygulama dönemi (1997-2005) ve Paris Anlaşması sonrasında (2015-2017) önemli kırılmaların meydana geldiğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, G7 ülkeleri bağlamında 1990-2023 dönemi için imzalanan uluslararası çevre anlaşmalarının karbondioksit (CO₂) emisyonları üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bulgular, Kyoto müzakereleri ve uygulama dönemi (1997-2005) ve Paris Anlaşması sonrasında (2015-2017) önemli kırılmaların meydana geldiğini göstermektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, gelecekte daha güçlü izleme mekanizmalarına duyulan ihtiyacı da ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2023 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Uluslararası Çevre Anlaşmaları · Kyoto Protokolü · Paris Anlaşması

Özet

Bu çalışma, G7 ülkeleri bağlamında 1990-2023 dönemi için imzalanan uluslararası çevre anlaşmalarının karbondioksit (CO₂) emisyonları üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Çalışmanın temel amacı, özellikle Kyoto Protokolü ve Paris Anlaşması çerçevesinde geliştirilen düzenlemelerden kaynaklanan emisyon eğilimlerindeki yapısal dönüşümleri ortaya çıkarmaktır. Emisyon serilerindeki rejim değişikliklerinin tarihleri, Bai-Perron çoklu yapısal kırılma testi kullanılarak belirlenmiştir. Bulgular, Kyoto müzakereleri ve uygulama dönemi (1997-2005) ve Paris Anlaşması sonrasında (2015-2017) önemli kırılmaların meydana geldiğini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, küresel finans krizi ve Avrupa borç krizi gibi ekonomik şoklar da çevre politikası uygulamasının etkinliğini etkilemiştir. Çevre anlaşmaları, G7 ülkelerinde mutlak emisyonları azaltmada kısmen başarılı olmuştur. Toplam emisyonlardaki payları 1990'da %40'tan 2023'te %20'ye düştü. Bununla birlikte, ülkeler arasında farklılıklar devam etmekte ve esnek taahhütlere dayalı mekanizmaların zayıf bağlayıcılığı, emisyon azaltımında farklı sonuçlara yol açmaktadır. Bu bağlamda, çalışma, küresel emisyon politikalarının şekillenmesinde çevresel anlaşmaların belirleyici rolünü vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, gelecekte daha güçlü izleme mekanizmalarına duyulan ihtiyacı da ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

This study analyzes the impacts of signed international environmental agreements on carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions for the period 1990-2023 in the context of the G-7 countries. The main objective of the study is to reveal the structural transformations in emission trends resulting from the regulations developed within the framework of international environmental agreements, particularly the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. The dates of regime shifts in the emission series were determined using the Bai-Perron multiple structural break test. The findings indicate that significant breaks occurred during the Kyoto negotiations and implementation period (1997-2005) and after the Paris Agreement (2015-2017). In addition, economic shocks such as the global financial crisis and the European debt crisis have also affected the effectiveness of environmental policy implementation. Environmental agreements have been partially successful in reducing absolute emissions in the G-7 countries. Their share of total emissions decreased from 40% in 1990 to 20% in 2023. However, differences persist across countries, and the weak binding nature of mechanisms based on flexible commitments leads to varying outcomes in emissions reductions. In this context, the study emphasizes the decisive role of environmental agreements in shaping global emissions policies. It also highlights the need for stronger monitoring mechanisms in the future.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özel, S., İnal, M. (2026). ULUSLARARASI ÇEVRE ANLAŞMALARI ÇERÇEVESİNDE G-7 ÜLKELERİNDE KARBON EMİSYONLARININ DÖNÜŞÜMÜ. Balkan Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Cilt: 14, 26–32. https://doi.org/10.17694/bajece.1888550

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (43)

  1. S. Mukhtarov, "Do renewable energy and total factor productivity eliminate CO2 emissions in Turkey?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 307-324, 2024.
  2. H. Kim, M. Kim, H. Kim, and S. Park, "Decomposition analysis of CO2 emission from electricity generation: Comparison of OECD countries before and after the financial crisis," Energies, vol. 13, no. 14, p. 3522, 2020.
  3. D. Bodansky and H. Van Asselt, The art and craft of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, 2024.
  4. A. N. Albayrak and S. H. Bostanci, "The Aim of Sustainable Urban Development and Climate Change Policies," in International Sustainable Buildings Symposium, 2017: Springer, pp. 220-230.
  5. C. Cui, D. Guan, D. Wang, V. Chemutai, and P. Brenton, Emerging emitters and global carbon mitigation efforts. World Bank, 2020.
  6. J. R. Fleming, Historical perspectives on climate change. Oxford University Press, 1998.
  7. R. Heede, "The evolution of corporate accountability for climate change," in Litigating the Climate Emergency: How Human Rights, Courts, and Legal Mobilization Can Bolster Climate Action C. Rodríguez-Garavito Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 239–254.
  8. P. Lawn and P. A. Lawn, Resolving the climate change crisis. Springer, 2016.
  9. L. C. Buelens, H. Poelman, G. B. Marin, and V. V. Galvita, "110th anniversary: carbon dioxide and chemical looping: current research trends," Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 58, no. 36, pp. 16235-16257, 2019.
  10. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
  11. R. Revelle and H. E. Suess, "Carbon dioxide exchange between atmosphere and ocean and the question of an increase of atmospheric CO2 during the past decades," Tellus, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 18-27, 1957.
  12. K. Skrable, G. Chabot, and C. French, "World atmospheric CO2, its 14C specific activity, non-fossil component, anthropogenic fossil component, and emissions (1750–2018)," Health Physics, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 291-305, 2022.
  13. C. D. Keeling, "The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas," Geochimica et cosmochimica acta, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 322-334, 1958.
  14. W. R. Moomaw, "Climate Protection and Energy Policy," in Encyclopedia of Energy vol. 1, ed: Elsevier, 2004.
  15. I. C. Okogbule, D. O. Agwor, and E. H. Nyekwere, "The historical development of international environmental law: A legal appraisal," 2022.
  16. P. Sands, J. Peel, A. Fabra Aguilar, and R. MacKenzie, Principles of international environmental law, 4 ed. Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  17. W. M. O. (WMO), "Declaration of the World Climate Conference," in World Climate Conference, Geneva, Switzerland, 1979: World Meteorological Organization. [Online]. Available: https://dgvn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DOKUMENTE/WCC-3/Declaration_WCC1.pdf. [Online]. Available: https://dgvn.de/fileadmin/user_upload/DOKUMENTE/WCC-3/Declaration_WCC1.pdf
  18. IPCC, "Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment," 1990. [Online]. Available: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf
  19. G. H. Brundtland, "Our common future world commission on environment and developement," 1987.
  20. U. Nations, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)," United Nations, New York, United States, International Convention 1992. [Online]. Available: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
  21. U. Nations, "Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," United Nations, Kyoto, Japan, International Agreement / Protocol 1998. [Online]. Available: https://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf
  22. J. T. Houghton et al., Climate change 2001: the scientific basis: contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge university press, 2001.
  23. L. Rajamani, "The Durban platform for enhanced action and the future of the climate regime," International & Comparative Law Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 501-518, 2012.
  24. J. Blunden. "2013 State of the Climate: Carbon Dioxide Tops 400 ppm." National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/climate.gov. https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/2013-state-climate-carbon-dioxide-tops-400-ppm (accessed 8 July, 2025).
  25. UNFCCC, "Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Nineteenth Session, held in Warsaw from 11 to 23 November 2013," in United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2014.
  26. U. Nations, "Paris Agreement," United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), Paris, France, International Agreement 2015. [Online]. Available: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/english_paris_agreement.pdf
  27. A. Kiss and D. Shelton, Guide to international environmental law. Brill, 2007.
  28. L. Rajamani, "The 2015 Paris Agreement: Interplay between hard, soft and non-obligations," Journal of environmental law, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 337-358, 2016.
  29. J. M. Smallwood, Implementing international environmental law and policy: An interactive approach to environmental regulation. Taylor & Francis, 2024.
  30. A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. Van Asselt, H. D. Asselt, and J. Forster, Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge University Press, 2018.
  31. T. Hale, "Catalytic cooperation," Global Environmental Politics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 73-98, 2020.
  32. R. Falkner, "The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics," International Affairs, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1107-1125, 2016.
  33. . The United States Nationally Determined Contribution: Reducing Greenhouse Gases in The United States: A 2035 Emissions Target. [Online] Available: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/2024-12/United%20States%202035%20NDC.pdf
  34. F. S. Bellelli, R. Scarpa, and A. Aftab, "An empirical analysis of participation in international environmental agreements," Journal of environmental economics and management, vol. 118, p. 102783, 2023.
  35. M. Chen and Z. Xu, "Assessing socio-ecological fit of international environmental agreements and trade-embodied carbon flows," Environmental Impact Assessment Review, vol. 106, p. 107534, 2024.
  36. A. Jahanger, I. Ozturk, J. C. Onwe, S. O. Ogwu, M. R. Hossain, and A. A. Abdallah, "Do pro-environmental interventions matter in restoring environmental sustainability? Unveiling the role of environmental tax, green innovation and air transport in G-7 nations," Gondwana Research, vol. 127, pp. 165-181, 2024.
  37. H. Kanaboshi, F. Sano, J. Oda, K. Akimoto, and N. Onishi, "Cost-efficient measures in the oil refinery and petrochemical sectors for the reduction of CO2 emissions under the Paris Agreement and air pollution under the MARPOL Convention," Energy and Climate Change, vol. 2, p. 100027, 2021.
  38. K. Mehmood, S. Tauseef Hassan, X. Qiu, and S. Ali, "Comparative analysis of CO 2 emissions and economic performance in the United States and China: Navigating sustainable development in the climate change era," Geoscience Frontiers, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 101843, 2024.
  39. M. Günther and T. Hellmann, "International environmental agreements for local and global pollution," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, vol. 81, pp. 38-58, 2017.
  40. L. Schneider and S. La Hoz Theuer, "Environmental integrity of international carbon market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement," Climate Policy, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 386-400, 2019.
  41. A. Michaelowa, I. Shishlov, and D. Brescia, "Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, vol. 10, no. 6, p. e613, 2019.
  42. J. Bai and P. Perron, "Estimating and testing linear models with multiple structural changes," Econometrica, pp. 47-78, 1998.
  43. J. Bai and P. Perron, "Computation and analysis of multiple structural change models," Journal of applied econometrics, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1-22, 2003.