KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Alanya Akademik Bakış / 2026 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2

Dijital Liderliğin Yenilikçi Davranışa Etkisinde İşe Adanmışlığın Aracılık Rolüne İlişkin Meta-Analitik Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi

The Mediating Role of Work Engagement in the Relationship between Digital Leadership and Innovative Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling

Zübeyir Özçelik(Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu)0000-0001-7027-7396
Hüseyin Çelik(CELÂL BAYAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0001-6311-0560
Sayfa
553–568
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırma bulguları, dijital liderliğin hem yenilikçi davranışı hem de işe adanmışlığı pozitif ve anlamlı düzeyde etkilediğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, dijital liderliğin çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerindeki etkisini ve bu ilişkide işe adanmışlığın aracılık rolünü belirlemeyi amaçlayan kapsamlı bir meta-analitik yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (Meta-SEM) gerçekleştirilmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma kapsamında Web of Science (WoS) ve Scopus veri tabanları taranmış; başlangıç aşamasında WoS’tan 55, Scopus’tan ise 41 makaleye ulaşılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırma bulguları, dijital liderliğin hem yenilikçi davranışı hem de işe adanmışlığı pozitif ve anlamlı düzeyde etkilediğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dijital Liderlik · Yenilikçi Davranış · İşe Adanmışlık

Özet

Bu çalışmada, dijital liderliğin çalışanların yenilikçi davranışları üzerindeki etkisini ve bu ilişkide işe adanmışlığın aracılık rolünü belirlemeyi amaçlayan kapsamlı bir meta-analitik yapısal eşitlik modellemesi (Meta-SEM) gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında Web of Science (WoS) ve Scopus veri tabanları taranmış; başlangıç aşamasında WoS’tan 55, Scopus’tan ise 41 makaleye ulaşılmıştır. PRISMA protokolü kriterlerine göre gerçekleştirilen ayıklama süreci sonucunda, analiz kriterlerini tam olarak karşılayan 15 çalışma meta-analiz kapsamına dahil edilmiştir. Bu çalışmalardan elde edilen özet veriler Python yazılımı kullanılarak analiz edilmiş ve analizler Meta-SEM yöntemiyle yürütülmüştür. Araştırma bulguları, dijital liderliğin hem yenilikçi davranışı hem de işe adanmışlığı pozitif ve anlamlı düzeyde etkilediğini göstermektedir. Yapısal eşitlik modellemesi sonuçları, işe adanmışlığın, dijital liderlik ile yenilikçi davranış arasındaki ilişkide kısmi aracılık üstlendiğini doğrulamaktadır. Bu sonuç, dijital dönüşüm sürecindeki liderlerin çalışan bağlılığını artırarak inovasyon çıktılarını dolaylı yoldan da desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır. Çalışma, dijital çağda örgütsel verimliliği artırmak isteyen uygulayıcılar ve literatürdeki teorik boşluğu doldurmak isteyen araştırmacılar için önemli kanıtlar sunmaktadır.

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive meta-analytic structural equation modeling (Meta-SEM) to examine the effect of digital leadership on employees’ innovative behavior and to determine the mediating role of work engagement in this relationship. Within the scope of the study, the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus databases were systematically searched; at the initial stage, 55 articles from WoS and 41 articles from Scopus were identified. Following the screening process conducted in accordance with the PRISMA protocol criteria, 15 studies that fully met the inclusion criteria were incorporated into the meta-analysis. The summary data obtained from these studies were analyzed using Python software, and the analyses were conducted through the Meta-SEM method. The findings indicate that digital leadership has a positive and significant effect on both innovative behavior and work engagement. The results of the structural equation modeling confirm that work engagement plays a partial mediating role in the relationship between digital leadership and innovative behavior. This result reveals that leaders in the digital transformation process indirectly support innovation outcomes by enhancing employee engagement. The study provides important evidence for practitioners seeking to improve organizational effectiveness in the digital era and for researchers aiming to address theoretical gaps in the literature.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özçelik, Z., Çelik, H. (2026). Dijital Liderliğin Yenilikçi Davranışa Etkisinde İşe Adanmışlığın Aracılık Rolüne İlişkin Meta-Analitik Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi. Alanya Akademik Bakış, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 2, 553–568. https://doi.org/10.29023/alanyaakademik.1882064

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (47)

  1. Abbas, S. M., Latif, M., & Sarwar, F. (2024). Digital leadership and innovative work behavior in IT sector: The mediating role of digital entrepreneurial orientation and digital organizational culture. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-024-09503-7
  2. Agarwal, U. A., Datta, S., Blake-Beard, S., & Bhargava, S. (2012). Linking LMX, innovative work behaviour and turnover intentions: The mediating role of work engagement. Career Development International, 17(3), 208–230. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620431211241063
  3. Ahmed, F., Naqshbandi, M. M., Waheed, M., & Ain, N. U. (2024). Digital leadership and innovative work behavior: Impact of LMX, learning orientation and innovation capabilities. Management Decision, 62(12), 3607–3631. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-04-2023-0673
  4. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2008). Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International, 13(3), 209–223.
  5. Basım, H. N., Korkmazyürek, H., & Tokat, A. O. (2008). Çalışanların öz yeterlilik algılamasının yenilikçilik ve risk alma üzerine etkisi: Kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (19), 121–130.
  6. Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590.
  7. Brunner, T. J., Schuster, T., & Lehmann, C. (2023). Leadership’s long arm: The positive influence of digital leadership on managing technology-driven change over a strengthened service innovation capacity. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 988808.
  8. De Jong, J. P. J., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.
  9. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  10. Dewi, R. K., & Sjabadhymi, B. (2021). Digital leadership as a resource to enhance managers’ psychological well-being in COVID-19 pandemic situation in Indonesia. The South East Asian Journal of Management, 15(2), 2.
  11. Edmondson, A. C., & Lei, Z. (2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23-43.
  12. Egger, M., Davey Smith, G., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ, 315(7109), 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
  13. Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydin, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-06-2021-0338
  14. Fatima, T., & Masood, A. (2024). Impact of digital leadership on open innovation: A moderating serial mediation model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 28, 161–180.
  15. Gao, P., & Gao, Y. (2024). How does digital leadership foster employee innovative behavior: A cognitive–affective processing system perspective. Behavioral Sciences, 14(5), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14050362
  16. Güven, Ş., & Doğan, E. (2025). The impact of organizational climate on innovative behavior: The mediating role of work engagement. EKOIST Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, (42), 209–222.
  17. Hadi, S., Setiawati, L., Kirana, K. C., Lada, S. B., & Rahmawati, C. H. T. (2024). The effect of digital leadership and organizational support on innovative work behavior: The mediating role of emotional intelligence. Quality – Access to Success, 25(199), 70–77. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/25.199.09
  18. Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302.
  19. Karafakioğlu, E., & Afacan Findikli, M. (2024). The mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between digital leadership and innovative behavior and organizational agility. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 13(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2024.60395
  20. Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.). NY: Wiley.
  21. Khan, A. N., Wang, Y., Khan, N. A., & Ahmad, A. (2025). Digital leadership enhances employee empowerment, techno-work engagement, and sustainability: SEM analysis in public healthcare. INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing, 62, 00469580251317653.
  22. Kim, W., & Park, J. (2017). Examining structural relationships between work engagement, organizational procedural justice, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior for sustainable organizations. Sustainability, 9(2), 205.
  23. Kong, Y., & Li, M. (2018). Proactive personality and innovative behavior: The mediating roles of job-related affect and work engagement. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 431–446.
  24. Li, M., & Xiao, W. (2023). Research on the effect of e-leadership on employee innovation behavior in the context of “self” and “relationship.” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 35(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/JOEUC.317090
  25. Li, Z., Yang, C., Yang, Z., & Zhao, Y. (2024). The impact of middle managers’ digital leadership on employee work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1368442.
  26. Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: Explanation and elaboration. BMJ, 339, b2700. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700
  27. Lin, H. C., & Lee, Y. D. (2017). A study of the influence of organizational learning on employees’ innovative behavior and work engagement by a cross-level examination. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3463–3478.
  28. Meriç, E., Çiftçi, D. Ö., & Yurtal, F. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve işe adanmışlık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 27(1), 65–74.
  29. Naktiyok, S., Zengin, Y., & Yıldırım, S. K. (2019). Yöneticilerin karanlık kişiliklerinin işe adanmışlık ve örgütsel muhalefete etkisi: Bir araştırma. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 11(4), 2474–2491.
  30. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  31. Peterson, R. A., & Brown, S. P. (2005). On the use of beta coefficients in meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(1), 175–181. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.1.175
  32. Sagbas, M., Oktaysoy, O., Topcuoglu, E., Kaygin, E., & Erdogan, F. A. (2023). The mediating role of innovative behavior on the effect of digital leadership on intrapreneurship intention and job performance. Behavioral Sciences, 13(10), 874. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13100874
  33. Said, H., & Kamel, N. A. (2023). Linking e-leadership to innovative and proactive work behaviors in tourism higher education institutions: A moderated mediation model using SEM. Tourism & Management Studies, 19(4), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.18089/tms.2023.190404
  34. Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(2), 224–253.
  35. Saputra, N., & Hutajulu, G. E. (2020). Engaging the millennials at office: Tracking the antecedents of holistic work engagement. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 21(1), 342–354.
  36. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71–92.
  37. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607. https://doi.org/10.2307/256701
  38. Sebetci, Ö., Çavuş, M. N., & Çavuş, B. (2025). Examining the impact of digital leadership on innovative work behavior and knowledge sharing behavior through psychological ownership. International Journal of Sociotechnology and Knowledge Development, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.355152
  39. Siregar, J., Widodo, W., Permana, R., Sriyono, H., & Saputro, A. (2026). Evoking teachers’ innovative work behavior: Perspective of digital leadership, creativity, and proactive personality through work engagement. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 323–339.
  40. Sun, Z. Y., Li, J. M., Li, B., & He, X. Y. (2024). Digital leadership and deviant innovation: The roles of innovation self-efficacy and employee ambitions. Current Psychology, 43(25), 22226–22237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06030-4
  41. Teece, D., Peteraf, M., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and strategic agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13-35.
  42. Vought, Wei Xin, (2017) E-leadership in Practice: The Components of Transformational Leadership in Virtual Business Environments. Education Doctoral. Paper 323. https://fisherpub.sjf.edu/education_etd/323.
  43. Wang, Y., Park, J., & Gao, Q. (2025). Digital leadership and employee innovative performance: The role of job crafting and person–job fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1492264. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1492264
  44. Wei, G., Alias, B. S., & Hamid, A. H. B. A. (2025). Digital leadership impact on teacher innovation in higher vocational colleges: The intermediary role of the organizational innovation climate. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 24(5), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.24.5.28
  45. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257
  46. Zhu, J., Luo, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). Digital leadership and employees’ innovative behavior in the hospitality industry: The role of digital self-efficacy and individual learning orientation. Current Psychology, 44, 16283–16297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08358-x
  47. Zia, A., Memon, M. A., Mirza, M. Z., Iqbal, Y. M. J., & Tariq, A. (2025). Digital job resources, digital engagement, digital leadership, and innovative work behaviour: A serial mediation model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 28(8), 3192–3216. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2023-0311