Dergiler / Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4

Stiren Akrilonitril ile Polietilen Tereftalatın Mekanik ve Termal İletkenlik Özelliklerinin Geliştirilmesi

Enhancement of The Mechanical and Thermal Conductivity Properties of Polyethylene Terephthalate with Styrene Acrylonitrile

Yunus Kartal(Kırıkkale Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5102-7655
Sayfa
1013–1023
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-03
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Shore-D yüzey sertliği ölçümleri, kompozitlerin saf PET'e nazaran %4,44 daha yüksek değere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışmada, polietilen tereftalat (PET) polimerinin özelliklerini geliştirmek amacıyla PET matrisine stiren akrilonitril (SAN) takviyesi eklenmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ağırlıkça dört farklı takviye oranında (2%, 4%, 6% ve 8%) hazırlanan karışım, çift vidalı ekstruder kullanılarak kompozit filamentlere ekstrüde edilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Shore-D yüzey sertliği ölçümleri, kompozitlerin saf PET'e nazaran %4,44 daha yüksek değere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:eklemeli imalat · PET bazlı kompozit · Eriyik biriktirme modelleme

Özet

Bu çalışmada, polietilen tereftalat (PET) polimerinin özelliklerini geliştirmek amacıyla PET matrisine stiren akrilonitril (SAN) takviyesi eklenmiştir. Ağırlıkça dört farklı takviye oranında (2%, 4%, 6% ve 8%) hazırlanan karışım, çift vidalı ekstruder kullanılarak kompozit filamentlere ekstrüde edilmiştir. Kompozit filamentlerden standartlara uygun nesneler üretmek için eriyik biriktirme modelleme (EBM) yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Kompozitlerin mekanik, termal iletkenlik, kristalografik karakterizasyonları ve taramalı elektron mikroskobu (SEM) kullanılarak yüzey analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Mekanik karakterizasyon için, saf PET ve PET/SAN kompozitlerine çekme ve darbe dayanımı testleri ile yüzey sertliği testleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kristalografik karakterizasyon için X-ışını dağılımı (XRD) analizleri yapılmıştır. Çalışmada sonunda, SAN takviyesinin numunelerin çekme dayanımını saf PET'e kıyasla ortalama %13,97, darbe dayanımını ise ortalama %25,81 artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Shore-D yüzey sertliği ölçümleri, kompozitlerin saf PET'e nazaran %4,44 daha yüksek değere sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Ayrıca PET/SAN kompozitlerin daha yüksek kristallik derecesine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. SEM analizi ile yapılan yüzey morfolojisi incelemeleri, PET/SAN kompozitlerin kırılma yüzeylerinin saf PET'e göre daha pürüzsüz olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Abstract

In this study, styrene acrylonitrile (SAN) reinforcement was added to the polyethylene terephthalate (PET) matrix to improve the properties of the PET polymer. The mixture, prepared with four different reinforcement ratios by weight (2%, 4%, 6%, and 8%), was extruded into composite filaments using a twin-screw extruder. The fused deposition modeling (FDM) method was used to produce objects from the composite filaments. The mechanical, thermal and crystallographic characterizations of the composites and surface analyses using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) were carried out. For mechanical characterization, tensile and impact strength tests and surface hardness tests were carried out on pure PET and PET/SAN composites. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were carried out to investigate the degree of crystallization of the samples. The study was determined that SAN reinforcement increased the tensile strength of the samples by an average of 13.97% and the impact strength by an average of 25.81% compared to pure PET. Shore-D surface hardness measurements revealed that the composites had a 4.44% higher surface hardness than pure PET. It has also been determined that PET/SAN composites had a higher crystallinity. Surface morphology investigations carried out by SEM analysis revealed that the fracture surfaces of PET/SAN composites were smoother compared to pure PET.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kartal, Y. (2026). Stiren Akrilonitril ile Polietilen Tereftalatın Mekanik ve Termal İletkenlik Özelliklerinin Geliştirilmesi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 26 Sayı: 4, 1013–1023. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1882492

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (63)

  1. Ales, M., Miroslav, M., Zdenek, H., David, M., Michal, S., Jakub, C., Martin, B., Ovsik, M., (2012). Properties of HDPE after radiation cross-linking. International Journal of Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 6. 584-591.
  2. Alyamaç-Seydibeyoğlu, E. (2004). Impact Modified Poly (Ethylene terephthalate) – Organoclay Nanocomposites. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara, 134.
  3. Aneesh, N., Piyush, S., Vishal, S., Diwan, P., K., (2020). Effect of UV-irradiation on the optical properties of transparent PET polymeric foils. Materials Today: Proceedings, 21, 2105-2111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.330.
  4. Anoop, M.S, Senthil P., (2019). Homogenisation of elastic properties in FDM components using microscale RVE numerical analysis. Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 41, 540. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-2037-8
  5. Antor, R.I., Bithi, A.M., Nahin, A.M., (2025). Variation in mechanical properties of polymer composites with reinforcements from different animal origins—a comprehensive review. International Journal of Polymer Science 4184239. https://doi.org/10.1155/ijps/4184239.
  6. Bocz, K., Ronkay, F., Decsov, K.E., Molnár, B., Marosi, G., (2021). Application of low-grade recyclate to enhance reactive toughening of poly(ethylene terephthalate). Polymer Degradation and Stability, 185, 109505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2021.109505
  7. Campbell, R.I., David, B., Gibson, Ian., (2012). Additive manufacturing: Rapid prototyping comes of age. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 18. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552541211231563.
  8. Dal Lago, E., Boaretti, C., Piovesan, F., Roso, M., Lorenzetti, A., Modesti, M., (2019). The Effect of Different Compatibilizers on the Properties of a Post-Industrial PC/PET Blend. Materials, 12(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12010049
  9. Dashan, M., Jie, Z., Xianqing, Z., Xinhe, Z., Shikui, J., Haiqing, B., (2023). Direct 3D Printing of Recycled PET/PP Granules by Shear Screw Extrusion. Polymers. 15, 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym15244620.
  10. Dixit, M., Mathur, V., Gupta, S., Baboo, M., Sharma, K., Saxena, N. S., (2009). Morphology, miscibility and mechanical properties of PMMA/PC blends. Phase Transitions, 82, 866–878. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411590903478304
  11. Eren, G., Seyfi, Ş., Özgür Ö., (2023). Pattern and filament optimization for 3D-printed reinforcements to enhance the flexural behavior of cement-based composites. Journal of Sustainable Construction Materials and Technologies, 8, 1, 3. https://doi.org/10.47481/jscmt.1207739.
  12. George, G., Balakrishnamurthy. S.K., Shivamurthy, B., Raghav, G.R., Rengaraj, M., Senthil, T., (2025). Preparation and characterization of SiC particle enhanced polyester fabric/epoxy hybrid composites. Polymer Composites, 46, 12780-12789. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29897.
  13. Haradhan M., (2025). Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET): An Overview on Production, Consumption, and Recycling. Art and Society, 4, 30-35. https://doi.org/10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2025.07.004.
  14. Jeefferie, A.R., Sit,i W., Noraiham, M., Poppy, P., Rosidah, J., Pindo, T., (2020). The Effects of R-HDPE/R-PP Formulation Ratio into mechanical, Thermal and Morphological Behaviour of r-HDPE/r-PP polymeric blends. Journal of Engineering and Management in Industrial System. 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jemis.2020.008.02.1.
  15. Juraj, B., Peter, K., Miloš, M., Michal, S., (2018). Experimental testing of PLA biodegradable thermoplastic in the frame of 3D printing FDM technology. MATEC Web of Conferences. 157, 06001. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815706001
  16. Kaeem J., (2019). Experimental investigation on mechanical behaviour and parameters of FDM printed carbon fibre reinforced PET-G and PET-G. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 8, 295-301. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v8i3.27327.
  17. Kajornprai, T., Suttiruengwong, S., Sirisinha, K., (2021). Manipulating Crystallization for Simultaneous Improvement of Impact Strength and Heat Resistance of Plasticized Poly(l-lactic acid) and Poly(butylene succinate) Blends. Polymers, 13, 3066. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13183066
  18. Kartal, Y. (2025). Investigation of Additive Manufacturing of Biocompatible Objects: Optimization of Degradation, Mechanical and Physical Properties. Scientia Iranica. https://doi.org/10.24200/sci.2025.65162.9325
  19. Kartal Y. (2025). Reinforced biocomposites: Improvement of mechanical properties of 3D printed short carbon fiber reinforced PLA composites Via optimization. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 239(12):4526-4536. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/09544062251323034
  20. Kartal Y. (2026).Thermal annealing assisted 3D printing: Enhancement of the mechanical and thermal properties of a SiC reinforced PET polymer in the FDM process. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering. 240(1), 1081-1093. https://doi.org/doi:10.1177/09544089251346883
  21. Kartal, Y., Metin, A.U. & Das, M.T. (2026). Laser annealing-integrated 3D printing of PP/BN composites: mechanical and thermal performance. Polymer Bulletin, 83, 91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00289-025-06209-0
  22. Kartal, Y., & Kantık, S., (2026). Optimisation of Production Parameters of ASA Based Materials in Additive Manufacturing Process by Taguchi L16 Method. International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, 18(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.29137/ijerad.1746449
  23. Korycki, A., Garnier, C., Irusta, S., Chabert, F., (2022). Evaluation of Fatigue Life of Recycled Opaque PET from Household Milk Bottle Wastes. Polymers, 14(17), 3466. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14173466
  24. Krause, B., Liguoro, A., Pötschke, P., (2021). Blend Structure and n-Type Thermoelectric Performance of PA6/SAN and PA6/PMMA Blends Filled with Single walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nanomaterials, 11, 1146. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11051146. 2021.
  25. Kumar, R., & Naiju, C.D., Senthil M., Padmanabhan K., Naol. D., (2021). Evaluation and Comparison of Mechanical Properties of PETG and CF - PETG Fabricated using FDM Process of Additive Manufacturing. SAE Technical Papers, 1, https://doi.org/10.4271/2021-28-0208.
  26. Laureijs, R. E., Roca, J. B., Narra, S. P., Montgomery, C., Beuth, J. L., and Fuchs, E. R. H., (2017). Metal Additive Manufacturing: Cost Competitive Beyond Low Volumes. ASME. Journal of Manufacturing Science Engineering, 139(8): 081010. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035420
  27. Liao, Y,j., Wu, Xl., Zhu, L., (2018). Synthesis and properties of novel styrene acrylonitrile/polypropylene blends with enhanced toughness. Chemistry Central Journal, 12, 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13065-018-0447-9
  28. Lopes, Cristina, L., and Maria, F., (2004). Thermal conductivity of PET/(LDPE/Al) composites determined by MDSC. Polymer Testing, 23, 637-643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting. 2004.01.013.
  29. Mahros, D., Jauza, L., Gaguk, J., Yuni, H., Aris, M., (2024). Feasibility study of PETG filament using FDM 3D printing technique for throttle sleeve products. ScienceRise. 2, 32-41. https://doi.org/10.21303/2313-8416.2024.003683.
  30. Miaozi, H., and Alois, S., (2021). Polypropylene/poly(ethylene terephthalate) microfibrillar reinforced composites manufactured by fused filament fabrication. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 138. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.50557.
  31. Muhammad R., Swapna J., Khalid A., (2020). Study of Microchannels Fabricated Using Desktop Fused Deposition Modeling Systems. Micromachines, 12, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi12010014.
  32. Olenka, L. & Silva, E. & Santos, Washington & Muniz, Edvani & Rubina, A. & Cardoso, Lisandro & Medina, Antonio & Miranda, Luiz & Baesso, Mauro & Bento, Antonio. (2001). Evaluation of the thermophysical properties of modified and dyed poly(ethylene terephthalate) films. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics, 34. 2248-2254. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/34/15/302.
  33. Peter, F., and Norbert, L., (2019). Evaluation opportunities of SEM pictures by CAD software. Design of Machines and Structures 9, 20-24. https://doi.org/10.32972/dms.2019.011.
  34. Park, S., Thanakkasaranee, S., Shin, H., Lee, Y., Tak, G., & Seo, J. (2021). PET/Bio-Based Terpolyester Blends with High Dimensional Thermal Stability. Polymers, 13(5), 728. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13050728
  35. Papajani, B., Qoku, E., Malkaj, P., et al., (2015). The study of phase compound and the degree of crystallinity of recycled LDPE by X-ray diffractometer and optical microscope, Int J Sci Res, 4(2): 2228-2232.
  36. Prasad, G., Arunav, H., Dwight, S., Ghosh, M. B., Jayadev, A., & Nair, D. I. (2024). Advancing Sustainable Practices in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review on Material Waste Recyclability. Sustainability, 16(23), 10246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310246
  37. Praveen, B., Burris, D.L. Jason, A., Toney, C., Richard, S., Linda, S., (2005). Effect of matrix morphology on the wear and friction behavior of alumina nanoparticle/poly (ethylene) terephthalate composites. Wear. 258, 1437-1443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2004.09.077.
  38. Rakib Hasan R., Ahmed, Md & Abul, B., Shafinur R., Mahfuz, Md & Ahmed S., Khan H., (2024). FDM printing process and its Biomedical Application. Chemical Research and Technology, 1, 138-149. https://doi.org/10.22034/chemrestec.2024.467346.1021.
  39. Ramesh M., Panneerselvam, K., (2020). PLA-Based Material Design and Investigation of Its Properties by FDM. Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Joining, 1, 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9433-2_20.
  40. Rupam R., Paramasivan K., Sanjib, A., Subhash P., Dipten, M., (2023). Development of high specific strength acrylonitrile styrene acrylate (ASA) structure using fused filament fabrication. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 8, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-023-00420-z.
  41. Rusu, M., & Radu, S., & Moldovan, C., Sarosi, C., Mazilu, A., Rusu, L., (2019). Mechanical and structural properties of composites made from recycled and virgin polyethylene terephthalate (PET) and metal chip or mesh wire. MATEC Web of Conferences, 299, 06007. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929906007
  42. Sandhya, G., Dinesh P., Mahesh B., Kananbala S., Saxena, N., (2010). Investigation of Al Schottky junction on n-type CdS film deposited on polymer substrate. Frontiers of Optoelectronics in China, 3, 321-327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12200-010-0102-0.
  43. Santosh, A., Ninad, I., Uttam, M., Vir, J.R., Pradip, M., (2018). Effect of Aqueous HCl with Dissolved Chlorine on Certain Corrosion-Resistant Polymers. ACS Omega. 3, 6692-6702. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.8b00515.
  44. Sheikh, T., Behdinan, K., (2024). Fused Deposition Modelling of Thermoplastic Polymer Nanocomposites: A Critical Review. C, 10, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/c10020029.
  45. Sinan, O., Yehia, I., Caleb, I., Mohamed, K., Ahmed, E., Roger, K., (2022). Thermal Conductivity of 3D-Printed Continuous Pitch Carbon Fiber Composites. Additive Manufacturing Letters, 4, 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addlet.2022.100106.
  46. Sodeifian, G., Ghaseminejad, S., Yousefi, A., (2019). Preparation of Polypropylene/Short Glass Fiber Composite as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) Filament. Results in Physics, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.065.
  47. Song, F., Wang, Q., Wang, T., (2016). The effects of crystallinity on the mechanical properties and the limiting PV (pressure× velocity) value of PTFE. Tribology International, 93, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.017
  48. Sousa, J., Oliveira, R., Santos, A., Gamallo, O., Araujo, L., Middea, A., Cid, Y., Nora C., R., (2023). Superabsorbent biodegradable CMC membranes loaded with propolis: Peppas-Sahlin kinetics release. Polímeros, 33. https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-1428.20230010.
  49. Swar, S., Máková, V., Rysová, M., Lovětinská‐Šlamborová, I., Voleský, L., Stibor, I., (2017). Biocompatible surface modification of poly(ethylene terephthalate) focused on pathogenic bacteria: Promising prospects in biomedical applications. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 134. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.44990.
  50. Teymoorzadeh, H., Rodrigue, D., (2015). Biocomposites of Wood Flour and Polylactic Acid: Processing and Properties. Journal of Biobased Materials and Bioenergy, 9, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1166/jbmb.2015.1510.
  51. Thomas, D., Gilbert, S., (2014). Costs and Cost Effectiveness of Additive Manufacturing. National Institute of Standards and Technology, 1176. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1176.
  52. Tsironi, T., Chatzidakis, S., Stoforos, N., (2022). The future of polyethylene terephthalate bottles: Challenges and sustainability. Packaging Technology and Science, 35. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2632.
  53. Veidt, M., Albermani, F., Daniel, W., Nikzad, M., Griffiths, J., Hargreaves, D., Mcaree, P., Meehan, P., Tan, A., (2007). Thermo-Mechanical Properties of a Metal-filled Polymer Composite for Fused Deposition Modelling Applications. Source. 7, 123-131
  54. Vinayak, G., Pravin, K., Hrushikesh, K., (2020). Mechanical and Thermo-mechanical Properties of Carbon fiber Reinforced Thermoplastic Composite Fabricated Using Fused Deposition Modeling Method. Materials Today: Proceedings. 22, 1786-1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.012.
  55. Vishal, M., Kananbala, S., (2016). Thermal response of polystyrene/poly methyl methacrylate (PS/PMMA) polymeric blends. Heat and Mass Transfer, 52, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00231-016-1779-4.
  56. Wang, J., Yang, B., Lin, X., Gao, L., Liu, T., Lu, Y., Wang, R., (2020). Research of TPU Materials for 3D Printing Aiming at Non-Pneumatic Tires by FDM Method. Polymers, 12, 2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12112492.
  57. Wang, L., Sanders, J. Gardner, D., Han, Y., (2018). Effect of fused deposition modeling process parameters on the mechanical properties of a filled polypropylene. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 3, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40964-018-0053-3.
  58. Yadavalli, V., Myadam, A., Telu, S., (2024). FDM 3D-Print on Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) with Different Process Parameters Using Gyroid and Zigzag Infill Patterns. Research and Development, 11, 11203. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1111203.
  59. Yanar, F. N., & Kartal, Y. (2026). Yüksek Mekanik Özellikler ve Boyutsal Doğruluk Temelli Yaklaşımın Eklemeli İmalat Yönteminde Taguchi Metodu ile Optimizasyonu. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Fen Ve Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, 26(1), 190-199. https://doi.org/10.35414/akufemubid.1708300
  60. Yehia, I., Ahmed, E., Jonathon S., Garrett M., Roger K., (2020). Effective thermal conductivity of 3D-printed continuous fiber polymer composites. Advanced Manufacturing: Polymer & Composites Science, 6, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/20550340.2019.1710023.
  61. Zhang, H., Song, J., Liu, C., (2013). Immobilization of α-Fe2O3 Nanoparticles on PET Fiber by Low Temperature Hydrothermal Method. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 52, 7403–7412. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie400019t.
  62. Zihni, Ç., (2025). The Effect of FDM Process Parameters on The Machinability of PET-G material: Delamination Analysis Using the Taguchi Approach. International Journal of 3D Printing Technologies and Digital Industry, 9, 310-319. https://doi.org/10.46519/ij3dptdi.1704399.
  63. Zisopol, D., Minescu, M., Iacob, D., (2024). A Study on the Influence of FDM Parameters on the Compressive Behavior of ASA Parts. Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, 14, 16237-16241. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.8067.