KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3

Bezelye proteini ve pamuk tohumu proteini bazlı biyokompozit filmlerin karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmesi: Mikrokristalin selüloz konsantrasyonunun performansları üzerindeki etkisi

Comparative evaluation of biocomposite films based on pea protein and cottonseed protein: Impact of microcrystalline cellulose concentration on their performances

Kamile Bayrak Akay(HARRAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-7976-377X
Bülent Başyiğit(HARRAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6617-1836
Mehmet Karaaslan(HARRAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8097-9535
Sayfa
1052–1069
Yayın Tarihi
2026-09-23
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bunun aksine, %5 (ağırlık/ağırlık) MCC konsantrasyonunda, muhtemelen agregasyon ve faz ayrışması nedeniyle bariyer etkinliğinde küçük azalmalar gözlemlenmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Petrol türevli sentetik plastiklerin çevresel ve sağlık üzerindeki etkileri, yenilenebilir ve biyolojik olarak parçalanabilir gıda ambalaj malzemelerine olan talebi artırmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Mikrokristalin selüloz (MCC) oranları, etkilerini gözlemlemek amacıyla kademeli olarak %0, %1, %3 ve %5 (ağırlık/ağırlık) oranlarında artırılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bunun aksine, %5 (ağırlık/ağırlık) MCC konsantrasyonunda, muhtemelen agregasyon ve faz ayrışması nedeniyle bariyer etkinliğinde küçük azalmalar gözlemlenmiştir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Bezelye proteini · pamuk tohumu proteini · mikrokristalin selüloz

Özet

Petrol türevli sentetik plastiklerin çevresel ve sağlık üzerindeki etkileri, yenilenebilir ve biyolojik olarak parçalanabilir gıda ambalaj malzemelerine olan talebi artırmıştır. Bu gereksinimi karşılamak için, hidrofilik bezelye proteini (PP) veya hidrofobik pamuk tohumu proteini (CSP) matrisleri kullanılarak biyokompozit filmler özenle üretilmiştir. Mikrokristalin selüloz (MCC) oranları, etkilerini gözlemlemek amacıyla kademeli olarak %0, %1, %3 ve %5 (ağırlık/ağırlık) oranlarında artırılmıştır. Üretilen filmlerin fiziksel, mekanik ve bariyer özellikleri karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar, her iki protein matrisine de %3 (w/w) MCC oranının en uygun olduğunu göstermiştir. %3 (w/w) MCC ilavesi, kristalin selüloz parçacıklarının polimer matrisi içinde homojen dağılımı sayesinde, çekme dayanımını (TS) PP için 17.68 MPa'ya ve CSP için 8.24 MPa'ya yükseltmiştir. Ek olarak, matris içindeki kırılmaya karşı fiziksel bariyerler (dolaylı yol etkisi) sayesinde, su buharı geçirgenliği (WVP) sırasıyla 0,31 ve 0,21 g·mm/m²·sa·kPa'ya düşürülerek maksimum su direnci elde edildi. Gerçek gıda simülatörü olarak ayçiçek yağı kullanılarak yapılan 30 günlük bir oksidasyon testinde, CSP-3 filmi mükemmel bir oksijen bariyeri göstererek peroksit değerini (PV) (5,80 meq O₂/kg) minimumda tutmuştur. Bu etkinlik, pamuk tohumu proteininin hidrofobik özelliklerinin MCC'nin sinerjik etkileşimiyle birleşmesinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Bunun aksine, %5 (ağırlık/ağırlık) MCC konsantrasyonunda, muhtemelen agregasyon ve faz ayrışması nedeniyle bariyer etkinliğinde küçük azalmalar gözlemlenmiştir. Özetle, endüstriyel bir yan ürün olan CSP ile MCC'nin değerlendirilmesi, güçlü mekanik özellikler ve oksidasyona karşı kayda değer direnç sağlayan, biyolojik ambalajlama için harika ve sürdürülebilir bir alternatif olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır.

Abstract

The environmental and health impact of petroleum-derived synthetic plastics has increased the demand for renewable and biodegradable food packaging materials To meet this requirement, biocomposite films were carefully made using either hydrophilic pea protein (PP) or hydrophobic cottonseed protein (CSP) matrices. The proportions of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) were gradually increased at 0%, 1%, 3%, and 5% w/w to observe their effects. The physical, mechanical, and barrier properties of the produced films were compared. The results demonstrated that a 3% (w/w) MCC ratio was optimal for inclusion in both protein matrices. Incorporating 3% (w/w) MCC increased the tensile strength (TS) to 17.68 MPa for PP and 8.24 MPa for CSP, due to the uniform distribution of crystalline cellulose particles within the polymer matrix. Additionally, thanks to the physical barriers to fracture within the matrix (the circuitous path effect), water vapor permeability (WVP) was reduced to 0.31 and 0.21 g·mm/m²·h·kPa, respectively, achieving maximum water resistance. In a 30-day oxidation test using sunflower oil as a real-food simulant, the CSP-3 film demonstrated an excellent oxygen barrier, keeping the peroxide value (PV) (5.80 meq O₂/kg) at its minimum. This effectiveness results from the hydrophobic properties of cottonseed protein combined with the synergistic interaction of MCC. Conversely, at a 5% (w/w) concentration of MCC, minor reductions in barrier efficacy were observed, presumably due to aggregation and phase separation. In summary, evaluating MCC with CSP (an industrial byproduct) reveals it as a great sustainable alternative for bio-packaging, providing strong mechanical properties and notable resistance to oxidation.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Akay, K. B., Başyiğit, B., Karaaslan, M. (2026). Bezelye proteini ve pamuk tohumu proteini bazlı biyokompozit filmlerin karşılaştırmalı değerlendirmesi: Mikrokristalin selüloz konsantrasyonunun performansları üzerindeki etkisi. Harran Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 30 Sayı: 3, 1052–1069. https://doi.org/10.29050/harranziraat.1919128

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (62)

  1. Abdul Rahman (Wahida), W., Syafiqah Ismail (Aina), A., & Aishatun Majid (Aishatun), N. (2022). Preparation and characterization of biocomposite film derived from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) of jackfruit rind waste. Materials Today: Proceedings, 66, 4055–4060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.06.071
  2. Akalan, M., Karakuş, M. Ş., Alaşalvar, H., Karaaslan, M., & Başyiğit, B. (2025). Facile synthesis of olive oil-incorporated oleofilms via high-power ultrasonic emulsification: A sustainable packaging model. Food Chemistry, 473, 142989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2025.142989
  3. Akay, K. B., Başyiğit, B., & Karaaslan, M. (2024). Fatty-acid incorporation improves hydrophobicity of pea protein based films towards better oxygen/water barrier properties and fruit protecting ability. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 276, 133965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.133965
  4. Assad, I., Bhat, S. U., Gani, A., & Shah, A. (2020). Protein based packaging of plant origin: Fabrication, properties, recent advances and future perspectives. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 164, 707–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.140
  5. Bai, H., Xu, J., Liao, P., & Liu, X. (2013). Mechanical and water barrier properties of soy protein isolate film incorporated with gelatin. Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting, 29(2), 174–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756087912468744
  6. Bangar, S. P., Esua, O. J., Nickhil, C., & Whiteside, W. S. (2023). Microcrystalline cellulose for active food packaging applications: A review. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 36, 101048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101048
  7. Bhatia, S., Shah, Y. A., Al-Harrasi, A., Jawad, M., Khan, T. S., Alam, T., Dıblan, S., Koca, E., & Aydemir, L. Y. (2024). Pectin/sodium alginate films tailored with Acetyl-11-keto-beta-boswellic acid for active packaging. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 261, 129698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129698
  8. Ceylan, H. G., & Atasoy, A. F. (2023). Synbiotic edible films enriched with probiotics and prebiotics: A novel approach for improving the quality and shelf life of sliced cheese. Packaging Technology and Science, 36(12), 1005–1019. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2771
  9. Chen, G., Dong, S., Zhao, S., Li, S., & Chen, Y. (2019). Improving functional properties of zein film via compositing with chitosan and cold plasma treatment. Industrial Crops and Products, 129, 318–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.11.072
  10. Chen, J., Chai, J., Chen, X., Huang, M., Zeng, X., & Xu, X. (2023). Development of edible films by incorporating nanocrystalline cellulose and anthocyanins into modified myofibrillar proteins. Food Chemistry, 417, 135820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135820
  11. Cheng, H. N., He, Z., Ford, C., Wyckoff, W., & Wu, Q. (2020). A review of cottonseed protein chemistry and non-food applications. Sustainable Chemistry, 1(3), 256–274. https://doi.org/10.3390/suschem1030017
  12. Cheng, J., Wang, J., Li, Z., Chen, B., & Cui, L. (2023). Improving the mechanical and water-resistance properties of pea protein-based edible film via wet-heating Maillard reaction: Insights into the simultaneous effect of heating and Maillard reaction. Food Packaging and Shelf Life, 35, 101024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2023.101024
  13. de Lima, G. G., Zakaluk, I. C. B., Artner, M. A., Pedro, A. C., Gonzalez de Cademartori, P. H., Muniz, G. I. B. de, & Magalhães, W. L. E. (2025). Enhancing barrier and antioxidant properties of nanocellulose films for coatings and active packaging: A review. ACS Applied Nano Materials, 8(9), 4397–4421. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.4c04805
  14. de Moura, M. R., Avena-Bustillos, R. J., McHugh, T. H., Wood, D. F., Otoni, C. G., & Mattoso, L. H. C. (2011). Miniaturization of cellulose fibers and effect of addition on the mechanical and barrier properties of hydroxypropyl methylcellulose films. Journal of Food Engineering, 104(1), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.008
  15. Dong, M., Tian, L., Li, J., Jia, J., Dong, Y., Tu, Y., Liu, X., Tan, C., & Duan, X. (2022). Improving physicochemical properties of edible wheat gluten protein films with proteins, polysaccharides and organic acid. LWT, 154, 112868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112868
  16. Fematt-Flores, G. E., Aguiló-Aguayo, I., Marcos, B., Camargo-Olivas, B. A., Sánchez-Vega, R., Soto-Caballero, M. C., Salas-Salazar, N. A., Flores-Córdova, M. A., & Rodríguez-Roque, M. J. (2022). Milk protein-based edible films: Influence on mechanical, hydrodynamic, optical and antioxidant properties. Coatings, 12(2), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings12020196
  17. Fu, M., Cao, M., Duan, J., Zhou, Q., Dong, M., Zhang, T., Liu, X., & Duan, X. (2022). Research on the properties of zein, soy protein isolate, and wheat gluten protein-based films containing cellulose nanocrystals. Foods, 11(19), 3010. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11193010
  18. Glicerina, V., Siroli, L., Gottardi, D., Ticchi, N., Capelli, F., Accorsi, R., Gherardi, M., Minelli, M., Fiorini, M., Andrisano, V., Colombo, V., Manzini, R., Lanciotti, R., & Romani, S. (2023). Influence of an innovative, biodegradable active packaging on the quality of sunflower oil and “pesto” sauce during storage. Applied Food Research, 3(2), 100313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afres.2023.100313
  19. Hager, A.-S., Vallons, K. J. R., & Arendt, E. K. (2012). Influence of gallic acid and tannic acid on the mechanical and barrier properties of wheat gluten films. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(24), 6157–6163. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf300983m
  20. Han, Y., Yu, M., & Wang, L. (2018). Soy protein isolate nanocomposites reinforced with nanocellulose isolated from licorice residue: Water sensitivity and mechanical strength. Industrial Crops and Products, 117, 252–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.02.028
  21. Hermawan, D., Lai, T. K., Jafarzadeh, S., Gopakumar, D. A., Owolabi, F. A. T., Aprilia, N. A.,. & Khalil, H. P. S. (2019). Development of seaweed-based bamboo microcrystalline cellulose films intended for sustainable food packaging applications. BioResources, 14(2), 3389–3410. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.2.3389-3410
  22. Huang, S., Tao, R., Ismail, A., & Wang, Y. (2020). Cellulose nanocrystals derived from textile waste through acid hydrolysis and oxidation as reinforcing agent of soy protein film. Polymers, 12(4), 958. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12040958
  23. Insaward, A., Duangmal, K., & Mahawanich, T. (2015). Mechanical, optical, and barrier properties of soy protein film as affected by phenolic acid addition. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 63(43), 9421–9426. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf504016m
  24. Kandasamy, S., Yoo, J., Yun, J., Kang, H.-B., Seol, K.-H., Kim, H.-W., & Ham, J.-S. (2021). Application of whey protein-based edible films and coatings in food industries: An updated overview. Coatings, 11(9), 1056. https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11091056
  25. Kim, H., Yang, H.-J., Lee, K.-Y., Beak, S.-E., & Song, K. Bin. (2017). Characterization of red ginseng residue protein films incorporated with hibiscus extract. Food Science and Biotechnology, 26(2), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10068-017-0050-1
  26. Kurt, A., & Kahyaoglu, T. (2014). Characterization of a new biodegradable edible film made from salep glucomannan. Carbohydrate Polymers, 104, 50–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2014.01.003
  27. Li, K., Jin, S., Chen, H., He, J., & Li, J. (2017). A high-performance soy protein isolate-based nanocomposite film modified with microcrystalline cellulose and Cu and Zn nanoclusters. Polymers, 9(5), 167. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym9050167
  28. Liu, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhen, M., Wu, Y., Ma, M., Cheng, Y., & Jin, Y. (2023). Effect of catechin and tannins on the structural and functional properties of sodium alginate/gelatin/ poly(vinylalcohol) blend films. Food Hydrocolloids, 135, 108141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2022.108141
  29. Ma, M., Ren, Y., Xie, W., Zhou, D., Tang, S., Kuang, M., Wang, Y., & Du, S. (2018). Physicochemical and functional properties of protein isolate obtained from cottonseed meal. Food Chemistry, 240, 856–862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.08.030
  30. Ma, X., Chang, P. R., & Yu, J. (2008). Properties of biodegradable thermoplastic pea starch/carboxymethyl cellulose and pea starch/microcrystalline cellulose composites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 72(3), 369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.09.002
  31. Mendes, J. F., Norcino, L. B., Martins, H. H. A., Manrich, A., Otoni, C. G., Carvalho, E. E. N., Piccoli, R. H., Oliveira, J. E., Pinheiro, A. C. M., & Mattoso, L. H. C. (2020). Correlating emulsion characteristics with the properties of active starch films loaded with lemongrass essential oil. Food Hydrocolloids, 100, 105428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.105428
  32. Moeini, A., Pedram, P., Fattahi, E., Cerruti, P., & Santagata, G. (2022). Edible polymers and secondary bioactive compounds for food packaging applications: Antimicrobial, mechanical, and gas barrier properties. Polymers, 14(12), 2395. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym14122395
  33. Moghadam, M., Salami, M., Mohammadian, M., Khodadadi, M., & Emam-Djomeh, Z. (2020). Development of antioxidant edible films based on mung bean protein enriched with pomegranate peel. Food Hydrocolloids, 104, 105735. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2020.105735
  34. Nurhaliza, Y., Nurulhaq, F., Yudhanto, S. M., & Suryanti, V. (2022). Edible film from microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) of waste banana (Musa paradisiaca) stem and chitosan. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2190(1), 012027. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2190/1/012027
  35. Okutan, G., Koç, G., Cansu, Ü., & Boran, G. (2025). Edible films based on plant and animal origin proteins: comparison of some mechanical and physicochemical characteristics. Food Science & Nutrition, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4712
  36. Oliveira Filho, J. G. de, Rodrigues, J. M., Valadares, A. C. F., Almeida, A. B. de, Lima, T. M. de, Takeuchi, K. P., Alves, C. C. F., Sousa, H. A. de F., Silva, E. R. da, Dyszy, F. H., & Egea, M. B. (2019). Active food packaging: Alginate films with cottonseed protein hydrolysates. Food Hydrocolloids, 92, 267–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2019.01.052
  37. Othman, S. H., Majid, N. A., Tawakkal, I. S. M. A., Basha, R. K., Nordin, N., & Shapi’i, R. A. (2019). Tapioca starch films reinforced with microcrystalline cellulose for potential food packaging application. Food Science and Technology, 39(3), 605–612. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.36017
  38. Pan, L., Li, P., & Tao, Y. (2020). Preparation and properties of microcrystalline cellulose/fish gelatin composite film. Materials, 13(19), 4370. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194370
  39. Park, S.-Y., Kim, H.-L., & Her, J.-Y. (2024). Isolation of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) from pistachio shells and preparation of carrageenan-based composite films. Carbohydrate Polymer Technologies and Applications, 7, 100423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carpta.2024.100423
  40. Pawde, S. V., Kaewprachu, P., Kingwascharapong, P., Sai-Ut, S., Karbowiak, T., Jung, Y. H., & Rawdkuen, S. (2025). A comprehensive review on plant protein-based food packaging: Beyond petroleum-based polymers. Current Research in Food Science, 10, 101104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crfs.2025.101104
  41. Raajeswari, P., Manivel, D., Dhanapal, A. C. T. A., Menkinoska, M., Pavlovska, G., Helal, M., Sami, R., Alsanei, W. A., Alessa, F. M., Trajkovska Petkoska, A., & Qari, S. H. (2025). Sustainable biodegradable tapioca starch films enhanced with basil oil, carboxymethyl cellulose, and citric acid for functional food packaging applications. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2025.1610769
  42. Reis, M. O., Zanela, J., Olivato, J., Garcia, P. S., Yamashita, F., & Grossmann, M. V. E. (2014). Microcrystalline cellulose as reinforcement in thermoplastic starch/poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) films. Journal of Polymers and the Environment, 22(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-014-0674-7
  43. Rojas-Lema, S., Nilsson, K., Trifol, J., Langton, M., Gomez-Caturla, J., Balart, R., Garcia-Garcia, D., & Moriana, R. (2021). Faba bean protein films reinforced with cellulose nanocrystals as edible food packaging material. Food Hydrocolloids, 121, 107019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107019
  44. Shabanpour, B., Kazemi, M., Ojagh, S. M., & Pourashouri, P. (2018). Bacterial cellulose nanofibers as reinforce in edible fish myofibrillar protein nanocomposite films. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 117, 742–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.038
  45. Shankar, S., & Rhim, J.-W. (2016). Preparation of nanocellulose from micro-crystalline cellulose: The effect on the performance and properties of agar-based composite films. Carbohydrate Polymers, 135, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2015.08.082
  46. Shao, Y., Mu, B., Yu, X., Xu, L., Dhandapani, R., & Yang, Y. (2024). Cottonseed proteins from meals with high yield for plasticizer-free biofilms with good mechanical properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 282, 137251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.137251
  47. Shivangi, S., Dorairaj, D., Negi, P. S., & Shetty, N. P. (2021). Development and characterisation of a pectin-based edible film that contains mulberry leaf extract and its bio-active components. Food Hydrocolloids, 121, 107046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107046
  48. Sukyai, P., Anongjanya, P., Bunyahwuthakul, N., Kongsin, K., Harnkarnsujarit, N., Sukatta, U., Sothornvit, R., & Chollakup, R. (2018). Effect of cellulose nanocrystals from sugarcane bagasse on whey protein isolate-based films. Food Research International, 107, 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.02.052
  49. Šuput, D. Z., Lazić, V. L., Popović, S. Z., & Hromiš, N. M. (2015). Edible films and coatings–sources, properties and application. Food and Feed Research, 42(1), 11-22.
  50. Trang, T. Y. D., Hanh, D. T., Dzung, H. T., Huong, T. T., Quynh, P. H., Phuong, H. T. N., Thu Hien, N. T., & Duc, H. T. (2024). Preservation of tomatoes (Lycopersicum esculentum) with composite biofilms based on starch and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC). Food Science and Technology, 12(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.13189/fst.2024.120201
  51. Wang, H., & Wang, L. (2017). Developing a bio-based packaging film from soya by-products incorporated with valonea tannin. Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 624–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.064
  52. Wang, H., Wei, D., Zheng, A., & Xiao, H. (2015). Soil burial biodegradation of antimicrobial biodegradable PBAT films. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 116, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.03.007
  53. Wang, Z., Sun, X., Lian, Z., Wang, X., Zhou, J., & Ma, Z. (2013). The effects of ultrasonic/microwave assisted treatment on the properties of soy protein isolate/microcrystalline wheat-bran cellulose film. Journal of Food Engineering, 114(2), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2012.08.004
  54. Xiao, Y., Liu, Y., Kang, S., & Xu, H. (2021). Insight into the formation mechanism of soy protein isolate films improved by cellulose nanocrystals. Food Chemistry, 359, 129971. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. foodchem.2021.129971
  55. Xiao, Y., Xu, H., Zhou, Q., Li, W., Gao, J., Liao, X., Yu, Z., Zheng, M., Zhou, Y., Sui, X., & Liu, Y. (2023). Influence mechanism of wheat bran cellulose and cellulose nanocrystals on the storage stability of soy protein isolate films: Conformation modification and molecular interaction perspective. Food Hydrocolloids, 139, 108475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108475
  56. Yadav, M., Liu, Y.-K., & Chiu, F.-C. (2019). Fabrication of cellulose nanocrystal/silver/alginate bionanocomposite films with enhanced mechanical and barrier properties for food packaging application. Nanomaterials, 9(11), 1523. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9111523
  57. Yavari Maroufi, L., Ghorbani, M., Tabibiazar, M., Mohammadi, M., & Pezeshki, A. (2021). Advanced properties of gelatin film by incorporating modified kappa-carrageenan and zein nanoparticles for active food packaging. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 183, 753–759. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.163
  58. Yücetepe, M., Başyiğit, B., & Karaaslan, M. (2021). Design of novel nutritious microcapsules comprising ω-5 fatty acids and essential amino acids by assembling pomegranate seed derived macromolecules. LWT, 143, 111162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111162
  59. Zhang, B., Guo, B., Wang, S., Liu, C., Cheng, L., & Wang, J. (2024). A Soy protein-based film based on chemical treatment and microcrystalline cellulose reinforcement obtained from corn husk byproducts. ACS Omega, 9(14), 15845–15853. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c07907
  60. Zheng, K., Xiao, S., Li, W., Wang, W., Chen, H., Yang, F., & Qin, C. (2019). Chitosan-acorn starch-eugenol edible film: Physico-chemical, barrier, antimicrobial, antioxidant and structural properties. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 135, 344–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.05.151
  61. Zhou, F., Gu, Z., Zeng, Z., Tang, X., Li, C., Fang, Z., Hu, B., Chen, H., Wang, C., Chen, S., Wu, H., Wu, W., & Liu, Y. (2022). Preparation, characterization and application of Konjac glucomannan/pullulan/microcrystalline cellulose/tea polyphenol active blend film. Food Bioscience, 49, 101898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2022.101898
  62. Hermawan, D., Lai, T. K., Jafarzadeh, S., Gopakumar, D. A., Owolabi, F. A. T., Aprilia, N. A.,. & Khalil, H. P. S. (2019). Development of seaweed-based bamboo microcrystalline cellulose films intended for sustainable food packaging applications. BioResources, 14(2), 3389–3410. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.14.2.3389-3410