Dergiler / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2017 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 5 S

Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture

Esra Tokat(ATAŞEHİR ADIGÜZEL MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)
Sayfa
1456–1462
Yayın Tarihi
2017-10-05
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this study, the First National Architectural Movement and the Second National Architectural Movement that have impact on the early 20 th century particularly are dealt with in terms of identity issues and ideological approaches of Neo-Classical Architecture inTurkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Examining the architectural actions, Turcs that have founded many states throughout the history are observed to have maintained the transfer of their culture, which has been shaped with different dinamics such as regime, ethnic diversity, geography, religion and has followed a natural flow even though factors has changed from time to time, to the early 20 th century.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The 20 th century of Turkish architecture has come to a point where it serves to the efforts of creating a new identity that has strayed from its natural line as a result of an ideological movement worldwide.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this study, the First National Architectural Movement and the Second National Architectural Movement that have impact on the early 20 th century particularly are dealt with in terms of identity issues and ideological approaches of Neo-Classical Architecture inTurkey.
🔬Tür:Konferans Bildirisi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Architecture · 20th Century · Identity

Abstract

Examining the architectural actions, Turcs that have founded many states throughout the history are observed to have maintained the transfer of their culture, which has been shaped with different dinamics such as regime, ethnic diversity, geography, religion and has followed a natural flow even though factors has changed from time to time, to the early 20 th century. The 20 th century of Turkish architecture has come to a point where it serves to the efforts of creating a new identity that has strayed from its natural line as a result of an ideological movement worldwide. Even though the movement that was expressed as the National Renaissance of Turkish architecture and demostrated its impact on public buildings during its period has later been called National Style, given its starting point, architectural components and referances, how accurate it is to be called national is open to debate. In this study, the First National Architectural Movement and the Second National Architectural Movement that have impact on the early 20 th century particularly are dealt with in terms of identity issues and ideological approaches of Neo-Classical Architecture inTurkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Tokat, E. (2017). Identity and ideology in 20th Century of Turkish Architecture. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 5 S, 1456–1462. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.319311

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Bozdoğan, S. (2008). Modernizm ve ulusun inşası – Erken cumhuriyet Türkiyesi’nde mimari kültür. İstanbul: Metis Yayınları.
  2. Demiren, Ş. (1949). Le Corbusier ile mülâkat. Arkitekt. 11-12, 230-231
  3. Eldem, S. H. (1931). Peşte sergisinde Türk Pavyonu. Arkitekt. 6, 187-192
  4. Eldem, S.H. (1940). Yerli mimariye doğru. Arkitekt. 03-04, 69-74
  5. Kuran, Aptullah. (2000). 19.yüzyıl Osmanlı mimarisi. Celal Esad Arseven anısına sanat tarihi semineri bildirileri (pp.234-240). İstanbul: Mimar Sinan Üniversitesi Matbaası.
  6. Sönmez, M.Zeki. Türk-İtalyan siyaset ve sanat ilişkileri. İstanbul: Bağlam Yayıncılık.
  7. Şafak, N. (2012, Ağustos). Osmanlı kuruluş döneminde devlet. Belleten. LXXVI (276), 431-454. İstanbul: Türk Tarih Kurumu
  8. Tapan, M. & Sözen, M. (1973). 50 Yılın Türk Mimarisi. İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  9. Türkiye’de mimarlık (2009). Ankara: TMMOB Mimarlar Odası.
  10. Yeşilkaya, N.G. (1999). Halkevleri: ideoloji ve mimarlık. İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.