KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2

Forecasting sustainable development level of selected Asian countries using M-EDAS and k-NN algorithm

Çiğdem Özarı(İSTANBUL AYDIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2948-8957
Esin Nesrin Can(ISTANBUL AYDIN UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4227-3934
Agah Alıcı(ALTINBAŞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3151-6814
Sayfa
101–112
Yayın Tarihi
2023-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, the findings obtained from the ranking analysis were evaluated using Spearman's correlation to compare the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study aims to forecast the sustainable development levels of countries with the least possible parameters based on social, economic, and environmental dimensions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:By using ranking findings, sustainability development levels were determined for 2017–2020.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, the findings obtained from the ranking analysis were evaluated using Spearman's correlation to compare the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2017–2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Asian Countries · EDAS Method · k-NN Algorithm

Abstract

This study aims to forecast the sustainable development levels of countries with the least possible parameters based on social, economic, and environmental dimensions. For this purpose, a hybrid model consisting of multi-criteria decision-making and machine learning methods is proposed. First, using the M-EDAS method, selected Asian countries were ranked based on the main goals of the Sustainable Development Report. By using ranking findings, sustainability development levels were determined for 2017–2020. Using the last two years before the relevant year as a training dataset, the sustainable development levels determined for 2019-2020 were estimated using two basic macroeconomic variables. 2020 forecast findings are not successful as 2019. Additionally, the findings obtained from the ranking analysis were evaluated using Spearman's correlation to compare the periods before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Özarı, Ç., Can, E. N., Alıcı, A. (2023). Forecasting sustainable development level of selected Asian countries using M-EDAS and k-NN algorithm. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 2, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1260482

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (52)

  1. Abdel-Basset, M., & Mohamed, R. (2020). A Novel Plithogenic TOPSIS-Critic Model for Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management. Journal of Cleaner Production. 247, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119586
  2. Aggarwal, A., Choudhary, C., & Mehrotra, D. (2018). Evaluation Of Smartphones In Indian Market Using EDAS. Procedia Computer Science. 132, 236-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.193
  3. Alkhatib, K., Najadat, H., Hmeidi, I.& Shatnawi, M. K. A. (2013). Stock Price Prediction Using K-Nearest Neighbor (k-NN) Algorithm. International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology. 3(3), 32-44.
  4. Almulhim, T. S. (2019). Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Insurance Industries Performance: An Analysis of EDAS Based On The Entropy Weight. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(4), 1097-1114. https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR14.04-07
  5. Ayan, T. Y., Ünal, H., & Samut, S. (2017). A Comparative Analysis of European And Central Asian Countries From The Economic Dimension Of Sustainable Development: Cluster Analysis And TOPSIS Method. Route Educational and Social Science Journal. 4(6), 202-213.
  6. Baral, S., Shekar, K. R., Sharma, M.& Rao, P. V. (2014). Optimization of Leaching Parameters for The Extraction of Rare Earth Metal Using Decision Making Method. Hydrometallurgy. 143, 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydromet.2014.01.006
  7. Behzad, M., Zolfani, S. H., Pamucar, D., & Behzad, M. (2020). A Comparative Assessment of Solid Waste Management Performance In The Nordic Countries Based On BWM-EDAS. Journal of Cleaner Production. 266, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122008
  8. Bhuvaneswari, P., & Therese, A. B. (2015). Detection Of Cancer in Lung With K-NN Classification Using Genetic Algorithm. Procedia Materials Science, 10, 433-440.
  9. Candan, G., & Cengiz Toklu, M. (2022). Sustainable Industrialization Performance Evaluation of European Union Countries: An Integrated Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process And Grey Relational Analysis Approach. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2027293
  10. Cherif, W. (2018). Optimization of K-NN Algorithm by Clustering And Reliability Coefficients: Application To Breast-Cancer Diagnosis. Procedia Computer Science, 127, 293-299.
  11. Choudhary, D., Singh, A. K., & Tiwari, S. (2013). A Statistical Approach for Iris Recognition Using K-NN Classifier. International Journal of Image, Graphics and Signal Processing, 5(4), 46-52. https://doi.org/10.5815/ijigsp.2013.04.06
  12. Colglazier, W. (2015). Sustainable Development Agenda: 2030. Science, 349(6252), 1048-1050.
  13. Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining Objective Weights in Multiple Criteria Problems: The Critic Method. Computers & Operations Research, 22(7), 763-770.
  14. Ecer, F. (2018). Third-party Logistics (3PLs) Provider Selection Via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS Integrated Model. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 24(2), 615-634. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2016.1213207
  15. Ehsani, R., & Drabløs, F. (2020). Robust Distance Measures For k-NN Classification of Cancer Data. Cancer informatics, 19, https://doi.org/10.1177/117693512096554
  16. Ela, M., & Soysal Kurt, H. (2019). Comparison of Macroeconomic Performances of Sub-Saharan African Countries with TOPSIS Method. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Elektronik Dergisi, 10(3), 547-555.
  17. Feng, X., Wei, C. & Liu, Q. (2018). EDAS Method for Extended Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multi-criteria Decision Making. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems. 20, 2470–2483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0504-5
  18. Gorbenkova, E., Shcherbina, E., & Belal, A. (2018). Rural Areas: Critical Drivers For Sustainable Development. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(30), 786-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.195
  19. Ghalehno, R. K. (2021). Modification Of the EDAS Method For Controlling Outlier Data. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 17(3), 91-108.
  20. Hák, T., Janoušková, S., & Moldan, B. (2016). Sustainable Development Goals: A Need For Relevant Indicators. Ecological Indicators, 60(1), 565-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.003
  21. Hassanat, A. B. (2014). Dimensionality Invariant Similarity Measure. Journal of American Science,10(8), 221-226.
  22. Huda, S., & Chowanda, A. (2021). Personality Prediction from Text On Social Media With Machine Learning. ICIC Express Letters, 15(12),1243-1251.
  23. Ilieva, G., Yankova, T., & Klisarova-Belcheva, S. (2018). Decision Analysis with Classic And Fuzzy EDAS Modifications. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 37(5), 5650-5680.
  24. Kahraman, C., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Bhuvaneswari, E. K., Cevik Onar, S., Yazdani, M., & Oztaysi, B. (2017). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Edas Method: An Application to Solid Waste Disposal Site Selection. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 25(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3846/16486897.2017.1281139
  25. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M. (2021). A simple modification to the EDAS method for two exceptional cases. BOHR International Journal of Advances in Management Research, 1(1), 36-39. https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202104.0111/v1
  26. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Amiri, M., & Turskis, Z. (2016). Extended EDAS Method For Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: An Application to Supplier Selection. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 11(3), 358-371.
  27. Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based On Distance From Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2015.57
  28. Krishnan, A. R., Kasim, M. M., Hamid, R., & Ghazali, M. F. (2021). A Modified CRITIC Method to Estimate the Objective Weights Of Decision Criteria. Symmetry, 13(6), 973. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13060973
  29. Lotfi, F. H., & Fallahnejad, R. (2010). Imprecise Shannon’s Entropy and Multi Attribute Decision Making. Entropy, 12(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.3390/e12010053
  30. Mehta, S., Shen, X., Gou, J., & Niu, D. (2018). A New Nearest Centroid Neighbor Classifier Based on K Local Means Using Harmonic Mean Distance. Information, 9(9), 1-16.
  31. Mukid, M. A., Widiharih, T., Rusgiyono, A., & Prahutama, A. (2018). Credit Scoring Analysis Using Weighted K Nearest Neighbor. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1025, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1025/1/012114.
  32. Mutlu M., & Sarı, M. (2017). Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemleri ve Madencilik Sektöründe Kullanımı. Bilimsel Madencilik Dergisi, 56(4),181-196.
  33. Ondrus, J., Bui, T., & Pigneur, Y. (2015). A Foresight Support System Using MCDM Methods. Group Decision and Negotiation, 24(2), 333-358.
  34. Ozari, Ç, Can, E. N., & Alıcı A. (2022). Predicting the Sustainable Development Level of Selected Asian Countries Using the Modified EDAS Method and K-NN Algorithm, Oriental Business and Innovation Center Conference, Challenges and Sustainability In The Post-Covid-19 Era: Asian Responses To Economic, Security, And Social Dilemmas Book Of Abstracts.
  35. Pacheco, W. D. N., & López, F. R. J. (2019). Tomato Classification According to Organoleptic Maturity (Coloration) Using Machine Learning Algorithms K-NN, MLP, and K-Means Clustering. XXII Symposium on Image, Signal Processing and Artificial Vision (STSIVA)1-5.
  36. Paradowski, B., Shekhovtsov, A., Bączkiewicz, A., Kizielewicz, B., & Sałabun, W. (2021). Similarity Analysis of Methods for Objective Determination of Weights In Multi-Criteria Decision Support Systems. Symmetry, 13(10), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13101874
  37. Pereira, J., Contreras, P., Morais, D. C., & Arroyo-López, P. (2022). A Multi-Criteria and Stochastic Robustness Analysis Approach To Compare Nations Sustainability. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 80, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101159
  38. Ramteke, R., & Monali, K. (2012). Automatic Medical Image Classification and Abnormality Detection Using K-Nearest Neighbour. International Journal of Advanced Computer Research, 2(4), Issue:6, 190-196.
  39. Ren, J., Hu, C. H., Yu, S. Q., & Cheng, P. F. (2021). An Extended EDAS Method Under Four-Branch Fuzzy Environments and Its Application in Credit Evaluation for Micro And Small Entrepreneurs. Soft Computing, 25(4), 2777-2792.
  40. Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1947). The Math Theory of Communica. Urbana: The University of Illinois Press.
  41. Shaw, S., Josi, K., Pathak, A., Thyagarajan, A. K., Vidya, G., Shah, R. H., Kishan, V. R., & Alex. J. S. R. (2021). Anomaly Detection in Drones with Machine Learning Algorithms. Futuristic Communication and Network Technologies, 792, 433-441. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-981-16-4625-6_42.
  42. Skvarciany, V., Jurevičienė, D., & Volskytė, G. (2020). Assessment Of Sustainable Socio-Economic Development in European Union Countries. Sustainability, 12(5), 2-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051986.
  43. Skvarciany, V., Lapinskaitė, I., & Volskytė, G. (2021). Circular Economy as Assistance For Sustainable Development In OECD Countries. Oeconomia Copernicana, 12(1), 11-34. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2020.001
  44. Singh, M., & Pant, M. (2021). A Review of Selected Weighing Methods in MCDM With A Case Study. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 12(1), 126-144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-01033-3
  45. Stanujkic, D., Popovic, G., Zavadskas, E. K., Karabasevic, D., & Binkyte-Veliene, A. (2020). Assessment of progress towards achieving Sustainable Development Goals of the “Agenda 2030” by using the CoCoSo and the Shannon Entropy methods: The case of the EU Countries. Sustainability, 12(14), 5717. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12145717
  46. Sun, F., & Yu, J. (2021). Improved Energy Performance Evaluating and Ranking Approach For Office Buildings Using Simple-normalization, Entropy-based TOPSIS and K-means Method. Energy Reports, 7, 1560-1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.03.007
  47. Tharwat, A., Mahdi, H., Elhoseny, M., & Hassanien, A. E. (2018). Recognizing Human Activity in Mobile Crowdsensing Environment Using Optimized k-NN Algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 107, 32-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.04.017
  48. Torkayesh, A. E., & Torkayesh, S. E. (2021). Evaluation Of Information and Communication Technology Development In G7 Countries: An Integrated MCDM Approach. Technology In Society, 66, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101670
  49. Yazdani, M., Torkayesh, A. E., Santibanez-Gonzalez, E. D., & Otaghsara, S. K. (2020). Evaluation Of Renewable Energy Resources Using Integrated Shannon Entropy—EDAS Model. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 1, 35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2020.12.002
  50. Wang, T.C., & Lee, H.D. (2009). Developing A Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based on Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. Expert Systems Applications, 36(5), 8980–8985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.11.035
  51. Xing, W., & Yilin B. (2017). Medical Health Big Data Classification Based on KNN Classification Algorithm. Preparation of Papers for IEEE Access,1-12, 28808-28819.
  52. Zavadskas, E. K., Stević, Ž., Turskis, Z., & Tomašević, M. (2019). A Novel Extended EDAS In Minkowski Space (EDAS-M) Method for Evaluating Autonomous Vehicles. Studies in Informatics and Control, 28(3), 255-264.