KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research / 2026 / Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3

"Short-Circuit" L1 use in pre-reading activities and its effects on L2 reading comprehension and focus-on-vocabulary learning

Harun Çiftci(Isparta Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1444-641X
Şevki Kömür(MUGLA SITKI KOCMAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0001-6739-7864
Sayfa
222–233
Yayın Tarihi
2023-09-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was also seen that categorically different pre-reading activities enhanced EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary learning.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study explores the effect of categorically different pre-reading activities in learners’ L1 on reading comprehension and learning of focus-on-vocabulary.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The findings revealed that the treatment group, who were exposed to pre-reading activities in L1, obtained better results both in reading comprehension and focus-on-vocabulary activities than the control group.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was also seen that categorically different pre-reading activities enhanced EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary learning.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Reading skills · Short-circuit · Pre-reading

Abstract

This study explores the effect of categorically different pre-reading activities in learners’ L1 on reading comprehension and learning of focus-on-vocabulary. The participants were sixty Turkish EFL learners attending a state high school, and the data was gathered from their achievement test scores. We analyzed the data through one-way multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and implemented t-test statistical procedures. The findings revealed that the treatment group, who were exposed to pre-reading activities in L1, obtained better results both in reading comprehension and focus-on-vocabulary activities than the control group. The positive effect of implementing the ‘’short-circuit’’ L1 use in pre-reading activities for reading comprehension and focus-on-vocabulary exercises was observed. It was also seen that categorically different pre-reading activities enhanced EFL learners’ reading comprehension and vocabulary learning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çiftci, H., Kömür, Ş. (2023). "Short-Circuit" L1 use in pre-reading activities and its effects on L2 reading comprehension and focus-on-vocabulary learning. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 3, 222–233. https://doi.org/10.24289/ijsser.1279975

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (69)

  1. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.61.5.1.
  2. Ajideh, P. (2006). Schema theory-based considerations on pre-reading activities in ESP textbooks. The Asian EFL Journal, 16, 1–19. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/November_2006_Vol16_Art2.pdf.
  3. Alderson, J., C. (2005). Assessing Reading. Cambridge University Press
  4. Alemi, M., & Ebadi, S. (2010). The effects of pre-reading activities on ESP reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(5). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.1.5.569-577.
  5. Alessi, S., & Dwyer, A. (2008). Vocabulary assistance before and during reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 246–263. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/October2008/alessi/alessi.pdf.
  6. Al-Khasawneh, F. (2019). The impact of vocabulary knowledge on the reading comprehension of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Education, 5(3), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2019.8822.
  7. Aron, H. (1986). The influence of background knowledge on memory for reading passages by native and nonnative readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(1), 136–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586396
  8. Azizifar, A., Roshani, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of Ilami High School students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.027.
  9. Bernhardt, E., B. (2004). Editorial: Maximizing success in phonological intervention. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20(3), 195–198. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265659004ct27.
  10. Bernhardt, E., B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. Routledge.
  11. Bilokcuoğlu, H. (2011). The effects of pre-reading activities in EFL classes on students’ reading comprehension. EUL Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 179–197. http://euljss.eul.edu.tr/euljss/si27.pdf.
  12. Boyer, K. (2017). The relationship between vocabulary and reading comprehension in third grade students who are English language learners and reading below grade level [Master’s Thesis]. Goucher College. https://bit.ly/2WGRVXk.
  13. Carrel, P., L., & Eisterhold, J., C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL, 17(4), 553–573. https://doi: 10.2307/3586613.
  14. Carrel, P., L. (1987). Content and formal schemata in ESL reading. TESOL Quarterly, 21(3), 461–487. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586498.
  15. Clarke, M., A. (1980). The short circuit hypothesis of ESL reading - or when language competence interferes with reading performance. The Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 203–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524513.013.
  16. Chen, S., Du, H., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2022). Understanding EFL reading anxiety in relation to learning motivation, attitudes, and strategies for Chinese and Spanish undergraduates. System, 108, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102842.
  17. Cook, G. (1997). Key concepts in ELT schemas. ELT Journal, 51(1), 86–86. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.1.86.
  18. Djuarsa, H., M. (2017). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension ability of senior high school students. Magister Scientiae, 41, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i41.1563.
  19. Erten, İ., H. (2018). Role of vocabulary in teaching reading. TESOL, 1, 1–5. https://doi: 10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0500.
  20. Field, A. P. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London, United Kingdom: Sage.
  21. Gass, S. M., & Davey, J. (1981). Reading in a foreign language: A model of top-down and bottom-up processing. Language Learning, 31(1), 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1981.tb00804.
  22. Ghafar, S., R., & Dehqan, M. (2012). Sociocultural theory and reading comprehension: The scaffolding of readers in an EFL context. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 2(3), 67–80. https://doi.org/10.5861/ijrsll.2012.183.
  23. Golombek, P., & Stott, N. (2004). Familiarity breeds contempt: Reading texts from learners’ own cultures does not guarantee recall. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588387.
  24. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Longman.
  25. Greggio, S., & Gil, G. (2007). Teacher’s and learner’s use of code switching in the English as a foreign language classroom: A qualitative study. Linguagem & Ensino, 10(2), 371–393. https://bit.ly/2HNA9bW.
  26. Hashemi, A., Mobini, F., & Karimkhanlooie, G. (2016). The impact of content-based pre-reading activities on Iranian high school EFL learners’ reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(1), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0701.15.
  27. Hudson, T. (1982). The effects of induced schemata on the “short circuit” in L2 reading: Non‐decoding factors in L2 reading performance. Language Learning, 32(1), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1982.tb00516.x.
  28. Joshi, M., R. (2005). Vocabulary: A critical component of comprehension. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560590949278.
  29. Kilpatrick, D., A., Joshi, R., M., & Wagner, R., K. (2019). Reading development and difficulties: Bridging the gap between research and practice. Springer.
  30. Koda, K. (1989). The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency. Foreign Language Annals, 22(6), 529–540. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1989.tb02780.x.
  31. Lee, J., & Schallert, D. L. (1997). The relative contribution of L2 language proficiency and L1 reading ability to L2 reading performance: A test of the threshold hypothesis in an EFL context. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 713–739.
  32. Lee, J. (2009). Top-down and bottom-up processes in second language reading. TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 223–247. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1545-7249.2009.tb00239.x.
  33. Lestrud, M. (2013). Reading skills. In Volkmar F.R. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Autism Spectrum Disorders (pp. 121-140). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1698-3_1579.
  34. Liu, D., Ahn, G.-S., Baek, K.-S., & Han, N.-O. (2004). South Korean high school English teachers’ code switching: Questions and challenges in the drive for maximal use of English in teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 605–638. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588282.
  35. Manyak, P., C., & Bauer, E.,B. (2009). English vocabulary instruction for English learners. The Reading Teacher, 63(2), 174–176. https:// doi.org/10.1598/RT.63.2.11.
  36. Melendez, E., J., & Pritchard, H., R. (1985). Applying schema theory to foreign language reading. Foreign Language Annals, 18(5), 399–403. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1985.tb00972.x.
  37. Mihara, K. (2011). Effects of pre-reading strategies on EFL/ESL reading comprehension. TESL Canada Journal, 28(72), 51–73. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v28i2.1072.
  38. Nijhawan, S. (2022). Translanguaging… or trans-foreign-languaging? Translation and Translanguaging in Multilingual Contexts, 8(2), 143–185. https://doi.org/10.1075/ttmc.00087.nij.
  39. Nunan, D. (2015). Teaching English to speakers of other languages. Routledge.
  40. Omari, H., A. (2018). Analysis of the types of classroom questions which Jordanian English language teachers ask. Modern Applied Science, 12(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v12n4p1.
  41. Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 281–307. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2015-0014 Petrus, S. L., & Md Shah, P. (2020). Relationship between reading anxiety, reading strategies and language competence of rural ESL secondary learners. Creative Education, 11(02), 126–142. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.112010.
  42. Pittelman, S., D. & Johnson, D., D. (1985). A field assessment of vocabulary instruction in the elementary school classroom. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin, Wisconsin Center for Educational Research, 84(3), 1–17. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED276988.pdf.
  43. Proctor, C. P., August, D., Carlo, M. S., & Snow, C. (2006). The intriguing role of Spanish language vocabulary knowledge in predicting English reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022.
  44. Rasouli, R., Vaghei, A., Z., & Pourmohammadi, M. (2019).The effect of pre-reading activities on the comprehension of L2 texts by Iranian pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Studies in Education, 9(3), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v9i3.14852.
  45. Ricketts J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(3), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701344306.
  46. Sauer B., L. (2020). Multilanguaging and linguistic hospitality. In Discussing the Faith (pp. 84–121). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110700749-005.
  47. Seng, G. H., & Hashim, F. (2006). Use of L1 in L2 reading comprehension among tertiary ESL learners. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18(1), 29–54. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ759834.
  48. Sousa, M., O. (2012). Pre-reading activities: What effects do they have on heterogeneous classes? [Master's thesis]. Universidade do Porto.
  49. Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Is there a role for the use of the L1 in an L2 setting? TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 760–770. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588224
  50. Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: The use of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 251–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400304.
  51. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
  52. Taglieber, L., K., Johnson, L., L., & Yarbrough, D., B. (1988). Effects of prereading activities on EFL reading by Brazilian college students. TESOL Quarterly, 22(3), 455–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587289.
  53. Thuy, T., T., T., & Yen, H., P. (2018). The impact of questioning and semantic map in pre-reading stage on students’ reading comprehension: A comparative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(6), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.5281/Zenodo.1245772
  54. Tierney, R. J., Readence, J. E., & Dishy, E. K. (1985). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium. Allyn & Bacon.
  55. Tudor, I. (1990). Pre-reading format and learner proficiency level in L2 reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 13(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.1990.tb00327.x.
  56. Tudor, I. (1989). Pre-reading: A categorization of formats. System, 17(3), 323–338. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0346-251X(89)90005-5.
  57. Turnbull, M. (2001). There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign teaching, but. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.531.
  58. Verhoeven, L. (1990). Acquisition of reading in a second language. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 90–114. https://www.jstor.org/stable/747596.
  59. Vogel, S., & García, O. (2017). Translanguaging. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.181.
  60. Wei, L. (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx039.
  61. Wei, L., & García, O. (2022). Not a first language but one repertoire: Translanguaging as a decolonizing project. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882221092841.
  62. Wesche, M.,B. & Paribakht, T., S. (2002) Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84(2), 196–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00062.
  63. Wu, H.-J. (2011). Anxiety and reading comprehension performance in English as a foreign language. Asian EFL Journal, 13(2), 273–307. https://asian-efl-journal.com/PDF/Volume-13-Issue-2-wu.pdf
  64. Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom, Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6.
  65. Chen, S., Du, H., Wang, S., & Yang, L. (2022). Understanding EFL reading anxiety in relation to learning motivation, attitudes, and strategies for Chinese and Spanish undergraduates. System, 108, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102842.
  66. Djuarsa, H., M. (2017). The relationship between vocabulary knowledge and reading comprehension ability of senior high school students. Magister Scientiae, 41, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.33508/mgs.v0i41.1563.
  67. Thuy, T., T., T., & Yen, H., P. (2018). The impact of questioning and semantic map in pre-reading stage on students’ reading comprehension: A comparative study. European Journal of Education Studies, 4(6), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.5281/Zenodo.1245772
  68. Tierney, R. J., Readence, J. E., & Dishy, E. K. (1985). Reading strategies and practices: A compendium. Allyn & Bacon.
  69. Turnbull, M. (2001). There is a role for the L1 in second and foreign teaching, but. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(4), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.4.531.