Dergiler / Yeni Medya / 2024 / Sayı: 17

Ana Haber Bültenlerine Yönelik Netnografik Bir Alımlama Analizi

A Netnographic Reception Analysis of Main News Bulletins

Türker Söğütlüler(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1154-1112
Sayfa
68–88
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Netnografi yöntemi ile alımlama yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanıma uygun olduğu görülmüş; izleyicilerin alımlama biçimlerinin sevilen sunucunun programdan ayrılması, programın ideolojik yöneliminin değişmesi, tarafsızlık ilkesine riayet edilmemesi, yankı çemberi etkisi sebepleriyle egemen biçimden müzakereci ve karşıt biçime döndüğü sonucuna varılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sosyal bilimlerin köklü yöntemlerinden olan etnografi, özellikle antropoloji ve sosyoloji alanları tarafından sıklıkla kullanılmış, toplumsal olana ilişkin pratiklerin araştırılmasında öne çıkmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Web 2.0 ile birlikte internetin etkileşim kazanan yapısı ise etnografi yönteminin dijital alanlara uyarlanma fikrini gündeme getirmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Netnografi yöntemi ile alımlama yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanıma uygun olduğu görülmüş; izleyicilerin alımlama biçimlerinin sevilen sunucunun programdan ayrılması, programın ideolojik yöneliminin değişmesi, tarafsızlık ilkesine riayet edilmemesi, yankı çemberi etkisi sebepleriyle egemen biçimden müzakereci ve karşıt biçime döndüğü sonucuna varılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İletişim Çalışmaları · İzleyici · Netnografi

Özet

Sosyal bilimlerin köklü yöntemlerinden olan etnografi, özellikle antropoloji ve sosyoloji alanları tarafından sıklıkla kullanılmış, toplumsal olana ilişkin pratiklerin araştırılmasında öne çıkmıştır. Web 2.0 ile birlikte internetin etkileşim kazanan yapısı ise etnografi yönteminin dijital alanlara uyarlanma fikrini gündeme getirmiştir. Netnografi adıyla anılan ve sanal toplulukların davranışlarını incelemeye odaklanan yeni bir yöntemin temelleri atılmış, kullanımında iletişim bilimleri öncü bir rol üstlenmiştir. İngiliz Kültürel Çalışmalar Geleneği araştırmacıları ise alımlama yöntemini literatüre kazandırmış, kodlama-kodaçımlama olarak adlandırdıkları bir model önerisi sunmuştur. Amerikan Davranışçı Yaklaşımın aksine kitle iletişim araçları tarafından sunulan metinlerin toplum tarafından mutlak bir kabulle karşılanmadığını belirtmiş, bireylerin sunulan mesajları kendi süzgecinden geçirerek yeni bir anlam inşa ettiğini ileri sürmüştür. Çalışmada söz konusu iki yöntem birlikte kullanılarak Ekşi Sözlük kullanıcılarının Atv Ana Haber ve Fox Ana Haber bültenlerine ilişkin netnografik alımlama biçimleri araştırılmıştır. Ekşi Sözlük sitesinde haber bültenlerinin başlıkları altında yer alan 703 entry incelenmiş; egemen, müzakereci ve karşıt okuma biçimi olarak kategorilendirimiştir. Frekans dağılımları IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 programı kullanılarak oluşturulmuştur. Netnografi yöntemi ile alımlama yöntemlerinin birlikte kullanıma uygun olduğu görülmüş; izleyicilerin alımlama biçimlerinin sevilen sunucunun programdan ayrılması, programın ideolojik yöneliminin değişmesi, tarafsızlık ilkesine riayet edilmemesi, yankı çemberi etkisi sebepleriyle egemen biçimden müzakereci ve karşıt biçime döndüğü sonucuna varılmıştır.

Abstract

Ethnography, one of the long-established methods of social sciences, has been frequently used especially by the fields of anthropology and sociology, and has come to the fore in the research of practices related to the social. The interactive structure of the internet with Web 2.0 has brought the idea of adapting the ethnography method to digital fields to the agenda. The foundations of a new method called Netnography, which focuses on examining the behaviour of virtual communities, have been laid and communication sciences have taken a leading role in its use. Researchers of the British Cultural Studies Tradition introduced the reception method to the literature and proposed a model called encoding-decoding. Contrary to the American Behaviourist Approach, the researchers stated that the texts presented by the mass media are not met with absolute acceptance by the society and argued that individuals construct a new meaning by filtering the messages presented through their own filters. In this study, by using these two methods together, the netnographic reception patterns of Ekşi Sözlük users regarding Atv Main News and Fox Main News bulletins were investigated. The 703 entries under the titles of the news bulletins in Ekşi Sözlük were analysed and categorised as dominant, negotiative and oppositional reading styles. Frequency distributions were generated using IBM SPSS Statistics 22.0 programme. Netnography method and reception methods were found to be suitable for use together; it was concluded that the reception styles of the viewers turned from dominant to negotiative and oppositional due to the departure of the popular presenter from the programme, the change in the ideological orientation of the programme, the non-compliance with the principle of impartiality, and the echo chamber effect.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Söğütlüler, T. (2024). Ana Haber Bültenlerine Yönelik Netnografik Bir Alımlama Analizi. Yeni Medya, Sayı: 17, 68–88. https://doi.org/10.55609/yenimedya.1515569

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (86)

  1. Abarashi, J., & Ferguson, S. (2010). Exploring interpersonal lending practices as a form of temporary disposition of meaningful obsessions. Centre for Business, Information Technology and Enterprise, School of Business and Administration, Wintec.
  2. Astuti, Y. D. (2019). The reception of Indonesian lecturers on hoaxes and hate speech when using social media. In 1st Annual International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (AICOSH 2019) (pp. 274–277). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aicosh-19.2019.57
  3. Basile, V., Brandão, A., & Ferreira, M. (2024). Does user-generated content influence value co-creation in the context of luxury fashion brand communities? Matching inclusivity and exclusivity. Italian Journal of Marketing, 1(26). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-024-00103-9
  4. Başer, E., & Söğütlüler, T. (2023). Değişen İzleme Eğilimleri Çerçevesinde Dijital Platformlar ve İçerik Reklamları Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi(41), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.31123/akil.1303391
  5. Bennett, O. (2010). Raymond Williams, Culture and society 1780–1950. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 16(1), 9–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286630902902962
  6. Bødker, H. (2016). Stuart Hall’s encoding/decoding model and the circulation of journalism in the digital landscape. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(5), 409–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1227862
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus (P. Collier, Trans.). Stanford University Press.
  8. Bowler, G. M. (2010). Netnography: A Method Specifically Designed to Study Cultures and Communities Online. The Qualitative Report, 15(5), 1270-1275. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2010.1341
  9. Burgess, J. (2023a). Utilizing non-participatory netnography to explore consumer reactions to narrative brands. In SAGE Research Methods: Business. Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781529622973
  10. Burgess, J., & Jones, C. (2021a). Exploring lack of closure as a brand transgression. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(3), 241-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-07-2020-3937
  11. Burgess, J., & Jones, C. (2021b). In a story-driven game, if the ending sucks it can ruin the whole franchise”: evaluating a narrative brand’s crisis recovery. Leisure/Loisir, 45(1), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2021.1872408
  12. Burgess, J., & Jones, C. (2023b). Consumer Brand Engagement and Video Game Media Brand Authenticity. International Journal on Media Management, 25(1–2), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2024.2336263
  13. Christopherson, K. M. (2007). The positive and negative implications of anonymity in Internet social interactions: “On the Internet, Nobody Knows You’re a Dog”. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(6), 3038-3056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.09.001
  14. Cohen, J. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in responses to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Society, 6(2), 191-202. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327825MCS0602_5
  15. Costello, L., McDermott, M. L., & Wallace, R. (2017). Netnography: Range of practices, misperceptions, and missed opportunities. International journal of qualitative methods, 16(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069177006
  16. Dametto, C., & Bonet-Marti, J. (2024). Netnography of Women´ s Cyberactivism Against Environmental Denialism on Instagram. Profesional de la información, 33(1). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2024.0011
  17. Dramastra, G., Imanjaya, E., & Winiharti, M. (2023, July). Gender Swap Reboot, Film Consumption and Social Activism in Ghostbusters (2016). In 2023 International Conference on Digital Applications, Transformation & Economy (ICDATE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDATE58146.2023.10248675
  18. Driskell, R. B., & Lyon, L. (2002). Are virtual communities true communities? Examining the environments and elements of community. City & Community, 1(4), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6040.00031
  19. Ekşi Sözlük. (2024, June 4). ATV Ana Haber. Retrieved from https://eksisozluk.com/ATV-ana-haber--34309
  20. Ekşi Sözlük. (2024, June 7). FOX Ana Haber. Retrieved from https://eksisozluk.com/FOX-ana-haber--1878788
  21. Elliott, R., & Jankel‐Elliott, N. (2003). Using ethnography in strategic consumer research. Qualitative market research: An international journal, 6(4), 215-223. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310495300
  22. Fisher, D., & Smith, S. (2011). Cocreation is chaotic: What it means for marketing when no one has control. Marketing theory, 11(3), 325-350. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470593111408179
  23. Gatzweiler, A., Blazevic, V., & Piller, F. T. (2017). Dark side or bright light: destructive and constructive deviant content in consumer ideation contests. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 34(6), 772-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12369
  24. Gholamhosseinzadeh, M. S., Chapuis, J. M., & Lehu, J. M. (2023). Tourism netnography: How travel bloggers influence destination image. Tourism Recreation Research, 48(2), 188-204. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2021.1911274
  25. Hall, S. (1973) Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, Birmingham. http://epapers.bham.ac.uk/2962/
  26. Hall, S. (1980a). Cultural studies: two paradigms. Media, Culture & Society, 2(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016344378000200106
  27. Hall, S. (1997). The spectacle of the other. Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, 7.
  28. Hall, S. (2007). Encoding and decoding in the television discourse. In CCCS selected working papers (ss. 402-414). Routledge.
  29. Hall, S. (2019). Encoding—Decoding (1980b). In Crime and Media (pp. 44-55). Routledge.
  30. Hall, S., Critcher, C., Jefferson, T., Clarke, J., & Roberts, B. (2017). Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. Bloomsbury Publishing.
  31. Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (1972). Coding/decoding. Culture, Media, Language. Working Papers in Cultural Studies, 79, 128–138. https://blog.richmond.edu/watchingthewire/files/2015/08/Encoding-decoding.pdf
  32. Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (Eds.). (2003). Culture, media, language: Working papers in cultural studies, 1972-79. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203381182
  33. Hanell, F., & Severson, P. J. (2023). An open educational resource for doing netnography in the digital arts and humanities. Education for Information, 39(2), 155-172. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-230024
  34. Hewer, P., & Brownlie, D. (2007). Cultures of consumption of car aficionados: Aesthetics and consumption communities. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 27(3/4), 106-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443330710741057
  35. Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances. In The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods (pp. 257-270). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020055
  36. Hine, C. M. (2000). Virtual ethnography. Sage. https://www.torrossa.com/gs/resourceProxy?an=4913900&publisher=FZ7200
  37. Hoggart, R. (1957) The Uses of Literach, (1st Edition) Routledge.
  38. Hoggart, R. (1993) An Imagined Life: Life and Times, 1959-91. Oxford University Press
  39. Hoggart, R. (1995). The Way We Live Now. Chatto & Windus.
  40. Hoggart, R. (2017). The uses of literacy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351302043
  41. Hoggart, R. (2018). Everyday language and everyday life. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351323802
  42. Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 19(3), 215-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049
  43. Jamieson, K. H., & Cappella, J. N. (2008). Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2009.tb01921.x
  44. Jones, P. (1981). Book Reviews: Raymond Williams, Politics and Letters: Interviews with New Left Review, New Left Books, 1979. Raymond Williams, Problems in Materialism and Culture: Selected Essays, Verso, 1980. Raymond Williams, Culture, Fontana New Sociology, 1981. Thesis Eleven, 3(1), 187-193. https://doi.org/10.1177/072551368100300119
  45. Knudsen, G. H., & Kjeldgaard, D. (2014). Online Reception Analysis: Big Data in Qualitative Marketing Research. Consumer Culture Theory, 217–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/s0885-211120140000016011
  46. Kostadinova, M. (2022). The Perception of Marvel Cinematic Universe’s Female Characters Within its Fandom on Reddit: A Netnographic and Content Analysis Approach. Malmö University Press.
  47. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The Field Behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.61.18935
  48. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Netnography: Doing Ethnographic Research Online. Sage.
  49. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. Sage.
  50. Kozinets, R. V., & Gretzel, U. (2024). Netnography evolved: New contexts, scope, procedures and sensibilities. Annals of Tourism Research, 104, 103693. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2023.103693
  51. Livaniou, N. (2020). Honest behavior and perceived anonymity in online environment [Master's thesis] University of Twente.
  52. Lodge, D. (2007). Richard Hoggart: A personal appreciation. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877907073898
  53. Malinowski, B. (2013). Argonauts of the western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea [1922/1994]. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315014463
  54. Markham, A. (2005). The politics, ethics, and methods of representation in online ethnography. In Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 793-820). Sage.
  55. Markham, A., & Buchanan, E. (2015). Internet research: ethical concerns. In J. Wright (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Science (2nd Edition, pp. 606-613). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.11027-X
  56. Mateos, P., & Durand, J. (2012). Residence vs. ancestry in acquisition of Spanish citizenship: A netnography approach. Migraciones internacionales, 6(4), 9-46. https://doi.org/10.17428/rmi.v6i23.722
  57. Michtalíková, K. (2024). Audience Reception of Slovak Telekom's Christmas Advertisement: Reflections on Slovak National Identity and its Implications for LGBTQ+ Minorities. [Master's thesis] Malmö University, Faculty of Culture and Society
  58. Moura, B. M., & de Souza-Leão, A. L. M. (2019). Enjoying the NFL in Brazil through social TV. Revista Pensamento Contemporâneo em Administração, 13(4), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.12712/rpca.v13i4.29511
  59. Ni, Y. (2024) Navigating Intercultural Communication in the Media Landscape: Challenging Stereotypes and Cultivating Critical Perspectives—Hall Model as the Framework. DISO 3(36) https://doi.org/10.1007/s44206-024-00126-x
  60. Nitschinsk, L., Tobin, S. J., Varley, D., & Vanman, E. J. (2023). Why Do People Sometimes Wear an Anonymous Mask? Motivations for Seeking Anonymity Online. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231210465
  61. O’Donohoe, S. (2010). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. International Journal of Advertising, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.2501/S026504871020118X
  62. Owen, S. (2008). Richard Hoggart and cultural studies. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1177/13678779070738
  63. Rageh, A., Melewar, T. C., & Woodside, A. (2013). Using netnography research method to reveal the underlying dimensions of the customer/tourist experience. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 16(2), 126-149.
  64. Rianto, P. (2019). Romantic drama of Korean and audience reading: Analysis of reception. MetaKom, 3(2), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.23960/metakom.v3i2.70
  65. RTÜK (2018). Televizyon İzleme Eğilimleri Araştırması-2018. Kamuoyu Yayın Araştırmaları ve Ölçme Dairesi Başkanlığı. https://www.rtuk.gov.tr/televizyon_izleme_egilimleri_arastirmasi_2018/335
  66. Sayre, S. (2001) Qualitative Methods for Marketplace Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985543
  67. Scholz, J., & Smith, A. N. (2019). Branding in the age of social media firestorms: How to create brand value by fighting back online. Journal of Marketing Management, 35(11-12), 1100-1134. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2019.1620839
  68. Schrøder, K. C. (2019). Audience reception research in a post-broadcasting digital age. Television & New Media, 20(2), 155-169. https://doi.org/10.1177/15274764188111
  69. Shaw, A (2020) Netnography and a summative content analysis approach to market research. Journal of Emerging Trends in Marketing and Management, 1(1). pp. 12-22.
  70. Silverstone, R., & Williams, R. (2004). Television: Technology and cultural form. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203426647
  71. Söğütlüler, T., & Aday, O. (2023). From the Movie Screen to the Mobile Screen: The Effects of Changing Screen Usage on the Audience. Medya Ve Kültürel Çalışmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 44-61. https://doi.org/10.55055/mekcad.1364537
  72. Söğütlüler, T., & Başer, E. (2023). Dijital Çağda Ebeveyn Olmak: Çocuk İzleyiciler ve Ekrandaki Şiddet Üzerine Bir Araştırma. TRT Akademi, 08(19), 814-845. https://doi.org/10.37679/trta.1328304
  73. Sthapit, E. (2017). A netnographic examination of tourists’ memorable hotel experiences. Anatolia, 29(1), 108–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/13032917.2017.1402190
  74. Sumiala, J. M., & Tikka, M. (2013). Broadcast yourself—Global news! A netnography of the “flotilla” news on YouTube. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6(2), 318-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/cccr.12008
  75. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Republic.com. Princeton University Press.
  76. Truong, H. B., Jesudoss, S. P., & Molesworth, M. (2022). Consumer mischief as playful resistance to marketing in Twitter hashtag hijacking. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(4), 828-841. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2040
  77. Turkuvaz Media Group. (2024). Media and Broadcasting. Retrieved July 11, 2024, from https://www.turkuvazmedya.com.tr
  78. Ukraina, V. K., Hasfi, N., & Lukmantoro, T. (2024). Audience Reception On Youtube Video About Childfree. Interaksi Online, 12(4), 595-607.
  79. Wei, Y., Straub, D. W., & Poddar, A. (2011). The power of many: an assessment of managing internet group purchasing. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 19.
  80. White, C. P. (2023). Socially Sharing Between the Lines: A Netnography Using Reception Analysis of the Representation of Flannery O’Connor’s Short Fiction in Online Communities [Doctoral dissertation], Regent University.
  81. Williams, R. (1961). The long revolution. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/will93760
  82. Williams, R. (1977). Marxism and Literature (Vol. 392). Oxford University Press.
  83. Williams, R. (1980). Problems in Materialism and Culture, Verso.
  84. Williams, R. (1983). Culture and society, 1780-1950. Columbia University.
  85. Williams, R. (2014). Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford university press.
  86. Wykes, M. (1998). [Review of Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices, by S. Hall]. Key Words: A Journal of Cultural Materialism, 1, 104–107. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26920212