KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2025 / Sayı: 51

YABANCI DİL OLARAK İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DÜŞÜNME VE ÖĞRETİM STİLLERİNİN ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BAKIŞ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ

AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFL TEACHERS' THINKING AND TEACHING STYLES THROUGH THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR STUDENTS

Haci Mehmet Öcal(Tarsus Üniversitesi)0009-0008-3860-6151
Gülden İlin(ÇUKUROVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1798-6956
Sayfa
30–66
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Düşünme ve öğretme stillerinin oluşumunda bazı bağlamsal faktörlerin etkili olduğu görüldü.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu nitel çoklu vaka çalışması, İngilizce dil öğretmenlerinin düşünme ve öğretme stillerinin uygulamada öğrencileri tarafından algılanıp algılanmadığını araştırmayı amaçlamıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma verileri, içerik analizi yöntemi kapsamında doğrudan yorumlama ve kategorik toplama olmak üzere iki strateji ile yorumlandı ve analiz edildi.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Düşünme ve öğretme stillerinin oluşumunda bazı bağlamsal faktörlerin etkili olduğu görüldü.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:İngilizce öğretimi · dil öğretmenleri · düşünme stilleri

Özet

Bu nitel çoklu vaka çalışması, İngilizce dil öğretmenlerinin düşünme ve öğretme stillerinin uygulamada öğrencileri tarafından algılanıp algılanmadığını araştırmayı amaçlamıştır. Türkiye'deki bir devlet üniversitesinde yürütülen bu çalışmaya, iki İngilizce öğretmeni ve bir akademik yıl boyunca İngilizce hazırlık programında kendilerinden eğitim almış öğrencileri dahil edildi. Çalışmada elverişli örnekleme kullanıldı. Veri toplamak için öğretmenler ve öğrencilerle yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler yapıldı. Araştırma verileri, içerik analizi yöntemi kapsamında doğrudan yorumlama ve kategorik toplama olmak üzere iki strateji ile yorumlandı ve analiz edildi. Çalışmanın sonuçlarına göre, her iki vakada da öğretmenlerin öğretme stilleri öğrencileri tarafından karşılık bulurken, öğretmenlerin düşünme stilleri sınıfta kısmen karşılık buldu. İki İngilizce dil öğretmeninin sınıfa getirmek istediği düşünme ve öğretme stilleri büyük ölçüde benzerdi. Düşünme ve öğretme stillerinin oluşumunda bazı bağlamsal faktörlerin etkili olduğu görüldü.

Abstract

This qualitative multiple case study is to investigate whether the thinking and teaching styles of English language teachers are perceived by their students in action. This study, which was conducted at a state university in Turkey, included two English language teachers and their students who had been trained in the English preparatory program for one academic year. Convenience sampling was used for the study. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with teachers and students to collect data. The research data were interpreted and analyzed with two strategies, direct interpretation and categorical aggregation, within the scope of the content analysis method. According to the results of the study, in both cases, the teachers' teaching styles reciprocated by their students, while the teachers' thinking styles partially reciprocated in the classroom. The thinking and teaching styles that the two English language teachers wanted to bring into the classroom were largely similar. It was seen that some contextual factors were effective in the formation of the thinking and teaching styles.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Öcal, H. M., İlin, G. (2025). YABANCI DİL OLARAK İNGİLİZCE ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN DÜŞÜNME VE ÖĞRETİM STİLLERİNİN ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BAKIŞ AÇISINDAN İNCELENMESİ. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 51, 30–66. https://doi.org/10.14520/adyusbd.1777686

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Ahmed, S., Khan Farooqi, M. T., & Iqbal, A. (2021). A Study of Teachers’ Teaching Styles and Students’ Performance. Ilkogretim Online, 20(2).
  2. Apaydin, B. B., & Cenberci, S. (2018). Correlation between Thinking Styles and Teaching Styles of Prospective Mathematics Teachers. World Journal of Education, 8(4), 36-46.
  3. Bernardo, A. B., Zhang, L. F., & Callueng, C. M. (2002). Thinking styles and academic achievement among Filipino students. The journal of Genetic psychology, 163(2), 149-163.
  4. Borg, S. (2015). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London: Bloomsbury.
  5. Brown, H. D. (2001). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Addision, Wesley Longman.
  6. Chen, Y.-C. (2008). An investigation of the relationships between teaching style and studies achievement in Miaoli Jianguo Junior High School. (Unpublished master's thesis). Hsuan Chuang University, Miaoli, Taiwan.
  7. Cotton, K. (1991). Teaching thinking skills. Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, School Improvement Program.
  8. Dewi, N. K. P. N., Dewi, N. L. P. E. S., & Suprianti, G. S. (2020). The students’ perceptions on English teachers’ teaching style and how it affects on learning motivation. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 546-554.
  9. Doménech-Betoret, F., & Gómez-Artiga, A. (2014). The relationship among students' and teachers' thinking styles, psychological needs and motivation. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 89-97.
  10. Durmus, A., & Güven, M. (2020). The Relationship between Teaching Styles of English Instructors and Learning Styles of English Prep Class Students at a Turkish State University. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(3), 15-26.
  11. Emir, S. (2013). Contributions of Teachers' Thinking Styles to Critical Thinking Dispositions (Istanbul-Fatih Sample). Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(1), 337-347.
  12. Gafoor, K. A., & Babu, H. (2012). Teaching style: A conceptual overview. Teacher education in the new millennium, 55-69.
  13. Gökçe, S., & Keçik, İ. (2021). English language teachers’ cognition in handling learners’ speaking problems. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi, (26), 315-339.
  14. Grasha, A. F. (2002). The dynamics of one-on-one teaching. College Teaching, 50(4), 139-146.
  15. Hasanuddin, S. S. D. (2021). The effects of teachers' thinking styles and teaching styles relationships on the effectiveness of learning process and level of understanding. Journal of Positive Psychology and Wellbeing, 5(4), 1003-1009.
  16. Hoekstra, A., Brekelmans, M., Beijaard, D., & Korthagen, F. (2009). Experienced teachers' informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behavior and cognition. Teaching and teacher education, 25(5), 663-673.
  17. Jahan, S., Hijazi, S., & Mahdaoui, W. (2021). The role of teaching styles in driving quality of student learning and achievement: evidence from universities in UAE. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business & Government, 27(5).
  18. Jarvis, P. (2004). Adult education and lifelong learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
  19. Komo, T. T. (2020). Teaching Styles in the Eyes of Students: Teacher or Learner-Centered? International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies (IJPSAT), 22(2), 319-328.
  20. Krippendorff, K. (2018). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage publications. Li, L. (2017). Social interaction and teacher cognition. Edinburgh University Press.
  21. Li, L. (2023). Cognition-in-interaction: A discursive psychological perspective of novice language teacher cognition. TESL-EJ, 27(2).
  22. Messick, S. (1976). Personality consistencies in cognition and creativity. Individuality in learning, 4, 22.
  23. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  24. Norzila, A. R., Fauziah, A., & Parilah, M. S. (2007). Perceived and preferred teaching styles (methods) of English for specific purposes (ESP) students. Jurnal e-Bangi, 2(2), 1-20.
  25. Öztürk, M. (2017). A comparative analysis of language teachers’ and learners’ preferences for thinking styles in EFL classrooms. The Journal of Language Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 69-78.
  26. Öztürk, M. (2021). Teacher cognition: A powerful phenomenon developing and governing habits of teaching. Turkish Journal of Education, 10(2), 178-194.
  27. Philip, B., Tan, K. H., & Jandar, W. (2019). Exploring teacher cognition in Malaysian ESL classrooms. 3L, Language, Linguistics, Literature, 25(4).
  28. Reyes, R. C. R. (2019). A study on students’ perceived and preferred teaching styles in Philippine politics. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(6), 247-253.
  29. Samson, J. (2019). The Effect of the Teacher's Teaching Style on Students' Motivation and Academic Performance in the 1st Quarter ofK-12 Grade 10 English Class of inosloban Marawoy-Integrated National High School for S. Ascendens Asia Journal of Multidisciplinary Research Abstracts, 3(2I).
  30. Sarmadi, M. R., Farajollahi, M., Saeidipour, B., & Ahmadifar, M. (2016). The impact of lecturers’ thinking styles on students’ creativity in distance higher education. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 17(4).
  31. Soleimani, N. (2020). ELT teachers’ epistemological beliefs and dominant teaching style: a mixed method research. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00094-y
  32. Song, Y. (2018). An Investigation of the Relationships between Thinking Style, Participation in Classroom Dialogue and Learning Outcomes–A Study based in Mainland China (Doctoral dissertation, University of Cambridge).
  33. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  34. Sternberg, R.J. (1988). Mental self-government: A theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 31, 197–224.
  35. Sternberg, R.J. (1990). Metaphors of mind: Conceptions of the nature of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  36. Sternberg, R.J. (1994). Thinking styles: Theory and assessment at the interface between intelligence and personality. In R.J. Sternberg & P. Ruzgis (Eds.), Intelligence and personality. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Thinking styles. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  38. Sternberg, R. J. (2000). Handbook of intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
  39. Sugesti, I., Rukmini, D., Faridi, A., & Fitriati, S. W. (2020). Teachers’ cognition and their teaching practices in an EFL classroom: a correlational study. In International Conference on Science and Education and Technology (ISET 2019) (pp. 563-566). Atlantis Press.
  40. Vermunt, J. D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and instruction, 9(3), 257-280.
  41. Walsh, R., & Wyatt, M. (2014). Contextual factors, methodological principles and teacher cognition. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 4(4), 693-718.
  42. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  43. Zhang, B. (2011). A study on the role of teachers’ cognition in foreign language teaching. US-China foreign language, 9(7), 435-442.
  44. Zhang, L. F. (2008). Teachers' styles of thinking: An exploratory study. The journal of Psychology, 142(1), 37-55.
  45. Zhang, L. F., & Sternberg, R. J. (2005). A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational psychology review, 17(1), 1-53.