KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Psikoloji Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 40 Sayı: 96

Kapsayıcı Liderliğin İş Performansına Etkisi: İş Özerkliğinin Aracılık Rolü ve İş Deneyiminin Düzenleyici Rolü

Fatma Ezgi Erbaş Kelebek(KOCAELİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5187-3416
Sayfa
1–20
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-22
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Yapılan analizler neticesinde kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerinde pozitif etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, iş deneyiminin düzenleyici etkisini inceleyerek kapsayıcı liderliğin ve iş özerkliğinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Eksik ve özensiz doldurulmuş olan anket formları analizden çıkarıldıktan sonra 194 form değerlendirmeye alınmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Yapılan analizler neticesinde kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerinde pozitif etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kapsayıcı Liderlik · İş Özerkliği · İş Performansı

Özet

Bu çalışma, iş deneyiminin düzenleyici etkisini inceleyerek kapsayıcı liderliğin ve iş özerkliğinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Bu bağlamda iş özerkliğinin aracılık rolü ve iş deneyiminin düzenleyici rolü araştırılmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini, Kocaeli’nde faaliyet gösteren özel hastanelerde çalışan hemşireler ve doktorlar oluşturmaktadır. Katılımcılara internet üzerinden link gönderilerek ya da katılımcılarla yüz yüze iletişim kurularak anket formlarını doldurmaları sağlanmıştır. Eksik ve özensiz doldurulmuş olan anket formları analizden çıkarıldıktan sonra 194 form değerlendirmeye alınmıştır. Veriler anket yöntemi kullanılarak Kapsayıcı Liderlik Ölçeği, İş Performansı Ölçeği ve İş Özerkliği Ölçeği aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Tüm çalışanlara ulaşmak mümkün olmadığından çalışmada kolayda örnekleme yöntemi tercih edilmiş ve toplanan verilerin analizinde SPSS 22.0 ve AMOS 24.0 programları kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler neticesinde kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerinde pozitif etkisinin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bu etkide iş özerkliğinin aracılık rolü ortaya çıkmıştır. Ek olarak iş deneyimi arttıkça iş özerkliğinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinin attığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kelebek, F. E. E. (2025). Kapsayıcı Liderliğin İş Performansına Etkisi: İş Özerkliğinin Aracılık Rolü ve İş Deneyiminin Düzenleyici Rolü. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 40 Sayı: 96, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.31828/turkpsikoloji.1581393

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (85)

  1. Adams, B. G., Meyers, M.C., ve Sekaja, L. (2020). Positive leadership: Relationships with employee inclusion, discrimination, and well-being. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1145-1173. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12230
  2. Alrashidi, N.A., Lagura, G.A.L., ve Celdran, M.C.B. (2023). Utilization of the dimensions of learning organization for enhanced hospital performance, Frontiers in Communication, 8, 1-9 https://doi. org/10.3389/fcomm.2023.1189234.
  3. Amini K, Negarandeh R, Ramezani-Badr F, Moosaeifard M, ve Fallah R. (2015). Nurses’ autonomy level in teaching hospitals and its relationship with the underlying factors. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 21(1), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijn.12210
  4. Baard, P., Deci, E., ve Ryan, R. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068, https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02690.x.
  5. Barrett, S. J. (2021). Exploring diversity and inclusion leadership in complex organizations. R. D. John- son (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Managerial and Leadership Psychology içinde (pp. 320-353). Business Science Reference/IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781-7998-3811-1.ch016
  6. Baş, M. (2022). Kamu çalışanlarının kapsayıcı liderlik algısı üzerine bir araştırma. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 343-354. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.1019637
  7. Bataineh, M. S. E., Zainal, S. R. M., Muthuveloo, R., Yasin, R., Wali, J. Al, ve Mugableh, M. I. (2022). Impact of inclusive leadership on adaptive performance: The role of innovative work behaviour. International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 17(1), 28-43. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357603899_Impact_of_inclusive_leadership_on_adaptive_performan-ce_The_role_of_innovative_work_behaviour
  8. Bentler, P. M., ve Chou, C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124187016001004
  9. Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life, New York: J Wiley & Sons.
  10. Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551-570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604
  11. Browne, M. W., ve Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37, 62-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2404_4
  12. Butler, S. S., Brennan-Ing, M., Wardamasky, S., ve Ashley, A. (2014). Determinants of longer job tenure among home care aides: What makes some stay on the job while others leave? Journal of Applied Gerontology, 33(2), 164-188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0733464813495958
  13. Carmeli, A., Reiter-Palmon, R., ve Ziv, E. (2010). Inclusive leadership and employee involvement in creative tasks in the workplace: The mediating role of psychological safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654
  14. Choi, S. B., Tran, T. B. H., ve Kang, S. W. (2017). Inclusive leadership and employee wellbeing: The mediating role of person-job fit. Journal of Happiness Studies, 18(6), 1877-1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9801-6
  15. Choi, Y., Yoon, D. J., ve Kim, D. (2020). Leader behavioral integrity and employee in-role performance: The roles of coworker support and job autonomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124303
  16. Cihangir Çankaya, Z. (2009). Özerklik desteği, temel psikolojik ihtiyaçların doyumu ve öznel iyi olma: Öz-belirleme kuramı. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(31), 23-31. https://dergipark. org.tr/tr/download/article-file/200003
  17. Claessens, B. J. C., Van Eerde, W., Rutte, C. G., ve Roe, R. A. (2004). Planning behavior and perceived control of time at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 937-950. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.292
  18. Çekmecelioğlu, H. G., ve Günsel, A. (2011). Promoting creativity among employees of mature industries: The effects of autonomy and role stress on creative behaviors and job performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24(3), 889-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.020
  19. Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/2151906
  20. Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (1985). Instrinsic motivation and self determination in human behavior. Berlin: Springer Science&Business Media.
  21. Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (1987). The support of autonomy and the control of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(6), 1024-1037. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.6.1024
  22. Deci, E. L., Connell, J. P., ve Ryan, R. M. (1989). Self-determination in work organization. Journal of Applied Pscyhology, 74(4), 580-590. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.4.580
  23. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagné, M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, D. R., Usunov, J., ve Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction motivation, and well-being in work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: A cross-cultural study of self-determination. Personalty and Social Psychology Bulliten, 27(8), 930-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278002
  24. Deci, E. L., ve Ryan, R. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation içinde (ss. 85-107). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195399820.013.0006
  25. Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., ve Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organization Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
  26. Deniz, M., ve Kumru, S. (2022). İş performans ölçeği geliştirme çalışması: Özel bir hastane uygulaması. Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 32(2), 549-562. https://doi.org/10.18069/firatsbed.833940
  27. Dude, D. J. (2012). Organizational commitment of principals: The effects of job autonomy, empowerment, and distributive justice. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, The University of Iowa.
  28. Erkal, P. (2023). Kapsayıcı liderliğin işe gömülmüşlük üzerine etkisinde lider üye etkileşiminin aracı rolü. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 58, 361-378. https://doi.org/10.30794/pausbed.1291621
  29. Fang, Y., Chen, J.-Y., Wang, M.-J., ve Chen, C.-Y. (2019). The impact of inclusive leadership on employees innovative behaviors: The mediation of psychological capital. Frontier Psychology, 10, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01803
  30. Fornell, C., ve Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  31. Gaskin J., ve Lim J. (2018). Multigroup analysis, Amos plugin. Gaskination’s StatWiki.
  32. Gellatly, I. R. ve Irving P. G. (2001). Personality, autonomy and contextual performance for managers. Human Performance, 43(3), 231-245. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1403_2
  33. Genç, E. (2018). Kamu çalışanlarında algılanan örgütsel desteğin iş performansına etkisinde örgütsel sinizmin aracılık rolü. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 169-183. http://esjournal.cumhuriyet.edu.tr/tr/download/article-file/586570
  34. Gül, E., ve Çakıcı, A. B. (2021). Kapsayıcı liderlik ölçeğinin türkçe uyarlaması ve kapsayıcı liderliğin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik güvenliğin aracılık rolü. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, 24(2), 323-339. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1634093
  35. Hackman, J. R., ve Oldham, G. R., (1976). Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance. 16(2), 250-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7
  36. Hair, J. F., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., ve Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. New York: Pearson.
  37. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., ve Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of Academy Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
  38. Hollander, E. (2009). Inclusive leadership: The essential leader-follower relationship. New York: Routledge.
  39. Javed, B., Abdullah, I., Zafar, M.A., Haque, A., ve Rubab, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behavior: The role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Management & Organizational 25(4), 554-571. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.15780abstract
  40. Jolly, P., ve Lee, L. (2021). Silence is not golden: motivating employee voice through inclusive leadership. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Research, 45(6), 1092-1113, https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020963699
  41. Jöreskog, K. G., ve Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International
  42. Katırcıoğlu E., ve Kabakulak A. (2020). Öz yeterliğin iş özerkliği üzerindeki etkisi: Turist rehberleri üzerine bir araştırma. Turist Rehberliği Dergisi, 3(1), 32-43. https://doi.org/10.34090/tured.740219
  43. Khalili, A., (2016). Linking transformational leadership, creativity, innovation, and innovation-supportive climate. Management. Decision, 54(9), 2277-2293. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2016-0196
  44. Khan, A., H., Nawaz, M., M., Aleem, M., ve Hamed, W. (2012). Impact of job satisfaction on employee performance: An empirical study of autonomous medical institutions of Pakistan. African Journal of Business Management, 6(7), 2697-2705. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM11.2222
  45. Kim, H., ve Qu, H. (2020). The mediating roles of gratitude and obligation to link employees’ social exchange relationships and prosocial behavior. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality. Managment, 32(2), 644-664. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijchm-04-2019-0373
  46. Kirkman, B. L., ve Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74. https://doi.org/10.2307/256874
  47. Kundu, S.C., Kumar, S., ve Gahlawat, N. (2019). Empowering leadership and job performance: mediating role of psychological empowerment, Management Research Review, 42(5), 605-624. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-04-2018-0183
  48. Kuvaas, B., Buch, R., ve Dysvik, A. (2016). Performance management: Perceiving goals as invariable and implications for perceived job autonomy and work performance. Human Resource Management, 55(3), 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21680
  49. Lee, M., ve Kim, B. (2023). Effect of employee experience on organizational commitment: Case of South Korea. Behavioral Sciences, 13(7), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13070521
  50. Mansoor, A., Farrukh, M., Wu, Y., ve Abdul Wahab, S. (2021). Does inclusive leadership incite innovative work behavior? Human Systems Management, 40(3), 93-102. https://doi.org/10.3233/hsm-200972
  51. Mert, Ş., ve Türkmen, E. (2020). Türkiye’de radyasyon onkolojisi hemşirelerinde mesleki otonomi, iş doyumu ve işle ilgili özellikler arasındaki ilişki. Psikiyatri Hemşeriliği Dergisi, 11(4), 292-297. https://doi.org/10.14744/phd.2020.03789
  52. Meyer K. E, ve Peng M.W. (2005), Probing theoretically into central and eastern europe: Transaction, resources, and institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(6), 600-621. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400167
  53. Mitchell, R., Boyle, B., Parker, V., Giles, M., Chiang, V., ve Joyce, P. (2015). Managing inclusiveness and diversity in teams: How leader inclusiveness affects performance through status and team identity. Human Resource Management, 54(2), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21658
  54. Mulyana, O. P., Izzati, U. A., ve Jannah, M. (2024). The role of tenure on the relationship between job autonomy and job involvement among senior high school teachers in private schools. International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v5i1.475
  55. Nejati, M., ve Shafaei, A. (2023). The role of inclusive leadership in fostering organisational learning behaviour. Management Research Review, 46(12), 1661-1678. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-10-2022-0716
  56. Nembhard, I. M., ve Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: the effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 27, 941-966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
  57. Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754-1774. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.0823
  58. Nishii, L. H., ve Mayer, D. M. (2009). Do inclusive leaders help to reduce turnover in diverse groups? The moderating role of leader–member exchange in the diversity to turnover relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1412-1426. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017190
  59. Nguyen, P.V., Le, H.T.N., Trinh, T.V.A., ve Do, H.T.S. (2019). The effects of inclusive leadership on job performance through mediators. Asian Academy of Management Journal, 24(2), 63-94. https://doi.org/10.21315/aamj2019.24.2.4
  60. Oldham, G. R., ve Hackman, J. R. (2010). Not what it was and not what it will be: The future of job design research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(2-3), 463-479. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.678
  61. Papathanassoglou E.D, Karanikola M.N, Kalafati M, Giannakopoulou M, Lemonidou C, ve Albarran J.W. (2012). Professional autonomy, collaboration with physicians, and moral distress among European intensive care nurses. American Journal of Critical Care, 21(2), 41-52. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2012205
  62. Pekdemir, I., Koçoglu, M., ve Gürkan, G.Ç. (2014). Özerklik ve ödüllendirme algılarının çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde çalışanının inovasyona yönelik davranışının aracılık rolüne yönelik bir araştırma. İstanbul Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 43(2), 332-350. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/98216
  63. Plaskoff, J. (2017). Employee experience: The new human resource management approach. Strategic HR Review, 16(3), 136-141. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-12-2016-0108
  64. Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., ve Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate. Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185-227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
  65. Qi L, Liu B, Wei X, ve Hu Y. (2019). Impact of inclusive leadership on employee innovative behavior: perceived organizational support as a mediator. PLoS One 14(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212091
  66. Qiu, S., Dooley, L. M., ve Xie, L. (2020). How servant leadership and self-efficacy interact to affect service quality in the hospitality industry: A polynomial regression with response surface analysis. Tourism Management. 78(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2019.104051
  67. Randel, A. E., Galvin, B. M., Shore, L. M., Ehrhart, K. H., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., ve Kedharnath, U. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Realizing positive outcomes through belongingness and being valued for uniqueness. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 190-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.002
  68. Ryan, R. M., ve Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
  69. Saragih, S. (2011). The effects of job autonomy on work outcomes: Self efficacy as an intervening variable. International Research Journal of Business Studies, 4(3), 203-215. https://doi.org/10.21632/irjbs.4.3.203-215
  70. Schwepker Jr., C. H., ve Dimitriou, C. K. (2021). Using ethical leadership to reduce job stress and improve performance quality in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2021.102860.
  71. Sekar, K., Raghuram, J.N.V., ve Manigandan, R. (2024). Healthcare excellence through inclusive leadership: The dual mediation effects of perceived organisational support and eco-friendly behaviour on employee performance. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 8(3), 310-347. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWE.2024.143129
  72. Serinikli, N. (2020). Sağlık çalışanlarında iş özerkliği ve iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel sinizm ve yaşam tatmini seri çoklu arabuluculuğu. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(2), 1693-1711. https://doi.org/10.20491/isarder.2020.938
  73. Shakil, R. M., Memon, M. A., ve Ting, H. (2023). Inclusive leadership and innovative work behaviour: The mediating role of job autonomy. Quality and Quantity, 57, 707-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021- 01102-0
  74. Shore, L. M., Randel, A. E., Chung, B. G., Dean, M. A., Holcombe Ehrhart, K., ve Singh, G. (2011). Inclusion and diversity in work groups: a review and model for future research. Journal of Management, 37(4), 1262-1289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310385943
  75. Shore, L. M., Cleveland, J. N., ve Sanchez, D. (2018). Inclusive work places: A review and model. Human Resource Management Review, 28(2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.07.003
  76. Sigler, T. H., ve Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5, 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1084-8568(00)00011-0
  77. Siyal S, Liu J, Ma L, Kumari K, Saeed M, Xin C, ve Hussain, S.N. (2023). Does inclusive leadership influence task performance of hospitality industry employees? Role of psychological em-powerment and trust in leader. Heliyon, 9(5), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15507
  78. Slemp, G. R., Kern, M. L., Patrick, K. J., ve Ryan, R. M. (2018). Leader autonomy support in the workplace: A meta-analytic review. Motivation and Emotion, 42(5), 706-724, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9698-y
  79. Tang, N.-Y., Jiang, Y., Chen, C.-Y., Zhou, Z.-C., Chen, C. C., ve Yu, Z.-X. (2015). Inclusion and inclusion management in the Chinese context: An exploratory study. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(6), 856-874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2014.985326
  80. Umrani, W.A., Bachkirov, A.A., Nawaz, A., Ahmed, U., ve Pahi, M.H. (2024). Inclusive leadership, employee performance and well-being: An empirical study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(2), 231-250. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-03-2023-0159
  81. Wambugu, L. W. (2014). Effects of organizational culture on employee performance (Case study of Wartsila-Kipevu Ii Power Plant). European Journal of Business and Management, 6(32), 80-92. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/EJBM/article/view/16864/17200#google_vignette
  82. Wolor, W. C., Solikhah, S., Fidhyallah, N. F., ve Lestari, D. P. (2020). Effectiveness of e-training, e-leadership, and work life balance on employee performance during COVID-19. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(10), 443-450. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2020.vol7.no10.443
  83. Yang, C., Chen, Y., Zhao, X., ve Hua, N. (2020). Transformational leadership, proactive personality and service performance: The mediating role of organizational embeddedness. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(1), 267-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2019-0244
  84. Yohn, D. L. (2020). Brand authenticity, employee experience and corporate citizenship priorities in the COVID-19 era and beyond. Strategy and Leadership, 48(5), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-06-2020-0077
  85. Zhu, Y., ve Akhtar, S. (2014). How transformational leadership influences follower helping behavior: The role of trust and prosocial motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(3), 373-392. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1884