KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1

Girişimcilik Eğitimi ve İnovasyon Stratejileri Üzerine Wos’ta Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2003-2025)

A Bibliometric Analysis on Entrepreneurship Education and Innovation Strategies in Wos (2003-2025)

Emre Seyrek(AĞRI İBRAHİM ÇEÇEN ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-6561-8739
Fetullah Battal(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-2895-0193
Sayfa
200–217
Yayın Tarihi
2025-04-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ayrıca, "innovation", "performance" ve "strategy" gibi anahtar kelimelerin bu alandaki temel araştırma odakları olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, girişimcilik eğitimi ve inovasyon stratejilerinin tarihsel gelişimini ve literatürdeki mevcut durumunu bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Girişimcilik eğitiminin bireylerin yaratıcı düşünme, risk alma ve etkili karar verme gibi becerilerini geliştirdiği, girişimci niyetleri güçlendirdiği ve ekonomik çıktılara katkı sağladığı vurgulanmaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ayrıca, "innovation", "performance" ve "strategy" gibi anahtar kelimelerin bu alandaki temel araştırma odakları olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2003-2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Girişimcilik eğitimi · İnovasyon stratejileri · Bibliyometrik analiz

Özet

Bu çalışma, girişimcilik eğitimi ve inovasyon stratejilerinin tarihsel gelişimini ve literatürdeki mevcut durumunu bibliyometrik analiz yöntemiyle incelemektedir. Girişimcilik eğitiminin bireylerin yaratıcı düşünme, risk alma ve etkili karar verme gibi becerilerini geliştirdiği, girişimci niyetleri güçlendirdiği ve ekonomik çıktılara katkı sağladığı vurgulanmaktadır. İnovasyon stratejileri ise işletmelerin rekabet avantajı elde etmesinde ve sürdürülebilir bir yapı kazanmasında kritik bir role sahiptir. Literatürde, girişimcilik eğitimi ve inovasyon stratejilerinin entegrasyonunun birey ve kurumların yenilikçi ve uyumlu bir yapı sergilemesine olanak tanıdığı belirtilmektedir. Araştırma, 2003-2025 yılları arasında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yayınlanmış 271 akademik dokümanı analiz etmiştir. Araştırma görselleri R ve Rstudio programları yardımıyla elde edilmiştir. Sonuçlar, girişimcilik eğitimi ve inovasyon stratejileri alanında uluslararası işbirliklerinin güçlü olduğunu ve bu konuların akademik çevrede giderek artan bir ilgi gördüğünü ortaya koymaktadır. Ayrıca, "innovation", "performance" ve "strategy" gibi anahtar kelimelerin bu alandaki temel araştırma odakları olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Çalışma, girişimcilik eğitimi ve inovasyon stratejilerinin entegrasyonunun bireysel ve örgütsel düzeyde yenilikçiliği artırabileceğini ve bu iki alanın birlikte ele alınmasının eğitim politikaları ve akademik çalışmalar için önemli bir rehber olabileceğini göstermektedir. Elde edilen bulguların, girişimcilik ve inovasyon süreçlerinin daha verimli hale getirilmesi için gelecekteki araştırmalara ışık tutması beklenmektedir.

Abstract

This study examines the historical development and current status of entrepreneurship education and innovation strategies in the literature through bibliometric analysis. It is emphasized that entrepreneurship education improves individuals' skills such as creative thinking, risk taking and effective decision making, strengthens entrepreneurial intentions and contributes to economic outputs. Innovation strategies, on the other hand, have a critical role in helping businesses gain competitive advantage and gain a sustainable structure. In the literature, it is stated that the integration of entrepreneurship education and innovation strategies enables individuals and organizations to exhibit an innovative and adaptive structure. The research analyzed 271 academic documents published in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 2003 and 2025. Research visuals were obtained with the help of R and Rstudio programs. The results reveal that international collaborations in the field of entrepreneurship education and innovation strategies are strong and that these topics are receiving increasing attention in academia. Moreover, keywords such as “innovation”, “performance” and “strategy” were found to be the main research foci in this field. The study shows that the integration of entrepreneurship education and innovation strategies can increase innovation at the individual and organizational level and that addressing these two areas together can be an important guide for educational policies and academic studies. The findings are expected to shed light on future research to make entrepreneurship and innovation processes more efficient.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Seyrek, E., Battal, F. (2025). Girişimcilik Eğitimi ve İnovasyon Stratejileri Üzerine Wos’ta Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz (2003-2025). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Meslek Yüksekokulu Dergisi, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 1, 200–217. https://doi.org/10.29249/selcuksbmyd.1628669

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (59)

  1. Adams, J. (2013). The fourth age of research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(2), 221-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22731
  2. Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. MD. ve Baharun, R. (2020). Research trends of neuromarketing: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962.
  3. Aria, M. ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
  4. Audretsch, D. B. (2004). Sustaining innovation and growth: Public policy support for entrepreneurship. Industry and Innovation, 11(3), 167-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366271042000265366
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
  6. Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C. ve Fiet, J. O. (2014). The relationship between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intentions: A meta-analytic review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
  7. Becker, G. S. (1994). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226041223.001.0001
  8. Bornmann, L. ve Daniel, H. D. (2007). What do we know about the h index?. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(9), 1381-1385. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20609
  9. Cassar, G. (2006). Entrepreneur opportunity costs and intended venture growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 610-632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.02.011
  10. Chen, H., Fu, G., Wu, H., Xiao, Y., Nie, X. ve Zhao, W. (2024). Sustainable collaboration and incentive policies for the integration of professional education and innovation and entrepreneurship education (IPEIEE). Sustainability, 16(17), 7558. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177558
  11. Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A. ve Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and nonfamily SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595-609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9490-z
  12. Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 373-397. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x
  13. Covin, J. G. ve Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101600102
  14. Danvila-del-Valle, I., Estevez-Mendoza, C. ve Lara, F. J. (2019). Human resources training: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 627-636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.026
  15. Dissanayake, H., Iddagoda, A. ve Popescu, C. (2022). Entrepreneurial education at universities: A bibliometric Analysis. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040185
  16. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N. ve Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
  17. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7
  18. Ellegaard, O. (2018). The application of bibliometric analysis: Disciplinary and user aspects. Scientometrics, 116, 181–202. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v10i1.1998
  19. Fayolle, A. ve Gailly, B. (2008). From craft to science: Teaching models and learning processes in entrepreneurship education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(7), 569-593. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590810899838
  20. Fayolle, A. ve Gailly, B. (2015). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial attitudes and intention: Hysteresis and persistence. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 75-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12065
  21. Galande, J. ve Fuente, J. M. (2003). Internal factors determining a firm’s innovation behavior. Research Policy, 32, 715-736. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00082-3
  22. Garfield, E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama, 295(1), 90-93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90
  23. Gobble, M. (2012). Innovation and strategy. Research Technology Management, 55(3), 63-65. https://doi.org/10.5437/08956308X5503005
  24. Gorman, G., Hanlon, D. ve King, W. (1997). Some research perspectives on entrepreneurship education, enterprise education, and education for small business management: A ten-year literature review. International Small Business Journal, 15(3), 56-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242697153004
  25. Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J. ve Terrell, K. (2010). Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 194-226. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.2.2.194
  26. Guan, J. C., Richard, C. M., Tang, E. P. ve Lau, A. K. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5), 802-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.009
  27. Guerrero, M. ve Urbano, D. (2012). The development of an entrepreneurial university. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 43-74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-010-9171-x
  28. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. ve Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 105-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-014-9377-4
  29. Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. ve Gajón, E. (2017). Higher education entrepreneurial ecosystems: Exploring the role of business incubators in an emerging economy. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 175-202.
  30. Gwynne, P. (1998). As R&D penetrates the service sector, researchers must fashion new methods of innovation management. Research Technology Management, 41(5), 2-4.
  31. Henry, C., Hill, F. ve Leitch, C. (2005). Entrepreneurship education and training: can entrepreneurship be taught? Part I. Education+ training, 47(2), 98-111. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910510586524
  32. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(46), 16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  33. Honig, B. (2004). Entrepreneurship education: Toward a model of contingency-based business planning. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3(3), 258-273. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2004.14242112
  34. Jayashree, S. ve Yang, X. (2015). Firm's typology and strategic innovation among Chinese cosmetic industry - A strategic transformation tool. International Journal of Technology Management, 67(2-4), 132-147. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.068221
  35. Kattara, H. S. ve El-Said, O. A. (2013). Innovation strategies: The implementation of creativity principles in Egyptian hotels. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 13(3), 140-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1467358414522053
  36. Khanra, S., Dhir, A. ve Mantymaki, M. (2020). Big data analytics and enterprises: A bibliometric synthesis of the literature. Enterprise Information Systems, 14(6), 737-768. https://doi.org/10.1080/17517575.2020.1734241
  37. King, D. A. (2004). The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430(6997), 311-316. https://doi.org/10.1038/430311a
  38. Korkmaz, O. (2012). Üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimlerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma: Bülent Ecevit Üniversitesi örneği. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(2), 209-226.
  39. Krueger, N. F. ve Brazeal, D. V. (1994). Entrepreneurial potential and potential entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(3), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800307
  40. Kuratko, D. F. (2005). The emergence of entrepreneurship education: Development, trends, and challenges. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 577-597. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00099.x
  41. Lendel, V. ve Varmus, M. (2011). Creation and implementation of the innovation strategy in the enterprise. Economics and Management, 16(1), 819-826.
  42. Lin, C. H., Lin, H. L. ve Lin, E. S. (2016). Is there a complementary relationship between product and process innovation on productivity in Taiwanese manufacturing firms? Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 57(2), 139-173.
  43. Lumpkin, G. T. ve Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  44. Martin, B. C., McNally, J. J. ve Kay, M. J. (2013). Examining the formation of human capital in entrepreneurship: A meta-analysis of entrepreneurship education outcomes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(2), 211-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.03.002
  45. Miller, D. ve Friesen, P. H. (1982). Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum. Strategic Management Journal, 3(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250030102
  46. Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., Santisteban-Espejo, A. ve Cobo, M. J. (2020). Software tools for conducting bibliometric analysis in science: An up-to-date review. El Profesional de la Información, 29(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.03
  47. Neck, H. M. ve Greene, P. G. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Known worlds and new frontiers. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00314.x
  48. Pittaway, L. ve Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship education: A systematic review of the evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242607080656
  49. Rae, D. (2006). Entrepreneurial learning: A conceptual framework for technology-based enterprise. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(1), 39-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320500520494
  50. Riahi, Y., Saikouk, T., Gunasekaran, A. ve Badraoui, I. (2021). Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain: A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions. Expert Systems with Applications, 173, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.114702
  51. Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318-328. https://doi.org/10.2307/30040715
  52. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  53. Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S. ve Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
  54. Sreenivasan, A. ve Suresh, M. (2023). Twenty years of entrepreneurship education: A bibliometric analysis. Entrepreneurship Education, 6(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41959-023-00089-zPMC
  55. Tabak, F. ve Barr, S. H. (1996). Adoption of organizational innovations: Individual and organizational determinants. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 388-392. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.1996.4980980
  56. Verzat, C. ve Bachelet, R. (2006). Developing an entrepreneurial spirit among engineering college students: What are the educational factors?. International Entrepreneurship Education, 11, 287-314. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201652.00019
  57. Wang, Q. ve Ngai, E. W. T. (2020). Event study methodology in business research: A bibliometric analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(10), 1863-1900. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0671
  58. Yılmaz, A. S. (2014). Bir sosyal değişim ajanı olarak: Girişimcilik eğitimi. Journal of World of Turks, 6 (1), 297-310.
  59. Zupic, I. ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629