KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Advancements and Challenges in Dental Shade Matching: A Comprehensive Review of Visual and Instrumental Techniques

Şevval Takva(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0009-0000-2058-8532
Dilara Sahin Hazir(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-4305-0257
Senay Canay(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİ FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0003-0485-361X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: Digital shade selection, spectrophotometer, intraoral scanner, colorimetry in dentistry, esthetic restorations, tooth color matching

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: Achieving lifelike aesthetics in dental restorations depends heavily on accurate tooth color matching.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Intraoral scanners show increasing accuracy due to advancements in optical technology, although their performance varies across models.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: Digital shade selection, spectrophotometer, intraoral scanner, colorimetry in dentistry, esthetic restorations, tooth color matching
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Digital shade selection · spectrophotometer · intraoral scanner

Abstract

Background: Achieving lifelike aesthetics in dental restorations depends heavily on accurate tooth color matching. However, conventional visual shade selection is often subjective and unreliable, prompting the integration of digital technologies in clinical workflows. Methods: This review examines current methods for tooth shade determination, including visual guides, colorimeters, spectrophotometers, hybrid systems, digital photography, and intraoral scanners. Each technique is evaluated in terms of accuracy, reproducibility, clinical applicability, and integration with digital dentistry systems. Results: Spectrophotometers consistently offer high precision and are less affected by environmental factors or observer bias, making them the gold standard for objective color determination. Intraoral scanners show increasing accuracy due to advancements in optical technology, although their performance varies across models. Digital photography, when standardized and calibrated, provides detailed visual documentation and aids in communication. Hybrid systems combine imaging and spectral analysis for improved consistency. Despite these advancements, no single method guarantees perfect results under all clinical conditions. Conclusions: The integration of digital technologies into shade selection has significantly enhanced objectivity and reproducibility in dental restorations. Nonetheless, combining multiple techniques—particularly visual inspection with spectrophotometric or scanner-based data—remains essential for accurate shade matching. Ongoing research and standardization efforts are needed to optimize clinical outcomes and improve reliability across devices. Keywords: Digital shade selection, spectrophotometer, intraoral scanner, colorimetry in dentistry, esthetic restorations, tooth color matching

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Takva, Ş., Hazir, D. S., Canay, S. (2026). Advancements and Challenges in Dental Shade Matching: A Comprehensive Review of Visual and Instrumental Techniques. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1723994

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (48)

  1. EL‐Etreby A, McLaren EA. A step‐by‐step technique to create an ideal color match, form, and surface texture to all‐ceramic restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024;36(1):65-77.
  2. Bahannan SA. Shade matching quality among dental students using visual and instrumental methods. J Dent.2014;42(1):48-52.
  3. Ebeid K, Sabet A, Della Bona A. Accuracy and repeatability of different intraoral scanners on shade determination. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(6):844-8.
  4. Mehl A, Bosch G, Fischer C, Ender A. In vivo tooth-color measurement with a new 3D intraoral scanning system in comparison to conventional digital and visual color determination methods. Int J Comput Dent. 2017;20(4).
  5. Abzal MS, Rathakrishnan M, Prakash V, Vivekanandhan P, Subbiya A, Sukumaran VG. Evaluation of surface roughness of three different composite resins with three different polishing systems. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(2):171-4.
  6. Alfouzan AF, Alqahtani HM, Tashkandi EA. The effect of color training of dental students on dental shades matching quality. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(5):346-51.
  7. Alkhudairy R, Tashkandi E. The effectiveness of a shade‐matching training program on the dentists' ability to match teeth color. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017;29(2):E33-E43.
  8. Gonzalez‐Chavez JA, Soto‐Barreras U, Perez‐Aguirre B, Nevarez‐Rascon M, Villegas‐Mercado CE, Dominguez‐Perez RA. Reliability of dental shade selection methods: agreement among spectrophotometer, intraoral scanner, and cross‐polarization photography. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025.
  9. Tabatabaian F, Beyabanaki E, Alirezaei P, Epakchi S. Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: a literature review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(8):1084-104.
  10. Munsell AH, Nickerson D. Munsell color system. Wadsworth, Howland & Co Inc.; 1915.
  11. Brennan JG, Newhall SM. ICI specifications of difference limens for Munsell hue, value, and chroma. J Opt Soc Am.1948;38(8):696-702.
  12. Öngül D, Şermet B, Balkaya MC. Visual and instrumental evaluation of color match ability of 2 shade guides on a ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent. 2012;108(1):9-14.
  13. Horn DJ, Bulan-Brady J, Hicks ML. Sphere spectrophotometer versus human evaluation of tooth shade. J Endod.1998;24(12):786-90.
  14. Jorquera GJ, Atria PJ, Galán M, Feureisen J, Imbarak M, Kernitsky J, et al. A comparison of ceramic crown color difference between different shade selection methods: visual, digital camera, and smartphone. J Prosthet Dent.2022;128(4):784-92.
  15. Paravina RD, Powers JM, Fay RM. Dental color standards: shade tab arrangement. J Esthet Restor Dent.2001;13(4):254-63.
  16. Yoon HI, Bae JW, Park JM, Chun YS, Kim MA, Kim M. A study on possibility of clinical application for color measurements of shade guides using an intraoral digital scanner. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(7):670-5.
  17. Lim JH, Mangal U, Nam NE, Choi SH, Shim JS, Kim JE. A comparison of accuracy of different dental restorative materials between intraoral scanning and conventional impression-taking: an in vitro study. Materials. 2021;14(8):2060.
  18. Shen C, Rawls HR, Esquivel-Upshaw JF. Phillips' science of dental materials. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.
  19. Jouhar R, Ahmed MA, Khurshid Z. An overview of shade selection in clinical dentistry. Appl Sci. 2022;12(14):6841.
  20. Imbery TA, Tran D, Baechle MA, Hankle JL, Janus C. Dental shade matching and value discernment abilities of first‐year dental students. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(9):821-7.
  21. Chang JY, Chen WC, Huang TK, Wang JC, Fu PS, Chen JH, et al. Evaluating the accuracy of tooth color measurement by combining the Munsell color system and dental colorimeter. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2012;28(9):490-4.
  22. Stamenković DD, Tango RN, Todorović A, Karasan D, Sailer I, Paravina RD. Staining and aging-dependent changes in color of CAD-CAM materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;126(5):672-8.
  23. Rashid F, Farook TH, Dudley J. Digital shade matching in dentistry: a systematic review. Dent J. 2023;11(11):250.
  24. De Oliveira DCRS, Ayres APA, Rocha MG, Giannini M, Puppin Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, et al. Effect of different in vitro aging methods on color stability of a dental resin‐based composite using CIELAB and CIEDE2000 color‐difference formulas. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2015;27(5):322-30.
  25. Lee YK, Powers JM. Comparison of CIE Lab, CIEDE2000, and DIN99 color differences between various shades of resin composites. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(2).
  26. Alnusayri MO, Sghaireen MG, Mathew M, Alzarea B, Bandela V, Sghaireen MG. Shade selection in esthetic dentistry: a review. Cureus. 2022;14(3).
  27. Borse S, Chaware SH. Tooth shade analysis and selection in prosthodontics: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020;20(2):131-40.
  28. Oh WS, Koh IW, O’Brien WJ. Estimation of visual shade matching errors with 2 shade guides. Quintessence Int.2009;40(10).
  29. Abu‐Hossin S, Onbasi Y, Berger L, Troll F, Adler W, Wichmann M, et al. Comparison of digital and visual tooth shade selection. Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023;9(2):368-74.
  30. Alnusayri M, Sghaireen M, Mathew M, Alzarea B, Bandela V. Shade selection in esthetic dentistry: a review. Cureus.2022;14(3):e23331.
  31. Gonzalez‐Chavez JA, Soto‐Barreras U, Perez‐Aguirre B, Nevarez‐Rascon M, Villegas‐Mercado CE, Dominguez‐Perez RA. Reliability of dental shade selection methods: agreement among spectrophotometer, intraoral scanner, and cross‐polarization photography. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025;37(7):1784-90.
  32. Kurian N, Varghese VS, Sudharson NA, Wadhwa S, Narang C, Sethi N, et al. A clinical study to evaluate the reliability of light-correcting devices in clinical shade selection. Dent Res J. 2023;20(1):69.
  33. Kutkut N, Jordi M, Almalki A, Conejo J, Anadioti E, Blatz M. Comparison of the accuracy and reliability of instrumental shade selection devices and visual shade selection: an in vitro study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024.
  34. Mehta R, Kumar A, Goel M, Kumar V, Arora T, Pande S. Shade selection: blending of conventional and digital methods – an updated review. J Oral Health Community Dent. 2014;8:109-12.
  35. Chu SJ, Trushkowsky RD, Paravina RD. Dental color matching instruments and systems: review of clinical and research aspects. J Dent. 2010;38:e2-e16.
  36. Dozic A, Kharbanda AK, Kamell H, Brand HS. European dental students’ opinions about visual and digital tooth colour determination systems. J Dent. 2011;39:e23-e8.
  37. Rutkūnas V, Dirsė J, Bilius V. Accuracy of an intraoral digital scanner in tooth color determination. J Prosthet Dent.2020;123(2):322-9.
  38. Gehrke P, Riekeberg U, Fackler O, Dhom G. Comparison of in vivo visual, spectrophotometric and colorimetric shade determination of teeth and implant-supported crowns. Int J Comput Dent. 2009;12(3):247-63.
  39. Aboushelib MN, Dozic A, Liem JK. Influence of framework color and layering technique on the final color of zirconia veneered restorations. Quintessence Int. 2010;41(5).
  40. Jarad F, Russell M, Moss B. The use of digital imaging for colour matching and communication in restorative dentistry. Br Dent J. 2005;199(1):43-9.
  41. Morsy N, Holiel A. Color difference for shade determination with visual and instrumental methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Syst Rev. 2023;12:95.
  42. Gotfredsen K, Gram M, Ben Brahem E, Hosseini M, Petkov M, Sitorovic M. Effectiveness of shade measurements using a scanning and computer software system: a pilot study. Int J Oral Dent Health. 2015;1(8).
  43. Liberato WF, Barreto IC, Costa PP, de Almeida CC, Pimentel W, Tiossi R. A comparison between visual, intraoral scanner, and spectrophotometer shade matching: a clinical study. J Prosthet Dent. 2019;121(2):271-5.
  44. Yılmaz B, Irmak Ö, Yaman BC. Outcomes of visual tooth shade selection performed by operators with different experience. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2019;31(5):500-7.
  45. Czigola A, Roth I, Vitai V, Fehér D, Hermann P, Borbély J. Comparing the effectiveness of shade measurement by intraoral scanner, digital spectrophotometer, and visual shade assessment. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2021;33(8):1166-74.
  46. Moussaoui H, El Mdaghri M, Gouma A, Bennani B. Accuracy, repeatability and reproducibility of digital intraoral scanner for shade selection: current status of the literature. Oral Health Dent Sci. 2018;2(4):1-6.
  47. Reyes J, Acosta P, Ventura D. Repeatability of the human eye compared to an intraoral scanner in dental shade matching. Heliyon. 2019;5(7).
  48. Culic C, Varvara M, Tatar G, Simu MR, Rica R, Mesaros A, et al. In vivo evaluation of teeth shade match capabilities of a dental intraoral scanner. Curr Health Sci J. 2018;44(4):337.