KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

From Analog to Digital: Advances, Challenges, and Material Innovations in Craniofacial Reconstruction

Aslıhan Öztürk(Hacettepe University)0009-0002-1266-4261
Şevval Takva(Hacettepe University)0009-0000-2058-8532
Senay Canay(Hacettepe University)0000-0003-0485-361X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Keywords: Additive manufacturing, Artificial intelligence, Digital dentistry, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Prosthetic materials, 3D printing.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: The rehabilitation of craniofacial defects is critical for restoring form, function, and patient quality of life.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:While conventional impression and hand-sculpting techniques present significant challenges regarding patient comfort and time efficiency, the integration of digital imaging, 3D printing, and advanced biomaterials has introduced a paradigm shift in maxillofacial prosthetics.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Keywords: Additive manufacturing, Artificial intelligence, Digital dentistry, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Prosthetic materials, 3D printing.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Additive manufacturing · Artificial intelligence · Digital dentistry

Abstract

Background: The rehabilitation of craniofacial defects is critical for restoring form, function, and patient quality of life. While conventional impression and hand-sculpting techniques present significant challenges regarding patient comfort and time efficiency, the integration of digital imaging, 3D printing, and advanced biomaterials has introduced a paradigm shift in maxillofacial prosthetics. Methods: This review evaluates the transition from analog to digital workflows in craniofacial reconstruction. The current approaches and technological advancements were analyzed across four key domains: digital data acquisition techniques (including optical scanning and photogrammetry), additive manufacturing modalities, the evolution and optimization of prosthetic materials, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in design and fabrication processes. Results: Digital data acquisition enhances patient comfort and reproducibility, though conventional methods often remain necessary for capturing dynamic functional borders. Additive manufacturing provides geometric freedom and efficient mold fabrication; however, the direct printing of definitive soft-tissue prostheses is currently constrained by surface resolution (the "staircase effect") and color limitations. Material innovations, such as 3D-printed titanium mesh scaffolds combined with silicone, successfully reduce prosthesis weight. Furthermore, AI integration facilitates automated anatomical segmentation, pigment prediction, and symmetry assessment, acting as a highly effective adjunctive tool rather than a replacement for clinical expertise. Conclusions: Although digital technologies significantly streamline the fabrication workflow and improve predictability, they cannot yet fully replace conventional analog techniques due to existing standardization and esthetic limitations. Currently, the most effective clinical strategy is a hybrid approach that integrates digital precision for substructures and molds with conventional artistry for final esthetic characterization. Keywords: Additive manufacturing, Artificial intelligence, Digital dentistry, Maxillofacial prosthetics, Prosthetic materials, 3D printing.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Öztürk, A., Takva, Ş., Canay, S. (2026). From Analog to Digital: Advances, Challenges, and Material Innovations in Craniofacial Reconstruction. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1902228

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (70)

  1. de Caxias FP, Dos Santos DM, Bannwart LC, de Moraes Melo Neto CL, Goiato MC. Classification, history, and future prospects of maxillofacial prosthesis. International journal of dentistry. 2019;2019(1):8657619.
  2. Phasuk K, Haug SP. Maxillofacial prosthetics. Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics. 2018;30(4):487-97.
  3. Ackerman AJ. Maxillofacial prosthesis. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1953;6(1):176-200.
  4. Li X, Xu J, Fan J, Xue Y, Gu X, Zhou H, et al. Current situation and development of facial prosthesis. Chinese Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2023;5(1):39-42.
  5. Cevik P, Kocacikli M. Three-dimensional printing technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prosthesis: A case report. The International Journal of Artificial Organs. 2020;43(5):343-7.
  6. Nazar SA, Nair VV, Kumar H, Ravichandran R. Retention in maxillofacial prosthetics: A review. Int J Appl Dent Sci. 2021;7(2):568-73.
  7. Annamma LM, Hattori M, Ali IE, Dsouza J, Waqar A, Chugh A, et al. Frequently used extraoral maxillofacial prosthetic materials and their longevity–A comprehensive review. Japanese Dental Science Review. 2024; 60:137-47.
  8. Wolfaardt J, Sugar A, Wilkes G. Advanced technology and the future of facial prosthetics in head and neck reconstruction. 2003. p. 121-3.
  9. Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Brom J, Huettig F, Keutel C. Direct 3D printing of silicone facial prostheses: A preliminary experience in digital workflow. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(2):303-8.
  10. Salazar-Gamarra R, Seelaus R, da Silva JVL, da Silva AM, Dib LL. Monoscopic photogrammetry to obtain 3D models by a mobile device: a method for making facial prostheses. Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery. 2016;45(1):33.
  11. Buzayan MM, Elkezza AH, Ahmad SF, Salleh NM, Sivakumar I. A comparative evaluation of photogrammetry software programs and conventional impression techniques for the fabrication of nasal maxillofacial prostheses. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;134(1):268-74.
  12. Suresh N, Janakiram C, Nayar S, Krishnapriya V, Mathew A. Effectiveness of digital data acquisition technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prostheses–A systematic review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2022;12(1):208-15.
  13. Jablonski RY, Osnes CA, Khambay BS, Nattress BR, Keeling AJ. Accuracy of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion versus laser scanning. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2019;122(3):333-8.
  14. Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Beuer F, Huettig F, Röhler A, Kraemer-Fernandez P. Accuracy of capturing nasal, orbital, and auricular defects with extra-and intraoral optical scanners and smartphone: an in vitro study. Journal of dentistry. 2022; 117:103916.
  15. Jablonski RY, Osnes CA, Khambay BS, Nattress BR, Keeling AJ. An in-vitro study to assess the feasibility, validity and precision of capturing oncology facial defects with multimodal image fusion. the surgeon. 2018;16(5):265-70.
  16. Elbashti ME, Sumita YI, Aswehlee AM, Seelaus R. Smartphone application as a low-cost alternative for digitizing facial defects: is it accurate enough for clinical application. Int J Prosthodont. 2019;32(6):541-3.
  17. Zhao Y-j, Xiong Y-x, Wang Y. Three-dimensional accuracy of facial scan for facial deformities in clinics: a new evaluation method for facial scanner accuracy. PloS one. 2017;12(1):e0169402.
  18. Farook TH, Rashid F, Jamayet NB, Abdullah JY, Dudley J, Alam MK. A virtual analysis of the precision and accuracy of 3-dimensional ear casts generated from smartphone camera images. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022;128(4):830-6.
  19. Unkovskiy A, Spintzyk S, Axmann D, Engel EM, Weber H, Huettig F. Additive manufacturing: a comparative analysis of dimensional accuracy and skin texture reproduction of auricular prostheses replicas. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(2):e460-e8.
  20. Memon AR, Wang E, Hu J, Egger J, Chen X. A review on computer-aided design and manufacturing of patient-specific maxillofacial implants. Expert review of medical devices. 2020;17(4):345-56.
  21. Singare S, Dichen L, Bingheng L, Yanpu L, Zhenyu G, Yaxiong L. Design and fabrication of custom mandible titanium tray based on rapid prototyping. Medical engineering & physics. 2004;26(8):671-6.
  22. Moiduddin K, Anwar S, Ahmed N, Ashfaq M, Al-Ahmari A. Computer assisted design and analysis of customized porous plate for mandibular reconstruction. IRBM. 2017; 38: 78-89.
  23. Taniguchi H, Sumita YI, Otomaru T, Minamisawa N, Inohara K. Maxillofacial prosthodontics—current treatment and research. Prosthodontic Research & Practice. 2008;7(2):132-4.
  24. Tian Y, Chen C, Xu X, Wang J, Hou X, Li K, et al. A Review of 3D Printing in Dentistry: Technologies, Affecting Factors, and Applications. Scanning. 2021; 2021:9950131.
  25. Lerner H, Nagy K, Pranno N, Zarone F, Admakin O, Mangano F. Trueness and precision of 3D-printed versus milled monolithic zirconia crowns: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2021; 113:103792.
  26. Mohammed MI, Tatineni J, Cadd B, Peart G, Gibson I, editors. Applications of 3D topography scanning and multi-material additive manufacturing for facial prosthesis development and production. 27th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium-An Additive Manufacturing Conference, SFF 2016; 2016.
  27. Powell SK, Cruz RL, Ross MT, Woodruff MA. Past, present, and future of soft‐tissue prosthetics: advanced polymers and advanced manufacturing. Advanced Materials. 2020;32(42):2001122.
  28. Piedra-Cascon W, Krishnamurthy VR, Att W, Revilla-Leon M. 3D printing parameters, supporting structures, slicing, and post-processing procedures of vat-polymerization additive manufacturing technologies: A narrative review. J Dent. 2021; 109:103630.
  29. Liebermann A, Schultheis A, Faber F, Rammelsberg P, Rues S, Schwindling FS. Impact of post printing cleaning methods on geometry, transmission, roughness parameters, and flexural strength of 3D-printed zirconia. Dent Mater. 2023;39(7):625-33.
  30. An S, Tazikeh M, Sa’Oor S, Wang T, Cameron A. Impact of isopropanol post-washing duration and post-polymerization devices on flexural properties of 3D-printed denture base: An in-vitro study. Digital Dentistry Journal. 2025;2(2):100020.
  31. Bardelcik A, Yang S, Alderson F, Gadsden A. The effect of wash treatment on the mechanical properties and energy absorption potential of a 3D printed polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Materials Today Communications. 2021; 26:101728.
  32. Hardiman K. Post-processing considerations for biomedical 3D printing of polymers. Polymer-Based Additive Manufacturing: Biomedical Applications: Springer; 2019. p. 219-41.
  33. Unkovskiy A, Bui PH-B, Schille C, Geis-Gerstorfer J, Huettig F, Spintzyk S. Objects build orientation, positioning, and curing influence dimensional accuracy and flexural properties of stereolithographically printed resin. Dental Materials. 2018;34(12):e324-e33.
  34. Reymus M, Stawarczyk B. In vitro study on the influence of postpolymerization and aging on the Martens parameters of 3D-printed occlusal devices. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;125(5):817-23.
  35. Kim D, Shim J-S, Lee D, Shin S-H, Nam N-E, Park K-H, et al. Effects of post-curing time on the mechanical and color properties of three-dimensional printed crown and bridge materials. Polymers. 2020;12(11):2762.
  36. Oskui SM, Diamante G, Liao C, Shi W, Gan J, Schlenk D, et al. Assessing and reducing the toxicity of 3D-printed parts. Environmental Science & Technology Letters. 2016;3(1):1-6.
  37. Çakmak G, Cuellar AR, Donmez MB, Abou-Ayash S, Lu W-E, Schimmel M, et al. Effect of printing layer thickness on the trueness of 3-unit interim fixed partial dentures. The journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2024;131(4):718-25.
  38. Lyu J, Yang X, Li Y, Tan J, Liu X. Effect of build angle on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with the nanoparticle jetting technique. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2023;130(4):613. e1-. e8.
  39. Alharbi N, Osman R, Wismeijer D. Effects of build direction on the mechanical properties of 3D-printed complete coverage interim dental restorations. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2016;115(6):760-7.
  40. Yu B-Y, Son K, Lee K-B. Evaluation of intaglio surface trueness and margin quality of interim crowns in accordance with the build angle of stereolithography apparatus 3-dimensional printing. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2021;126(2):231-7.
  41. Alqarawi FK, Gad MM. Tendency of microbial adhesion to denture base resins: a systematic review. Frontiers in Oral Health. 2024; 5:1375186.
  42. Osman RB, Khoder G, Fayed B, Kedia RA, Elkareimi Y, Alharbi N. Influence of fabrication technique on adhesion and biofilm formation of Candida albicans to conventional, milled, and 3D-printed denture base resin materials: A comparative in vitro study. Polymers. 2023;15(8):1836.
  43. Costa-Palau S, Clua-Palau A, Real-Voltas F, Brufau-de Barberà M, Cabratosa-Termes J. A comparison of digital and conventional fabrication techniques for an esthetic maxillofacial prosthesis for the cheek and lip. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2025;133(1):315-20.
  44. Yadav S, Narayan AI, Choudhry A, Balakrishnan D. CAD/CAM‐assisted auricular prosthesis fabrication for a quick, precise, and more retentive outcome: a clinical report. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2017;26(7):616-21.
  45. Bauermeister AJ, Zuriarrain A, Newman MI. Three-dimensional printing in plastic and reconstructive surgery: a systematic review. Annals of plastic surgery. 2016;77(5):569-76.
  46. Gunay Y, Kurtoglu C, Atay A, Karayazgan B, Gurbuz CC. Effect of tulle on the mechanical properties of a maxillofacial silicone elastomer. Dental materials journal. 2008;27(6):775-9.
  47. Radey NS, Al Shimy AM, Ahmed DM. Effect of extraoral aging conditions on mechanical properties of facial silicone elastomer reinforced with titanium-oxide nanoparticles (in vitro study). Alexandria Dental Journal. 2020;45(3):29-36.
  48. Mohan AS, Manju V, Babu AS, Krishnapriya V. Effect of particle size of nano-oxides on color stability and mechanical properties of maxillofacial silicone elastomers: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2021; 34:54-60.
  49. Rai M, Yadav A, Gade A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology advances. 2009;27(1):76-83.
  50. Roe D, Karandikar B, Bonn-Savage N, Gibbins B, Roullet J-B. Antimicrobial surface functionalization of plastic catheters by silver nanoparticles. Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy. 2008;61(4):869-76.
  51. Meran Z, Besinis A, De Peralta T, Handy RD. Antifungal properties and biocompatibility of silver nanoparticle coatings on silicone maxillofacial prostheses in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2018;106(3):1038-51.
  52. Kim K-J, Sung WS, Suh BK, Moon S-K, Choi J-S, Kim JG, et al. Antifungal activity and mode of action of silver nano-particles on Candida albicans. Biometals. 2009;22(2):235-42.
  53. Panáček A, Kolář M, Večeřová R, Prucek R, Soukupová J, Kryštof V, et al. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles against Candida spp. Biomaterials. 2009;30(31):6333-40.
  54. Spintzyk S, Brinkmeier S, Huettig F, Unkovskiy A. Bonding strength of 3D printed silicone and titanium retention magnets for maxillofacial prosthetics application. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2022;66(3):422-30.
  55. Generalova AN, Vikhrov AA, Prostyakova AI, Apresyan SV, Stepanov AG, Myasoedov MS, et al. Polymers in 3D printing of external maxillofacial prostheses and in their retention systems. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2024; 657:124181.
  56. Guttridge C, Shannon A, O'Sullivan A, O'Sullivan KJ, O'Sullivan LW. Biocompatible 3D printing resins for medical applications: A review of marketed intended use, biocompatibility certification, and post-processing guidance. Annals of 3D Printed Medicine. 2022; 5:100044.
  57. Lerner H, Mouhyi J, Admakin O, Mangano F. Artificial intelligence in fixed implant prosthodontics: a retrospective study of 106 implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns inserted in the posterior jaws of 90 patients. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):80.
  58. Aradya A, Sravani K, Ravi M, Swamy KR, Ganesh S, Chandra KP, et al. Artificial intelligence for maxillofacial prosthodontics: A technological shift in craniofacial rehabilitation-a scoping review. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research. 2025;15(6):1749-66.
  59. Elsen R, Nayak S. Artificial Intelligence-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Bone Scaffold Fabrication and Its Application in Preclinical and Clinical Investigations. ACS biomaterials science & engineering. 2024;10(2):677-96.
  60. Dodia MA, Patel N, Desai C, Chakraborty B, Patel NN. Comparative evaluation of conventional and digital techniques for maxillofacial prosthesis fabrication: a systematic review of the literature. Cureus. 2025;17(10).
  61. Elsen R, Nayak S. Artificial Intelligence-Based 3D Printing Strategies for Bone Scaffold Fabrication and Its Application in Preclinical and Clinical Investigations. ACS biomaterials science & engineering. 2024.
  62. Kurt M, Kurt Z, Işık Ş. Using deep learning approaches for coloring silicone maxillofacial prostheses: A comparison of two approaches. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2023;23(1):84-9.
  63. Pathak A, Dhamande MM, Gujjelwar S, Das P, Chheda EV, Puthenkandathil R. Fabrication of implant-supported auricular prosthesis using artificial intelligence. Cureus. 2024;16(5).
  64. Wodzinski M, Daniol M, Socha M, Hemmerling D, Stanuch M, Skalski A. Deep learning-based framework for automatic cranial defect reconstruction and implant modeling. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine. 2022; 226:107173.
  65. Preda F, Morgan N, Van Gerven A, Nogueira-Reis F, Smolders A, Wang X, et al. Deep convolutional neural network-based automated segmentation of the maxillofacial complex from cone-beam computed tomography: A validation study. Journal of Dentistry. 2022; 124:104238.
  66. Ceratti C, Maspero C, Consonni D, Caprioglio A, Connelly ST, Inchingolo F, et al. Cone-beam computed tomographic assessment of the mandibular condylar volume in different skeletal patterns: a retrospective study in adult patients. Bioengineering. 2022;9(3):102.
  67. Nakada T, Koyachi M, Sugahara K, Nishiyama A, Kawakami M, Nakajima S, et al. A case of application of computer-aided design and manufacturing technology and extended reality surgical assistance to marginal mandibulectomy. Journal of clinical medicine. 2024;14(1):8.
  68. Li R, Jie B, Han B, Zheng Y, Wang C, Yang X, et al. A Point Cloud Generation Network for Automatic Prediction of Postoperative Maxillofacial Soft Tissue: R. Li et al. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 2025;53(8):1975-85.
  69. Ali IE, Hattori M, Sumita Y, Wakabayashi N. Automated design prediction for definitive obturator prostheses: A case‐based reasoning study. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2025;34(5):490-9.
  70. Du W, Wang H, Zhao C, Cui Z, Li J, Zhang W, et al. Postoperative facial prediction for mandibular defect based on surface mesh deformation. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2024;125(5):101973.