KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Effect of Sonic Application Mode on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Two Adhesive Systems

Alpaslan Can Çelik(Selçuk Üniversitesi)0009-0008-9542-8566
Nimet Ünlü(SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF DENTISTRY)
Sultan Gizem Ülkü
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While sonic activation adversely affected the bonding performance of the simplified universal adhesive system, it had no significant effect on the bond strength of the two-step self-etch adhesive system.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of application according to manufacturers’ instructions and sonic activation on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of a universal adhesive system and a two-step self-etch adhesive system.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and Methods: Forty caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10) based on adhesive system and application mode (slight rubbing or sonic activation).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While sonic activation adversely affected the bonding performance of the simplified universal adhesive system, it had no significant effect on the bond strength of the two-step self-etch adhesive system.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:dental adhesive · sonic activation · self-etch

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to compare the effects of application according to manufacturers’ instructions and sonic activation on the microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to dentin of a universal adhesive system and a two-step self-etch adhesive system. Materials and Methods: Forty caries-free human molars were randomly assigned to four experimental groups (n = 10) based on adhesive system and application mode (slight rubbing or sonic activation). A universal adhesive system (Nova Compo B Plus [NC]; Imicryl, Turkey) and a two-step self-etch adhesive system (Clearfil SE Bond [SE]; Kuraray, Japan) were evaluated. Each adhesive was applied either with a slight rubbing motion, as recommended by the manufacturers, or with sonic activation. All teeth were restored with a composite resin compatible with the respective adhesive system. After storage in distilled water at 37°C for 24 hours, specimens were sectioned into stick-shaped samples with a cross-sectional area of approximately 0.9 mm². Microtensile bond strength testing was performed at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min, and failure modes were assessed under a stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s post hoc test (α = 0.05), and failure mode distributions were evaluated using the chi-square test. Results: Adhesive failures were observed in all groups. Sonic application significantly reduced the µTBS of the universal adhesive system compared with conventional rubbing application (P < 0.05). However, sonic activation did not significantly affect the dentin bond strength of the two-step self-etch adhesive system. Conclusion: The effect of sonic application on dentin bond strength appears to be adhesive-system dependent. While sonic activation adversely affected the bonding performance of the simplified universal adhesive system, it had no significant effect on the bond strength of the two-step self-etch adhesive system.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çelik, A. C., Ünlü, N., Ülkü, S. G. (2026). Effect of Sonic Application Mode on the Microtensile Bond Strength of Two Adhesive Systems. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1846738

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (39)

  1. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Van Landuyt K, Yoshida Y, Peumans M. From Buonocore's Pioneering Acid-Etch Technique to Self-Adhering Restoratives. A Status Perspective of Rapidly Advancing Dental Adhesive Technology. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(1):7-34.
  2. Breschi L, Maravic T, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Mancuso E, Cadenaro M, et al. The evolution of adhesive dentistry: From etch-and-rinse to universal bonding systems. Dent Mater. 2025;41(2):141-58.
  3. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, Yoshioka M, Snauwaert J, Abe Y, et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. J Dent Res. 2001;80(6):1565-9.
  4. Araújo-Neto VG, Silvestre FA, Lomonaco D, Sauro S, Feitosa VP, Giannini M. Effect of multi-layer applications of self-etch universal bonding agents on the adhesion of resin composite to enamel. Odontology. 2025;113(1):252-60.
  5. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, Yoshiyama M, Saito T, Brackett WW, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):133-41.
  6. Nakaoki Y, Sasakawa W, Horiuchi S, Nagano F, Ikeda T, Tanaka T, et al. Effect of double-application of all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Dent. 2005;33(9):765-72.
  7. De Vito Moraes AG, Francci C, Carvalho CN, Soares SP, Braga RR. Microshear bond strength of self-etching systems associated with a hydrophobic resin layer. J Adhes Dent. 2011;13(4):341-8.
  8. Serafim M, Leal A, Bauer J, Gomes I, Carneiro K. Effect of an hydrophobic layer on a universal adhesive. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. 2018; 66:339-44.
  9. Cardoso Pde C, Loguercio AD, Vieira LC, Baratieri LN, Reis A. Effect of prolonged application times on resin-dentin bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):143-9.
  10. Kirsch J, Schmidt D, Herzberg D, Weber MT, Gäbler S, Hannig C. Effect of Sonic Application of Self-etch Adhesives on Bonding Fiber Posts to Root Canal Dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2017;19(4):295-304.
  11. Muñoz MA, Luque-Martinez I, Hass V, Gutierrez MF, Reis A, Loguercio AD. The sonic application of universal adhesives in self-etch mode improves their performance on enamel. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 2019; 88:43-9.
  12. Guarda MB, Di Nizo PT, Abuna GF, Catelan A, Sinhoreti MAC, Vitti RP. Effect of Electric Current-assisted Application of Adhesives on their Bond Strength and Quality. J Adhes Dent. 2020;22(4):393-8.
  13. Almahdy A, Koller G, Sauro S, Bartsch JW, Sherriff M, Watson TF, et al. Effects of MMP inhibitors incorporated within dental adhesives. J Dent Res. 2012;91(6):605-11.
  14. Hardan L, Bourgi R, Cuevas-Suárez CE, Devoto W, Zarow M, Monteiro P, et al. Effect of Different Application Modalities on the Bonding Performance of Adhesive Systems to Dentin: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cells. 2023;12(1).
  15. Ahmad M, Pitt Ford TR, Crum LA, Walton AJ. Ultrasonic debridement of root canals: acoustic cavitation and its relevance. J Endod. 1988;14(10):486-93.
  16. Mena-Serrano A, Costa TR, Patzlaff RT, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and dentin permeability of self-etching systems. J Adhes Dent. 2014;16(5):435-40.
  17. Jang JH, Jeon BK, Mo SY, Park M, Choi D, Choi KK, et al. Effect of various agitation methods on adhesive layer formation of HEMA-free universal dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J. 2019;38(1):101-6.
  18. Lee J, Jang KT, Kim JW, Lee SH, Hahn SH, Kim CC. Effect of ultrasonic vibration on dentin bond strength and resin infiltration. Am J Dent. 2003;16(6):404-8.
  19. Burrow MF, Nopnakeepong U, Phrukkanon S. A comparison of microtensile bond strengths of several dentin bonding systems to primary and permanent dentin. Dent Mater. 2002;18(3):239-45.
  20. Roulet J-F, Van Meerbeek B. Editorial: Statistics: a nuisance, a tool, or a must? The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2007: Pages 287-8.
  21. Armstrong S, Breschi L, Özcan M, Pfefferkorn F, Ferrari M, Van Meerbeek B. Academy of Dental Materials guidance on in vitro testing of dental composite bonding effectiveness to dentin/enamel using micro-tensile bond strength (μTBS) approach. Dent Mater. 2017;33(2):133-43.
  22. Price RB, Hall GC. In vitro comparison of 10-minute versus 24-hour shear bond strengths of six dentin bonding systems. Quintessence Int. 1999;30(2):122-34.
  23. Lea SC, Walmsley AD. Mechano-physical and biophysical properties of power-driven scalers: driving the future of powered instrument design and evaluation. Periodontol 2000. 2009; 51:63-78.
  24. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod. 2009;35(6):791-804.
  25. Mena-Serrano A, Garcia EJ, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Effect of sonic application mode on the resin-dentin bond strength and nanoleakage of simplified self-etch adhesive. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(3):729-36.
  26. Chan KM, Tay FR, King NM, Imazato S, Pashley DH. Bonding of mild self-etching primers/adhesives to dentin with thick smear layers. Am J Dent. 2003;16(5):340-6.
  27. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Michel MD, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Active application improves the bonding performance of self-etch adhesives to dentin. J Dent. 2009;37(1):82-90.
  28. do Amaral RC, Stanislawczuk R, Zander-Grande C, Gagler D, Reis A, Loguercio AD. Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent. 2010;35(2):211-9.
  29. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A. Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. J Dent. 2011;39(8):578-87.
  30. Loguercio AD, Raffo J, Bassani F, Balestrini H, Santo D, do Amaral RC, et al. 24-month clinical evaluation in non-carious cervical lesions of a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive applied using a rubbing motion. Clin Oral Investig. 2011;15(4):589-96.
  31. Loguercio AD, Stanislawczuk R, Mena-Serrano A, Reis A. Effect of 3-year water storage on the performance of one-step self-etch adhesives applied actively on dentine. Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(8):578-87.
  32. Imai A, Takamizawa T, Sai K, Tsujimoto A, Nojiri K, Endo H, et al. Influence of application method on surface free‐energy and bond strength of universal adhesive systems to enamel. European journal of oral sciences. 2017;125(5):385-95.
  33. Bagis B, Turkarslan S, Tezvergil-Mutluay A, Uctasli S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of ultrasonic agitation on bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10(6):441-5.
  34. Bagis B, Turkaslan S, Vallittu PK, Lassila LV. Effect of high frequency ultrasonic agitation on the bond strength of self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(5):369-74.
  35. Awad MM, Alhalabi F, Bamuqadm M, Alhoti A, Almasaad A, Robiaan A, et al. Adhesive sonic agitation improves bonding durability to class-II cavity preparation. Odontology. 2023;111(2):409-19.
  36. Finger WJ, Tani C. Effect of application mode on bonding performance of self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent. 2005;18(1):41-4.
  37. Senawongse P, Srihanon A, Muangmingsuk A, Harnirattisai C. Effect of dentine smear layer on the performance of self-etching adhesive systems: A micro-tensile bond strength study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;94(1):212-21.
  38. Kenshima S, Reis A, Uceda-Gomez N, Tancredo Lde L, Filho LE, Nogueira FN, et al. Effect of smear layer thickness and pH of self-etching adhesive systems on the bond strength and gap formation to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):117-26.
  39. Yenier Yurdagüven G, Tarım B. Farklı adeziv uygulama tekniklerinin dentine mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımlarının değerlendirilmesi. Selcuk Dental Journal. 2023;10(4):210-7.