KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 1

Effect of combined application of self-etching primer and hydrofluoric acid on the microtensile bond strength between resin cement and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material

Hüseyin Şeker(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6690-3267
Yener Okutan(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-7188-4929
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The high μTBS values obtained after thermocycling with the self-etching primer application alone indicated that this application may be a viable treatment alternative for polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: To evaluate the effect of hydrofluoric acid (HF), self-etching primer (Monobond Etch & Prime; MEP), and combined application of these protocols (HFMEP) on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) between polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material and resin cement.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Resin-ceramic beams were randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to aging condition: 1) 24 h water storage and 2) 10.000 thermocycling (TC). μTBS was measured using a universal testing device.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The high μTBS values obtained after thermocycling with the self-etching primer application alone indicated that this application may be a viable treatment alternative for polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hydrofluoric acid etching · Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network · Resin bond strength

Abstract

Background: To evaluate the effect of hydrofluoric acid (HF), self-etching primer (Monobond Etch & Prime; MEP), and combined application of these protocols (HFMEP) on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) between polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material and resin cement. Methods: Specimens were divided into four groups based on the surface treatment applied: Control (C), HF, MEP, and HFMEP. Resin-ceramic beams were randomly divided into 2 subgroups according to aging condition: 1) 24 h water storage and 2) 10.000 thermocycling (TC). μTBS was measured using a universal testing device. The surface roughness (Ra) of additional samples (n=20) for each treatment group was measured using a profilometer. One sample per group was subjected to scanning electron microscopy. Data were analyzed by one- and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD, and independent t-tests (α=.05). Results: C and HF groups exhibited the lowest and highest Ra values, respectively (p .05), but MEP treatment resulted in significantly higher μTBS values than in the HF-etched group after TC (p<.001). μTBS values for the HFMEP group were higher than those for solely HF or MEP-applied groups at baseline (p<.001). After TC, the μTBS values for all groups were reduced (p<.001). Conclusion: The combined application of hydrofluoric acid and self-etching primer effectively improved resin bond strength compared to hydrofluoric acid etching alone. The high μTBS values obtained after thermocycling with the self-etching primer application alone indicated that this application may be a viable treatment alternative for polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Şeker, H., Okutan, Y. (2026). Effect of combined application of self-etching primer and hydrofluoric acid on the microtensile bond strength between resin cement and polymer-infiltrated ceramic network material. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1796331

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (35)

  1. Skorulska A, Piszko P, Rybak Z, Szymonowicz M, Dobrzyński M. Review on polymer, ceramic and composite materials for CAD/CAM indirect restorations in Dentistry-Application, mechanical characteristics and comparison. Materials (Basel). 2021;14(7):1592.
  2. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):227-35.
  3. Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564-9.
  4. Spitznagel FA, Scholz KJ, Vach K, Gierthmuehlen PC. Monolithic polymer-infiltrated ceramic network CAD/CAM single crowns: Three-year mid-term results of a prospective clinical study. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33(2):160-8.
  5. Lawson NC, Bansal R, Burgess JO. Wear, strength, modulus and hardness of CAD/CAM restorative materials. Dent Mater. 2016;32(11):275-83.
  6. Lu T, Peng L, Xiong F, Lin XY, Zhang P, Lin ZT, et al. A 3-year clinical evaluation of endodontically treated posterior teeth restored with two different materials using the CEREC AC chair-side system. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):363-8.
  7. Souza R, da Silva NR, de Miranda LM, de Araújo GM, Moura D, Barbosa H. Two-year follow-up of ceramic veneers and a full crown treated with self-etching ceramic primer: A case report. Oper Dent. 2020;45(4):352-8.
  8. Amaral R, Ozcan M, Bottino MA, Valandro LF. Microtensile bond strength of a resin cement to glass infiltrated zirconia-reinforced ceramic: the effect of surface conditioning. Dent Mater. 2006;22(3):283-90.
  9. Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):178.
  10. Turunç-Oğuzman R, Şişmanoğlu S. Influence of surface treatments and adhesive protocols on repair bond strength of glass-matrix and resin-matrix CAD/CAM ceramics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023;35(8):1322-31.
  11. Spitznagel FA, Horvath SD, Guess PC, Blatz MB. Resin bond to indirect composite and new ceramic/polymer materials: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2014;26(6):382-93.
  12. El-Damanhoury HM, A Elsahn N, Sheela S, Gaintantzopoulou MD. Adhesive luting to hybrid ceramic and resin composite CAD/CAM Blocks: Er: YAG Laser versus chemical etching and micro-abrasion pretreatment. J Prosthodont Res. 2021;65(2):225-34.
  13. Spitznagel FA, Vuck A, Gierthmühlen PC, Blatz MB, Horvath SD. Adhesive bonding to hybrid materials: An overview of materials and recommendations. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2016;37(9):630-7.
  14. Vila-Nova TEL, Moura DMD, Araújo GM, Pinto RAS, Leite FPP, Melo RM, et al. Effect of adhesive resin application on the durability of adhesion to CAD/CAM glass-ceramics after either hydrofluoric acid etching or self-etch primer application. J Adhes Dent. 2022; 24:279-89.
  15. Awad MM, Alhalabi F, Alotaibi N, Alzamil F, Binalrimal S, Alrahlah A, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of bond strength studies associated with self-etching primer and HF acid etching of dental glass-ceramics. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2022; 118:103216.
  16. Şeker H, Okutan Y. Self-etching primer versus hydrofluoric acid and air-abrasion: effects on flexural and resin bond strengths of resin-based CAD/CAM material. J Adhes Sci Technol, 2024;38(15):2731-48.
  17. Dimitriadi M, Zinelis S, Zafiropoulou M, Silikas N, Eliades G. Self-etch silane primer: Reactivity and bonding with a lithium disilicate ceramic. Materials (Basel). 2020;13(3):641.
  18. González-Angulo E, Fernández-Estevan L, Casas-Terrón J, Senent-Vicente G, Fons-Badal C, García-Sala Bonmatí F, et al. Microtensile bond strength of CAD-CAM restorative dental material blocks to resin cement: An in vitro study. Materials (Basel). 2023;16(13):4796.
  19. Tian T, Tsoi JK, Matinlinna JP, Burrow MF. Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials. Dent Mater. 2014;30(7):147-62.
  20. Ramakrishnaiah R, Alkheraif AA, Divakar DD, Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. The effect of hydrofluoric acid etching duration on the surface micromorphology, roughness, and wettability of dental ceramics. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(6):822.
  21. Campos F, Almeida CS, Rippe MP, de Melo RM, Valandro LF, Bottino MA. Resin bonding to a hybrid ceramic: Effects of surface treatments and aging. Oper Dent. 2016;41(2):171-8.
  22. Guarda GB, Correr AB, Gonçalves LS, Costa AR, Borges GA, Sinhoreti MA, et al. Effects of surface treatments, thermocycling, and cyclic loading on the bond strength of a resin cement bonded to a lithium disilicate glass ceramic. Oper Dent. 2013;38(2):208-17.
  23. Kalavacharla VK, Lawson NC, Ramp LC, Burgess JO. Influence of etching protocol and silane treatment with a universal adhesive on lithium disilicate bond strength. Oper Dent. 2015;40(4):372-8.
  24. Riesgo BVP, da Silva Rodrigues C, do Nascimento LP, May LG (2023). Effect of hydrofluoric acid concentration and etching time on the adhesive and mechanical behavior of glass-ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2023; 121:103303.
  25. Tribst J, Anami LC, Özcan M, Bottino MA, Melo RM, Saavedra G. Self-etching primers vs acid conditioning: Impact on bond strength between ceramics and resin cement. Oper Dent. 2018;43(4):372-9.
  26. Lima RBW, Muniz IAF, Campos DES, Murillo-Gómez F, Andrade AKM, Duarte RM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass-ceramics: A systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(3):392-402.
  27. Tribst JPM, Monteiro JB, Venturini AB, Pereira GKR, Bottino MA, Melo RM, et al. Fatigue failure load of resin-bonded simplified lithium disilicate glass-ceramic restorations: Effect of ceramic conditioning methods. J Adhes Dent. 2019;21(4):373-81.
  28. Siqueira FSF, Campos VS, Wendlinger M, Muso RAC, Gomes JC, Reis A, et al. Effect of self-etching primer associated to hydrofluoric acid or silane on bonding to lithium disilicate. Braz Dent J. 2019;30(2):171-8.
  29. Tekçe N, Tuncer S, Demirci M, Kara D, Baydemir C. Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM resin blocks to dual-cure adhesive cement: The effect of different sandblasting procedures. J Prosthodont. 2019;28(2):485-90.
  30. Abdelhady S, Hamama H, Matinlinna JP, Mahmoud S. Effect of surface pretreatments on surface roughness and repair bond strength of aged machinable hybrid ceramic with nanohybrid resin composite. Sci Rep. 2025;24;15(1):32709.
  31. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJ, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res. 1995;74(1):381-7.
  32. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, et al. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to Class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater. 2005;21(11):999-1007.
  33. Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27(2):89-99.
  34. Elkassaby AA, Kandil MM, Alian GA. The effect of repair protocols and chewing simulation on the microtensile bond strength of two resin matrix ceramics to composite resin. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):171.
  35. Naderi N, Majidinia S, Moghaddas MJ, Shooshtari Z, Hoseinzadeh M. Surface modification effect on the repair bond strength of hybrid and non-hybrid ceramics. BMC Oral Health. 2025;25(1):1131.