KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2026 / Volume: 13 Issue: 2

Effect of Surface Treatments on the Repair Bond Strength Between Aged Glass Ceramics and Composite Resin: An In Vitro Study

Melika Ahmad(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0009-0007-3253-038X
Bilgehan Kottaş(SELCUK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-8007-5656
Abdulhaluk Savaş(Beyhekim Oral and Tooth Health Hospital)0000-0002-8897-3928
Tuba Yılmaz Savaş(SELÇUK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6516-276X
Ceyda Akın(NECMETTIN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9704-3100
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-08-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Overall, the tested primers significantly enhanced the bonding to aged glass-ceramics, supporting their use in repair procedures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of glass bead particle abrasion and different primer systems on the repair bond strength of two types of aged glass ceramics and composite resins.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:After thermocycling (5–55 °C, 30 s dwell time, 5000 cycles), each ceramic specimen was divided into five test groups (n=8): control (C), air abrasion with 50-µm glass beads (GB), 37% phosphoric acid etching, Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus application (CP), Monobond Etch&Prime (MEP) application, 4.8% hydrofluoric acid etching, and Monobond N (MN) application.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Overall, the tested primers significantly enhanced the bonding to aged glass-ceramics, supporting their use in repair procedures.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:aging · bond strength · glass beads

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the effects of glass bead particle abrasion and different primer systems on the repair bond strength of two types of aged glass ceramics and composite resins. Methods: Eighty specimens were prepared from leucite-reinforced (G-Ceram) and lithium disilicate (IPS e.max CAD) glass-ceramic materials. After thermocycling (5–55 °C, 30 s dwell time, 5000 cycles), each ceramic specimen was divided into five test groups (n=8): control (C), air abrasion with 50-µm glass beads (GB), 37% phosphoric acid etching, Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus application (CP), Monobond Etch&Prime (MEP) application, 4.8% hydrofluoric acid etching, and Monobond N (MN) application. All specimens were coated with a universal adhesive (Nova Compo B Plus) following treatment. Clearfil Majesty Esthetic, a nanohybrid composite resin, was applied. The specimens were kept in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h and evaluated for the shear bond strength (1 mm/min). Data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD and Bonferroni post-hoc tests (α=0.05). Results: Surface treatment and its interaction with the ceramic material exhibited a statistically significant effect on the repair bond strength (P 0.05). The C and GB groups demonstrated significantly lower mean bond strength values than the CP, MEP, and MN groups (P 0.05). In the leucite-reinforced ceramics, the MN group showed significantly higher bond strength than the CP (P < 0.05). Although the overall effect of surface treatment was consistent across ceramic types, in the CP group, lithium disilicate specimens exhibited a higher bond strength than leucite-reinforced ceramics (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Both phosphoric acid and hydrofluoric acid etching followed by different primer applications achieved the highest bond strength for lithium disilicate ceramics, whereas silane-based treatment after hydrofluoric acid etching was the most effective for leucite-reinforced ceramics. Overall, the tested primers significantly enhanced the bonding to aged glass-ceramics, supporting their use in repair procedures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ahmad, M., Kottaş, B., Savaş, A., Savaş, T. Y., Akın, C. (2026). Effect of Surface Treatments on the Repair Bond Strength Between Aged Glass Ceramics and Composite Resin: An In Vitro Study. Selcuk Dental Journal, Volume: 13 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.15311/selcukdentj.1818852

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (42)

  1. Denry I, Holloway JA. Ceramics for Dental Applications. Materials. 2010; 3(1):351-68.
  2. Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, Silva NR, Bonfante EA. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015; 28(3):227-35.
  3. Hoeller B, Belli R, Petschelt A, Lohbauer U, Zorzin JI. Influence of simulated oral conditions on different pretreatment methods for the repair of glass-ceramic restorations. J Adhes Dent. 2022; 24:b2701717.
  4. Nogueira IdO, Pereira CNdB, Abreu LG, Diniz IM, de Magalhães CS, da Silveira RR. Do different protocols affect the success rate or bond strength of glass-ceramics repaired with composite resin? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2025; 133(5):1157-71.
  5. Ritzberger C, Apel E, Höland W, Peschke A, Rheinberger VM. Properties and clinical application of three types of dental glass-ceramics and ceramics for CAD-CAM technologies. Materials. 2010; 3(6):3700-13.
  6. Kocaağaoğlu H, Manav T, Albayrak H. In vitro comparison of the bond strength between ceramic repair systems and ceramic materials and evaluation of the wettability. J Prosthodont. 2017; 26(3):238-43.
  7. Polat S, Tokar E, Asar NV, Kirmali O. Evaluation of efficacy of various surface conditioning methods on the repair bond strength of composite to different fracture types of zirconia ceramics. Scanning. 2021; 2021(1):5537761.
  8. Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003; 19(8):725-31.
  9. Alnafaiy S, Labban N, Maawadh A, Alshehri H, Albaijan R. Repair bond strength of composite resin to aged resin and glass-matrix CAD/CAM ceramic materials using two different repair systems. Coatings. 2021; 11(11):1331.
  10. de Bessa MS, Marinho LCN, de Miranda LM, de Carvalho IHG, Campos BO, Borges BCD, dos Santos Calderon P, e Souza ROdA. Repair bond strength of resin composite to CAD/CAM glass-ceramic: Influence of cleaning methods, surface treatments, and aging. J Dent. 2025; 154:105568.
  11. Naderi N, Majidinia S, Moghaddas MJ, Shooshtari Z, Hoseinzadeh M. Surface modification effect on the repair bond strength of hybrid and non-hybrid ceramics. BMC Oral Health. 2025; 25(1):1131.
  12. Gourav R, Ariga P, Jain A, Philip J. Effect of four different surface treatments on shear bond strength of three porcelain repair systems: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2013; 16(3):208-12.
  13. Blum I, Nikolinakos N, Lynch C, Wilson N, Millar B, Jagger D. An in vitro comparison of four intra-oral ceramic repair systems. J Dent. 2012; 40(11):906-12.
  14. Attia A. Influence of surface treatment and cyclic loading on the durability of repaired all-ceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci. 2010; 18:194-200.
  15. Bayraktar Y, Arslan M, Demirtag Z. Repair bond strength and surface topography of resin-ceramic and ceramic restorative blocks treated by laser and conventional surface treatments. Microsc Res Tech. 2021; 84(6):1145-54.
  16. Turunç‐Oğuzman R, Şişmanoğlu S. Influence of surface treatments and adhesive protocols on repair bond strength of glass‐matrix and resin‐matrix CAD/CAM ceramics. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023; 35(8):1322-31.
  17. Giraldo TC, Villada VR, Castillo MP, Gomes OMM, Bittencourt BF, Dominguez JA. Active and passive application of the phosphoric acid on the bond strength of lithium disilicate. Braz Dent J. 2016; 27(1):90-94.
  18. Mario UT. Surface treatment of lithium disilicate with different concentrations of hydrofluoric acid and orthophosphoric acid. EC Dent Sci. 2019; 18:1128-37.
  19. Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Irie M, Yoshihara K, Matsumoto T, Minagi S. Does acid etching morphologically and chemically affect lithium disilicate glass ceramic surfaces? J Appl Biomater Functional Mater. 2017; 15(1):93-100.
  20. Steinhauser HC, Turssi CP, Franca FMG, Amaral FLBd, Basting RT. Micro-shear bond strength and surface micromorphology of a feldspathic ceramic treated with different cleaning methods after hydrofluoric acid etching. J Appl Oral Sci. 2014; 22:85-90.
  21. Yildirim B, Recen D, Paken G. Effect of self-etching ceramic primer on the bond strength of feldspathic porcelain repair. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2019; 33(14):1598-610.
  22. Elsaka SE. Bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to self-adhesive resin cement: the effect of surface treatments. J Adhes Dent. 2014; 16(6):531-40.
  23. Albakry M, Guazzato M, Swain MV. Effect of sandblasting, grinding, polishing and glazing on the flexural strength of two pressable all-ceramic dental materials. J Dent. 2004; 32(2):91-9.
  24. Nobuaki A, Keiichi Y, Takashi S. Effects of air abrasion with alumina or glass beads on surface characteristics of CAD/CAM composite materials and the bond strength of resin cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23:629-36.
  25. Mehari K, Parke AS, Gallardo FF. Assessing the effects of air abrasion with aluminum oxide or glass beads to zirconia on the bond strength of cement. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020; 21(7):713-7.
  26. Abdou A, Hussein N, Kusumasari C, Abo-Alazm E, Rizk A. Alumina and glass-bead blasting effect on bond strength of zirconia using MDP containing self-adhesive resin cement and primers. Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):19127.
  27. Matinlinna J, Vallittu P. Bonding of resin composites to etchable ceramic surfaces – an insight review of the chemical aspects on surface conditioning. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34(8):622-30.
  28. Özcan M, Allahbeickaraghi A, Dündar M. Possible hazardous effects of hydrofluoric acid and recommendations for treatment approach: a review. Clin Oral Investig. 2012; 16(1):15-23.
  29. Wille S, Lehmann F, Kern M. Durability of resin bonding to lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramic using a self-etching primer. J Adhes Dent. 2017; 19(6): 491-6.
  30. Lima RBW, Muniz IdAF, Murillo-Gómez F, de Andrade AKM, Duarte RM, de Souza GM. Effect of universal adhesives and self-etch ceramic primers on bond strength to glass-ceramics: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2024; 131(3):392-02.
  31. El-Damanhoury HM, Gaintantzopoulou MD. Self-etching ceramic primer versus hydrofluoric acid etching: Etching efficacy and bonding performance. J Prosthodont Res. 2018; 62(1):75-83.
  32. Al-Harthi A, Aljoudi M, Almaliki M, El-Banna K. Laboratory study of micro-shear bond strength of two resin cements to leucite ceramics using different ceramic primers. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2018; 19(8):918-24.
  33. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res. 2014; 93(4):329-34.
  34. Schellenberg R, Özcan M. Comparison of repair protocols for veneered zirconia as a function of surface conditioning parameters, ceramic primer types and defect sizes. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2021; 35(19):2110-23.
  35. Alqahtani A, Alhelal A, Almutairi MD, Alhassoon AH, Alshahrani KS, Alshahrani TS, Habib SR. Shear bond strength of resin composite to silica-based ceramic: a comparative study of different surface treatments. Front Maters. 2025; 12:1654956.
  36. Ueda N, Takagaki T, Nikaido T, Takahashi R, Ikeda M, Tagami J. The effect of different ceramic surface treatments on the repair bond strength of resin composite to lithium disilicate ceramic. Dent Mater J. 2021; 40(5):1073-9.
  37. Duzyol M, Sagsoz O, Polat Sagsoz N, Akgul N, Yildiz M. The effect of surface treatments on the bond strength between CAD/CAM blocks and composite resin. J Prosthodont. 2016; 25(6):466-71.
  38. Khanlar L, Abdou A, Takagaki T, Mori S, Ikeda M, Nikaido T, Zandinejad A, Tagami J. The effects of different silicatization and silanization protocols on the bond durability of resin cements to new high-translucent zirconia. Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(4):3547-61.
  39. Khanlar L, Takagaki T, Abdou A, Inokoshi M, Ikeda M, Takahashi A, Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Nikaido T, Blatz M, et al. Effect of air-particle abrasion protocol and primer on the topography and bond strength of a high-translucent zirconia ceramic. J Prosthodont. 2022; 31(3):228-38.
  40. Yoshihara K, Nagaoka N, Sonoda A, Maruo Y, Makita Y, Okihara T, Irie M, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. Effectiveness and stability of silane coupling agent incorporated in ‘universal’ adhesives. Dent Mater. 2016; 32(10):1218-25.
  41. Moreno MBP, Murillo-Gómez F, de Goes MF. Physicochemical and morphological characterization of a glass ceramic treated with different ceramic primers and post-silanization protocols. Dent Mater. 2019; 35(8):1073-81.
  42. Chen B, Lu Z, Meng H, Chen Y, Yang L, Zhang H, Xie H, Chen C. Effectiveness of pre-silanization in improving bond performance of universal adhesives or self-adhesive resin cements to silica-based ceramics: Chemical and in vitro evidences. Dent Mater. 2019; 35(4):543-53.