Dergiler / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Sayı: 38

Verses of Change: Democratisation of Poetry in Ford Madox Ford’s “Antwerp” and Nazım Hikmet Ran’s “The Legend of the National Militia”

Meltem Can(Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi)0000-0002-8561-804X
Sayfa
1511–1521
Yayın Tarihi
2024-02-21
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

While Ford’s poem immortalises the martyrdom of Belgians and the agonies of Belgian refugees brought on by the conflicting interests of hegemonic countries, Nazım’s poem portrays the defiance of the ignored people of Anatolia against both imperialist powers and the unjust social structures.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Wars have always been echoed in literature as manifestations of humankind's desire for supremacy and power across history.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This article contends that Ford’s “In October 1914 [Antwerp]” and N.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:While Ford’s poem immortalises the martyrdom of Belgians and the agonies of Belgian refugees brought on by the conflicting interests of hegemonic countries, Nazım’s poem portrays the defiance of the ignored people of Anatolia against both imperialist powers and the unjust social structures.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Antwerp · Kuvayi Milliye Destanı · Ford Madox Ford

Abstract

Wars have always been echoed in literature as manifestations of humankind's desire for supremacy and power across history. Twentieth-century poetry, marked by the turmoil of the two World Wars and the wars of independence, reflects poets' patriotic and personal responses to the power struggles and expansionist policies of imperialist countries. These poems also challenge traditional war narratives that glorify politicians while ignoring the horrors of war and the ordinary people whose heroic struggles changed the course of history. Ford Madox Ford, one of the leading Modernist poets and novelists in English literature, and Nazım Hikmet, a pivotal figure in twentieth-century Turkish poetry, wrote unique narrative poems that critically reimagine war and attribute heroism to common people. This article contends that Ford’s “In October 1914 [Antwerp]” and N. Hikmet’s “The Legend of the National Militia” (Kuvayi Milliye Destanı) mirror the poets’ attempts to democratise poetry by portraying the extraordinary resistance of ordinary people instead of the idealised hero archetype. Furthermore, the poems serve to politicise modernist verse by addressing the suffering of ordinary individuals and their struggles against expansionist countries and calling for the recognition of alternative histories. While Ford’s poem immortalises the martyrdom of Belgians and the agonies of Belgian refugees brought on by the conflicting interests of hegemonic countries, Nazım’s poem portrays the defiance of the ignored people of Anatolia against both imperialist powers and the unjust social structures.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Can, M. (2024). Verses of Change: Democratisation of Poetry in Ford Madox Ford’s “Antwerp” and Nazım Hikmet Ran’s “The Legend of the National Militia”. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 38, 1511–1521. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.1440004

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (16)

  1. Arp, J. A. (2005). Urban trenches: War poetry and the unreal city of the Great War in T.S. Eliot’s The Waste Land [Master of Arts]. Iowa State University.
  2. Bezirci, A., & Hikmet, N. (1975). Kuvayi Milliye Destanı. İn Nâzım Hikmet ve seçme şiirleri: İnceleme-antoloji (pp. 139–143). A Yayınları.
  3. Dolcerocca, O. N. (2016). Reimagining the Epic: Historical and Collective Memory in Nâzım Hikmet and Pablo Neruda. JFL, 33(2), 111–121.
  4. https://www.academia.edu/35629982/Reimagining_the_Epic_Historical_and_Collective_Memory_in_N%C3%A2z%C4%B1m_Hikmet_and_Pablo_Neruda
  5. Ersoy, A. (2010). The Legend of National Militia: Context. In M. Górny, V. Kechriotis, & A. Ersoy (Eds.), & A. Ersoy (Trans.), Modernism: The Creation of Nation-States. Central European University Press.
  6. Essen, L. van der. (1917). The Invasion & the War in Belgium from Liège to the Yser: With a Sketch of the Diplomatic Negotiations Preceding the Conflict. T. F. Unwin.
  7. Ford, F. M. (2003). In October 1914 [Antwerp]. In Ford Madox Ford: Selected Poems (pp. 82–85). Psychology Press.
  8. Frayn, A. (2016). Ford and the First World War. In A. Chantler & R. Hawkes (Eds.), An Introduction to Ford Madox Ford (pp. 121–134). Routledge.
  9. Gariper, K. (2016a). Epik Destan Geleneği ve Nâzım Hikmet’in Kuvâyi Milliye Destanı. Yeni Türk Edebiyatı Araştırmaları Modern Turkish Literature Researches, 8(15), 82–99.
  10. Gariper, K. (2016b). Hegemonyaya Karşı Bir Varoluş Mücadelesi Nâzım Hikmet’in Kuvâyi Milliye Destanı. ISSMC, 361–370. https://www.academia.edu/35465591/HEGEMONYAYA_KAR%C5%9EI_B%C4%B0R_VAROLU%C5%9E_M%C3%9CCADELES%C4%B0_N%C3%82ZIM_H%C4%B0KMET_%C4%B0N_KUV%C3%82Y%C4%B0_M%C4%B0LL%C4%B0YE_DESTANI
  11. Günaydin, N. (2014). Modern Şiirin Öncüleri: Nazım Hikmet Ve Walt Whıtman. The Journal of Academic Social Science, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.16992/ASOS.135
  12. Hikmet, N. (1992). Şiirler 3 - Kuvâyi Milliye: Kuvayi Milliye / Saat 21 - 22 Şiirleri / Dört Hapisaneden / Rubailer (G. Turan, Ed.; 6th ed.). Adam Yayınları.
  13. Hikmet, N. (2002). Human Landscapes from My Country: An Epic Novel in Verse (Randy Blasing, & Mutlu Konuk Blasing, Trans.). Persea Books.
  14. Rademacher, J. W. (2007). Images of the First World War: Ford’s ‘in October 1914’ Read in the Context of Contemporary German Writers. International Ford Madox Ford Studies, 6, 179–188. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44871509
  15. Saunders, M. (2003). Introduction. In M. Saunders (Ed.), Ford Madox Ford: Selected Poems (pp. ix–xv). Psychology Press.
  16. Wiesenfarth, J. (2014). Death in the Wasteland: Ford, Wells, and Waugh. International Ford Madox Ford Studies, 13, 197–206. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44871710