KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

Çocuk Edebiyatı ve Matematik İlişkilendirmesi: Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Problem Kurma Durumlarından Yansımalar

The Connection between Children's Literature and Mathematics: Reflections from Problem Posing Situations of Prospective Mathematics Teachers

Neslihan Demirci(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, MATEMATİK EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0002-4621-6558
Çiğdem Arslan(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, MATEMATİK VE FEN BİLİMLERİ EĞİTİMİ BÖLÜMÜ, MATEMATİK EĞİTİMİ ANABİLİM DALI)0000-0001-7354-8155
Sayfa
84–112
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çalışma sonucunda çocuk edebiyatı ile matematik ilişkilendirmesinin öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel ilişkilendirme becerilerini ve yaratıcılıklarını olumlu anlamda etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Matematik öğretiminde disiplinler arası ilişkilendirmeden yararlanmak öğretimin niteliğini arttırmakta, öğrenmeyi daha etkili ve kalıcı hale getirmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu doğrultuda matematik öğretmen adaylarına çocuk edebiyatı ve matematik ilişkilendirmesine yönelik aralıklı olacak şekilde 6 haftalık uygulamalar gerçekleştirilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışma sonucunda çocuk edebiyatı ile matematik ilişkilendirmesinin öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel ilişkilendirme becerilerini ve yaratıcılıklarını olumlu anlamda etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Çocuk edebiyatı · ilişkilendirme · matematik eğitimi

Özet

Matematik öğretiminde disiplinler arası ilişkilendirmeden yararlanmak öğretimin niteliğini arttırmakta, öğrenmeyi daha etkili ve kalıcı hale getirmektedir. Bu çalışmada çocuk edebiyatı ile matematik ilişkilendirmesi ele alınmış, bu ilişkilendirme problem kurma üzerinden incelenmiştir. İlgili araştırma nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden durum çalışması deseni ile yürütülmüştür. Bu doğrultuda matematik öğretmen adaylarına çocuk edebiyatı ve matematik ilişkilendirmesine yönelik aralıklı olacak şekilde 6 haftalık uygulamalar gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu uygulamalar sonucunda matematik öğretmen adaylarından bir çocuk edebiyatı eserinde yer alan görselden yararlanarak kurabildikleri kadar problem kurmaları istenmiştir. 27 matematik öğretmen adayı tarafından kurulan 66 matematiksel problem “İçerik”, “Matematiksel İlişkilendirme” ve “Yaratıcılık” temalarını içeren “Problem Kurmayı Değerlendirme Kriterleri” ile betimsel olarak değerlendirilmiş, temalara yönelik frekanslar tablo halinde sunulmuştur. Çalışma sonucunda çocuk edebiyatı ile matematik ilişkilendirmesinin öğretmen adaylarının matematiksel ilişkilendirme becerilerini ve yaratıcılıklarını olumlu anlamda etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır. Aynı zamanda öğretmen adaylarının kurdukları problemlerde problem çözme stratejilerinin kullanımının sayıca fazla olduğu ve en fazla tercih edilen problem çözme stratejisinin matematiksel muhakeme yapma olduğu görülmüştür.

Abstract

Utilizing interdisciplinary connections in teaching mathematics increases the quality of teaching and makes learning more effective and permanent. In this study, the connection between children’s literature and mathematics was discussed and this connection was examined through problem posing. The relevant research was conducted with a case study design, which is one of the qualitative research methods. In this direction, 6-week tasks were carried out intermittently for prospective mathematics teachers regarding the connection between children’s literature and mathematics. As a result of these tasks, prospective mathematics teachers were asked to pose as many problems as they could using a visual in a book of children’s literature. 66 mathematical problems posed by 27 prospective mathematics teachers were evaluated descriptively with the problem posing evaluation criteria including the themes of “Content”, “Mathematical Connection” and “Creativity”, and the frequencies for the themes were presented in a table. As a result of the study, it was concluded that the connection between children’s literature and mathematics positively affected the mathematical connection skills and creativity of the prospective teachers. At the same time, it was observed that the number of problem-solving strategies used in the problems posed by the prospective teachers was high and the most preferred problem-solving strategy was mathematical reasoning.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Demirci, N., Arslan, Ç. (2025). Çocuk Edebiyatı ve Matematik İlişkilendirmesi: Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Problem Kurma Durumlarından Yansımalar. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 84–112. https://doi.org/10.17522/balikesirnef.1569647

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (68)

  1. Arslan-Başdağ, D., & Dağlıoğlu, H. (2020). Study of basic mathematical skills of picture story books. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(2), 233-253. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.528015
  2. Arslan Ç., & Kartal, H. (2023). Matematiksel problem kurmanın çocuk edebiyatı ile bütünleştirilmesi. In F. Erdoğan (Eds.), Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitiminde Yeni Yaklaşımlar 2023-II (pp. 343-354). Efe Akademi.
  3. Aslan, O. (2019). ‘Child Literature’ in the mathematics education of the children of Z generation. Turkish Scientific Researches Journal, 4(1), 32-48. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tubad/issue/52863/698416
  4. Ayvaz, A. (2010). The effect of teaching with literary materials on students’ achievement and attitudes in division sub-learning area of 4th grade mathematics course. (Publication No. 273062) [Master’s thesis, Sakarya University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  5. Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educatur, 29(1), 14-17, 20-22, 43-46. https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/65072
  6. Baltacı, A. (2019). The qualitative research process: How to conduct a qualitative research? Ahi Evran University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 5(2), 368-388. https://doi.org/10.31592/aeusbed.598299
  7. Barlow, A. T., & Cates, J. M. (2006). The impact of problem posing on elementary teachers’ beliefs about mathematics and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18136.x
  8. Barnaby, D. (2015). The use of children’s literature to teach mathematics to improve confidence and reduce math anxiety. [Unpublished master’s thesis]. University of Toronto. https://tspace.library.utoronto.ca/handle/1807/68738
  9. Baumanns, L., & Rott, B. (2022). Developing a framework for characterising problem-posing activities: A review. Research in Mathematics Education, 24(1), 28-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2021.1897036
  10. Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611833
  11. Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390310001595401
  12. Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2020). Learning to teach through mathematical problem posing: Theoretical considerations, methodology, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.01.001
  13. Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem solving: From research to effective practice (pp. 3-34). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_1
  14. Cai, J., Jiang, C., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Hu, D. (2016). How do textbooks incorporate mathematical problem posing? In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), An international comparative study. In Posing and solving mathematical problems (pp. 3-22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28023-3_1
  15. Cankoy, O. (2011). Problem-solving instruction in the context of children’s literature and problem understanding. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 44, 89-110.
  16. Coşkun, M. (2013). To what extent making connections are given place in mathematics classes?: Examples from real classroom practices. (Publication No. 357654) [Master’s thesis, Gaziantep University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  17. Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.
  18. Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
  19. Demirci, N. (2023). Investigation of mathematics teacher candidates’ skills in associating children’s literature with mathematics through activities and mind mapping. (Publication No. 834563) [Master’s thesis, Bursa Uludağ University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  20. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed., pp. 1–43). Sage. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-06339-001
  21. Diakiw, J. (1990). Children’s literature and global education: Understanding the developing world. The Reading Teacher, 43(4), 296-300. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20200368
  22. Durmaz, B., & Miçoogullari, S. (2021). The effect of the integrated mathematics lessons with children’s literature on the fifth grade students’ place value understanding. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 14(2), 244-256. https://doi.org/10.24193/adn.14.2.18
  23. Edelman, J. (2017). How preservice teachers use children’s literature to teach mathematical concepts: Focus on mathematical knowledge for teaching. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(4), 741-752. https://iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/282/275
  24. Eli, J. A., Mohr-Schroeder, M. J., & Lee, C. W. (2011). Exploring mathematical connections of prospective middle-grades teachers through card-sorting tasks. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23(3), 297-319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-011-0017-0
  25. English, L. D. (1996). Children’s problem posing and problem solving preferences. In J. Mulligan, & M. Mitchelmore (Eds.), Research in early number learning (pp. 227– 242). Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers.
  26. Fırat, Z., & Dinçer, Ç. (2020). Examining illustrated story books containing mathematical concepts in terms of format and content. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(3), 664-685. https://doi.org/10.17860/mersinefd.704755
  27. Furner, J. M. (2018). Using children’s literature to teach mathematics: An effective vehicle in a STEM world. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 14. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/3874
  28. Green, K. B. (2013). The effects of the integration of mathematics within children’s literature on early numeracy skills of young children with disabilities. [Doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University]. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/effects-integration-mathematics-within-childrens/docview/1609013964/se-2
  29. Haury, D. L. (2001). Literature-based mathematics in elementary school. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED464807
  30. Işık, C., & Kar, T. (2012). Pre-service elementary teachers’ problem posing skills. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty, 1(23), 190-214. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/maeuefd/issue/19396/206038
  31. Joaquin, M.N.B. (2023). Problem posing among preservice and inservice mathematics teachers. In T. L. Toh, M. Santos-Trigo, P. H. Chua, N. A. Abdullah, & D. Zhang (Eds.), Problem posing and problem solving in mathematics education (pp 173-187). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-7205-0_10
  32. Kitzinger, J. (1995). Qualitative research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ, 311(7000), 299-302. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299
  33. Korkmaz, E., & Gür, H. (2006). Determining of prospective teachers’ problem posing skills. Balıkesir University Journal of Science Institute, 8(1), 65-74. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/baunfbed/issue/24795/261959
  34. Kuş, S., & Işık-Tertemiz, N. (2022). The effect of problem-solving teaching with verbal problems associated with children’s books on mathematics lesson attitude. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice Research, 8(3), 246-260. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ekuad/issue/74727/1227281
  35. Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90. https://doi.org/10.12973/iejme/2698
  36. Lenchner, G. (1983). Creative problem solving in school mathematics. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
  37. Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856345
  38. Mallart, A., Font, V., & Diez, J. (2018). Case study on mathematics pre-service teachers’ difficulties in problem posing. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1465-1481. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83682
  39. Mersin, N., & Akkaş, E. N. (2023). Investigation of mathematics teacher candidates’ mathematical connections skills and problem posing and connections self-efficacy in the context of problem posing. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 12(1), 237-248. https://doi.org/10.30703/cije.1201082
  40. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE.
  41. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/Dosyalar/201813017165445-MATEMAT%C4%B0K%20%C3%96%C4%9ERET%C4%B0M%20PROGRAMI%202018v.pdf
  42. Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. (2024). Türkiye yüzyılı maarif modeli ortaokul matematik dersi öğretim programı (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). https://tymm.meb.gov.tr/upload/program/2024programmat5678Onayli.pdf
  43. Mink, D. V., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Evaluation of a K–5 mathematics program which integrates children’s literature: Classroom environment and attitudes. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 3, 59-85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-2975-0
  44. Moyer, P. S. (2000). Communicating mathematically: Children’s literature as a natural connection. The Reading Teacher,54(3), Pp. 246-255. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20204901
  45. NCTM (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2003). The PISA 2003 assesment framework – mathematics, reading, science and problem solving knowledge and skills. OECD Publishing.
  47. Özgen, K. (2013). Mathematical connection skill in the context of problem solving: The case of pre-service teachers. Education Sciences, 8(3), 323-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2013.8.3.1C0590
  48. Özgen, K. (2017). The skills of prospective teachers to design activities that connect mathematics to different disciplines. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 20(1), 101-118. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.363984
  49. Özmusul, M., & Kaya, A. (2014). A comparative analysis of the results of Turkey’s PISA 2009 and 2012. Journal of European Education, 4(1), 23-40. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284783248_Turkiye'nin_PISA_2009_ve_2012_Sonuclarina_Iliskin_Karsilastirmali_Bir_Analiz
  50. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.
  51. Pugalee, D. K. (1999). Constructing a model of mathematical literacy. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 73(1), 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098659909599632
  52. Raymond, A. (1995). Engaging young children in mathematical problem solving: Providing a context with children’s literature. Contemporary Education, 66(3), 172. https://www.proquest.com/openview/4bcb0681a0cb945eb3b41b4490d2984e/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=1816594
  53. Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40248099
  54. Singer, F. M., Ellerton, N., & Cai, J. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: New questions and directions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9478-2
  55. Singer, F.M., & Voica, C. (2015). Is problem posing a tool for identifying and developing mathematical creativity? In F.M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical problem posing: From research to effective practice (pp. 141-174). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6258-3_7
  56. Ünlü, M. (2017). Investigating mathematics teachers candidates’ knowledge about problem solving strategies through problem posing. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(8), 218-236. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1138829
  57. Van de Walle J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementry and middle school mathematics, teaching developmently (7th. ed.). Pearson.
  58. Van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. V. D., & Boogaard, S. V. D. (2008). Picture books as an impetus for kindergartners’ mathematical thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 341-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060802425539
  59. Ward, R. A. (2005). Using children’s literature to inspire K–8 preservice teachers’ future mathematics pedagogy. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 132-143. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.59.2.3
  60. White, J. (2016). Using children’s literature to teach problem solving in math: Addressing the standards for mathematical practice in K–5. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315527536
  61. Whitin, D. J. (1992). Explore mathematics through children’s literature. School Library Journal, 38(8), 24-28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ450496
  62. Xu, B., Cai, J., Liu, Q., & Hwang, S. (2020). Teachers’ predictions of students’ mathematical thinking related to problem posing. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, Article 101427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.005
  63. Yalçın, M., Akkaya, R., & Durmaz, B. (2022). The effect of integrated maths lessons with children’s literature on problem solving attitudes and self-efficacy. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 35(3), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1060077
  64. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2021). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri (12. baskı). Seçkin.
  65. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
  66. Young, E., & Marroquin, C. L. (2006). Posing problems from children’s literature. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(7), 362-366. https://doi.org/10.5951/TCM.12.7.0362
  67. Zhang, L., Cai, J., Song, N., Zhang, H., Chen, T., Zhang, Z., & Guo, F. (2022). Mathematical problem posing of elementary school students: The impact of task format and its relationship to problem solving. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 54(3), 497-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01324-4
  68. Zhang, Q., Sun, J., & Yeung, W. Y. (2023). Effects of using picture books in mathematics teaching and learning: A systematic literature review from 2000–2022. Review of Education, 11(1), Article e3383. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3383