Dergiler / Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4

Mortality and the Factors Affecting Patients Over 65 Age with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail

Proksimal Femur Çivisi ile Tedavi Edilen 65 Yaş Üstü İnstabil İntertrokanterik Kırıklarda Mortalite ve Etki Eden Faktörler

Sayfa
403–407
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These patients are at especially high risk for mortality within the first year and should be monitored closely.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: We aimed to investigate the factors affecting postoperative mortality associated with intertrochanteric femoral fractures in patients age 65 and older who were treated with osteosynthesis with a proximal femoral nail (PFN).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Patients with more than two systemic additional diseases and an ASA of score 5 were not included in the study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These patients are at especially high risk for mortality within the first year and should be monitored closely.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Objective: We aimed to investigate the factors affecting postoperative mortality associated with intertrochanteric femoral fractures in patients age 65 and older who were treated with osteosynthesis with a proximal femoral nail (PFN). Materials and Methods: Patients were categorized and examined according to age, gender, pre-operative American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) scores, time of surgery and type of anesthesia. Patients with more than two systemic additional diseases and an ASA of score 5 were not included in the study. Post-operative mortality results and the factors associated with mortality were investigated. Results: Thirty-one patients (36.1%) were male and 55 (63.9%) were female. The mean age was 78.31 years and forty-eight of the patients were under 80 years old (55.8%) and 38 were over 80 years old (44.2%). According to the Jensen fracture classification, 35 (40.6%) of the patients were evaluated as type 3, 15 (17.4%) patients were type 4 and 36 (42%) patients were type 5. The ASA score was used for preoperative risk assessment. Thirty (34.8%) patients had an ASA score of 1-2, while 56 (65.2%) had an ASA asore of 3-4. Patients were categorized as “3 days before” or “3 days after” according to the time of surgery, and the mean time to surgery was 3.7 days. The type of anesthesia was classified as general and regional with 65 patients (75.5%) operating under regional anesthesia and 21 patients (24.4%) under general anesthesia. After a mean follow-up of 18 months, the mortality rate was 20.9% (18/86). Mortality was significantly higher in patients over 80 years old (36.8% vs 8.3%, p=0.004). Conclusion: Patients 80 years and older are at serious risk for mortality when they have unstable trochanteric fractures treated with PFN. These patients are at especially high risk for mortality within the first year and should be monitored closely.

Abstract

Amaç: Çalışmamızda proksimal femur çivisi (PFN) ile cerrahi tedavi yapılan 65 yaş üstü intertrokanterik femur kırıklarında post operatif dönemde mortalite sonuçlarını ve etki eden faktörleri araştırmayı amaçladık. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Hastalar yaş, cinsiyet, preoperatif Amerikan Anestezistler Derneği (ASA) skoru, ameliyata alınma zamanı ve anestezi tipine göre kategorize edilerek incelendi. Çalışmaya ikiden fazla komorbidite yaratacak ek hastalığı olanlar ve ASA 5 hastalar dahil edilmedi. Postoperatif dönem mortalite sonuçları ile beraber mortaliteye etki eden faktör ilişkisi araştırıldı. Bulgular: Hastaların 31’i (%36,1) erkek, 55’i (%63,9) kadındı. Ortalama yaş 78,31 olarak hesaplandı. Bunlardan 48’i 80 yaş ve altı (%55,8), 38’i 80 yaş üstü (%44,2) idi. Evans-Jensen kırık sınıflamasına göre hastalarda, 35 (%40,6) tip 3, 15 (%17,4) tip 4, 36 (%42) tip 5 mevcuttu. Preoperatif risk değerlendirmesi olarak ASA skoru kullanıldı ve 30 (%34,8) hasta ASA 1-2, 56 (%65,2) hasta ASA 3-4 olduğu görüldü. Hastalar operasyona alınma zamanına göre 3 gün ve öncesi ile 3 gün sonrası olmak üzere kategorize edildi ve ortalama ameliyata alınma zamanı 3,7 gün olarak ölçüldü. Anestezi tipi genel ve rejyonel olarak ikiye ayrılarak incelendi ve 65 hastanın (%75,5) rejyonel anestezi ve 21 hastanın (%24,4) genel anestezi aldığı görüldü. Ortalama 18 ay takip sonunda mortalite oranı %20,9 (18/86) olduğu görüldü. Seksen yaş üstü hastalarda mortalitenin 80 yaş ve altına göre belirgin olarak yüksek olduğu görüldü (%36,8-%8,3; p=0,004). Sonuç: Seksen yaş üstünün PFN ile tedavi edilen instabil trokanterik kırıklarda mortalite için ciddi risk faktörü olduğunu düşünüyoruz. Ayrıca bu hastaların ilk 1 yıl içinde mortalite açısından risk altında olduğunu ve yakın takip edilmesi gerektiği kanaatindeyiz.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

CENGİZ, Ö., DEMİR, N., DİRVAR, F., CEYLAN, H. H. (2018). Mortality and the Factors Affecting Patients Over 65 Age with Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail. Bakırköy Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 4, 403–407. https://ajindex.com/articles/127440

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Hodel S, Beeres FJP, Babst R, Link BC. Complications following proximal femoral locking compression plating in unstable proximal femur fractures: medium-term follow-up. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2017;27:1117-24.
  2. Schlickewei CW, Johannes MR, Ruecker AH. Nailing of Displaced Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures. Techniques in Orthopaedics Volume 30, issue 2. Philadelphia: Wolter Kluwer Health. Inc. 2015. p.70-86.
  3. Boonen S, Autier P, Barette M, Vanderschueren D, Lips P, Haentjens P. Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: a one-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:87-94. Colón-Emeric C, Kuchibhatla M, Pieper C, Hawkes W, Fredman L, Magaziner J, et al. The contribution of hip fracture to risk of subsequent fracture: data from two longitudinal studies. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:879-83. DeLee JC. Fractures and Dislocations of the Hip, Rockwood and Green’s Fractures in Adults Vol.2. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996:1659-827. Jensen JS. Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand 1980;51:803-10.
  4. Lieberman JR. “Fracture of the hip,” inAAOS Comprehensive Orthopaedic Review, chapter 55, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, Ill, USA, 2009. p. 597-610.
  5. Canale CT, Campbell’s Operative Orthopaedics. Basbozkurt M (Türkçe çeviri editörü), Yıldız C (Türkçe çeviri editörü). Cilt 3. 11. Baskı, Ankara: Günes Tıp Kitabevleri; 2011. p.3237-3308.
  6. Gadegone WM, Shivashankar B, Lokhande V, Salphale Y. Augmentation of proximal femoral nail in unstable trochanteric fractures. SICOT J 2017;3:12. Zuckerman JD. Hip fracture. N Engl J Med 1996;334:1519-25.
  7. McGuire KJ, Bernstein J, Polsky D, Silber JH. The 2004 Marshall Urist award: delays until surgery after hip fracure increases mortality. Clinic Orthop Relat Res 2004;428:294-301.
  8. Al-Ani AN, Samuelsson B, Tidermark J, Norling A, Ekström W, Cederholm T, et al. Early operation on patients with a hip fracture improved the ability to return to independent living. A prospective study of 850 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90:1436-42.
  9. Lefaivre KA, Macadam SA, Davidson DJ, Gandhi R, Chan H, Broekhuyse HM. Length of stay, mortality, morbidity and delay to surgery in hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009;91:922-7.
  10. Smektala R, Endres HG, Dasch B, Mayer C, Trampisch HJ, Bonnaire F, et al. The effect of time to-surgery on outcome in elderly patients with proximal femoral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:171. Söderqvist A, Ekström W, Ponzer S, P