Dergiler / Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN OPEN EDUCATION SYSTEM: STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT OPEN-ENDED QUESTION (OEQ) PRACTICE

Sayfa
179–193
Yayın Tarihi
2020-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study is to determine students’ opinions about open-ended question exam practice during 2018-2019 academic year for the following programs of Anadolu University Open Education System: Economy, Hospitality Management, Philosophy, History, Sociology, and Turkish Language and Literature.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The measurement tool developed to achieve that purpose includes 5 Likert type questions, 8 closed-ended question – 3 of which are yes-no questions-, and 2 open-ended questions.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2018-2019 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Open Education · open ended questions · measurement

Abstract

The aim of this study is to determine students’ opinions about open-ended question exam practice during 2018-2019 academic year for the following programs of Anadolu University Open Education System: Economy, Hospitality Management, Philosophy, History, Sociology, and Turkish Language and Literature. The study was designed as a quantitative study that describes an existing situation. The measurement tool developed to achieve that purpose includes 5 Likert type questions, 8 closed-ended question – 3 of which are yes-no questions-, and 2 open-ended questions. The data were collected between February 14th 2020 and February 16th 2020 and 3236 students responded to the tool in total. Percentage-frequency tables and graphs were used for the analysis of the data collected. Since each question in the tool measured a different and independent dimension of the research, the tool was not taken as a scale, so each question was analyzed separately. The data were recoded for certain questions and chi-square analysis was done by using “age”, “gender” and “the program they attend” variables. The results of the study showed that majority of the participants find open-ended questions more difficult than multiple-choice questions and have negative opinions about open-ended questions in terms of measuring subject matter competency and fair assessment.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KARADAG, N., YUKSEKDAG, B. B., AKYILDIZ, M., IBILEME, A. I. (2020). ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION IN OPEN EDUCATION SYSTEM: STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT OPEN-ENDED QUESTION (OEQ) PRACTICE. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 179–193. https://ajindex.com/articles/126363

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Atilgan, H., Kan, A., & Dogan, N. (2009). Egitimde olcme ve degerlendirme. Ani Yayincilik. Bahar, M., Nartgun, Z., Durmus, S., & Bicak, B. (2010). Geleneksel-tamamlayici olcme ve degerlendirme teknikleri. Ankara:
  2. Pegem Akademi Yayincilik. Dogan, N. (2013). Yazili yoklamalar. H. Atilgan (Ed.), Egitimde olcme ve degerlendirme icinde (145-168). Ankara:
  3. Ani Yayincilik. Du Plessis, S., & Du Plessis, S. (2009). A new and direct test of the ‘gender bias’ in multiple-choice questions. Duran, E., & Tufan, B. S. (2017). The Effect Of Open-Ended Questions And Multiple Choice Questions On Comprehension, International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 5(1), 242–254.
  4. Eckes, T. (2005). Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking performance assessments: A many-facet Rasch analysis. Language Assessment Quarterly: An International Journal, 2(3), 197-221.