KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1

Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Yapay Zekâ Farkındalıkları ve Yapay Zekânın Eğitimdeki Rolüne İlişkin Görüşleri

Classroom Teachers' Awareness of Artificial Intelligence and Their Views on the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volkan Sayın(TC MİLLİ EĞİTİM BAKANLIĞI AMASYA)0000-0002-7365-0050
Keziban Orbay(AMASYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-7642-4139
Sayfa
156–177
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-24
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu nedenle öğretmenlere YZ’nin eğitimde kullanımına dair hizmet içi eğitim verilebilir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Günümüzde yapay zekâ (YZ) birçok alanda olduğu gibi eğitimde de kullanılmaya başlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:YZ’nin sınıflarda eğitime entegre edilmesinde öğretmenlere önemli görevler düşmektedir. 2024 yılında Amasya’da gerçekleşen bu çalışmada sınıf öğretmenlerinin YZ’ye yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu nedenle öğretmenlere YZ’nin eğitimde kullanımına dair hizmet içi eğitim verilebilir.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:teknoloji · eğitim · sınıf öğretmeni

Özet

Günümüzde yapay zekâ (YZ) birçok alanda olduğu gibi eğitimde de kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. YZ’nin sınıflarda eğitime entegre edilmesinde öğretmenlere önemli görevler düşmektedir. 2024 yılında Amasya’da gerçekleşen bu çalışmada sınıf öğretmenlerinin YZ’ye yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem olarak nitel araştırma desenlerinden durum çalışması tercih edilmiştir. Amaçlı örnekleme türlerinden kolay ulaşılabilir örnekleme yoluyla ulaşılan 51 sınıf öğretmeninden veriler yapılandırılmış görüşme formu ile yazılı olarak toplanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analiziyle incelenmiştir. Analiz sonucunda sınıf öğretmenlerinin büyük bölümünün 2020 yılı ve sonrasında YZ’yi genel olarak internetten, televizyon haberlerinden ve sosyal medyadan fark ettiği görülmüştür. Öğretmenler YZ’nin eğitim öğretime; öğretim sürecini geliştirme, yönetim, ölçme değerlendirme ve zamandan tasarruf bakımından katkı sağlayacağını belirtmişlerdir. Öğretmenler YZ’nin; etik, tembellik, fırsat eşitliği ve duygusal bakımdan olumsuz etkilerinin olacağını, kişisel verilerin gizliliği, öğrenci görevlerinden dolayı öğrenciler arasında haksız rekabet ve ahlaki sorunlara sebep olabileceğini ifade etmişlerdir. Bu nedenle öğretmenlere YZ’nin eğitimde kullanımına dair hizmet içi eğitim verilebilir.

Abstract

Today, Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being used in education as in many other fields. Teachers have an important role to play in integrating AI into classroom education. The aim of this study is to examine the opinions of primary school teachers about artificial intelligence in a study conducted in Amasya in 2024. The preferred method was the case study, a qualitative research design. Data were collected in writing from 51 classroom teachers who were selected through convenience sampling using purposive sampling techniques, using a structured interview form. The data obtained were analyzed using content analysis. As a result of the analysis, it was found that most classroom teachers noticed AI from the internet, TV news and social media in 2020 and beyond. Teachers stated that AI contributes to education and teaching by improving the teaching process, management, assessment, and saving time. Teachers expressed that AI may have negative effects in terms of ethics, laziness, equal opportunity, and emotional well-being, and may cause issues such as privacy of personal data, unfair competition among students due to student assignments, and moral problems. Therefore, teachers can be provided with in-service training on the use of AI in education.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sayın, V., Orbay, K. (2026). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Yapay Zekâ Farkındalıkları ve Yapay Zekânın Eğitimdeki Rolüne İlişkin Görüşleri. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 1, 156–177. https://doi.org/10.52826/mcbuefd.1800802

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (69)

  1. Aktaş, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence according to the views of administrators and teachers: A metaphor study. In 1st National Congress on Artificial Intelligence Applications in Education Full Text Proceedings Booklet (pp. 4-36) Şanlıurfa.
  2. Alwaqdani, M. (2024). Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: potential and difficulties. Education and Information Technologies, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9
  3. Ateş, V., Dişlioğlu, T. A., & Medeni, T. D. (2025). Yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin eğitimde kullanılması: Öğretmen değerlendirmeleri. Kamu Yönetimi ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7(2), 167-191.
  4. Becker, S. A., Brown, M., Dahlstrom, E., Davis, A., DePaul, K., Diaz, V., & Pomerantz, J. (2018). Horizon report 2018 higher education edition brought to you by Educause (pp. 1-54). Educause.
  5. Benzer, R., & Benzer, S. (2022). The views of graduate students in the field of informatics on artificial intelligence. Electronic Journal of Social Sciences, 2022(10), 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/sbe.62139
  6. Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artifi cial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32, 725–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5
  7. Çam, M. B., Çelik, N. C., Turan Güntepe, E. & Durukan, Ü. G., (2021). Determining teacher candidates’ awareness of artificial intelligence technologies. Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 18(48), 263-285.
  8. Coşkun, F. & Gülleroğlu, H. D. (2021). Development of artificial intelligence in history and its usage in education. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 54 (3), 947-966. https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.916220
  9. Cukurova, M., Khan-Galaria, M., Millán, E., & Luckin, R. (2021). A Learning Analytics Approach to Monitoring the Quality of Online One-to-one Tutoring. J. Learn. Anal. 1, 1–10. doi: 10.35542/osf.io/qfh7z
  10. Dick, S. (2019). Artificial intelligence. Harvard Data Science Review, 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.92fe150c
  11. Druga, S., Williams, R., Park, H. W., & Breazeal, C. (2018, June). How smart are the smart toys? Children and parents' agent interaction and intelligence attribution. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on interaction design and children (pp. 231-240).
  12. Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Spence, P. R., & Lin, X. (2018). I, teacher: Using artificial intelligence (AI) and social robots in communication and instruction. Communication Education, 67(4), 473-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2018.1502459
  13. Eriçok, B., Karataş, F., & Yüce, E. (2024). Metaphorical perceptions of pre-service teachers regarding artificial intelligence (AI). Kocaeli University Journal of Education, 7(2), 607-630. https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1511500
  14. Giannini, S., (2023). Reflections on generative AI and the future of education. UNESCO 2023. Retrievedfrom https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000385877/PDF/385877eng.pdf.multi/.
  15. Griol, D., Molina, J. M., & Callejas, Z. (2014). An approach to develop intelligent learning environments by means of immersive virtual worlds. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments, 6(2), 237–255. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-140255
  16. Haseski, H. İ. (2019). What do Turkish pre-service teachers think about artificial intelligence? International Journal of Computer Science Education in Schools, 3(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.21585/ijcses.v3i2.55
  17. Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
  18. Holstein, K., McLaren, B. M., & Aleven, V. (2019). Designing for complementarity: Teacher and student needs for orchestration support in AI-enhanced classrooms. Paper presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education: 20th International Conference, AIED 2019, Chicago, IL, USA, June 25–29, 2019, Proceedings, Part I 20.
  19. Hong, J. Y., Ko, H., Mesicek, L., & Song, M. (2019). Cultural intelligence as education contents: Exploring the pedagogical aspects of effective functioning in higher education. Concurrency and Computation: Practice & Experience, 33, e5489. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpe.5489
  20. Hwang, G., Sung, H., Chang, S., & Huang, X. (2020). A fuzzy expert system-based adaptive learning approach to improving students’ learning performances by considering affective and cognitive factors. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(1), 100003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100003.
  21. İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021 The use and development of artificial intelligence in education. e-Journal of New Media 5(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.17932/IAU.EJNM.25480200.2021/ejnm_v5i1001
  22. Karademir-Coşkun, T., & Alper, A. (2024). Evaluating the evaluators: A comparative study of AI and teacher assessments in higher education. Digital Education Review, (45), 124-140.
  23. Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s Perceptions of Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based Educational Tool Scientific Writing. Frontiers Education, 7. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914/full
  24. Köse, U., & Arslan, A. (2016). Intelligent e-learning system for improving students’ academic achievements in computer programming courses. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 185–198.
  25. Köse, B. B., Radıf, H., Uyar, B., Baysal, İ., & Demirci, N. (2023). The Importance of artificial intelligence in education according to teachers' views. Journal of Social, Humanities and Administrative Sciences (JOSHAS), 9(71), 4203-4209. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JOSH AS.74125
  26. Kutlusoy, Z. (2019). Felsefe açısından yapay zekâ. G. Telli (Ed.), Yapay zekâ ve gelecek içinde (ss. 25-43). Doğu Kitapevi.
  27. Küçükkara, M. F., Ünal, M., & Sezer, T. (2024). Okul öncesi eğitimi öğretmenlerinin yapay zekâya ilişkin görüşleri. Temel Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.55008/te-ad.1431142
  28. Lindner, A., & Romeike, R. (18-20 Kasım 2019). Teachers’ perspectives on artificial intelligence. (Oral presentation). ISSEP 2019- 12th International conference on informatics in schools: Situation, evaluation and perspectives. Larnaca, Kıbrıs.
  29. Liang, X.W, Cai, Y.Y., Su, J. S., Liao, J. Y., & Chen, Z.Y. (2019). Update on thyroid ultrasound: A narrative review from diagnostic criteria to artificial intelligence techniques. Chinese Medical Journal, 132(16), 1974-1982. https://doi.org/10.1097/cm9.0000000000000346
  30. Luckin, R. (2018). Machine learning and human intelligence: The future of education for the 21st century ERIC.
  31. Matsuda, N., Weng, W., & Wall, N. (2020). The effect of metacognitive scaffolding for learning by teaching a teachable agent. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-019-00190-2
  32. Meadows, M. S., (2010). We, robot: Skywalker's hand, blade runners, iron man, slutbots, and how fiction became fact. Lyons Press.
  33. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research. A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley-Sons
  34. Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded Sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  35. Moura, A., & Carvalho, A. A. A. (2024). Teachers' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in the classroom. Atlantis Highlights in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities 17,140-150. Doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-380-1_13
  36. Nabiyev, V. & Erümit, A. K. (2020). Yapay zekânın temelleri. İçinde V. Nabiyev ve A. K. Erümit (Edl.), Eğitimde yapay zekâ kuramdan uygulamaya [Artificial intelligence in education from theory to practice] (ss. 2-37), Pegem Akademi Yayınları.
  37. Orbay, M. (Editör), Taşdemir, D.D. & Kara, M. (2024). Yapay zekâya sahip sistemlerde etik model önerisi. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  38. Osoba, O. A., & Welser IV, W. (2017). An Intelligence in our image: The risks of bias and errors in artificial intelligence. Rand Corporation.
  39. Özer, S., Sancar-Yazıcı, A., Akgül, S., & Yıldırım, A. (2023). Okullarda yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. National Education Journal (ULEDER), 3(10), 1776-1794 https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10085759
  40. Paek, S., & Kim, N. (2021). Analysis of worldwide research trends on the impact of artificial intelligence in education. Sustainability, 13(14), 7941. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147941
  41. Pane, J. F., Griffin, B. A., McCaffrey, D. F., & Karam, R. (2014). Effectiveness of cognitive tutor algebra I at scale. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(2), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373713507480
  42. Popenici, S. A., & Kerr, S. (2017). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on teaching and learning in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 22(12). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-017-0062-8
  43. Russell, S. (2019). Human compatible: AI and the problem of control. Penguin Books.
  44. Saçan, S., Yaralı, K. T., & Kavruk, S. Z. (2022). Çocukların “yapay zekâ” kavramına ilişkin metaforik algılarının incelenmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Faculty of Education, (64), 274-296. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.1074024
  45. Sánchez-Prieto, J. C., Cruz-Benito, J., Therón Sánchez, R., and García Peñalvo, F. J. (2020). Assessed by Machines: Development of a TAM-Based Tool to Measure AI-based Assessment Acceptance Among Students. International Journal of Interactive Multimedia and Artificial Intelligence, 6(4), 80-86. https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2020.11.009
  46. Satır, T., & Korucu A.T. (2023). An Evaluation on the use of artificial intelligence in education specific to ChatGPT. Specific to ChatGPT. a (1), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v12i1.6513
  47. Sayın, V., & Orbay, K. (2025). Comparison of metaphorical perceptions of classroom teachersand candidates regarding artificial intelligence. International Journal of Turkish Education Sciences, 13 (3), 1972-1999. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1628903
  48. Saykal, A., & Sağır, Ş. U. (2021). Investigation of the relationship between the attitudes of classroom teachers towards the teaching profession and their technological pedagogical content knowledge. Dicle University Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education Journal, 1(40), 99-110.
  49. Seyrek, M., Yıldız, S., Emeksiz, H., Şahin, A., & Türkmen, M. T. (2024). Teachers' perceptions on the use of artificial intelligence in education. International Journal of Social and Humanities Sciences Research (JSHSR), 11(106), 845-856. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11113077
  50. Su, J., & Yang, W. (2022). Artificial intelligence in early childhood education: A scoping review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100049
  51. Şahin, D., Baysal, M., Yılmaz, O. (2025). Eğitim-öğretim sürecinde yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. International Journal of Social and Huma nities Sciences (IJSHS), 9(1), 133-144
  52. Tartuk, M. (2023). Metaphorical perceptions of middle school students regarding the concept of artificial intelligence. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 11(2), 108-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.11n.2p.108
  53. Taşçı, G., & Çelebi, M. (2020). Eğitimde yeni bir paradigma: “Yükseköğretimde Yapay Zekâ”. [A New paradigm in education: "Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education] OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(29), 2346-2370. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.747634
  54. Topçubaşı, T. (2025). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının yapay zekânın eğitim ortamlarında kullanımına yönelik görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Temel Eğitim Çalışmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 43-55.
  55. Uğurlu, C.T. ve Usta, H.G. (2025). Yapay zekânın (yz) eğitime yansımaları: Öğretmenlerin bakış açıları. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 16(1), 1350-1374.DOI. 10.51460/baebd.1578952
  56. Uyak, S., Uyak, S. G., Ürey, D., Keskin, Ö., Aymaz, A. & Aydın, İ. (2023). Okul öncesi eğitim kurumlarında yapay zekâ uygulamaları: Yönetici ve öğretmen görüşleri [Artificial Intelligence applications in preschool education institutions: Administrators and teachers' opinions]. Social Mentality and Researcher Thinkers Journal, 9(75), 4625-4636. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/smryj.72414
  57. Vazhayil, A., Shetty, R., Bhavani, R. R., & Akshay, N. (2019). Focusing on teacher education to introduce AI in schools: Perspectives and illustrative findings. In 2019 IEEE Tenth International Conference on Technology for Education (T4E) (pp. 71–77). IEEE.
  58. Walan, S. (2024). Primary school students’ perceptions of artificial intelligence–for good or bad. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-024-09898-2
  59. Wei, Y., Yang, Q., Chen, J., & Hu, J. (2018). The exploration of a machine learning approach for the assessment of learning styles changes. Mechatronic Systems and Control (Formerly Control and Intelligent Systems), 46(3), 121–126. https://dx.doi.org/10.2316/Journal.201.2018.3.201-2979
  60. Yang W. (2022). Artificial intelligence education for young children: Why, what, and how in curriculum design and implementation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100061
  61. Yau, K. W., Chai, C. S., Chiu, T. K., Meng, H., King, I., & Yam, Y. (2023). A phenomenographic approach on teacher conceptions of teaching Artificial Intelligence (AI) in K-12 schools. Education and information technologies, 28(1), 1041-1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11161-x
  62. Yeşilyurt, S., Dündar, R. & Aydın, M. (2024). Sosyal bilgiler eğitimi alanında lisansüstü eğitimini sürdüren öğrencilerin yapay zekâ hakkındaki görüşleri. [Opinions of students contınuıng theır graduate education ın social studies education on artifıcial intelligence] Asya Studies-Academic Social Studies, 8(27), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.31455/asya.1406649
  63. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri (10. Baskı) [Qualitative research methods in social sciences (10th edition)]. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  64. Zafari, M., Bazargani, J. S., Sadeghi-Niaraki, A., & Choi, S. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence applications in K-12 education: A systematic literature review. IEEE Access, 10, 61905-61921. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3179356
  65. Zeide, E. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Applications, promise and perils, and ethical questions. Educause Review, 54(3), 1-13.
  66. Zhai, X., Haudek, K. C., Shi, L., Nehm, R. H., & Urban-Lurain, M. (2020). From substitution to redefinition: a framework of machine learning-based science assessment. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 57, 1430–1459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/tea.21658
  67. Zhang, C., & Lu, Y. (2021). Study on artificial intelligence: The State of the art and future prospects. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 23, Article 100224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2021.100224
  68. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and education: Artificial intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
  69. Zhao, L., Wu, X., & Luo, H. (2022). Developing AI literacy for primary and middle school teachers in China: Based on a Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. Sustainability, 14(21), 14549. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114549