KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3

ABD medya kuruluşlarında sendikal hakların temsili: Politik eğilimler üzerine çerçeveleme teorisi temelinde bir içerik analizi

Representations of trade union rights in us media outlets: A framing theory-based content analysis across political leanings

Engincan Yıldız(İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2549-3473
Naim Göktaş(İstanbul Gelişim Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5378-3147
Esma Göktaş(İSTANBUL GELİŞİM ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0000-2104-4238
Sayfa
1806–1826
Yayın Tarihi
2025-09-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu durum, sermaye yanlısı ideolojik tutumun haberleri şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:ABD’de özellikle Covid-19 pandemisi sonrasında işçilerin sendikalaşma çabaları daha görünür hâle gelmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ad Fontes Media’nın sınıflandırmasına dayanarak eşit sayıda sağ, merkez ve sol eğilimli 12 medya kuruluşu belirlenmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu durum, sermaye yanlısı ideolojik tutumun haberleri şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sendikal Haklar · Çerçeveleme Teorisi · Çerçeve Temaları

Özet

ABD’de özellikle Covid-19 pandemisi sonrasında işçilerin sendikalaşma çabaları daha görünür hâle gelmiştir. Medyanın bu konuyla ilgili haberlerindeki söylemler ise kamuoyunun sendikal haklara ilişkin algısının şekillenmesinde belirleyici bir rol oynamaktadır. Çalışma; kökenini Goffman’ın çerçeveleri yorum şemaları olarak tanımlayan yaklaşımından almakta ve Entman’ın çerçeveleme işlevleri ile Scheufele’nin frame building anlayışı temelinde konumlanmaktadır. Ad Fontes Media’nın sınıflandırmasına dayanarak eşit sayıda sağ, merkez ve sol eğilimli 12 medya kuruluşu belirlenmiştir. Bu kuruluşlarda, Covid-19 pandemisinden itibaren yayımlanan sendikal haklarla ilgili 213 haber metni, çerçeveleme teorisi temelinde MASQDA programı aracılığıyla incelenmiştir. Frekans analizi ve çerçeve temaları üzerinden; medya kuruluşlarının hangi çerçeveleri öne çıkardığı, politik eğilimlere göre farklılaşma olup olmadığı ve ideolojik pozisyonların haber temsillerine etkisi araştırılmıştır. Sonuçlara göre, sağ eğilimli medya sendikal haklara açıkça olmasa da olumsuz bir tutumla yaklaşırken, sol eğilimli medyada bunun tersi bir eğilim gözlenmiştir. Merkez medya ise çoğunlukla bilgilendirici bir dil kullanmıştır. Medya kuruluşlarının emek gündemini çoğunlukla güncel politik tartışmalarla ilişkilendirdiği, sendikaların gücüne odaklandığı; ancak hak çerçevesinin zayıf kaldığı ve şirketlerin sendika karşıtı politikalarının yeterince görünür olmadığı saptanmıştır. Bu durum, sermaye yanlısı ideolojik tutumun haberleri şekillendirdiğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

In the United States, after the Covid-19 pandemic, workers’ unionization efforts have become more visible. Media discourse plays a critical role in shaping public perception of trade union rights. This study uses Goffman's approach, which defines frames as interpretive schemes, and is grounded in Entman's framing functions and Scheufele's understanding of frame-building. Based on AD Fontes Media’s classification, this study selected 12 media outlets with equal representation of right-, center-, and left-leaning perspectives. 213 news articles published since the start of the pandemic were analyzed using the MASQDA program within the framing theory. Through frequency and thematic analysis, the study examined which frames were highlighted, whether there were differences across political leanings, and how ideological positions affected news representations. Findings show that right-leaning media adopted a negative stance—though not explicitly—toward union rights, while left-leaning outlets showed a more supportive tone. Center-leaning media generally remained informational. Overall, media outlets frequently linked labor issues with current political debates and focused more on the unions’ power and strategies. Except for some left-leaning outlets, the frame for rights concerning workers' collective actions is weak, and companies' anti-union policies were underreported. In this regard, it has been argued that the pro-capital stance in the US media affects news coverage of union rights.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldız, E., Göktaş, N., Göktaş, E. (2025). ABD medya kuruluşlarında sendikal hakların temsili: Politik eğilimler üzerine çerçeveleme teorisi temelinde bir içerik analizi. Nevşehir Hacı Bektaş Veli Üniversitesi SBE Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 3, 1806–1826. https://doi.org/10.30783/nevsosbilen.1724363

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (53)

  1. Ad Fontes Media. (n.d.). About Ad Fontes Media. https://adfontesmedia.com/about-ad-fontes-media/
  2. Ad Fontes Media. (2025). The Media Bias Chart [Infographic]. https://adfontesmedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Media-Bias-Chart-13.0_Jan-2025-Licensed-scaled.jpg?submissionGuid=351aee30-c10d-4754-a161-44d5b7445b20
  3. Bergin, A. E. (2005). What effects do public relations actions have on labor disputes? A look at corporate campaigns. Seminar Research Paper Series, Paper 15.
  4. Blanc, E. (2024). Worker-led unionization sweeps the US. International Labor and Working-Class History, 105, 301–307. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0147547924000012
  5. Blanc, E. (2024b). Seven lessons from Starbucks workers’ historic victory. Jacobin. https://jacobin.com/2024/02/starbucks-sbwu-contract-bargaining
  6. Broomfield, C., Nye, C., & Wells, R. (2022). Media framing of migrant labour in UK fruit and vegetable production: An analysis of reporting in UK farming and mainstream print press. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.033
  7. Candeub, A. (2007). Media ownership regulation, the First Amendment, and democracy’s future. Michigan State University College of Law. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=985113
  8. Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
  9. Civila, S., & Lugo-Ocando, J. A. (2024). News framing and platform affordances in social media. Journalism Practice, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2024.2319249
  10. Çelik, A., Göktaş, N., & Yıldız, E. (2025). A new perspective on social sustainability: Examining Amazon workers’ working conditions and protests applying computational methods in social sciences. Discover Sustainability, 6, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00737-x
  11. Darr, J. P., & Harman, M. (2024). Leaving a legacy: Shifting media use and American democratic attitudes. Political Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-024-09992-0
  12. D’Angelo, P. (2019). Framing theory and journalism. In T. P. Vos & F. Hanusch (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of journalism studies (pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118841570.iejs0021
  13. de Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information Design Journal, 13(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
  14. Dimitrova, D. V., & Connolly-Ahern, C. (2007). A tale of two wars: Framing analysis of online news sites in coalition countries and the Arab world during the Iraq War. Howard Journal of Communications, 18(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/10646170701309973
  15. Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  16. Fahmy, S. (2010). Contrasting visual frames of our times: A framing analysis of English- and Arabic-language press coverage of war and terrorism. International Communication Gazette, 72(8), 695–717. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048510380801
  17. Fantasia, R., & Voss, K. (2004). Hard work: Remaking the American labor movement. University of California Press.
  18. Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95(1), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1086/229213
  19. Ghai, D. (2003). Decent work: Concept and indicators. International Labour Review, 142, 113–144. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2003.tb00256.x
  20. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
  21. Gülmez, M. (2010). Sendikal hakların bölünmezliği: “Toplu sözleşmesiz ve grevsiz sendika hakkı, özünden yoksundur”. Çalışma ve Toplum Dergisi, 2010(3), 9–50.
  22. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge University Press.
  23. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. (1988). Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media. Pantheon Books.
  24. Hossain, A., Wahab, J. A., & Khan, M. S. R. (2022). A computer-based text analysis of Al Jazeera, BBC, and CNN news shares on Facebook: Framing analysis on COVID-19 issues. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211068497
  25. Hyman, R. (2001). Understanding European trade unionism: Between market, class and society. SAGE.
  26. International Labour Organization. (1948). C087 – Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87). https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO::p12100_instrument_id:312232
  27. International Labour Organization. (1949). C098 – Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98). https://normlex.ilo.org/dyn/nrmlx_en/f?p=NORMLEXPUB:12100:0::NO:12100:P12100_INSTRUMENT_ID:312243:NO
  28. International Labour Organization. (n.d.). Statistics on social dialogue. https://ilostat.ilo.org/topics/industrial-relations/#
  29. International Labour Office. (2010). Trade unions and decent work country programmes: A resource package. International Labour Organization.
  30. Kelly, J. (1998). Rethinking industrial relations: Mobilization, collectivism and long waves. Routledge.
  31. Kliner, S. (2014). Helpful or harmful? The U.S. news media's framing of organized labor from 2009 through 2013 (Master’s thesis, George Washington University). GW ScholarSpace. https://scholarspace.library.gwu.edu/etd/f7623c69j
  32. Kuckartz, U., & Rädiker, S. (2019). Analyzing qualitative data with MAXQDA: Text, audio, and video. Springer.
  33. Logan, J. (2023). A model for labor’s renewal? The Starbucks campaign. New Labor Forum, 32(1), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/10957960221144972
  34. Marjaei, S., Yazdi, F. A., & Chandrashekara, M. (2019). MAXQDA and its application to LIS research. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2019.
  35. Matthes, J., & Kohring, M. (2008). The content analysis of media frames: Toward improving reliability and validity. Journal of Communication, 58(2), 258–279. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00384.x
  36. Minchin, T. J. (2024). A new labor movement? Assessing the worker upsurge in the contemporary U.S. Labor History, 65(4), 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/0023656X.2024.2327487
  37. Moody, K. (2017). On new terrain: How capitalism is reshaping the battleground of class war. Haymarket Books.
  38. Morstatter, F., Wu, L., Yavanoglu, U., Corman, S. R., & Liu, H. (2018). Identifying framing bias in online news. ACM Transactions on Social Computing, 1(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1145/3204948
  39. Ndamah-Arthur, K. (2018). Framing effects in newspaper reports (Master’s thesis, Tilburg University). Tilburg University Research Portal. https://arno.uvt.nl/show.cgi?fid=146129
  40. Oliveira, M., Bitencourt, C. C., Zanardo Dos Santos, A. C. M., & Teixeira, E. K. (2016). Thematic content analysis: Is there a difference between the support provided by the MAXQDA and NVIVO software packages? Brazilian Journal of Management, 9(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465911213
  41. Otero, V., Von Wald, J., Fox-Ramirez, E., & Heldebrandt, B. (2025, April). Ad Fontes Media content analysts methodology paper. Ad Fontes Media. https://www.adfontesmedia.com
  42. Özveri, M. (2012). Toplu iş ilişkileri yasa tasarısı ve sendikal haklar. Birleşik Metal-İş Yayınları.
  43. Powers, A., & Godbersen, J. (2023). Culture and conflict: The framing of news in three national U.S. newspapers. Journal of Creative Industries and Cultural Studies, 9(2), 24–47. https://doi.org/10.56140/JoCis-v9-2
  44. Scheufele, D. A. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49(1), 103–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
  45. Schmitt, J., & Mitukiewicz, A. (2012). Politics matter: Changes in unionisation rates in rich countries, 1960–2010. Industrial Relations Journal, 43(3), 260–280.
  46. Shierholz, H., McNicholas, C., Poydock, M., & Sherer, J. (2024). Workers want unions but the latest data point to obstacles in their path. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/union-membership-data/
  47. Standing, G. (2011). The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury Academic.
  48. Tarish, A. H., Abdalhakeem, S. H., & Hasani, S. A. (2022). American media framing of Bush, Obama, and Trump speeches. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2022.2115245
  49. Töngür, Ü. & Elveren, A. (2014). Deunionization and pay inequality in OECD countries: A panel granger causality approach. Economic Modelling, 38: 417–425.
  50. United Nations. (n.d.). Universal Declaration of Human Rights. https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
  51. Valentini, C., Ihlen, Ø., Somerville, I., Raknes, K. & Davinson, S. (2020). Trade unions and lobbying: Fighting private interests while defending the public interest?. International Journal of Communication, 14(2020), 4913-4931.
  52. Visser, J. (2019). Can unions revitalize themselves. International Journal of Labour Research, 9 (1-2): 17-48.
  53. Yuniawan, T., Urip, S. R., Seinsiani, I. G., Din, W. A., Swanto, S., & Ardi, H. (2023). Media framing and COVID-19 infodemic in news headlines of Indonesian online newspapers. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.902003