Dergiler / Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1

Biyoyararlanım ve Biyoeşdeğerlik#

Bioavailability and Bioequivalence

Sayfa
85–94
Yayın Tarihi
2015-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗

Özet

85

Abstract

At the present days, developments in the pharmaceutical industry ans technological progression continues to increase. The Pharmaceutical products which are sold a lot, are marketed under different names by pharmaceutical companies. Thus, containing the same active ingredient in the same amount is increasing rapidly the number of similar preparations on the market. The similar products which are same active ingredient in the same amount must be equivalent to each other to be pharmaceutically bioequivalent. Drugs should be effective, safe, affordable and acceptable cost. The amount of drugs which reach from application area to target area, is important. This means is bioavailability. The bioavailability is the most important factor on the medication treatment applications. Whether obtain the therapeutic response of systemically active drugs is determined by bioavailability studies. Therefore, the health authorities which permit to production and sale of drugs, want to prove generic drugs to be bioequivalent to the original drug. To get better quality, cheaper and safer drugs will be possible with bioavailability and bioequivalence studies

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇELİK, G., BİRDANE, Y. O. (2015). Biyoyararlanım ve Biyoeşdeğerlik#. Kocatepe Veteriner Dergisi, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 1, 85–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/124758

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Anonymous. Guidelines fort he Conduct of Bioequivalence Studies for Veterinary Medicinal Product. The European Agency fort he Evaluation of Medicinal Products Veterinary Medicines and Information Technology. Committee for Veterinary Medicinal Product. EMEA/CVMP/016/00-corr-FINAL.2001;
  2. Armando YP, Serra CH, Porta V, Koono EEM, Kano EK. Bioequivalence assay between orally disintegrating and conventional tablet formulations in healthy volunteers. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 2009; 366: 149–153. Canbolat O. İlaç ve İlaç Politikalarına Bakış, Sena Ltd. Şti, Ankara. 2002; s.2-30.
  3. Chereson R, Banakar U. Chapter 8: Bioavailability, Bioequivalence and Drug Selection, In: Basic Pharmacokineics, Ed; Makoid M, Vuchetich P, Banakar U. Creighton University. Omaha. 1999; 20-88.
  4. Colwell PE, Jamalı F, Dryden W, Friesen E, Koven S, Mohamed I, Osmond B, Severini AS, Sheldon L, Sheldon R, Tam Y, Tsuyuki R, Zhanel G. Bioequivalence and interchangeability of narrow therapeutic range drugs. Canadian society for pharmaceutical sciences discussion. J. Pharm Pharmaceut Sci. 1998; 1(1): 2-7. Dortunç B. Biyoyararlanım Tedavide Neden Önemlidir. Ankem Dergisi, 2007; 21(3): 197-201.
  5. Duncan W, MacDonald G, Thornton MJ. Some factors influencing the absorption of griseofulvin from the gastro-intestinal tract. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1962; 14: 217-224. EMEA. Commitee for proprietary medicinal products (CPMP). Not efor Guidance on The Investigation of Bioavailability and Bioequivalance. London, 26 July 2001. CPMP/EWP/QWP/1401/98. 2001.
  6. Faloon WW, Paes IC, Woolfolk D. Effect of neomycin and kanamycin on inestinal absorption. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1966; 132: 879. FDA. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies for oraliy administered drug products-general considerations. Erişim: [http:// www.fda.gov/eder/guidance/3 61 5fnl.pdf]. Erişim Tarihi; 06.05.2003. FDA. Guidance for industry. Bioavailability and bioequivalance studies for oraliy administered drug products-general considerations. Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), October. 2002; 3-12. Federal Register. Bioavailabilty and Bioequivalance Requirement. Abbreviated Applications. Proposed Revisions. 1998; 63: 64222-64228. Federal Register. Bioavailabilty and Bioequivalence Requirement. Abbreviated Applications. Proposed Revisions. 1998; 63(223): 64222-64228.
  7. Feng F, Zhang W, Wang Y. Bioequivalence study of bromhexine by liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry after oral admini