KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2

Investigation Of Agility Performance In Some Anthropometric Variables For Young Male Soccer Players

Veysel Böge(Faculty of Sports Sciences , Selcuk University)0000-0002-7466-1173
Turgut Kaplan(SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE)0000-0002-6150-5235
Halil Taşkın(SELCUK UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF SPORTS SCIENCE)0000-0002-1618-2123
Sayfa
216–222
Yayın Tarihi
2021-08-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, in this age period, a small difference in maturation may imply a substantial difference in body height and weight, associated with a huge difference in agility performance.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study was to investigate the agility performance of young male soccer players in anthropometric variables.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:One hundred sixty-nine healthy young male soccer players (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 age) were examined.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, in this age period, a small difference in maturation may imply a substantial difference in body height and weight, associated with a huge difference in agility performance.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Agility · Agility Test · Body Mass Index

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the agility performance of young male soccer players in anthropometric variables. One hundred sixty-nine healthy young male soccer players (10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 age) were examined. The mean (SD) age was 12.31 ± 1.29 years, height was 153.28 ± 9.79 cm, body weight was 44.18 ± 10.30 kg, and Body Mass Index (BMI) was 18.57 ± 2.82 kg/m2 for the 169 young soccer players. Height, body mass index, body weight, 5 0 5 agility test, the pro-agility test, T test and Illinois agility test score were collected in 169 young soccer players. Body weight was significant predictor of pro-agility, 5 0 5 agility test, T test, and Illinois agility test while Age was significant predictor of pro-agility, T test, and Illinois agility test. Also, height was significant predictor of 5 0 5 agility test, T test, and Illinois agility test. On the other hand, body mass index was significant predictor of T test and Illinois agility test. Players who higher body weight has performed better in all agility tests in this study. In conclusion, in this age period, a small difference in maturation may imply a substantial difference in body height and weight, associated with a huge difference in agility performance.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Böge, V., Kaplan, T., Taşkın, H., *, V. B. (2021). Investigation Of Agility Performance In Some Anthropometric Variables For Young Male Soccer Players. Türk Spor ve Egzersiz Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 2, 216–222. https://ajindex.com/articles/1234267

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (27)

  1. Almuzaini K. Optimal Peak and Mean Power on the Wingate Test: Relationship with Sprint Ability, Vertical Jump and Standing Long Jump in Boys. Pediatric exercise science, 2000; 12, 349-359. doi:10.1123/pes.12.4.349.
  2. Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Lekue JA, Amado M, Gil SM. Does a 1-Year Age Gap Modify the Influence of Age, Maturation, and Anthropometric Parameters as Determinants of Performance Among Youth Elite Soccer Players? J Strength Cond Res, 2019; 33(9), 2541-2547. doi:10.1519/jsc.0000000000002203.
  3. Chaalali A, Rouissi M, Chtara M, Owen A, Bragazzi N, Moalla W, Chaouachi A, Amri A, Chamari K. Agility training in young elite soccer players: Promising results compared to change of direction drills. Biology of Sport, 2016; 33, 345-351. doi:10.5604/20831862.1217924.
  4. Forsman H, Gråstén A, Blomqvist M, Davids K, Liukkonen J, Konttinen N. Development of perceived competence, tactical skills, motivation, technical skills, and speed and agility in young soccer players. J Sports Sci, 2016; 34(14), 1311-1318. doi:10.1080/02640414.2015.1127401.
  5. Gambetta V. How to develop sport-specific speed. Sports Coach, 1996; 19(3), 22-24.
  6. Gil S, Ruiz F, Irazusta A, Gil J, Irazusta J. Selection of young soccer players in terms of anthropometric and physiological factors. J Sports Med Phys Fitness, 2007; 47(1), 25-32.
  7. Gil SM, Badiola A, Bidaurrazaga-Letona I, Zabala-Lili J, Gravina L, Santos-Concejero J, Lejue JA, Granados C. Relationship between the relative age effect and anthropometry, maturity and performance in young soccer players. J Sports Sci, 2014; 32(5), 479-486. doi:10.1080/02640414.2013.832355.
  8. Harman E, Garhammer J, Pandorf C. Essentials of strength and conditioning. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics (E. R. Baechle TR Ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics: Essentials of strength and conditioning. 2000.
  9. Harter S. The construction of the self: Developmental and sociocultural foundations: Guilford Publications. 2015.
  10. Horn TS. Developmental Perspectives on Self-Perceptions in Children and Adolescents. In Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective. (pp. 101-143). Morgantown, WV, US: Fitness Information Technology. 2004.
  11. Lloyd R, Read P, Oliver J, Meyers R, Nimphius S, Jeffreys I. Considerations for the Development of Agility During Childhood and Adolescence. Strength and Conditioning Journal, 2013; 35, 2-11. doi:10.1519/SSC.0b013e31827ab08c.
  12. Malina RM, Bouchard C, Bar-Or O. Growth, Maturation, and Physical Activity: Human Kinetics. 2004.
  13. Malina RM, Eisenmann JC, Cumming SP, Ribeiro B, Aroso J. Maturity-associated variation in the growth and functional capacities of youth football (soccer) players 13-15 years. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2004; 91(5-6), 555-562. doi:10.1007/s00421-003-0995-z.
  14. Mero A. Power and speed training during childhood. Pediatric anaerobic performance, 1998; 241-269.
  15. Meylan C, Cronin J, Oliver J, Hughes M. Reviews: Talent Identification in Soccer: The Role of Maturity Status on Physical, Physiological and Technical Characteristics. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 2010; 5, 571-592. doi:10.1260/1747-9541.5.4.571.
  16. Miller MG, Herniman JJ, Ricard MD, Cheatham CC, Michael TJ. The effects of a 6-week plyometric training program on agility. J Sports Sci Med, 2006; 5(3), 459-465.
  17. Moreno L, León J, Serón R, Mesana M, Fleta J. Body composition in young male football (soccer) players. Nutrition Research, 2004; 24, 235-242. doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2003.10.006.
  18. Mujika I, Santisteban J, Impellizzeri F, Castagna C. Fitness determinants of success in men's and women's football. Journal of sports sciences, 2009; 27, 107-114. doi:10.1080/02640410802428071.
  19. Nikolaïdis PT. Prevalence of overweight, and association between body mass index, body fat percent and physical fitness in male soccer players aged 14-16 years. Science & Sports, 2013; 28(3), 125-132.
  20. Okur M, Taskin H, Taskin M. Effects of Speed Training Over the Agility, Quickness And Acceleration For Young Basketball Players. Kinesiologia Slovenica, 2019; 25(3).
  21. Papaiakovou G, Giannakos A, Michailidis C, Patikas D, Bassa E, Vassilios K, Anthrakidis N, Kotzamanidis C. The effect of chronological age and gender on the development of running speed phases during developmental ages. National Strength & Conditioning Association Journal, 2009; 23, 2568-2573.
  22. Philippaerts RM, Vaeyens R, Janssens M, Van Renterghem B, Matthys D, Craen R, Bourgois J, Vrijens J, Beunen G, Malina RM. The relationship between peak height velocity and physical performance in youth soccer players. J Sports Sci, 2006; 24(3), 221-230. doi:10.1080/02640410500189371.
  23. Semenick D. Testing protocols and procedures. In: Baechle T, editor. Essentials of strength training and conditioning. 1st ed. Champaign (IL): Human Kinetics; 1994. p. 258-73.
  24. Sheppard JM, Young WB. Agility literature review: classifications, training and testing. J Sports Sci, 2006; 24(9), 919-932. doi:10.1080/02640410500457109.
  25. Vänttinen T, Blomqvist M, Nyman K, Häkkinen K. Changes in body composition, hormonal status, and physical fitness in 11-, 13-, and 15-year-old Finnish regional youth soccer players during a two-year follow-up. J Strength Cond Res, 2011; 25(12), 3342-3351. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e318236d0c2.
  26. Vescovi JD, Rupf R, Brown TD, Marques MC. Physical performance characteristics of high-level female soccer players 12-21 years of age. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2011; 21(5), 670-678. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0838.2009.01081.x.
  27. Wong PL, Chamari K, Dellal A, Wisløff U. Relationship between anthropometric and physiological characteristics in youth soccer players. J Strength Cond Res, 2009; 23(4), 1204-1210. doi:10.1519/JSC.0b013e31819f1e52.