KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2

Orta Asya’da etki alanları: Çin’in Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi ve Rusya’nın Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği’nin karşılaştırmalı analizi

Spheres of influence in Central Asia: a comparative study of China’s Belt and Road Initiative and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union

Sharifa Giritlioglu(HOCA AHMET YESEVİ ULUSLARARASI TÜRK-KAZAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4135-4094
Sayfa
1290–1313
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, Orta Asya ülkelerinin bu iki gücün örtüşen hedefleri arasında yol alırken kritik içgörüler sunarak, egemenliklerini ve bağımsızlıklarını korurken faydaları en üst düzeye çıkarma stratejilerini vurgulamaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Büyük güçler arasındaki çatışmaları önlemek ve jeopolitik istikrarı korumak için 19. yüzyılda kurulan etki alanları kavramı, modern çağda önemli ölçüde evrim geçirmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasının ardından Rusya ve Çin, Orta Asya’da nüfuz sahibi olmak için birincil rakipler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır ve her biri stratejik çıkarları güvence altına almak, ekonomik entegrasyonu teşvik etmek ve bölgesel güvenlik tehditlerini önlemek için çaba göstermişlerdir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, Orta Asya ülkelerinin bu iki gücün örtüşen hedefleri arasında yol alırken kritik içgörüler sunarak, egemenliklerini ve bağımsızlıklarını korurken faydaları en üst düzeye çıkarma stratejilerini vurgulamaktadır.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Etki alanı · Orta Asya · Çin

Özet

Büyük güçler arasındaki çatışmaları önlemek ve jeopolitik istikrarı korumak için 19. yüzyılda kurulan etki alanları kavramı, modern çağda önemli ölçüde evrim geçirmiştir. Sovyetler Birliği’nin dağılmasının ardından Rusya ve Çin, Orta Asya’da nüfuz sahibi olmak için birincil rakipler olarak ortaya çıkmıştır ve her biri stratejik çıkarları güvence altına almak, ekonomik entegrasyonu teşvik etmek ve bölgesel güvenlik tehditlerini önlemek için çaba göstermişlerdir. Tarihsel olarak, Rusya Orta Asya’yı kendi münhasır etki alanı olarak görmüştür. Ancak Çin’in hızlı ekonomik büyümesi ve genişleyen siyasi hırsları, Moskova’nın bölgedeki geleneksel hakimiyetine giderek daha fazla meydan okumaktadır. Bu araştırma, Çin’in Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (BRI) ve Rusya’nın Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği’nin (EAEU) ikili mercekleri aracılığıyla Orta Asya’daki Çin-Rus etkisi arasındaki etkileşimi analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Tarihsel bağlamlardan yararlanarak ve güncel dinamiklere odaklanarak, çalışma ekonomik entegrasyon ve jeopolitik etki için ilgili stratejilerinin karşılaştırmalı bir analizini sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma, BRI ve EAEU girişimlerini karşılaştırarak, Çin ve Rusya’nın Orta Asya’da güç uygulamak için benimsediği farklı yaklaşımlara ilişkin ayrıntılı bir anlayış sunmaktadır. Bulgular, Orta Asya ülkelerinin bu iki gücün örtüşen hedefleri arasında yol alırken kritik içgörüler sunarak, egemenliklerini ve bağımsızlıklarını korurken faydaları en üst düzeye çıkarma stratejilerini vurgulamaktadır.

Abstract

The concept of spheres of influence, originally established in the 19th century to prevent conflicts among great powers and maintain geopolitical stability, has evolved significantly in the modern era. Following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, Russia and China have emerged as the primary competitors for influence in Central Asia, each striving to secure strategic interests, foster economic integration, and address regional security challenges. Historically, Russia has regarded Central Asia as its exclusive sphere of influence. However, China’s rapid economic growth and expanding political ambitions have increasingly challenged Moscow’s traditional dominance in the region. This research aims to analyze the interplay between Sino-Russian influence in Central Asia through the dual lenses of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU). Drawing from historical contexts and focusing on current dynamics, the study presents a comparative analysis of their respective strategies for economic integration and geopolitical influence. By comparing these initiatives, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the distinct approaches China and Russia adopt to exert power in Central Asia. The findings offer critical insights for Central Asian nations as they navigate the overlapping ambitions of these two powers, highlighting strategies to optimize benefits while safeguarding their sovereignty and independence.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Giritlioglu, S. (2025). Orta Asya’da etki alanları: Çin’in Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi ve Rusya’nın Avrasya Ekonomik Birliği’nin karşılaştırmalı analizi. Ordu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 1290–1313. https://doi.org/10.48146/odusobiad.1613978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (72)

  1. Ahunbayev, A., Babajanyan, V., Berdigulova, A., Fedorov, K., Kharitonchik, A., Kuznetsov, A., Malakhov, A., Pereboev, V., Usmanov, N., & Zaboev, A. (2022). The Economy of Central Asia: A Fresh Perspective (22/3; p. 98). Eurasian Development Bank. https://eabr.org/en/analytics/special-reports/
  2. Allan, D., Bohr, A., Boulègue, M., Giles, K., Gould-Davies, N., Hanson, P., Lough, J., Lutsevych, O., Mallinson, K., Marin, A., Nixey, J., Noble, B., Petrov, N., Schulmann, E., Sherr, J., Wolczuk, K., & Wood, A. (2021). Myths and misconceptions in the debate on Russia [Russia and Eurasia Programme]. Chatham House.
  3. Ayyildiz, E., Alipbayev, A., Byuzheyeva, B., & Wang, X. (2018). Kazakhstan–Chinese relations within the framework of the SCO. KazNU BULLETIN. International Relations and International Law Series, 82(2), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.26577/IRILY-2018-2-789
  4. Bianco, V., Proskuryakova, L., & Starodubtseva, A. (2021). Energy inequality in the Eurasian Economic Union. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111155
  5. Bitabarova, A. G. (2018). Unpacking Sino-Central Asian engagement along the New Silk Road: A case study of Kazakhstan. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 7(2), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2018.1553226
  6. Bull, H. (2002). The Anarchical Society. A Study of Order in World Politics. Palgrave.
  7. Buzan, B., & Wæver, O. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press. https://ir101.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Buzan-Waever-2003-Regions-and-Powers-The-Structure-of-International-Security.pdf
  8. Cai, K. G. (2018). The One Belt One Road and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Beijing’s New Strategy of Geoeconomics and Geopolitics. Journal of Contemporary China, 27(114), 831–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2018.1488101
  9. Cai, P. (2017). Understanding China’s Belt and Road Initiative (p. 27). Lowy Institute for International Policy. https://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep10136
  10. CGTN. (2023). China, Central Asia vow to build a closer community with a shared future at milestone Xi’an summit. https://news.cgtn.com/news/2023-05-19/China-Central-Asia-vow-to-build-closer-community-with-shared-future-1jVLJrBkwuI/index.html
  11. Chupilkin, M., Javorcik, B., & Plekhanov, A. (2023). The Eurasian Roundabout: Trade Flows Into Russia Through the Caucasus and Central Asia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4368618
  12. CNPC. (2024). Central Asia-China Gas Pipeline. https://www.cnpc.com.cn/en/CentralAsia/CentralAsia_index.shtml
  13. Costa Buranelli, F. (2018). Spheres of Influence as Negotiated Hegemony – The Case of Central Asia. Geopolitics, 23(2), 378–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1413355
  14. eaeunion.org. (2024). Eurasian Economic Union. https://www.eaeunion.org/?lang=en#about
  15. EEC. (2019). Eurasian Economic Union Figures and Facts. Eurasian Economic Comission. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnhttps://eec.eaeunion.org/upload/files/paos/library/%D0%A6%D0%98%D0%A4_%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B3%D0%BB%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B0%D1%8F%20%D0%B2%D0%B5%D1%80%D1%81%D0%B8%D1%8F.pdf
  16. Feigenbaum, E. (2016). China and the World. Dealing With a Reluctant Power. Foreign Affairs, December. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/china/china-and-world
  17. Ferguson, I., & Hast, S. (2018). Introduction: The Return of Spheres of Influence? Geopolitics, 23(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1461335
  18. Gabuev, A. (2016). Crouching Bear, Hidden Dragon: “One Belt One Road” and Chinese-Russian Jostling for Power in Central Asia. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 5(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2016.11869097
  19. Gelvig, S. (2020). China-Kazakhstan Economic Cooperation and “One Belt, One Road" Initiative. European Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 2, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.29013/EJEMS-20-2-49-58
  20. Global Initiative Maps. (2024). The Belt and Road Initiative Map. Global Initiative. https://bri.globalinitiative.net/#/map
  21. Grant, A. (2020). Crossing Khorgos: Soft power, security, and suspect loyalties at the Sino-Kazakh boundary. Political Geography, 76, 102070. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2019.102070
  22. Hast, S. (2014). Spheres of influence in international relations: History, theory and politics. Ashgate.
  23. Hon Kong Trade Development Council. (2016). China-Kazakhstan Border Cooperatin in Xinjiang. Hong Kong Trade Development Council. http://economists-pick-research.hktdc.com/business-news/article/Research-Articles/China-KazakhstanBorder-Co-operation-in-Xinjiang/rp/en/1/1X000000/1X0A5JIX.htm
  24. Islam, A. I. (2012). The U.S. Role and Policy in Central Asia: Energy and Beyond. Arts Faculty Journal, 33–51. https://doi.org/10.3329/afj.v4i0.12931
  25. Jackson, V. (2020). Understanding spheres of influence in international politics. European Journal of International Security, 5(3), 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2019.21
  26. Kaczmarski, M. (2017). Two Ways of Influence-building: The Eurasian Economic Union and the One Belt, One Road Initiative. Europe-Asia Studies, 69(7), 1027–1046. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2017.1373270
  27. Kaufman, E. (1976). The superpowers and their spheres of influence: The United States and the Soviet Union in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Croom Helm.
  28. Keal, P. (1983). Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance. MacMillan.
  29. Kimball, W. (1991). The Juggler: Franklin Roosevelt as Wartime Statesman. Princeton University Press.
  30. kremlin.ru. (2024). On May 8, Vladimir Putin will take part in Supreme Eurasian Economic Council meeting. Official Information Source of the President of Russian Federation. http://www.en.kremlin.ru/press/announcements/73978
  31. Larrabee, S., & Karasik, T. (1997). Foreign and Security Policy Decisionmaking Under Yeltsin. RAND National Defense Research Institute.
  32. Laruelle, M., & Royce, D. (2020). No Great Game: Central Asia’s Public Opinions on Russia, China, and the U.S. Wison Center Kennan Cable, 56, 1–17.
  33. Liao, J. X. (2021). China’s energy diplomacy towards Central Asia and the implications on its “belt and road initiative”. The Pacific Review, 34(3), 490–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2019.1705882
  34. Lukin, A. (2021). The Russia–China entente and its future. International Politics, 58(3), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-020-00251-7
  35. Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geo-Economics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17–23.
  36. Mahmood, A. (2021). Central Asia: A Testing Ground of Sino-Russian Energy Partnership. Pakistan Social Sciences Review, 5(II), 1059–1071. https://doi.org/10.35484/pssr.2021(5-II)81
  37. Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton & Company.
  38. mfa.gov.cn. (2024). Wang Yi: The China-Central Asia Summit Creates a New Platform for Good-neighbourliness and Friendly Cooperation in the Region. Ministry of Foreign Affairs The People’s Republic of China. https://www.mfa.gov.cn/eng/wjbzhd/202403/t20240319_11262316.html
  39. Ministry of Foreign Affairs the PRC. (2001). Treaty of Good-Neighborliness and Friendly Cooperation Between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation. Ministry of Foreign Affairs The People’s Republic of China. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_eng/gjhdq_665435/3265_665445/3220_664352/3221_664354/202406/t20240611_11423147.html
  40. Mirza, M., & Ayub, S. (2021). Sino-Russian Competitive Collaboration for the Central Asian Sphere of Influence. Trames. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 25(4), 437. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2021.4.04
  41. Mostafa, G., & Mahmood, M. (2018). Eurasian Economic Union: Evolution, challenges and possible future directions. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 9(2), 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euras.2018.05.001
  42. Muratbekova, A. (2023). Central Asia in China’s Foreign Policy: Xi’an Summit. Akhmet Yassawi University Eurasian Research Institute. https://www.eurasian-research.org/publication/central-asia-in-chinas-foreign-policy-xian-summit/
  43. Neafie, J. (2023). Producing the Eurasian Land Bridge: A case study of the geoeconomic contestation in Kazakhstan. International Politics, 60(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-022-00386-9
  44. News Central Asia. (2024, November 19). The Central Asia–China Gas Pipeline: 500+ billion cubic meters of clean energy and millions of tons of reduced emissions. https://www.newscentralasia.net/2024/11/19/the-central-asia-china-gas-pipeline-500-billion-cubic-meters-of-clean-energy-and-millions-of-tons-of-reduced-emissions/
  45. Nye, J. S. (1990). Bound to lead: The changing nature of American power. Basic Books.
  46. Ortmann, S. (2018). Beyond Spheres of Influence: The Myth of the State and Russia’s Seductive Power in Kyrgyzstan. Geopolitics, 23(2), 404–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2018.1451843
  47. Pantucci, R. (2015). China and Russia’s Soft Competition in Central Asia. Current History, 114(774), 272–277. https://doi.org/10.1525/curh.2015.114.774.272
  48. Perskaya, V. V., Khairov, B. G., Revenko, N. S., & Khairova, S. M. (2022). Role of the People’s Republic of China in the Activities of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. East Asia, 39(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-021-09373-y
  49. primeminister.kz. (2023, March 28). Kazakhstan and China sign commercial contracts worth more than $565 million. Official Information Source of the Prime minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. https://primeminister.kz/en/news/kazakhstan-and-china-sign-commercial-contracts-worth-more-than-565-million-23501
  50. Racz, A. (2015). Russia’s hybrid war in Ukraine: Breaking the enemy’s ability to resist. Finnish Institute of International Affairs.
  51. Roberts, S. P., & Moshes, A. (2016). The Eurasian Economic Union: A case of reproductive integration? Post-Soviet Affairs, 32(6), 542–565. https://doi.org/10.1080/1060586X.2015.1115198
  52. Sahakyan, M. (2020). Russia, China and Central Asia: Cooperation over Competition. Asia Global SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4339023
  53. Scott, T. C., & Askerov, A. (2024). A Post-Mortem of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO). JTPP, 81–103.
  54. Singh, A. (2021). Chapter 2. Analysis of Geopolitical Settings of Central Asian States in the 21st Century: Engagement of Regional and International Contestants. In 青山国際政経論集 (pp. 93–110).
  55. Sinitsina, I. (2012). Economic Cooperation Between Russia and Central Asian Countries: Trends and Outlook (Working Paper 5; p. 89). University of Central Asia. Graduate School of Development. Institute of Public Policy and Administration. https://www.ssrn.com/abstract=3023190
  56. statista.com. (2024). Total mutual trade turnover between countries of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) from 2016 to 2021. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1267385/intra-eaeu-trade-volume/
  57. stats.gov.cn. (2023). China Statistical Yearbooks. National Bureau of Statistics of China. https://www.stats.gov.cn/english/Statisticaldata/yearbook/
  58. Stronski, P., & Ng, N. (2018). Cooperation and Competition. Russia and China in Central Asia, the Russian Far East, and the Arctic. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
  59. Suslov, M. (2018). “Russian World” Concept: Post-Soviet Geopolitical Ideology and the Logic of “Spheres of Influence”. Geopolitics, 23(2), 330–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2017.1407921
  60. Taylor, M. (2022). China’s Digital Authoritarianism. A Governance Perspective. Palgrave Macmillan UK.
  61. The People’s Map of Global China. (2023). Central Asia–China Gas Pipeline (Line A, Line B, and Line C). The People’s Map of Global China. https://thepeoplesmap.net/project/central-asia-china-gas-pipeline-line-a-line-b-and-line-c/
  62. Umarov, T. (2024). Дружба за влияние. Как Россия и Китай уживаются в Центральной Азии. Фонд Карнеги за международный мир.
  63. Uslu, N. (2024). Central Asia in Regional and Global Policies of Russia and China. Bilig, 111, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.11101
  64. Vakilova, V. R. (2019). Сотрудничество Китая и России в Центральной Азии: Партнёры или конкуренты? East Asia: Facts and Analytics, 1, 37–46.
  65. Vinokurov, E. (2017). Eurasian Economic Union: Current state and preliminary results. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.004
  66. Weitz, R. (2011). Nervous neighbours: China finds a sphere of influence. World Affairs, 173(6), 6–14.
  67. Xinhua. (2017). VISION AND ACTIONS ON JOINTLY BUILDING SILK ROAD ECONOMIC BELT AND 21ST-CENTURY MARITIME SILK ROAD. Issued by the National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China, with State Council authorization. http://2017.beltandroadforum.org/english/n100/2017/0410/c22-45.html
  68. Xinhua. (2023, November 25). Xinhua Headlines: Xinjiang land ports play robust role amid efforts to expand opening up. Xinhua. https://english.news.cn/20231125/184e947a844a43749a5f142bc23fdcb8/c.html
  69. Xinhua. (2024, August 24). China-Central Asia natural gas pipeline fostering a shared future. https://english.news.cn/20230824/f2468a16409945eaa27caf079d1702cc/c.html
  70. Yeliseyev, A. (2019). The Eurasian Economic Union: Expectations, Challenges, and Achievements (No. 10). The German Marshall Fund of the United States.
  71. Yuan, J.-D. (2010). China’s Role in Establishing and Building the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). Journal of Contemporary China, 19(67), 855–869. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2010.508587
  72. Zhai, F. (2018). China’s belt and road initiative: A preliminary quantitative assessment. Journal of Asian Economics, 55, 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asieco.2017.12.006