Dergiler / Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: Special Issue on 24th International Business Congress Özel Sayı

THE SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT AMONG MIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY

Sayfa
1–15
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Finally, the analysis has revealed that the majority of the studies are published from highly developed countries that receive a considerable amount of migrants.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Migration has always been a crucial part of humanity.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A bibliometric search was conducted on three academic databases: SCOPUS, Web of Science and Emerald. 56 distinct studies were identified and analyzed.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Finally, the analysis has revealed that the majority of the studies are published from highly developed countries that receive a considerable amount of migrants.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sustainability · Entrepreneurship · Migrant Entrepreneurship

Özet

Migration has always been a crucial part of humanity. Throughout the centuries, people have moved from one part of the world to another for various reasons. Regardless of the motivation, entrepreneurship tends to be one of the most common ways for migrants to maintain their economic survival. Yet, the concept of sustainability is rarely considered within the framework of migrant entrepreneurship. In this context, the main objective of this paper is to examine the academic literature surrounding the concepts of migrant entrepreneurship and sustainability. A bibliometric search was conducted on three academic databases: SCOPUS, Web of Science and Emerald. 56 distinct studies were identified and analyzed. The results revealed that the field is in its infancy stage, but has received significant attention in the last couple of years. The prominent use of qualitative data collection methods and lack of uniform theories further justify the infancy of the field. Finally, the analysis has revealed that the majority of the studies are published from highly developed countries that receive a considerable amount of migrants.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Mauck, J. J., Altın, H. O. (2026). THE SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPT AMONG MIGRANT ENTREPRENEURS: A BIBLIOMETRIC STUDY. Yaşar Üniversitesi E-Dergisi, Cilt: 21 Sayı: Special Issue on 24th International Business Congress Özel Sayı, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.19168/jyasar.1761678

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. Aakhus, M., & Bzdak, M. (2015). Stakeholder engagement as communication design practice. Journal of Public Affairs, 15(2), 188–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1569
  2. Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Neyişçi, N. (2020). A Review of graduate dissertations on migration in Turkey: 1967-2018. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 16(29), 1628-1641.
  3. Aliaga-Isla, R., & Rialp, A. (2013). Systematic review of immigrant entrepreneurship literature: previous findings and ways forward. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 25(9-10), 819-844.
  4. Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). Human development and economic sustainability. World development, 28(12), 2029-2049.
  5. Anderson, S. (2022, July). Immigrant entrepreneurs and U.S. billion-dollar companies (NFAP Policy Brief). National Foundation for American Policy.
  6. Azoulay, P., Jones, B., Kim, J. D., & Miranda, J. (2020). Immigration and entrepreneurship in the United States (Working Paper No. 27778). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w27778
  7. Baycan-Levent, T., & Nijkamp, P. (2009). Characteristics of migrant entrepreneurship in Europe. Entrepreneurship and regional development, 21(4), 375-397.
  8. Berghoff, H. (2020). Immigrant entrepreneurship: A typology based on historical and contemporary evidence. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management.
  9. Brunow, S., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2015). The impact of international migration on economic growth in the global economy. In Handbook of the economics of international migration (Vol. 1, pp. 1027-1075). North-Holland.
  10. Brundtland, G.H. (1987) Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Geneva, UN-Dokument A/42/427.
  11. Dahles, H. (2013). Cambodian returnees' entrepreneurial ventures: The opportunities and constraints of mixed embeddedness. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/jec-03-2013-0009
  12. Dyllick, T., & Muff, K. (2016). Clarifying the meaning of sustainable business: Introducing a typology from business-as-usual to true business sustainability. Organization & Environment, 29(2), 156–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615575176
  13. Elkington, J. (2013). Enter the triple bottom line. In A. Henriques & J. Richardson (Eds.), The triple bottom line: Does it all add up? (pp. 1-16). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/
  14. Etling, A., Backeberg, L., & Tholen, J. (2020). The political dimension of young people’s migration intentions: Evidence from the Arab Mediterranean region. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 46(7), 1388-1404.
  15. Fahimnia, B., Sarkis, J., & Davarzani, H. (2015). Green supply chain management: A review and bibliometric analysis. International journal of production economics, 162, 101-114.
  16. Fraihat, I., & Yaseen, T. (2020). Evolving trends in the post-Arab spring era: Implications for peace and stability in the MENA region. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 15(3), 331-347.
  17. Gerlach, I., & Ryndzak, O. (2022). Ukrainian migration crisis caused by the war. Studia Europejskie-Studies in European Affairs, 26(2), 17-29.
  18. Hoffmann, R., Šedová, B., & Vinke, K. (2021). Improving the evidence base: A methodological review of the quantitative climate migration literature. Global Environmental Change, 71, 102367.
  19. Höse, K., Süß, A., & Götze, U. (2022). Sustainability-Related Strategic Evaluation of Business Models. Sustainability, 14(12), 7285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127285
  20. International Organization for Migration (IOM). (2024). World Migration Report 2024 Interactive. International Organization for Migration. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/msite/wmr-2024-interactive/
  21. Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is sustainability?. Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448.
  22. Kurvet-Käosaar, L., Ojamaa, T., & Sakova, A. (2019). Situating Narratives Of Migration And Diaspora: An Introduction. Trames: A Journal of the Humanities & Social Sciences, 23(2).
  23. Labanca, C. (2020). The effects of a temporary migration shock: Evidence from the Arab Spring migration through Italy. Labour Economics, 67, 101903.
  24. Lee, A. (2013). Welcome to the Unicorn Club. TechCrunch. https://techcrunch.com/2013/11/02/welcome-to-the-unicorn-club/
  25. Naudé, W., Siegel, M., & Marchand, K. (2017). Migration, entrepreneurship and development: critical questions. IZA Journal of Migration, 6, 1-16.
  26. OECD. (2022). International migration outlook 2022. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2022/10/international-migration-outlook-2022_140ace0e/30fe16d2-en.pdf
  27. Stiglitz, J. E. (2016). How to restore equitable and sustainable economic growth in the United States. American Economic Review, 106(5), 43-47.
  28. Sukhdev, P. (2012). Corporation 2020: Transforming business for tomorrow's world. Island Press.
  29. Thomas, D. R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
  30. UNHCR. (2025). Refugee statistics. United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. https://www.unhcr.org/refugee-statistics
  31. World Population Review. (2025). Immigration by country. World Population Review. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/immigration-by-country