KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4

BİREY, GRUP VE ÖRGÜT DÜZEYİNDE ÖĞRENMENİN ÖRGÜT PERFORMANS DÜZEYİNE ETKİLERİ: ZONGULDAK İLİ BANKA ÇALIŞANLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA

THE EFFECTS OF INDIVIDUAL - GROUP AND ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING ON THE LEVEL OF ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A STUDY ON BANK EMPLOYEES IN ZONGULDAK PROVINCE

Sinan Yılmaz(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8576-9913
Cansu Doğan Girgin0000-0002-0956-7834
İbrahim Müjdat Başaran(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6608-273X
Sayfa
1202–1229
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Buna göre örgütsel öğrenme süreçlerini destekleyen bilgi yönetimi stratejileri, farklı seviyelerde farklı özellikler gösteren kritik başarı faktörleri haline gelirken, üç farklı örgütsel öğrenme düzeyinin örgütsel performans düzeyi üzerindeki etkileri öğrenme düzeyleri arasındaki hiyerarşiyi doğrulamaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bireysel öğrenme deneyimi kişilere özgü farklılıklardan kaynaklanan değişken etkilere sahip olsa da iş organizasyonlarına ilişkin yazında, örgüt düzeyinde ortak ve kapsayıcı niteliklere sahip bilgi yönetimi yapı, süreç, politika ve stratejileri geliştirilebileceğine ilişkin yaygın bir kabul olduğunu belirtmek mümkündür.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Buna rağmen öğrenmenin bireylere özgü bir davranış biçimi olup olmadığı ve dahası öğrenme düzeyleri arasındaki etkileşimlerin yönü iş örgütleri için öğrenme kavramının doğasına ilişkin derin bir tartışma sahası haline gelmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Buna göre örgütsel öğrenme süreçlerini destekleyen bilgi yönetimi stratejileri, farklı seviyelerde farklı özellikler gösteren kritik başarı faktörleri haline gelirken, üç farklı örgütsel öğrenme düzeyinin örgütsel performans düzeyi üzerindeki etkileri öğrenme düzeyleri arasındaki hiyerarşiyi doğrulamaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Örgütsel Öğrenme · Bilgi Yönetimi · Örgütsel Performans

Özet

Bireysel öğrenme deneyimi kişilere özgü farklılıklardan kaynaklanan değişken etkilere sahip olsa da iş organizasyonlarına ilişkin yazında, örgüt düzeyinde ortak ve kapsayıcı niteliklere sahip bilgi yönetimi yapı, süreç, politika ve stratejileri geliştirilebileceğine ilişkin yaygın bir kabul olduğunu belirtmek mümkündür. Buna rağmen öğrenmenin bireylere özgü bir davranış biçimi olup olmadığı ve dahası öğrenme düzeyleri arasındaki etkileşimlerin yönü iş örgütleri için öğrenme kavramının doğasına ilişkin derin bir tartışma sahası haline gelmiştir. Bu makalenin temel amacı; birey, grup ve örgüt düzeyinde öğrenme süreçleri arasındaki etkileşimleri ve bu etkileşimlerin örgütsel performans düzeyi üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda yürütülen araştırmada, Türkiye genelinde faaliyet gösteren farklı bankaların Zonguldak ili Merkez şubelerinde çalışan 212 beyaz yakalı çalışandan anket yoluyla veri toplanmış; elde edilen veriler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi teknikleri ile analiz edilmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre; birey, grup ve örgüt düzeyinde öğrenme süreçleri hiyerarşik bir etkileşim eğilimi sergilemektedir. Buna göre örgütsel öğrenme süreçlerini destekleyen bilgi yönetimi stratejileri, farklı seviyelerde farklı özellikler gösteren kritik başarı faktörleri haline gelirken, üç farklı örgütsel öğrenme düzeyinin örgütsel performans düzeyi üzerindeki etkileri öğrenme düzeyleri arasındaki hiyerarşiyi doğrulamaktadır.

Abstract

Although individual learning experiences have different effects due to individual differences, it can be said that there is widespread acceptance in the literature on business organizations that knowledge Senmanagement structures, processes, policies and strategies with common and overarching characteristics can be developed at the organizational level. Nevertheless, whether learning is a behavior specific to individuals and, moreover, the direction of interactions between levels of learning has become a deep area of debate regarding the nature of the concept of learning for business organizations. The main purpose of this article is to examine the interactions between learning processes at the individual, group and organizational levels and the effects of these interactions on the level of organizational performance. In the research conducted in line with this purpose, data were collected from 212 employees working in the central branches of different banks operating in Turkey in Zonguldak province through a questionnaire and the data obtained were analyzed using structural equation modelling techniques. According to the analysis results, learning processes at individual, group and organizational levels show a hierarchical interaction tendency. Accordingly, knowledge management strategies that support organizational learning processes become critical success factors with different characteristics at different levels. In contrast, the effects of three different organizational learning levels on the organizational performance level confirm the hierarchy between learning levels.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yılmaz, S., Girgin, C. D., Başaran, İ. M. (2024). BİREY, GRUP VE ÖRGÜT DÜZEYİNDE ÖĞRENMENİN ÖRGÜT PERFORMANS DÜZEYİNE ETKİLERİ: ZONGULDAK İLİ BANKA ÇALIŞANLARI ÜZERİNE BİR ARAŞTIRMA. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: 4, 1202–1229. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1519261

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (83)

  1. Akgün, A. E., Keskin, H., Aksoy, Z., Samil Fidan, S., & Yigital, S. (2023). The mediating role of organizational learning capability and resilience in the error management culture-service innovation link and the contingent effect of error frequency. The Service Industries Journal, 43(7-8), 525-554.
  2. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2006). The relationship between individual and organizational learning: New evidence from managerial learning practices. Management Learning, 37(4), 455-473.
  3. Antunes, H. D. J. G., & Pinheiro, P. G. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 140-149.
  4. Argote, L., Lee, S., & Park, J. (2021). Organizational learning processes and outcomes: Major findings and future research directions. Management Science, 67(9), 5399-5429.
  5. Argote, L. (2013). Organizational learning: creating, retaining and transferring knowledge. Springer Science & Business Media.
  6. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reis, (77/78), 345-348.
  7. Atkinson, R., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Fredrickson, B. L., Loftus, G. R., & Lutz, C. (2003). Atkinson & Hilgard’s introduction to psychology (Translated by Arjmand, M. & Rafiee, H.). Tehran: Arjmand. Bag, S., Gupta, S., Kumar, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2021). An integrated artificial intelligence framework for knowledge creation and B2B marketing rational decision making for improving firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 92, 178-189.
  8. Balbastre, F., Oltra, V., Martinez, J. F., & Moreno, M. (2003). Individual, group, and organizational learning levels and their interactions: An integrative framework. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 1(3), 253-267.
  9. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 23-28.
  10. Basten, D., & Haamann, T. (2018). Approaches for organizational learning: A literature review. Sage Open, 8(3).
  11. Becerra-Fernández, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2008). Individual, group, and organizational learning. Knowledge Management, An Evolutionary View, 13.
  12. Beck, T. J. (2020). From cybernetic networks to social narratives: Mapping value in mental health systems beyond individual psychopathology. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 40(2), 85.
  13. Bell, S. J., Mengüç, B., & Widing, R. E. (2010). Salesperson learning, organizational learning, and retail store performance. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 38, 187-201.
  14. Bessant, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Lamming, R. (2003). Putting supply chain learning into practice. International Journal of Operations & Production, (2), 167-184.
  15. Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, techniques, and people. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 68-75.
  16. Boateng, R. (2011). Do organizations learn when employees learn: The link between individual and organizational learning. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 25(6), 6-9.
  17. Bowen, J. L. (2006). Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. New England Journal of Medicine, 355(21), 2217-2225.
  18. Bowen, D. E., & Siehl, C. (1997). The future of human resource management: March and Simon [1958] revisited. Human Resource Management (1986-1998), 36 (1), 57-63.
  19. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: Toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovation. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
  20. Cangelosi, V. E., & Dill, W. R. (1965). Organizational learning: observations toward a theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 175-203.
  21. Castañeda, D., & Rios, M. F. (2007). From individual learning to organizational learning. In ECKM2007- Proceedings of the 8th European Conference on Knowledge Management: ECKM (Vol. 5, pp. 363-372). Academic Conferences Limited.
  22. Cicerelli, F., & Ravetti, C. (2024). Sustainability, resilience and innovation in industrial electronics: A case study of internal, supply chain and external complexity. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 19(2), 343-372.
  23. Chahal, H., & Bakshi, P. (2015). Examining intellectual capital and competitive advantage relationship: Role of innovation and organizational learning. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
  24. Chen, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). How does openness to innovation drive organizational ambidexterity? The mediating role of organizational learning goal orientation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 66(2), 156-169.
  25. Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2015). Predicting and changing health behaviour: A social cognition approach. Predicting and changing health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models, 3, 1-29.
  26. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522-537.
  27. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. In J. Miner (Ed.). Organizational Behavior 2 (pp. 60-77). New York: Routledge.
  28. Dalkir, K. (2023). Knowledge management in theory and practice. MIT Press Books. Daft, R. L., & Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 284-295.
  29. de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Pacitti, B. J., da Silva Gomes, J. F., & Pearson, A. W. (2002). Tools for the improvement of organizational learning processes in innovation. Journal of Workplace Learning, 14(8), 320-331.
  30. Dissanayaka, D. R., Janadari, M. P. N., & Chathurani, R. A. I. (2010). Role of emotional intelligence in organizational learning: an empirical study based on banking sector in Sri Lanka.
  31. Do, T. T., & Mai, N. K. (2022). Organizational learning and firm performance: A systematic review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 71(4), 1230-1253.
  32. Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256.
  33. Easterby-Smith, M., & Lyles, M. A. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management, John Wiley & Sons.
  34. Gibbons, R. (2013). Cyert and March (1963) at fifty: A perspective from organizational economics. MIT and NBER April, 7(2013), 12-13.
  35. Grinin, L., & Grinin, A. (2020). The cybernetic revolution and the future of technologies. The 21st century singularity and global futures: a big history perspective, 377-396.
  36. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Hampshire: Cengage Learning.
  37. Hamad, Z., & Yozgat, Y. (2017). Does organizational agility affect organizational learning capability? Evidence from commercial banking. Management Science Letters, 7(8), 407-422.
  38. Harteis, C. (2019). Digitalisation of work. Work-based Learning as a Pathway to Competence-based Education, 85.
  39. Hedberg, B. (1981). How organizations learn and unlearn (Ed. P. Nystrom & W. Starbuck). Handbook of Organizational Design, New York: Oxford University Press, 1-27.
  40. Hernandez-de-Menendez, M., Morales-Menendez, R., Escobar, C. A., & McGovern, M. (2020). Competencies for industry 4.0. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 14, 1511-1524.
  41. Huo, B., Haq, M. Z. U., & Gu, M. (2021). The impact of information sharing on supply chain learning and flexibility performance. International Journal of Production Research, 59(5), 1411-1434.
  42. Kandemir, D., & Hult, G. T. M. (2005). A conceptualization of an organizational learning culture in international joint ventures. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(5), 430-439.
  43. Ivaldi, S., Scaratti, G., & Fregnan, E. (2022). Dwelling within the fourth industrial revolution: organizational learning for new competences, processes and work cultures. Journal of Workplace Learning, 34(1), 1-26.
  44. Kızıloglu, M. (2015). The effect of organizational learning on firm innovation capability: An investigation in the banking sector. Global Business & Management Research, 7(3), 17-33.
  45. Kim, D. H. (2009). The link between individual and organizational learning. In The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital, Routledge, 41-62.
  46. Koç, U. (2009). Örgütsel öğrenme: Tanımı, yakın terimler arasındaki kavramsal ayrımlar ve davranışsal yaklaşım. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(1), 151- 165.
  47. Lawlor, D., Sher, M., & Aram, E. (2023). Complexity theory. In D. Lawlor, M. Sher (Ed.) Systems psychodynamics: innovative approaches to change (175-194). New York: Routledge.
  48. Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (1996). Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview. The Career Development Quarterly, 44(4), 310-321.
  49. Leonard-Barton D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.
  50. Lesser, E., & Prusak, L. (2001). Preserving knowledge in an uncertain world. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(1), 101-102.
  51. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 14(1), 319-338.
  52. Liao, S. H., Chang, W. J., Hu, D. C., & Yueh, Y. L. (2012). Relationships among organizational culture, knowledge acquisition, organizational learning, and organizational innovation in Taiwan’s banking and insurance industries. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(1), 52-70.
  53. Lin, C. Y., & Huang, C. K. (2021). Employee turnover intentions and job performance from a planned change: the effects of an organizational learning culture and job satisfaction. International Journal of Manpower, 42(3), 409-423.
  54. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Organizations. John Wiley & Sons. Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2003). Demonstrating the value of an organization’s learning culture: the dimensions of the learning organization questionnaire. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 5(2), 132-151.
  55. Mousa, M., Massoud, H., & Ayoubi, R. (2022). Contexts of organizational learning in developing countries: The role of training programmes in Egyptian public banks. Personnel Review, 51(3), 1169-1186.
  56. Mowles, C. (2015). Managing in uncertainty: Complexity and the paradoxes of everyday organizational life. Routledge.
  57. Nimran, U., Al Musadieq, M., & Afrianty, T. W. (2024). Empowerment effect on competence and organizational commitments: Organizational learning culture as moderating. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(2), 2024038-2024038.
  58. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
  59. North, M. J., & Macal, C. M. (2007). Managing business complexity: discovering strategic solutions with agent-based modeling and simulation. Oxford University Press.
  60. Orth, D., & Schuldis, P. M. (2021). Organizational learning and unlearning capabilities for resilience during COVID-19. The Learning Organization, 28(6), 509-522.
  61. Pargaonkar, S. (2021). Unveiling the future: Cybernetic dynamics in quality assurance and testing for software development. Journal of Science & Technology, 2(1), 78-84.
  62. Park, Y., & Mithas, S. (2020). Organized complexity of digital business strategy: A configurational perspective. Mis Quarterly, 44(1).
  63. Pereira, V., & Bamel, U. (2021). Extending the resource and knowledge based view: A critical analysis into its theoretical evolution and future research directions. Journal of Business Research, 132, 557-570.
  64. Rolf, B., Jackson, I., Müller, M., Lang, S., Reggelin, T., & Ivanov, D. (2023). A review on reinforcement learning algorithms and applications in supply chain management. International Journal of Production Research, 61(20), 7151-7179.
  65. Rossinskiy, B. V. (2022). The system of public power and integration of cybernetic and synergetic approaches in public administration. Lex Russica, 75(7), 28-39.
  66. Roy, V., Silvestre, B. S., & Singh, S. (2020). Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturer’s perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107672.
  67. Scott, B. (2021). Cybernetics for the social sciences. Brill Research Perspectives in Sociocybernetics and Complexity, 1(2), 1-128.
  68. Senge, P. M. (1997). The fifth discipline. Measuring business excellence, 1(3), 46-51.
  69. Smith, K. A., Vasudevan, S. P., & Tanniru, M. R. (1996). Organizational learning and resource- based theory: An integrative model. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9(6), 41-53.
  70. Spekman, R. E., Spear, J., & Kamauff, J. (2002). Supply chain competency: learning as a key component. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 7(1), 41-55.
  71. Sturgeon, T. J. (2021). Upgrading strategies for the digital economy. Global Strategy Journal, 11(1), 34-57.
  72. Subramanian, A., Anantha, S., & Archana, M. S. (2022). A model for the adoption of sustainable knowledge management practices in techno—innovative clubs: A case study. In Flexibility, Innovation, and Sustainable Business (pp. 89-100). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
  73. Świgoń, M. (2013). Personal knowledge and information management–conception and exemplification. Journal of Information Science, 39(6), 832-845.
  74. Suyatno, S., & Suryani, D. A. (2024). Intervention of Local Resource-Based MSME Human Resource’s Competency Development. Jurnal Administrasi Publik (Public Administration Journal), 14(1), 40-53.
  75. Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296.
  76. Tortorella, G. L., Vergara, A. M. C., Garza-Reyes, J. A., & Sawhney, R. (2020). Organizational learning paths based upon industry 4.0 adoption: An empirical study with Brazilian manufacturers. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 284-294.
  77. Tsai, M. S. (2015). Openness’ and organizational factors’ effects on learning behavior. Journal of Marketing and HR, 1(1), 1-15.
  78. Uhlenbruck, K., Meyer, K. E., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Organizational transformation in transition economies: resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Journal of Management Studies, 40(2), 257-282.
  79. Valenduc, G., & Vendramin, P. (2017). Digitalisation, between disruption and evolution. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 23(2), 121-134.
  80. Van der Bent, J., Paauwe, J., & Williams, R. (1999). Organizational learning: an exploration of organizational memory and its role in organizational change processes. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 12, 377-404.
  81. Wei, Y., & Miraglia, S. (2017). Organizational culture and knowledge transfer in project-based organizations: Theoretical insights from a Chinese construction firm. International journal of project management, 35(4), 571-585.
  82. Zietsma, C., Winn, M., Branzei, O., & Vertinsky, I. (2002). The war of the woods: Facilitators and impediments of organizational learning processes. British Journal of Management, 13(S2), S61-S74.
  83. Zhu, Q., Krikke, H., & Caniëls, M. C. (2018). Supply chain integration: value creation through managing inter-organizational learning. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 38(1), 211-229.