KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

TÜKETİCİ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK ALGISI: SİSTEMATİK LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ VE GELECEK ARAŞTIRMALAR İÇİN ARAŞTIRMA AJANDASI

CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF SUSTAINABILITY: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND FUTURE RESEARCH AGENDA

Nilşah Cavdar Aksoy(GALATASARAY ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0734-3930
Sayfa
333–355
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-26
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular ışığında, ADO çerçevesi kapsamında çıkarımlar ve gelecek araştırmalar için bir ajanda sunulmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Sürdürülebilirlik işletme alanı için dikkat çeken bir araştırma konusunu temsil etmektedir ve sürdürülebilirliğin aktarılacağı taraflardan biri olarak tüketicinin yanıtları işletmeler için önem arz etmektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilirliğin bir alıcısı olarak tüketicilere odaklanarak sürdürülebilirlik algısı üzerine daha önce yapılmış davranışsal araştırmaların kapsamlı bir değerlendirmesini sunmaktır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular ışığında, ADO çerçevesi kapsamında çıkarımlar ve gelecek araştırmalar için bir ajanda sunulmuştur.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Algılanan Sürdürülebilirlik · Sürdürülebilirlik Algısı · Sistematik Literatür Taraması

Özet

Sürdürülebilirlik işletme alanı için dikkat çeken bir araştırma konusunu temsil etmektedir ve sürdürülebilirliğin aktarılacağı taraflardan biri olarak tüketicinin yanıtları işletmeler için önem arz etmektedir. Tüketiciler işletmelerin sürdürülebilirlik çabalarının bir alıcısı konumunda olmasına rağmen, bu alandaki araştırmalar sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, sürdürülebilirliğin bir alıcısı olarak tüketicilere odaklanarak sürdürülebilirlik algısı üzerine daha önce yapılmış davranışsal araştırmaların kapsamlı bir değerlendirmesini sunmaktır. Bunu yaparken, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protokolü vasıtasıyla elde edilen 45 makale; Öncüller, Kararlar ve Ardıllar (ADO) çerçevesi kapsamında analiz edilmiştir. İlk olarak, bu çalışmalara dair trendi anlayabilmek adına yıl, alan, dergi ve metodoloji dağılımlarını içeren bir tasvir sunulmuştur. Sonrasında, ADO çerçevesi kapsamında algılanan sürdürülebilirlik bir Karar olarak konumlandırılıp ilgili makalelerde ne şekilde ele alındığı öncül ve ardılları ile analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular ışığında, ADO çerçevesi kapsamında çıkarımlar ve gelecek araştırmalar için bir ajanda sunulmuştur. Çalışma bulguları, çıkarımlar ve araştırma ajandasının gelecek algılanan sürdürülebilirlik araştırma ve uygulamaları için katkı sağlayacağına inanılmaktadır.

Abstract

Sustainability is a significant research subject within business studies, and consumer responses are crucial for businesses as one of the stakeholders to whom sustainability will be created and communicated. Although consumers are receivers of businesses’ sustainability practices, research in this area remains limited. This study aims to provide a thorough assessment of prior behavioral research on the sustainability perceptions of consumers as a receiver of sustainability. 45 papers acquired using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol were examined through the Antecedents, Decisions, and Outcomes (ADO) framework. An initial descriptive summary was provided, encompassing year, field, journal, and methodology distributions to elucidate trends in these studies. Within the parameters of the ADO framework, perceived sustainability was positioned as a Decision, and analyzed through its antecedents and outcomes in the related papers. Based on findings, implications and a future research agenda were provided within the parameters of the ADO framework. The study findings, implications, and future research agenda are expected to enhance future research and practices regarding perceived sustainability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Aksoy, N. C. (2026). TÜKETİCİ SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK ALGISI: SİSTEMATİK LİTERATÜR İNCELEMESİ VE GELECEK ARAŞTIRMALAR İÇİN ARAŞTIRMA AJANDASI. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1, 333–355. https://doi.org/10.17130/ijmeb.1670497

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (71)

  1. Akasreku, F., Mensah, K., Amenuvor, F. E., Oko-Adjei, G. A., & Amoah, S. K. (2025). Using the theory of interpersonal behaviour to determine sustainable consumer behaviour in purchasing secondhand clothes in developing economies. SN Business & Economics, 5(11), 1-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43546-025-00934-4
  2. Aldlimi, T., Priporas, C. V., & Chang, S. W. (2025). Engagement in influencer marketing: A systematic review of key drivers, behaviors, and future research directions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(3), 1541-1566. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2485
  3. Alwani, H., & Bhukya, R. (2025). Brand social sustainability and consumer behavior: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(4), e70095. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70095
  4. Burkert, M., Gil Roig, J. M., Rahmani, D., & Hüttl-Maack, V. (2023). The influence of green consumption values on how consumers form overall sustainability perceptions of food products and brands. Journal of Sustainable Marketing, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.51300/JSM-2023-103
  5. Carneiro, F. S., Jahn, S., Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Boztug, Y. (2025). Rescue us all! the effects of the “rescued” claim for familiar and unfamiliar food ingredients. Food Quality and Preference, 105462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105462
  6. Chaisuwan, B. N. (2021). Sufficiency economy philosophy-based sustainability dimensions impact on customer equity and brand loyalty. ABAC Journal, 41(1), 43.
  7. Chen, X., Sun, X., Yan, D., & Wen, D. (2020). Perceived sustainability and customer engagement in the online shopping environment: The rational and emotional perspectives. Sustainability, 12(7), 2674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072674
  8. Conti, S., Dias, Á., & Pereira, L. (2023). Perceived city sustainability and tourist behavioural intentions. Smart Cities, 6(2), 692-708. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6020033
  9. Dash, A. (2025). Examining the moderating role of residents’ pro-tourism behavior on the relationship between perceived sustainability of hosting mega sporting events and quality of life. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism, 26(2), 148-168. https://doi.org/10.1080/15470148.2025.2478923
  10. Duong, N. H., Luu, T. B., Ho, T. H., Tran, M. L., Ho, T. N., & Ho, T. T. (2024). An empirical investigation of sustainable consumption behavior among Vietnamese students: Integrating the theory of planned behavior and theory of consumption value. Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 11(7), 229-249. https://doi.org/10.33168/JLISS.2024.0713
  11. Ek Styvén, M., & Mariani, M. M. (2020). Understanding the intention to buy secondhand clothing on sharing economy platforms: The influence of sustainability, distance from the consumption system, and economic motivations. Psychology & Marketing, 37(5), 724-739. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21334
  12. Emon, M. M. H., & Khan, T. (2024). A systematic literature review on sustainability integration and marketing intelligence in the era of artificial intelligence. Review of Business and Economics Studies, 12(4), 6-28. https://doi.org/10.26794/2308-944X2024-12-4-6-28
  13. Estrada, M., Moliner, M. Á., Monferrer, D., & Vidal, L. (2024). Sustainability and local food at tourist destinations: A study from the transformative perspective. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 32(5), 1008-1026. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2195594
  14. Frey, S., Am, J. B., Doshi, V., Malik, A., & Noble, S. (2023). Consumers Care About Sustainability—And Back It Up with Their Wallets., McKinsey & Nielsen IQ. Retrieved from: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/consumer-packaged-goods/our-insights/consumers-care-about-sustainability-and-back-it-up-with-their-wallets, Accessed 31.03.2025.
  15. Gong, J., Liu, Y., Knight, D. W., Ma, Y., & Zang, Y. (2025). Gateway communities and parks in Limbo: Sustainability, trust, and resident participation in quasi-national parks. Tourism Planning & Development, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2025.2566115
  16. Granato, G., Fischer, A. R., & Van Trijp, H. C. (2022). A meaningful reminder on sustainability: When explicit and implicit packaging cues meet. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 79, 101724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101724
  17. Guizzardi, A., Stacchini, A., & Costa, M. (2022). Can sustainability drive tourism development in small rural areas? Evidences from the Adriatic. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(6), 1280-1300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2021.1931256
  18. Hallez, L., Boen, F., & Smits, T. (2025). Message in a bottle: How sustainable packaging shapes consumers’ food perceptions and non-hypothetical choices. Journal of Foodservice Business Research, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/15378020.2025.2537077
  19. Harris, J. D., Quatman, C. E., Manring, M. M., Siston, R. A., & Flanigan, D. C. (2014). How to write a systematic review. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 42(11), 2761-2768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546513497567
  20. Iniesta-Bonillo, M. A., Sánchez-Fernández, R., & Jiménez-Castillo, D. (2016). Sustainability, value, and satisfaction: model testing and cross-validation in tourist destinations. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 5002-5007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.071
  21. Jürkenbeck, K., Heumann, A., & Spiller, A. (2019). Sustainability matters: consumer acceptance of different vertical farming systems. Sustainability, 11(15), 4052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154052
  22. Khan, A. W., & Pandey, J. (2023). Consumer psychology for food choices: a systematic review and research directions. European Journal of Marketing, 57(9), 2353-2381. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-07-2021-0566
  23. Khan, I., & Fatma, M. (2023). Does perceived sustainability affect the customer responses toward the brands? Role of customer engagement as a mediator. Sustainability, 15(10), 8259. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108259
  24. Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118-121. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118
  25. Kim, J., Taylor, C. R., Kim, K. H., & Lee, K. H. (2015). Measures of perceived sustainability. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 25(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2015.1015473
  26. Kim, M. S., Thapa, B., & Kim, H. (2017). International tourists’ perceived sustainability of Jeju Island, South Korea. Sustainability, 10(1), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010073
  27. Kim, Y., & Oh, K. W. (2020). Effects of perceived sustainability level of sportswear product on purchase intention: Exploring the roles of perceived skepticism and perceived brand reputation. Sustainability, 12(20), 8650. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208650
  28. Klein, P., & Popp, B. (2022). Last-mile delivery methods in e-commerce: Does perceived sustainability matter for consumer acceptance and usage?. Sustainability, 14(24), 16437. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416437
  29. Kossmann, H., Schulze, H., Mergenthaler, M., & Breunig, P. (2023). Acceptance of animal-free cheese products: evidence from an information experiment in Germany. Food Quality and Preference, 111, 104984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2023.104984
  30. Lee, Y. C. (2020). Communicating sustainable development: effects of stakeholder‐centric perceived sustainability. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(4), 1540-1551. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1900
  31. Lee, Y. J., Tsai, I. Y., & Chang, T. Y. (2023). Exploring tourist behavior in a reused heritage site. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 47(6), 1071-1088. https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480211020089
  32. Liang, J., Wang, R., & Li, J. (2022). Exploring the relationship between Chinese urban residents’ perceptions of sustainable consumption and their efficiency behavior: A mediation and moderation analysis based on the social practice approach. Sustainability, 14(18), 11262. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811262
  33. Liang, X., Hu, X., Li, E. Y., & Meng, H. (2023). Untangling the influence of perceived sustainability orientation on value-co-creation behavior in crowdfunding process: Investigating a mediation model. Internet Research, 33(4), 1544-1572. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2021-0921
  34. Lunde, M. B. (2018). Sustainability in marketing: A systematic review unifying 20 years of theoretical and substantive contributions (1997–2016). AMS Review, 8(3), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13162-018-0124-0
  35. Małecka, A., Mitręga, M., & Pfajfar, G. (2025). Demand‐side perspective on the informal economy: a review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(4), e70084. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70084
  36. Meng, K., Mahapatra, M. S., & Xiao, J. J. (2025). artificial intelligence and consumer financial behavior: a systematic literature review and agenda for future research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 24(4), 1755-1786. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2497
  37. Mladenovic, M., Van Trijp, H., & Piqueras-Fiszman, B. (2024). (Un) Believably green: The role of information credibility in green food product communications. Environmental Communication, 18(6), 743-760. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2024.2317910
  38. Moliner‐Tena, M. Á., Monferrer‐Tirado, D., Estrada‐Guillén, M., & Vidal‐Meliá, L. (2023). Sustainable service ecosystems from the transformative value perspective: A study in tourism destinations. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2358
  39. Nguyen, N. B., & Nguyen, L. H. (2024). Agricultural tourism in Vietnam: Role of technology for perceived sustainability and visitors’ intention to return. Bioproducts Business, 9(2), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.22382/bpb-2024-002
  40. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020sStatement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  41. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021b). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003
  42. Park, H., & Kim, Y. K. (2016). An empirical test of the triple bottom line of customer-centric sustainability: The case of fast fashion. Fashion and Textiles, 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40691-016-0077-6
  43. Paul, J., & Benito, G. R. (2018). A review of research on outward foreign direct investment from emerging countries, including China: what do we know, how do we know and where should we be heading? Asia Pacific Business Review, 24(1), 90-115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2017.1357316
  44. Paul, J., & Criado, A. R. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 101717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
  45. Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021a). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews (SPAR‐4‐SLR). International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1-O16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12695
  46. Paul, J., Merchant, A., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Rose, G. (2021b). Writing an impactful review article: What do we know and what do we need to know? Journal of Business Research, 133, 337-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.005
  47. Perret, J. K., Gómez Velázquez, A., & Mehn, A. (2025). Green cosmetics - The effects of package design on consumers’ willingness-to-pay and sustainability perceptions. Sustainability, 17(6), 2581. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062581
  48. Polenzani, B., Riganelli, C., & Marchini, A. (2020). Sustainability perception of local extra virgin olive oil and consumers’ attitude: A new Italian perspective. Sustainability, 12(3), 920. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030920
  49. Rasoolimanesh, S. M., Chee, S. Y., & Ari Ragavan, N. (2025). Tourists’ perceptions of the sustainability of destination, satisfaction, and revisit intention. Tourism Recreation Research, 50(1), 106-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508281.2023.2230762
  50. Rodrigues Romano, K., Deliza, R., & Banovic, M. (2025). Sustainable bites: Can health goal framing and perceived sustainability reduce the impact of food neophobia on the intention to purchase insect‐based products? Journal of Sensory Studies, 40(2), e70032. https://doi.org/10.1111/joss.70032
  51. Sancho-Esper, F., Rodríguez-Sánchez, C., & Torres-Moraga, E. (2023). Environmental sustainability at destination level: The role of tourist citizenship behavior. Advances in Hospitality and Tourism Research (AHTR), 12(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.30519/ahtr.1292435
  52. Sánchez-Fernández, R., Iniesta-Bonillo, M. Á., & Cervera-Taulet, A. (2019). Exploring the concept of perceived sustainability at tourist destinations: A market segmentation approach. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 36(2), 176-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2018.1505579
  53. Shah, P., Mahajan, H., Sompura, N. H., Sunil, A., & Naldurgakar, R. (2025). Consumer decision‐making processes regarding healthy food choices: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(1), e70021. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70021
  54. Sharma, K., Trott, S., Sahadev, S., & Singh, R. (2023). Emotions and consumer behaviour: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(6), 2396-2416. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12937
  55. Shih, I. T., Silalahi, A. D. K., Baljir, K., & Jargalsaikhan, S. (2024). Exploring the impact of perceived sustainability on customer satisfaction and the mediating role of perceived value. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2431647. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2431647
  56. Södergren, J. (2021). Brand authenticity: 25 years of research. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), 645-663. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12651
  57. Steenis, N. D., Van Herpen, E., Van Der Lans, I. A., & Van Trijp, H. C. (2023). Partially green, wholly deceptive? How consumers respond to (in) consistently sustainable packaged products in the presence of sustainability claims. Journal of Advertising, 52(2), 159-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2022.2047841
  58. Stremmel, G., Elshiewy, O., Boztug, Y., & Carneiro-Otto, F. (2022). Vegan labeling for what is already vegan: Product perceptions and consumption intentions. Appetite, 175, 106048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.106048
  59. Stolz, J., & Bautista, R. (2015). Corporate sustainability: Perception and response by older consumers. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(4), 343-351. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12199
  60. Utgård, J., & Gaustad, T. (2024). Carbon emission reductions and offsets: Consumer perceptions of firm environmental sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 470, 143300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143300
  61. Vidal-Meliá, L., Moliner, M. Á., Monferrer, D., Estrada, M., & Quille, K. (2025). Segmenting tourists based on perceived sustainability and satisfaction using machine learning. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-025-00376-9
  62. Vinitha, V. U., Kumar, D. S., & Purani, K. (2021). Biomorphic visual identity of a brand and its effects: A holistic perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 28(3), 272-290. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-020-00222-6
  63. Vyas, S., Rathore, J., Kumar, S., & Kumar, V. (2025). Mapping consumer stickiness: A SPAR‐4‐SLR protocol compliant review and future directions. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 49(4), e70089. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.70089
  64. Wang, X., Sung, B., & Phau, I. (2024). Examining the mediating role of consumer desire for luxury: Can perceived sustainability and natural rarity evoke willingness to pay more? Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 36(4), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2024.2333756
  65. Westin, L., Hallencreutz, J., & Parmler, J. (2024). Integrating perceived sustainability into customer satisfaction models-insights from the Swedish banking and energy sectors. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2387203. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2387203
  66. Wolf, L. (2023). Device‐mediated customer behaviour on the internet: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 47(6), 2270-2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12925
  67. Yadav, S., Xu, Y., & Hergeth, H. (2024). Walking the talk: Unraveling the influence of the sustainability features of leather alternatives on consumer behavior toward running shoes. Sustainability, 16(2), 830. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020830
  68. Zhang, A., Zhang, B., & Zhu, Y. (2025). Determinants of technology adoption in tourism: Insights from a systematic literature review. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251388798. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251388798
  69. Zhao, X., & An, H. (2023). Research on the mechanism of heterogeneous corporate environmental responsibility in z-generation consumers’ sustainable purchase intention. Sustainability, 15(13), 10318. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310318
  70. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021a). The PRISMA 2020sStatement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  71. Page, M. J., Mckenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D.,. & Moher, D. (2021b). Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: Development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 134, 103-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003